Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Multifunction Phased Array Radar PAR Work Group Magda Batista-Carver June 21, 2007 Radar Operations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Military Certification Office
Advertisements

Session 6: Way Ahead to Address MPAR Risk Reduction— Implementation Strategy and Interagency Management Approach Moderator: Dr. Paul D. Try, Science and.
Transportation Estimators Association Conference Saratoga Springs, New York October 4, 2008 Procedures Guide for Right of Way Cost Estimation and Cost.
The National Declassification Center Releasing All We Can, Protecting What We Must Public Interest Declassification Board NDC Project Update April 22,
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Early Tests of Aircraft Tracking on NWRT PAR Working Group William Benner, Weather Processors Team.
Presented to: MPAR Symposium By: William Benner, Aviation Weather Group, Operations Planning Date: 12 October 2007 Federal Aviation Administration Multi-function.
Update On The NEXRAD Agency Plans For Near Real-Time WSR-88D Base Data Collection And Distribution Tim Crum, Ph.D. Radar Operations Center (ROC) NWS Focal.
Presented to: MPAR Symposium II By: James Williams – Director, Systems Engineering and Safety Date: 17 November 2009 Federal Aviation Administration Multifunction.
CS Integration Management (Part 6) Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümü – Bilkent Üniversitesi – Fall 2009 Dr.Çağatay ÜNDEĞER Instructor Bilkent University,
4. 2Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with the Unified Process Objectives  Explain the elements of project management and the responsibilities of a.
Chapter 3: The Project Management Process Groups
Chapter 3: The Project Management Process Groups: A Case Study
Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: William Benner, Weather Processors Team Manager (AJP-1820), FAA Technical Center Date: 19 March 2007 Federal Aviation.
NSWRC Operational Scenarios October 18, 2012 Mark Weadon AvMet Applications.
Future of Surveillance in the National Airspace System
MIT Lincoln Laboratory 2007 MPAR-1 JSH 5/2/2007 Session 2: Current State of Military Investment in PAR Panel Lead: Dr. Jeffrey Herd (MIT LL) Panelists:
Multi-function Phased Array Radar Findings of the Joint Action Group
About Waterloo website Project report June Outline Overview of process Project deliverables Lessons learned.
The National Severe Storms Laboratory Jeff Kimpel, Director NSSL NOAA Science Advisory Board Norman, Oklahoma November 5, 2002.
Sebastián Torres Weather Radar Research Innovative Techniques to Improve Weather Observations.
Mr. Samuel P. Williamson Federal Coordinator for Meteorology Sponsored by: The Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting.
Recreation and Wellness Intranet Project
Field Project Planning, Operations and Data Services Jim Moore, EOL Field Project Services (FPS) Mike Daniels, EOL Computing, Data and Software (CDS) Facility.
Chapter 3: The Project Management Process Groups: A Case Study
Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology 1 Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research (OFCM) Briefing.
Federal Agency Update - A Public Real Estate Symposium Las Vegas, Nevada January 26, 2010 Procedures Guide for Right of Way Cost Estimation and Cost Management.
Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: Garth Torok, Weather Processors Group, Aviation Weather Directorate Date: 21 June 2007 Federal Aviation Administration.
Centro de Estudos e Sistemas Avançados do Recife PMBOK - Chapter 4 Project Integration Management.
DHS Airspace Surveillance Requirements MPAR Symposium Randel Zeller Science and Technology Directorate Department of Homeland Security Director, Interagency.
Arctic Observing Network (AON): Current Status and Future Development Martin O. Jeffries National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs Division.
Copyright 2009  Describe the five project management (PM) process groups, the typical level of activity for each, and the interactions among them  Understand.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
Putting it Together: Customizing Your PM Approach with Tailoring Tim Mawhinney IT Project Manager.
Project Life Cycle.
Presented in: Finance PRC June 2015 By: Nancy Cordell DOT FAA ISG Date: June 2015 Federal Aviation Administration Legacy LIS Interfund Billing Stop Gap.
Dr. Jana Jagodick Polytechnic of Namibia, 2012 Project Management Chapter 5 Project Integration Management.
Lecture 3 Title: Information Technology Project Methodology By: Mr Hashem Alaidaros MIS 434.
0 Office of Performance Assessments and Root Cause Analyses (PARCA) PARCA EVM Update Presenter: Phone:
MIT Lincoln Laboratory RGH 4/9/01 Hurricane Conf Road Weather Management Workshop April 9, 2001 Robert G. Hallowell MIT Lincoln Laboratory Aviation Sensors.
Hall 180 Cryogenic test facility: Project management: Project Change Request, EVM and Interface Sheet L. Serio.
Update on Multifunction Phased Array Radar (MPAR)
1IT Project Management, Third Edition Chapter 3 Chapter 3: The Project Management Process Groups: A Case Study.
Implementation Strategy July 2002 STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT LIFECYCLE PROCESS ORP Publishes & Maintains 8 Standing Committee Recommends Approval / Disapproval.
U.S./Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: Date: “Global Aviation Safety Processes: Refining Reinforcing, and Streamlining” Federal Aviation.
Multifunction Phased Array Radar PAR Work Group Magda Batista-Carver September 11, 2007 Legacy Radar Lifecycle Cost Data Analysis Update Magda Batista-Carver,
Federal Aviation Administration 2011 V&V Summit: Verification & Validation Overview Presented by: John Frederick Date:10/19/11.
PAR Study-1 JSH 3/28/2005 MIT Lincoln Laboratory MPAR Cost-Benefit Discussion Mark Weber Jeff Herd 14 December 2009.
Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology OFCM Assessment of MPAR Capability to Meet Agency Needs Jud Stailey, OFCM Executive Secretary, MPAR EC.
Joint Planning and Development Office (JPDO) Col Mark Weadon Air Force Weather Deputy for Federal Programs May 17 th,
Federal Software Asset Management Initiative Concept of Operations Report to the Executive Steering Committee March 8, 2004 Implementing the President’s.
Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: Jim Williams, Director of Systems Engineering, Operations Planning Date: 11 September 2007 Federal Aviation Administration.
Reusable Launch Vehicle Working Group Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee Presented to COMSTAC Meeting George Whitesides, RLVWG Chairman.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Training Module: APD Template County APD Process Training November 16, 2007 California Health and Human Services Agency - Office of Systems Integration.
0 eCPIC User Training: A-11 Funding Information These training materials are owned by the Federal Government. They can be used or modified only by FESCOM.
National Academy Panel Evaluation of MPAR Planning Process Paul L. Smith, Chair (Professor, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology) Steven Rutledge.
SCOPE DEFINITION,VERIFICATION AND CONTROL Ashima Wadhwa.
Multifunction Phased Array Radar (MPAR) Update 1ICMSSR 12/16/11 ICMSSR Meeting December 2011 Doug Forsyth, Co-chair, WG/MPAR.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Runway Safety Nextgen Initiatives Capstone 3 Industry Day Paul S. Erway, AJS-4SW, Runway Safety.
For Presentation at 28 th APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting Vancouver, Canada Walter Kulyk Director, Office of Mobility Innovation Federal Transit.
Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (1-minute SPG products) Mike Istok Radar Improvement Manager NWS Office of Science & Technology 4-5 August 2014 National.
1 Stan Pszczolkowski FAA Technical Center (609) October 19, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration.
1 Chapter 3: The Project Management Process Groups: A Case Study.
Fundamentals of Project Management and Schedule Development.
UNCLASSIFIED PSM Support to Cost Reporting 1. UNCLASSIFIED PSM Help Required 2 DoDI requires cost reporting on ALL Sustainment Contracts over.
B U D I L U H U R U N I V E R S I T Y POST GRADUATE PROGRAM MAGISTER ILMU KOMPUTER (M.Kom) IS PROJECT MANAGEMENT.
Presented to: Friends of Aviation Weather Forum By: Dan Citrenbaum, FAA, Investment Planning and Analysis Office, Operations Research Group Date: October.
Chapter 3: The Project Management Process Groups: A Case Study 1.
Colorado Springs Cadet Squadron Aviation Weather Services Lt Richard Jessop C/CMSgt William Hughes.
MILTECH Study Update LtCol PJ Zimmerman, USMC
Presentation transcript:

Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Multifunction Phased Array Radar PAR Work Group Magda Batista-Carver June 21, 2007 Radar Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Cost Data Collection and Analysis Update

2 Federal Aviation Administration MPAR Existing Radar O&M Cost Update June 21, Radar O&M Cost Data Collection Being developed in response to MPAR Working Group Action Item # , “Complete life cycle cost analysis for legacy radar systems”

3 Federal Aviation Administration MPAR Existing Radar O&M Cost Update June 21, Purpose Form key input for overall cost benefit analysis for MPAR Business Case Systems to be included –171 WSR-88Ds (NEXRAD) – 47 Terminal Doppler Weather Radars (TDWR) –135 ASR-9s/Mode-S –149 ASR-11s –118 Long Range Radars (LRR) ARSR-1 through 4 FPS-20/60

4 Federal Aviation Administration MPAR Existing Radar O&M Cost Update June 21, Methodology Adopt standardize Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) to ensure consistency between FAA radar and NEXRAD costs Collect and analyze historical data for baseline Projected costs include –standard inflation –failure rate estimates of major components

5 Federal Aviation Administration MPAR Existing Radar O&M Cost Update June 21, Work Breakdown Structure Template N/A: Requirements are not applicable

6 Federal Aviation Administration MPAR Existing Radar O&M Cost Update June 21, WBS Element Examples

7 Federal Aviation Administration MPAR Existing Radar O&M Cost Update June 21, Challenges Inability to collect detailed cost information Inability to breakout corrective and preventative maintenance costs Inconsistent terminology Collecting and integrating NEXRAD tri- agency cost information

8 Federal Aviation Administration MPAR Existing Radar O&M Cost Update June 21, Status

9 Federal Aviation Administration MPAR Existing Radar O&M Cost Update June 21, NEXRAD Team Composition National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration –Tim Crum –Marty Williams –Russ Cook Department of Defense –Mike Spaulding Office of Federal Coordinator for Meteorology –Mark P. Weadon Federal Aviation Administration –Magda Batista-Carver

10 Federal Aviation Administration MPAR Existing Radar O&M Cost Update June 21, NEXRAD Unique Cost Factors Archival costs NEXRAD Radar Operations Center (ROC) Product Improvement Categories –Performance Enhancement (e.g., Dual Polarization, Radar Product Generator Refresh, etc.) –Obsolescence –Reliability (e.g. Open Radar Data Acquisition (ORDA), trigger amplifier, etc.)

11 Federal Aviation Administration MPAR Existing Radar O&M Cost Update June 21, Next Steps O&M Cost Working Group –Continue to collect and analyze cost data –Complete final report by October 2007 PAR Working Group –Use O&M Cost final report as a key input to a PAR Business Case