Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A 10 GeV, 4 MW, FFAG, Proton Driver at 50 Hz G H Rees, RAL.
Advertisements

Insertions for an Isochronous, 8-16 turn, 8-20 GeV, Muon FFAG G H Rees, RAL.
Isochronous, FFAG Rings with Insertions for Rapid Muon or Electron Acceleration G H Rees, RAL.
Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
FFAG Workshop 2005 Dejan Trbojevic April 3, 2005 Electron model lattice with added edge focusing  Introduction:  Rick Baartman : “Spiral focusing slides”
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
Sergey Antipov, University of Chicago Fermilab Mentor: Sergei Nagaitsev Injection to IOTA ring.
Options for a 50Hz, 10 MW, Short Pulse Spallation Neutron Source G H Rees, ASTeC, CCLRC, RAL, UK.
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
FFAG Concepts and Studies David Neuffer Fermilab.
100 MeV- 1 GeV Proton Synchrotron for Indian Spallation Neutron Source Gurnam Singh Beam Dynamics Section CAT, Indore CAT-KEK-Sokendai School on Spallation.
Neutrino Factory,  ± Decay Rings C Johnstone, FNAL, F Meot, CEA, & G H Rees, RAL.
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Proton Driver Status ISIS Accelerator Division John Thomason.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
A 3 Pass, Dog-bone Cooling Channel G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL.
Related poster [1] TPAG022: Slow Wave Electrode Structures for the ESS 2.5 MeV Chopper – Michael A. Clarke-Gayther Status Funding bids have been prepared.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
MW Upgrades for the ISIS Facility John Thomason. OptionCommentsBeam Power (MW) Neutron Yield 1(a)Add 180 MeV LinacTechnical Issues~ (b)Add 800.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
F Project-X Related Issues in Recycler A.Burov, C.Gattuso, V.Lebedev, A.Leveling, A.Valishev, L.Vorobiev Fermilab AAC Review 8/8/2007.
Neutrino Factory,  ± Decay Rings C Johnstone, FNAL, F Meot, CNRS, & G H Rees, RAL.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
FFAG Studies at RAL G H Rees. FFAG Designs at RAL Hz, 4 MW, 3-10 GeV, Proton Driver (NFFAGI) Hz,1 MW, GeV, ISIS Upgrade (NFFAG) 3.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
WG2 (Proton FFAG) Summary G.H. Rees. Proton Driver Working Group  Participants: M. Yashimoto, S. Ohnuma, C.R. Prior, G.H. Rees, A.G. Ruggiero  Topics:
New Gantry Idea for H + /C 6+ Therapy G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL 4 th September, 2008.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
4 MW, 50 Hz, 10 GeV, 1 ns (rms), FFAG Proton Driver Study G H Rees, RAL.
3 GeV, 1.2 MW, RCS Booster and 10 GeV, 4.0 MW, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
ISS Muon Bunch Structure Convenors: S Berg, BNL, and G H Rees, RAL.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
RCS design Valeri Lebedev AAC Meeting November 16-17, 2009.
Accumulator & Compressor Rings with Flexible Momentum Compaction arccells MAP 2014 Spring Meeting, Fermilab, May 27-31, 2014 Y. Alexahin (FNAL APC)
1 Tracking study of muon acceleration with FFAGs S. Machida RAL/ASTeC 6 December, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
Update on RF parameters A.Lachaize11 th HPPS design meeting04/09/13.
HP-PS beam acceleration and machine circumference A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 On behalf of HP-PS design team.
FFAG Studies at BNL Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG’06 - KURRI, Osaka, Japan - November 6-10, 2006.
Towards a Common Proton Driver for a Neutrino Factory
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
Zgoubi tracking study of the decay ring
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Isochronous, FFAG Rings with Insertions for Rapid Muon or Electron Acceleration G H Rees, RAL.
Luminosity Optimization for FCC-ee: recent results
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Progress activities in short bunch compressors
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Optics considerations for PS2
Cooler Ring Design Status - July 2017
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
Presentation transcript:

Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL

Proton Driver: Linac, Booster & NFFAG Layout 3 GeV RCS booster 66 cells 200 MeV Hˉ linac 10 GeV NFFAG Hˉ collimators H°, Hˉ

Aims of the Electron Model The aims of the model are to check the following: The effects of the non-linear magnetic fields Constancy of tune at 25 reference energies The halo growth during 50 Hz acceleration The range of momentum for the acceleration Adiabatic bunch compression to < 1 ns rms Longitudinal space charge limited operation The effect of  Q = 0.1 at the injection energy The effect of  Q = 0.1 for compressed bunch

Momentum Range for the Model The 3 to 10 GeV protons have β  = to The 3 to MeV eˉ have β  = to Range is smaller because the model has fewer cells, causing too large an edge focusing at low energies. Proton ring has 66 cells, with ° bend per cell. Electron ring has 27 cells,with 13.33° bend per cell. An eˉ ring with more cells leads to very low B fields. The β  range is chosen for the compression studies.

Lattice Cell for Electron Model bd(-) BF(+/-) BD(+) BF(+/-) bd(-) ( cm) ° 7.0° ° 7.0° -7.0° Lengths and angles for the MeV orbit

Parameters for the Electron Model Maximum orbit length of five unit NFFAG cell = m. Minimum orbit length of five unit NFFAG cell = m. Circumference for the 27 lattice cells = to m. bd magnet field range = to gauss. BF magnet field range = to gauss. BD magnet field range = to gauss. Horizontal and vertical cell betatron tunes = 4/13, 3/13. Horizontal and vertical ring betatron tunes = 8 4/13, 6 3/13. Value of gamma transition at MeV =

Lattice and Magnet Parameters Kinetic energy (MeV) Full ε n ((π) mm mr) Maximum β v (m) Maximum β h (m) Maximum D h (m) Max. v beam size (mm) Max. h beam size (mm) Max. chamber height (mm) 4.5 Max. orbit separation (mm) 39.5 Magnet v x h gap size (mm) 10.0 x 45.0

Acceleration Frequency at Reference Energies Proton Driver (h =40) Electron Model (h =3) T(GeV) F(MHz) T(MeV) F(MHz) x x 12……… x 12……… x 12……… x 12……… x 12……… x 12……… x 12………. Code for e - model to be modified for more accuracy. (Smaller frequency range for electrons)

Electron Model Lattice Studies Fix path length at top energy, but change the bend angles: bd: - 7° to - 8°, BF: 7° to 7.5°, BD ° to °. Reduce number of reference energies (δ) from 25 to 17. There are two complete designs for the model; final choice is related to bunch compression.

Non-linear Cell, Longitudinal Effects For p = p o (1 + δ), L = L o (1 + δ (α o + α 1 δ + α 2 δ 2 + …..) Non-linear lattice program gives L(+δ), L(-δ) and α o (=  t -2 ) Hence it is possible to solve for α 1 and α 2. F o is the frequency of one of the 25 (p o, C o ) reference orbits.  F is the change in frequency between the orbits. C = ring circumference = C o (1 + δ (α o + α 1 δ + α 2 δ 2 +,..) h = 3, F = h β(δ) c / C(δ),  =  F/F o = (  o -2 - α o ) δ + (  o -2 (α o β o 2 /2) - α 1 ) δ 2 - (α 2 +  o -2 (α o (1 + β o 2 /2) + α 1 + 5β o 2 /2 - β o 4 /2 +  o -4 )) δ 3

Comparison of Model with Proton Driver For the proton driver at a reference energy of 6.5 GeV, for example: α 1 = α 2 = The values of α 1 and α 2 at the compression energy need to be compared for the proton driver and the two electron model designs, before selecting the final electron model.

Betatron Tunes for the Model Reference energies are at 2 to 3% momentum intervals. Tunes at ref. energies are 4/13, 3/13, as in proton driver. Ring has 27 cells, 26 of which have Q h = 8 and Q v = 6. At a reference energy, betatron tunes vary with amplitude. Orbits near reference energies don’t have zero chromaticity. The tunes vary with energy, but return to reference values.

Space Charge Effects Model needs to simulate the proton driver space charge effects. Assume electrons in a single, MHz beam bunch. Assume Hofmann-Pederson, longitudinal beam distributions. Find bunching factors for  Q= 0.1 at compression & injection. Find bunch area for δ = ± , T < 1 ns rms, at compression. Find the rf voltage needed to achieve the bunch compression. Find rf voltage needed at injection for  Q = 0.1 and η sc < 0.4.

Bunch Compression Parameters For N = ,  = & gaussian transverse distributions,  Q = 0.1 at a bunching factor of B f = The bunch phase and time extents needed at MHz are:  φ = ± 0.45 and  T = ± ns (~ 0.76 ns rms). Assume  p/p = ± as for compressed proton driver bunch. Bunch area A (  E,  T ) = eV sec. If Z wall cancels η sc, then V = hηπ (Ach / (Rα) ) 2 / (128  E o ). V = volts for compression with h= 3.

3 MeV Injection Parameters For N = ,  = & gaussian transverse distributions,  Q = 0.1 at a bunching factor of B f = The bunch phase and time extents needed at MHz are :  φ = ± and  T = ± 4.89 ns (~ 1.96 ns rms). η sc not cancelled; V(1 - η sc ) = hηπ (Ach / (Rα) ) 2 / (128  E o ). Vη sc = Neh 2 g / (2ε o RF  2 ), F = , α = For the injection, when h =3, η sc = and  p/p = ± V = volts during injection with h =3.

MHz RF System The use of three, broad band mini-drift tubes is proposed. These are located in cells 1, 4 and 7 (120° in phase apart). Each drift tube is 0.29 m long in a 0.35 m straight section. The phase extent is ± 6.59° at the rf harmonic of three. The voltage reduction factor due to the short  φ is Needed per drift tube are ~ 50 V (inj.) and 164 V ( compr.). 50 Ω load 25 Ω input feeder 50 Ω load eˉeˉ

Summary An eˉ model for the NFFAG proton driver is now proposed. It has 27 cells in comparison with the 66 of the proton driver. The ring circumference is m (too large for the DL hall?) Increased bend angles restrict the range to MeV. The cell tunes at each reference energy are as for the driver, but there are more edge effects in the electron models. Design aims for the eˉ model are met, but development of a 3D space charge code is needed for tracking of acceleration.