Chapter 8 PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT. DEFINING “PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT” … THE TOTAL LEARNING EXPERIENCES PROVIDED TO CONSUMERS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE OBJECTIVES.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent Search.
Advertisements

Louis L. Redding Middle School Appoquinimink School District.
By Linda Munger and Valerie Von Frank. Principal is the Instructional Leader, yet the sole leader is no longer enough. Current research emphasizes a team.
National Coaching Certification Program Roles, Functions & Tasks of a Coach.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Program Improvement Unit Collaborating to increase student achievement and fundamentally improve the interaction between the teacher and the students to.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) PE Coordinator’s Mini-Conference Wednesday, March 14, 2012 Framework for Effective Teaching.
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
1 14. Project closure n An information system project must be administratively closed once its product is successfully delivered to the customer. n A failed.
Active Youth Ideas for Implementing CDC Physical Activity Promotion Guidelines.
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
Curriculum Development For Adult Learners. Basics Educational objective- – What they will learn – Learning needs assessment or gap analysis Learner outcomes-
Professional Learning in the Learning Profession Effective Practice  Increased Student Learning Frederick Brown Director of Strategy.
Grants By: Kailey Halliwell. Carol M. White PEP Grant The most well known Grant Your school or organization could receive $100,000 to $750,000 the average.
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
PPS Department Update Denise Doolittle, Director Paul Pattavina, Supervisor Lori Secchiaroli, Supervisor December 15, 2014.
Kim Ward and Pat Auger. Why is evaluation of technology literacy and use important to students, educators, the community, and our society? Outcome/Mega:
December 6, 2007 Site-Based Governance Local and National Models iDivision Los Angeles Unified School District January 2008.
CH 3 – The Role of Middle School Physical Education  Accomplished physical educators: –Create advocates for P.R. by providing opportunities for family.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
The Technology Integration Planning Model (TIP)
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Leading the Learning and Creating High Expectations for Student Achievement- Make AYP Now! Theresa West NAESP Convention April 11, 2010.
VERONA PUBLIC SCHOOLS STRATEGIC PLAN REVIEW & ANNUAL GOAL SETTING JULY 2015 VERONA PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
January 31, 2014 Data Use Information and Guide. Copyright © 2014 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. What is “TELL Oregon” ? TELL Oregon is an anonymous.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Adapted Physical Education in the Public Schools.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
Resources for School Wellness Policy Implementation Francesca Zavacky Senior Manager National Association for Sport and Physical Education NASPE Sets the.
Segment 5: Sample Activities Federal Accountability Requirements School Leadership Instructional Supervision 1.
Chapter 7 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
Chapter 2 Athletic Training. 2 Sports Medicine Team Physician Certified athletic trainer Coach Athletes.
Technology Use Plan Presented by: Bob Santi. Rationale A technology plan is a current guideline for the appropriate and effective use of technology a.
FCCLA Basics. Family, Career and Community Leaders of America is a dynamic and effective national student organization that helps young men and women.
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 Power Point Presentations for Each Chapter of SuperVision and Instructional Leadership: A Developmental Approach Carl D.
Chapter 2 The Athletic Health Care Team Sports Medicine Definition: “A field that uses a holistic, comprehensive, and multidisciplinary approach to health.
Onslow County Schools Division of Media and Instructional Technology This presentation was prepared under fair use exemption of the U.S. Copyright Law.
Integrated Media and Technology Program with an Emphasis on Student Achievement.
JANUARY 12,  My Voice Staff Survey Results: % in agreement StatementSEP 10 JUN 11 I feel valued for my unique skills and talents5042 School is.
Problem-Solving Approach of Allied Health Learning Community.
Building a Culture of Leadership at Belmont High School Michael M. Harvey, Ed.D. Principal, Belmont High School.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Building Collaborative Teams Susan Rasicot. Examine: The Statistics  Number of students on grade level  Number of students by grade below grade level.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Evaluating Your Physical Education Curriculum Chapter 13.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
1 School Board and Superintendent Continuous Improvement and Evaluation Quality New Mexico June 9, 2011.
PWCSB June 4, Prince William County Schools S TRATEGIC P LAN Going from “good” to “great”
PYP EXHIBITION Parent Orientation
The Day in the Life of OFPSI staff By: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell Director of Federal Programs & School Improvement (OFPSI) Petersburg City Public Schools.
Michael Lubelfeld Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools Deerfield Public Schools, District 109 – Lake County ISAL II Cohort Member
1 Copyright © 2012 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2008 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 40 The Nurse Leader in.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Physical education Pedagogy
Professional and Curriculum Development Survey
Chapter 10: State and National Standards
ChApter 2: Program Organization and Management
Chapter 2 Athletic Training.
EDU827 : EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP
New Prospect Elementary School
Chapter 5: Test management
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 8 PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT

DEFINING “PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT” … THE TOTAL LEARNING EXPERIENCES PROVIDED TO CONSUMERS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE OBJECTIVES OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORT.

PROGRAM GOALS FOR PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORT DEVELOP HEALTH- AND MOTOR- PERFORMANCE RELATED FITNESS DEVELOP SKILL IN ACTIVITIES DEVELOP AN UNDERSTANDING OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY PROVIDE MEANINGFUL PSCHOSOCIAL EXPERIENCE

PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT FOCAL POINTS WHAT OUGHT TO BE (IDEAL) WHAT IS (CURRENT PROGRAM) WHAT CAN BE (THE PRACTICAL)

PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT PLAYERS MANAGERS STAFF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS PARTICIPANTS PARENTS, GUARDIANS, ETC COMMUNITY LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS

FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT THE COMMUNITY FEDERAL & STATE LEGISLATION PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS MANAGERS, FACULTY, AND PARTICIPANTS VISION/ATTITUDES PHYSICAL EDUC/COACHING STAFF

PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT FACTORS (Continued) FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT CLASS SCHEDULES OR SPORTS OFFERED CLASS OR TEAM SIZE RESEARCH CLIMATE AND GEOGRAPHY SOCIAL FORCES

SELECTED APPROACHES TO PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS APPROACH CONCEPTUAL APPROACH –CONCEPT AND SUB-CONCEPTS –BASIC STUFF I AND II (NASPE) COMPETENCY-BASED APPROACH ACTIVITY-BASED APPROACH

GUIDELINES TO CONSIDER IN PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT MOTIVATION OF PARTICIPANTS ACTIVITY INVOLVED INTERACTION OPPORTUNITIES INTEGRATION OF CONCEPTS

STEPS IN PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT 1.DETERMINE ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES 2. ANALYZE PROGRAM OBJECTIVES 3. ANALYZE THE OBJECTIVES IN TERMS OF ACTIVITIES 4. DEVELOP PROGRAM GUIDES 5. EVALUATE THE PROGRAM

EVALUATION IS CONCERNED WITH... MEETING PARTICIPANT NEEDS MEETING PROGRAM OBJECTIVES CONSIDERING THE NEEDS OF PARENTS, COMMUNITY, STAFF, AND CONCERNED OTHERS

GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATION INCLUDE STAFF MEMBERS, PARTICIPANTS, & STAKEHOLDERS EXAMINE PROGRAM & PERSONNEL FOCUS ON PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT HELP STAFF MEMBERS IMPROVE FOCUS ON THE FUTURE

APPROACHES TO EVALUATION COMPARE PROGRAM PARTICIPATION, PROGRESS, SUCCESSES WITH GOALS RATINGS AND CHECKLISTS STUDENT EVALUATIONS & SURVEYS SELF-EVALUATIONS FOR MANAGERS OBSERVATIONS OF TEACHERS, COACHES, AND OTHER STAFF INDEPENDENT EVALUATORS

SCHOOL AND UNIVERSITY PROGRAM EVALUATIONS BASIC INSTRUCTIONAL PHYSICAL EDUCATION ADAPTED/DEVELOPMENTAL RECREATIONAL SPORTS INTERSCHOLASTIC AND INTERCOLLEGIATE SPORT STAFF AND FACULTY

EVALUATING PROGRAM CHANGES WHAT ARE THE FUNCTIONS? AM I SUFFICIENTLY INFORMED? HOW DOES THE CHANGE RELATE TO FACULTY, STAFF, FACILITIES, BUDGET, AND OTHER ISSUES? WHAT DO THE EXPERTS SAY? WHO IS THE EVALUATION FOR AND WHAT WILL COME FROM IT?