 Purpose:  Identify skills builder students & determine their course taking patterns  Background:  Student course taking patterns is current method.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Diana Sunday, Office of Institutional Research September 2013 Career and Technical Education (CTE) Employment Outcomes Survey Columbia College.
Advertisements

INVESTIGATING MILESTONES AND COMPLETIONS AT A LOCAL INSTITUTION BASED ON ADELMAN’S STUDY, “THE TOOLBOX REVISITED.” What’s in YOUR toolbox? DANIEL MARTINEZ,
Labor Market Information Division Tonya Lee ST. CLAIR COUNTY 2014 Existing Industry Seminar.
Options After High School.  On average, you will earn almost twice as much in your lifetime with a college degree than with only a high school diploma.
Using the Salary Surfer Tool Alice van Ommeren & Ryan Fuller Chancellor's Office Research/TRIS.
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges 2010 Report: Moreno Valley College Calculation presented by presented by David Torres, Dean Institutional.
CTE Outcomes Survey KC Greaney, Santa Rosa Junior College VERATAC September CAIR Conference, Nov. 20, 2013.
Chabot College Students Fall 2007 Demographic, Educational & Psychographic Characteristics Dr. Carolyn Arnold Chabot College Institutional Research Office.
Pass Rates in Paired and Unpaired Courses Fall 1998 Office of Institutional Research LaGuardia Community College.
Accountability Measures 2009 (based on data) Report for Central Piedmont Community College.
Millbrook High School Occupational Course of Study Program.
AGC Update November Wyoming Public Schools’ Middle College is a collaboration between Wyoming Public Schools and Grand Rapids Community College.
Colorado’s Health Care Labor Market Alexandra Hall Chief Economist Colorado Dept. of Labor and Employment Labor Market Information, CDLE.
WTCS Transfers to the University of Wisconsin System University of Wisconsin System Office of Policy Analysis and Research October 24, 2002.
MY CAREER RESEARCH Sandra Yousif 2/10/15 6 th hour Career/Education & Training.
Dr. Christina Whitfield, Director of Research and Policy Analysis Kentucky Community and Technical College System The Growing Pressure to Use Workforce.
GOLD COAST INSTITUTE OF TAFE HEALTH PROGRAMS. 2010/2011 GCIT Student Snapshot No. of students: Percentage of online students: 19% Overall rate.
Development of a Measure of Career Skills-Building Students KC Greaney, Santa Rosa Junior College Alice van Ommeren, California Community Colleges Chancellor’s.
Defining a Career Skills Building Student Cohort & Outcome.
Kathy Booth, RP Group & Rock Pfotenhauer, Cabrillo College What’s Completion Got to Do With It? Unpacking the Value of Student Short-Term Course-Taking.
Ohio Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High School.
Scorecard Update Salary Surfer/Wage Tracker Alice van Ommeren Ryan Fuller Research, Analysis and Accountability.
ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
Student Success Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges September 2011.
Dr. Christina Whitfield April 29, 2013 Big E Symposium KCTCS PERFORMANCE METRICS WHERE’S THE DATA?
Annual Median Gross Pay Coventry working age residents by protected characteristics Data source: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings and Annual Population.
New methods for exploring labor market outcomes: Examining wages for award completers at California Community Colleges Patrick Perry Ryan Fuller.
The Twelve Enhanced Accountability Measures and Six Performance Funding Measures Annual Report to the Board of Trustees Academic Year
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges, 2012 Report Riverside Community College District Riverside Community College District Teaching & Learning.
Defining a Career Skills Building Student Cohort & Outcome.
Achieving the Dream: Assessing Implementation CCPRO February 20, 2007.
The Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment Northern Virginia Community College (NOVA) AUGUST 2005.
Peralta Community College District Open Forum 2015 Strategic Plan January 21, 2015.
Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC) 2007 Report for Cerritos College Bill Farmer and Nathan Durdella.
Aggregated Core Indicator Data TOPs Code 12 – Performance Of All Voc Ed & Special Populations Students.
Cuesta College ARCC Data Report to the San Luis Obispo Community College District Board of Trustees May 5, 2010.
REPORT TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MARCH 7, 2012 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT INSTITUTIONAL.
1. ACCJC INSTITUTION-SET STANDARDS DISCUSSION 2 A “standard” is the level of performance set by the institution to meet educational quality and institutional.
Fact Book Fall 2010 Outcomes *Unless otherwise specified, charts exclude students taking only non-credit courses.
2014 Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation May 7, 2014 E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC)
Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation April 17, 2013 FOOTHILL COLLEGE E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community.
+ General Education Assessment Spring 2014 Quantitative Literacy.
South Dakota Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
Graduation, Completion, and Transfer ATD Data Team Subcommittee report January 2011.
Missouri Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
Hawaii Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Student Services Institutional Highlights Fall 2006 Engaging Sacramento City College.
SCC Office of Institutional Research Fall 2006 Enrollment Update Where we’re coming from and where we’re headed.
Pierce College Students: Who They Are & How They’re Doing Carol Kozeracki Student Success Mini-Conference February 9, 2007.
Kentucky Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
FE to HE PROGRESSION PROJECT Report to Welsh Government and HEFCW.
Oklahoma Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Gerard Redmond Community Catholic School High School Presentation
Palomar College Presentation to Palomar College Board of Trustees March 11, 2008.
Increasing Postsecondary Access through Online Education Accessibility Subcommittee May 25, 2010.
Kansas Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
1 A ccountability R eporting for the C ommunity C olleges (ARCC) 2008 Presentation to Peralta Community College Board of Trustees Merritt College Office.
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees Meeting November 2, 2016
2016 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Indicators Four areas of institutional effectiveness
2017 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Cooperative Innovative High School Programs in North Carolina
Student Success Scorecard & Other Institutional Effectiveness Metrics
IPRE Retreat Transfer & Employment Natalia Córdoba- Velasquez
Dr. Brian Lofman, Dean April 18, 2017 Student Success Scorecard 2017:
Dr. Brian Lofman, Dean April 18, 2017 Student Success Scorecard 2017:
Institution-Set Standards for Improvement
2008 ARCC Report Findings February 2, 2009
Institution-Set Standards for Improvement
Presentation transcript:

 Purpose:  Identify skills builder students & determine their course taking patterns  Background:  Student course taking patterns is current method for creating cohorts  Self-reported goal traditionally unreliable, maybe not for skills builders  Methodology:  Fall 2010 students who have educational goal of “update job skills”  Analyze characteristics of students to validate skills builders students.  If these are skills builders, we can identify their course taking pattern  And, create a skills builders cohort to determine their progress/success

 Student characteristics  Median age was 38, older than traditional students  28% report having a BA or higher compared to 8% of all other students  59% of the students were male, as opposed to 45% of all other students  Educational patterns  One third (33%) attended a 4-year institution before Fall 2010  A quarter (26%) had earned an award in the system before Fall 2010  Largest course enrollments were public safety and fire academy  Employment outcomes  Median wages 2 years before Fall 2010 were $49,800 and $54,600 1 year after Fall 2010  42% remained in the same industry from to  Of those that stayed in same industry, 64% had a positive wage gain

 Number of units and terms:  Median units earned in Fall 2010 =2.5 and attempted in Fall 2010 =3  Average of 5 terms and median of 6.5 units earned before Fall 2010  Types of courses:  In Fall 2010, 49% of courses taken classified as ‘Positive Attendance’  Also, 49% of courses taken were taught by temporary or contract faculty  62 % of the courses taken were occupational (SAM A, B, C)  Most common type of courses were SAM C (Clearly Occupational)  Largest course enrollments were Public Safety and Fire Academy/Sciences, followed by Math, Office Technology, English and Child Development,  Success and other factors:  Only 9% of student transferred and 6 % earned award after Fall 2010  70% course success rate, same as the overall enrollments

 Student characteristics  Median age was 30  19% report having a BA or higher compared to 8% of all other students  55% female/45% male  Educational patterns  5% had earned an award in the system before Fall 2010

 Number of units:  Median units earned in Fall 2010 =3 and attempted in Fall 2010 =4.2  Types of courses:  In Fall 2010, 24% of courses taken classified as ‘Positive Attendance’  45 % of the courses taken were occupational (SAM A, B, C)  Most common type of courses were SAM C (Clearly Occupational)  Largest course enrollments were Admin of Justice, Math, English, Child Development, Fire Tech, Registered Nursing, Physical Education, Psychology, Supervised Tutoring & Office Technology.  Success and other factors:  Only 4.4% of student transferred and 11% earned award after Fall 2010  61% course success rate, lower than overall enrollment

Goal H (update job skills) Goal I (maintain cert/lic) Student Characteristics Age3830 BA or higher (reported)28%19% % Male59%45% Award (before)26%5% Course Taking Patterns Median units earned2.53 Median unit attempted “Positive Attendance” courses49%24% Occupational (Sam A, B, C)62%45% Success Patterns Course Success Rate70%61% Transfer (after Fall 2010)9%4.4% Award (after Fall 2010)6%11%

 Cohort:  All students with goal ‘H or ‘I’ students who were not enrolled the following year. Filter out those that went on to earn an award or transfer, or  All students that earned between 1 and 18 vocational units (SAM A, B, C) in a year, received no award, were no longer enrolled the following year and did not transfer.  Cohort size N=244,926 (Annual )

 Cohort:  Students who earn between.25 and 8 units the first term (range of units earned in the fall term for Goal H students), and  Attempting a SAM A, B, C course that term, and  Were not enrolled in a Community College the following year and did not subsequently transfer.  Cohort size N=153,333 (Fall 2010)