Mock Data Retreat Pam Lange TIE/ESA 7. 2 Agenda  Based on school’s need  May be ½ day/ full day/ two days  Work with district to determine needs –

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact on Student Learning The conversation is about multiple indicators for this category BUT Few if any places actually have viable multiple indicators.
Advertisements

Data Retreat® is a registered service mark of Cooperative Educational Service Agency 7, Green Bay, WI Todays Leadership for Tomorrows Results.
Understanding the North Carolina School Report Card.
1  Janet Hensley  Pam Lange  Barb Rowenhorst Meade School District.
TIE REGIONAL SUMMITS 1 ST OF 5 SETTING DIRECTION AND LEADING THE WAY By: Dr. Pam Lange TIE Development Coordinator.
Local Control Funding Formula & Local Control Accountability Plan Stakeholders Meeting March 12, 2014.
Program Improvement Unit Collaborating to increase student achievement and fundamentally improve the interaction between the teacher and the students to.
WELCOME – RIG 2 - Session 1 September, 2012 OESD 114 RIG 2 - Session 1.
Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
Ways to Utilize the 2012 FCPS Working Conditions Survey April 11, 12, 13 Laurie Fracolli, Sid Haro, and Andrew Sioberg.
Understanding Wisconsin’s New School Report Card.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
TODAY Observations Hypotheses Connection to Student Performance CSIP ASPIRING Goal(s) Objectives & Actions.
+ Equity Audit & Root Cause Analysis University of Mount Union.
Saginaw KEYS Data Analysis Training for Continuous School Improvement March 20 and 21, 2006 Jacques Nacson Gary Obermeyer.
SB : The Great Teachers and Leaders Act State-wide definition of “effective” teacher and principal in Colorado Academic growth, using multiple measures.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Principal Professional Learning Team August 2012.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
R APID C ITY S CHOOL D ISTRICT Standards Retreat September 2007.
TRAINING AND REALIZING RESULTS USING GREENBELT ACROSS DIVISIONS: A CASE STUDY WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF MENOMONEE FALLS Wisconsin State Education Convention.
M-DCPS Framework of Effective Instruction Part I: Dr. David K. Moore.
1  Barb Rowenhorst  Janet Hensley Rapid City. Take care of your own needs. Limit side conversations in large group Chimes – return to large group Respect.
Why must we do Data Teams? We know the implementation of DT benefit STUDENTS -helps teachers identify exceeding/proficient students and plan for targeted.
1  Jennifer Nehl Kemmerer. Outcomes To discuss district report card status. To examine PAWS data reports. To analyze reading and math standards at individual.
PROGRESS & & ACHIEVEMENT Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System (PVAAS) The Power of School District School District.
ESA 7 June 9-10,  Develop an understanding of the accreditation requirements for schools not currently listed in improvement versus schools currently.
1 New Hampshire – Addenda Ppt Slides State Level Results (slides 2-7) 2Enrollment - Grades 3-8 for 2005 and Reading NECAP 4Mathematics
DEA/FCAT is YOUR game! You are the greatest teachers!
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
Data for Student Success Using State Data to Identify School Improvement Goals “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional.
The School Improvement Process LaSalle County ROE #35
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
DCAS “Standard Setting” Appoquinimink School District Board of Education December 14, 2010 Odessa, DE.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
December BLT Training. 2 Outcomes Participants will: Understand how data was used to determine growth and award incentives Review school-wide and grade.
Castle / Kahuku Complex Area Support Team (CK CAST) Phase I Professional Development
Understanding Your Top from Your Bottom: A Guide to Michigan’s Accountability System September 2013 Mitch Fowler
Based on the work of Assessment FOR Learning by Rick Stiggins October 29, 2007 ASSESSMENT “OF” AND “FOR”: DOES IT REALLY MAKE A DIFFERNCE?
Data for Student Success Using State Data to Identify School Improvement Goals “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional.
Listen with Engagement Honor Confidentiality of data Honor Private Think Time Everyone has a Voice Be Respectful of all Comments Limit Side Conversation.
In cooperation with PLN 34: Taking Action with Data™ Session 1.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Anderson School Accreditation We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing.
WELCOME! DATA TEAM COACH TRAINING  Review the PLC Process, Roles and Expectations  Provide an opportunity for questions and possible responses.
Creating Student Success through the Data Team Process Mason City Community School District Kathryn Schladweiler TJ.
TEAMW RK Data Retreat ® An On-going Team Process to Analyze and Prioritize Data to Improve Instructional Practices.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
DATA TEAM SIX STEP PROCESS. GOAL: IMPROVED TEACHING AND STUDENT LEARNING Analyze student performance in context with school, district and state performance.
Assessment and Accountability Update Longbranch Elementary School September 27,
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Bennett County School District
K-6 Benchmark Assessment Inservices
Data Coaches Academy
Identifying Gifted Potential in Underrepresented Populations
BLT Kick-off Training Pam Lange Marilyn Hofer Barb Rowenhorst
Office of Education Improvement and Innovation
Anderson Elementary School
Prepared for DD Key Contacts – September 2013
Parent Discussion Meeting
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
Action Workshop Template
Presentation transcript:

Mock Data Retreat Pam Lange TIE/ESA 7

2 Agenda  Based on school’s need  May be ½ day/ full day/ two days  Work with district to determine needs – the more time they can devote the more in-depth you can be.

3 Sample: One Day Data Retreat 8:00 – 10:00Welcome Opening Activity Changes to Test Changes to Accountability System Content Revision Cycle District/Middle School Reports 10:00 – 10:15Break 10:15 – 11:30District/Middle School Reports Evaluation of School Improvement Plan 12:00 – 1:30Individual DakotaSTEP Results STAR Results DACS Results 1:30 – 1:45Break 1:45 – 4:00Planning for Individual Student Success

4 Outcomes  To examine district-wide data  To examine building-level data  To examine individual student achievement data  To determine next steps

5 Ice Breaker I always do some type of Ice Breaker - for sake of time, we won’t do one today!

6 Group Norms  Take care of personal needs  Mute cell phones  Limit side conversations  Others???

7 Team Readiness Confidentiality Form Assigning Roles

8 4 Lenses of Data Prioritize & Set Goals Study & Plan Successful Strategies Observe Patterns & Hypothesize Student Data Program & Structures Data Family & Community Data Professional Practices Data

9 District Data Sources  Data Matrix (Handout)  Data Discussion Guide

10 District Audit Tool Categories  Leadership Implications  Academic Content and Achievement Standards  Curriculum/Instruction  Highly Qualified Staff  Professional Development  Assessment and Accountability  School Culture/Climate  Budget and Resources  Parents and Community

11 District Audit Tool Categories  If you have the results from the District Audit Tool and/or School Profile this is where you would discuss some of those results – bring in to data discussion. Show how they fit into the four lenses of data.  Example: Academic Content and Achievement Standards

12 Student Data DakotaSTEP Results

13 “Pure” DakotaStep Items Criterion- referenced “Pure” SAT 10 Items Norm- referenced

14 Data Report Terms  Scaled Score How well did this student score?  Cut Scores What score is good enough?  Advanced  Proficient  Basic  Below Basic  AMO How many students scored proficient and advanced?  AYP Is your school or district above in every category?  Reading  Math  Attendance or graduation rate

15 Annual Measurable Objectives up to 2014 K School Year ReadingMathReadingMath %65%66%54% %65%72%54% %72%72%63% %72%77%63% %79%83%72% %86%89%81% %93%94%90% %100%100%100%

16

17 South Dakota State Content Standards Revision Cycle  Science test was given in spring Districts are not be held accountable for science content standards, but did receive results of how students scored.  At this point, the DakotaSTEP will not be aligned to Social Studies

18 Sat/DAT Tool

19 Document Data Findings Observations What patterns do we see in the data? What observations: facts only – no discussion at this point Hypotheses What explanations or theories might we have about the data? What impact might this data have?

20 Willy E. Everlearn High School/District All Students

21 Observation Worksheet  Buff colored handout  Name of report  Who is the “paper” recorder?  Who is the “chart” recorder?

22 SAT/DAT Analysis  Look at ALL four years  Watch number of students who were tested  Compare male to female  Compare number of students advanced in reading versus math

23 Document Data Findings Observations What patterns do we see in the data? What observations: facts only – no discussion at this point Hypotheses What explanations or theories might we have about the data? What impact might this data have?

24 Growth Reports Focus of Report:  Achievement Gaps  Are we on target?

25 Growth Report

26 Growth Reports ► Is ► Is the group “All” students (black line) on target to meet AMO in subsequent years? the group “Below Basic and Basic” students (pink line) on target to meet AMO in subsequent years?

27 Growth Reports Is the achievement gap getting smaller or larger? Are your students on target?

28 Looking at Individual Data  Confidentiality  I will need these reports back

29 Document Data Findings Observations What patterns do we see in the data? What observations: facts only – no discussion at this point Hypotheses What explanations or theories might we have about the data? What impact might this data have?

30 Highlight Color Meaning Proficiency on DakotaSTEP Our Cutoff Levels Blue WOW! Beyond ExpectationsAdvanced or 90% and above Green GOOD! Students performed well on this item -- Meets Expectations Proficient or 65 to 89% Yellow CAUTION! Students had some difficulty with this item -- Below Expectations Basic or 50 to 65% PinkURGENT! Students performed poorly on this item -- In need of Immediate Improvement Below Basic or 0 to 49% Using Highlighting to Illuminate the Data

31 Individual Growth Reports Math – Blue/Reading – Pink  What observations can you make about students who have a negative growth?  What surprises you about this group?  What observations can you make about students who have the greatest amount of growth?  What surprises you about this group?

32 Individual Growth Reports Math – Blue/Reading – Pink  What impact do these observations have at the classroom level?  How can looking at individual student data drive our instructional practices in the classroom? Does it?

33 How close are we – really?  Cut Scores  points above

34 Differentiated Instruction Based on the individual data, if you were asked to differentiate student groups, how would you group them? How would the groups differ for reading versus math?

35 Student Data Non-DakotaSTEP

36 CRT Report (Criterion Reference Testing) Website: E-Metrics

37 Document Data Findings Observations What patterns do we see in the data? What observations: facts only – no discussion at this point Hypotheses What explanations or theories might we have about the data? What impact might this data have?

38 CRT Data (Individual Standards)  Individual building report  Seven questions per indicator (combines standards)  Discuss the bell shaped curve theory  60 to 65 percent

39 Highlight Color Meaning Average % Correct Scores Our Cutoff Levels Blue WOW! Beyond Expectations90% and above Green GOOD! Students performed well on this item -- Meets Expectations 65 to 89% Yellow CAUTION! Students had some difficulty with this item -- Below Expectations 50 to 65% PinkURGENT! Students performed poorly on this item -- In need of Immediate Improvement 0 to 49% Using Highlighting to Illuminate the Data

40 State Content Standards  Explain State Process  Unpacked Standards (see handout)  Math, Reading, Science 

41 CRT Data (Individual Standards)  Brainstorm ideas about the low standards  Why might they be low?  Are these standards that need to be high priority?  What strategies are we currently using?  What are some areas we could look at to make sure we are covering these standards?

42 School Profile If you have school profile – what can you utilize at a data retreat?

43 Other Data Sources  At the building level, what other data sources do you have available?  As a group, prioritize what you would like to focus on next?  Look at assessment matrix

44 4 Lenses of Data Prioritize & Set Goals Study & Plan Successful Strategies Observe Patterns & Hypothesize Student Data Program & Structures Data Family & Community Data Professional Practices Data

45 Where do we go from here?  What data do ALL staff members need to look at?  When/how can this happen?  How can this information be useful to you?  What other information can you add to this form?  What can we pull from other initiatives that will help us when planning for student success?  What can I do to help in the process?

46  Three things that you still have questions about  Two things that you feel really good about  One thing that surprised you Check-Out