HIT Policy Committee Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi, Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative, Chair David Lansky, Pacific Business Group on.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Legal Work Group Developing a Uniform EHR/HIE Patient Consent Form.

Advertisements

Strategy and Innovation Workgroup October 21, 2014 David Lansky, chair Jennifer Covich, co-chair.

ONC Policy and Program Update Health IT Standards Committee Meeting February 20, 2013 Jodi Daniel, Office of Policy and Planning, ONC.

NATE’s Blue Button for Consumers (NBB4C) Trust Bundle Direct Project Connect-a-Thon January 22, 2015 Aaron Seib, NATE CEO

HIT Policy Committee Information Exchange Workgroup Proposed Next Steps Micky Tripathi, Chair David Lansky, Co-Chair August 19, 2010.

ONC Program and Policy Update Health IT Standards Committee Meeting March 27, Judy Murphy, RN, FACMI, FHIMSS, FAAN Deputy National Coordinator for.

Overview of Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Presentation to HIT Steering Committee May 24, 2012.

Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup March 10, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair.

Privacy and Security Workgroup: Big Data Public Hearing December 8, 2014 Deven McGraw, chair Stan Crosley, co-chair.

Consumer Work Group Presentation Federal Health IT Strategic Plan January 9, 2015 Gretchen Wyatt Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Analysis.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia University, Co- Chair December 13,

Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Face to Face Informational Session Charter Discussion – 9:30am – 10:00am October 18, 2011.

HIE Request for Information March 26, 2013 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi.

HIT Policy Committee Accountable Care Workgroup – Kickoff Meeting May 17, :00 – 2:00 PM Eastern.

Oregon Health Authority Communications and Engagement Plan Patty Wentz Director of Communications Oregon Health Authority and Department of Human Services.

Strategy and Innovation Workgroup: Recommendations on the Federal Health IT Strategic Plan March 4, 2015 David Lansky, Chair Jennifer Covich,

ONC Policy and Program Update Health IT Policy Committee Meeting January 14, 2014 Jodi Daniel, Director Office of Policy and Planning.

August 10, 2011 A Leading Provider of Consulting and Systems Engineering Services to Public Health Organizations.

Campaign Readiness Project Overview Enabling a structured, scalable approach to customer-centric campaigns.

Privacy and Security Tiger Team Recommendations Adopted by The Health IT Policy Committee Relevant to Consumer Empowerment May 24, 2013.

Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup April 2, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair 1.

HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup Introductory Remarks David Lansky, Chair Pacific Business Group on Health Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair Department of Commerce,

LCC -Proposal for Next Steps August 28, Discussion Points Recap of Whitepaper Recommendations Critical milestones and activities driving LCC activities.

UK Wide Core Skills & Training Framework Findings of 2 nd Stage Consultation and Implications for Development of the Framework.

Larry Wolf, chair Marc Probst, co-chair Certification / Adoption Workgroup March 19, 2014.

HIT Standards Committee Privacy and Security Workgroup Dixie Baker, Chair, Privacy and Security Workgroup Walter Suarez, Co-Chair, Privacy and Security.

HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup Recommendations Phase 2 David Lansky, Chair Pacific Business Group on Health Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair Department of.

Public Health Tiger Team we will start the meeting 3 min after the hour DRAFT Project Charter April 15, 2014.

10/27/111 Longitudinal Care Work Group (LCWG) Proposal to Re-Scope and Re-Name the LTPAC WG.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Presentation to HIT Policy Committee Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia.

GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.

HIT Policy Committee Privacy and Security Tiger Team Deven McGraw, Chair Paul Egerman, Co-Chair Patient Matching Recommendations February 2,

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Paul Tang, Chair George Hripcsak, Co-Chair June 25, 2010.

Transition of Care Reference Implementation & Pilots Kick-Off May 31, 2011.

Draft Transition Plan for the Transfer of the Drug Medi-Cal Treatment Program Fourth Series: Stakeholder Meetings Department of Health Care Services Department.

HIT Standards Committee NHIN Workgroup Introductory Remarks Farzad Mostashari Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT Douglas Fridsma Office of.

Larry Wolf Certification / Adoption Workgroup May 13th, 2014.

S&I Provider Directories Initiative Revisions to Initiative Charter July 1, 2011.

Federal Advisory Committees Introducing Future Topics and Adding Workgroups Discussion Document October 2009 ** Pre-decisional Draft Do not Disclose **

Lab Results Interfaces S&I Framework Initiative Bi-Weekly Initiative Meeting August 1, 2011.

Open Public Meeting July 27, am – 12 pm State Transportation Building, Boston MassHealth Demonstration to Integrate Care for Dual Eligibles.

Lab Results Interfaces S&I Framework Initiative Bi-Weekly Initiative Meeting May 9, 2011.

HITPC - Information Exchange Work Group Meaningful Use Stage 3 Subgroup 2: Care Coordination and Patient and Family Engagement Co-Chairs: Jeff Donnell.

HIT Standards Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Update Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia University, Co- Chair.

Draft – discussion only Consumer Workgroup Christine Bechtel, chair Neil Calman, co-chair December 8, 2014.

Draft Terms of Reference for the Country Research Studies Promoting Agriculture-Climate-Trade linkages in the East African Community (PACT EAC) BY RASHID.

Status Update Deven McGraw, Chair Center for Democracy & Technology Micky Tripathi, Co-Chair Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative May 19, HIT Policy.

S&I FRAMEWORK PROPOSED INITIATIVE SUMMARIES Dr. Douglas Fridsma Office of Interoperability and Standards December 10, 2010.

Lab Results Interfaces S&I Framework Initiative Bi-Weekly Initiative Meeting August 29, 2011.

State Alliance for e-Health Michelle Lim Warner, MPH Senior Policy Analyst NGA Center for Best Practices

Parks & Recreation Service Delivery Model Review Progress Report #1 City of Pitt Meadows Council January 19,

Data Gathering HITPC Workplan HITPC Request for Comments HITSC Committee Recommendations gathered by ONC HITSC Workgroup Chairs ONC Meaningful Use Stage.

Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Thursday, May 23, 2013.

Certification and Adoption Workgroup HIT Policy Committee April 28, 2014 Discussion on Incremental Rulemakings.

ACWG Charge Make recommendations to the Health IT Policy Committee on how HHS policies and programs can advance the evolution of a health IT infrastructure.

Every Student Succeeds Act January Christopher Woolard Senior Executive Director, Center for Accountability and Continuous Improvement Colleen D.

Update on USS Pension Fund Staff Presentations 26 th November December 2014 Will Spinks Registrar, Secretary and Chief Operating Officer.

Lab Results Interfaces S&I Framework Initiative Bi-Weekly Initiative Meeting September 12, 2011.

Update to Members Analysis Team Update on current activities for comment List of proposed new project ideas Opportunity for Members to suggest new projects.

CBP Biennial Strategy Review System

Reliability Assessment Committee Proposal TSS Meeting

Report by the VICH Steering Committee on issues raised by Forum members during the 1st Outreach Forum meeting Hervé Marion, DVM VICH Secretariat.

Health IT Standards Committee Workgroup Evolution Discussion

Health IT Policy Committee Workgroup Evolution

CBP Biennial Strategy Review System ~Meetings Detail~ DRAFT August 29, /6/2018 DRAFT.

CBP Biennial Strategy Review System

Data & Learning Team February 1, 2018.

Scene setter European Commission DG Environment

NICE has many methods and processes

Technology Bob Dohrer, Technology Working Group Chair

Presentation transcript:

HIT Policy Committee Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi, Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative, Chair David Lansky, Pacific Business Group on Health, Co-Chair February 2, 2011

Agenda Update on Provider Directory Recommendations Next Steps for Information Exchange Workgroup 2

Presentation to HIT Standards Committee Presented the Entity-Level Provider Directory recommendations during the January 12 th HIT Standards Committee meeting.

ILPD framework Users and Uses FunctionsContent Operating rqmts Business models Policy issues Policy actions Who wants an ILPD? What do they want to use it for? What functions do users need for their desired uses? What data will be required in order to enable desired functions? What operating business requirements will be needed in order for this to be used? What are possible business models for meeting needs? Which business models should the government promote? What are the policy issues related to each of the suggested business models? What policy actions should be taken to address the policy issues? Directory Requirements and OptionsRecommendations Recommendations to IE WG January Consensus conclusions and recommendations 4

5 Revised Workplan for ILPD Recommendations DateMeetingTopic Feb 7PD TFRecommendations on users, uses, content, functional capabilities Finalize business requirements Discuss policy issues Feb 11PD TFFinalize policy issues and actions Feb 28PD TF/IE WG Approve Recommendation Mar 2HITPCRecommendations to HITPC on Individual-level Provider Directories 5

Proposed Next Steps for IE WG With provider directory recommendations set to wrap up in March need to begin discussions of next steps for the Workgroup. With the large scope of exchange issues that would benefit from Workgroups insights moving forward the Workgroup plans to take a more lightweight approach to selected topics focusing on identifying issues inhibiting or limiting exchange and potential levers for addressing as opposed to developing detailed recommendations Meaningful Use Stage 2 will be the lens through which the Workgroup does this

MU Stage 2 Process (as far as we know) MU WG public comments: through Feb 25 MU WG plan: –“Following analysis of the comments received through the 45-day public comment period, the HITPC intends to revisit these recommendations in its public meetings in the Spring of At that time, the HITPC will be able to review public comments in the context of the early feedback from providers on experience with stage 1 MU. In addition, the HITPC will consider additional input from its other workgroups working on quality measures, information exchange, and privacy and security.” Proposed Approach for input: –Develop formalized recommendations for HITPC in alignment with anticipated spring meetings 7

Targeted Topic Areas, Timeline, Approach Potential Areas to focus on –Stage 2 MU and S&I Framework: Feb-March –Public health: April –Transitions in care: May –Quality reporting: June –Consumer engagement: May –Administrative simplification: August –HIE and HIX: September Address –Current status/achievement of goals (focus on stage 1 where relevant) –Issues and challenges: business, policy, regulatory, technology –Most promising/high yield solutions, levers including: Policy levers Meaningful Use levers Standards levers State HIE Program levers Assumptions on how to address tactical topics starting in April –Two meetings per topic: 1 st issue identification, 2 nd outline key opportunities, key issues that need to be resolved, levers –Leverages offline work: one workgroup member as topic lead, ONC staff and consultants support issue identification, outline key opportunities

An approach for tackling specific issues As we go through MU Stage 2 recommendations, we will undoubtedly identify specific issues that require more detailed assessment Scan the field on selected topic to identify key challenges stakeholders are facing and present potential levers to address. –For each selected topic a lead Workgroup member who is an expert on the topic will take the lead in developing the agenda for meetings addressing the topic –Where relevant/necessary outside experts will be brought in to augment the groups expertise