Doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1101r3 Submission September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 1 Additional 40 MHz Scanning Proposal Date: 2008-09-09 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0049r0 Submission January 2007 Matthew Fischer, BroadcomSlide 1 Signaling of intolerance for 40 MHz transmissions Notice: This document.
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE /0085r1 Jan 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Legacy Fairness Issues of Enhanced CCA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1303r5 Submission November 2010 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Overlapping BSS Co-Existence Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0984r0 Submission September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 1 Bluetooth test cases with n 40 MHz Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /441r0 Submission September 2001 Steve Shellhammer, Symbol Technologies Slide 1 IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /1054r0 Submission Sep Santosh Pandey (Cisco)Slide 1 FILS Reduced Neighbor Report Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0094r2 Submission Jan 2012 Slide 1 Authors: MAC Header Design for Small Data Packet for ah Date: Lv kaiying, ZTE.
Doc.: IEEE /1238r4 Submission November 2008 Peter Loc & KiranSlide 1 Proposal to Add Optional non n Radio Scans for 40 MHz Operation in.
Doc.: IEEE /0256r0 Submission March 2010 Zhou Lan NICTSlide 1 Proposal of Synchronized Quiet Period for Incumbent User Detection Date: 2010-March.
Doc.: IEEE /0231r3 Submission March 2010 John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd. & NiCTSlide 1 Efficient Methods for Coexistence with Other 60GHz Systems Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0127r0 Submission January 2009 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 1 Bluetooth AFH and IEEE Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0576r3 Submission May 2009 George Vlantis (STMicroelectronics) et aliiSlide 1 TGn SB2: Presentation for 40MHz Coexistence CIDs Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /0079r0 Submission Interference Signalling Enhancements Date: xx Mar 2010 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0992r1 Submission September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola Inc.Slide 1 20/40 MHz 11n Interference on Bluetooth Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /00144r0 Submission 3/01 Nada Golmie, NISTSlide 1 IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks Dialog with FCC Nada.
Doc.: IEEE /1086r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Authors: Improved Virtual Carrier Sensing Mechanism for 45GHz Sep ZTE Corp.
Doc.: IEEE /0039r2 Submission Nov 2010 Raja Banerjea, Marvell SemiconductorSlide 1 Transmit Spectral Mask Changes Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /2446r0 Submission September 2007 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 MIB Attributes for 40 MHz Scanning in 2.4 GHz Date:
Doc.:IEEE /1385r0 Submission Sep Brian Hart, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Making the Quiet Channel Element Work for 11a/11n Clients Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1468r1 Submission Jan 09 Ashish Shukla, Marvell SemiconductorSlide 1 ERP Protection in IEEE s Mesh Network Date:
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 PHY measurements for interference reduction from 11h Joe Kwak, Marian Rudolf InterDigital doc: IEEE /537r0July.
Doc.: IEEE /034r0 Submission January 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg ChairpersonSlide 1 TGg Report to the IEEE Working Group Matthew B. Shoemake.
Doc.: IEEE /1899r1 Submission December 2006 james woodyatt / Apple Computer, Inc.Slide 1 Issues for Coexistence in 2.4 GHz ISM Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0992r0 Submission September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola Inc.Slide 1 20/40 MHz 11n Interference on Bluetooth Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /462r0 Submission July 2002 Bill McFarland, Atheros CommunicationsSlide 1 Backwards/Forwards Compatibility for 11h There will exist.
Doc.: IEEE /1101r0 Submission September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 1 Additional 40 MHz Scanning Proposal Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0623r0 Submission May 2007 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Resolutions to 20/40 MHz Coexistence in 2.4 GHz Issues Notice:
Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA
Response to Official Comments
40 MHz Coexistence in 2.4 GHz Tutorial
LB97 20/40 BSS Coexistence Date: Authors: July 2007
July 2008 doc.: IEEE /1021r0 November 2008
Proposed Evaluation Methodology Additions
Proposed response to 3GPP ED request
LB97 CID Coex Date: Authors: May 2007 May 2007
Wake Up Frame to Indicate Group Addressed Frames Transmission
Proposed Evaluation Methodology Additions
120MHz channelization solution
Submission Title: [Bluetooth SIG Liaison Report Nov08]
LB97 20/40 BSS Coexistence Date: Authors: July 2007
Consideration on Interference Management in OBSS
Bluetooth Liaison Report
Fair Quiet for DFS Date: Authors: February 2008
CR for CID 1105 Date: Authors: January 2019 Month Year
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Consideration on Interference Management in OBSS
WUR and Efficiency Tradeoffs
Submission Title: [WG n Liaison Report, March09]
Energy Detect CCA Threshold
July 2008 doc.: IEEE /1021r0 November 2008
Additional 40 MHz Scanning Proposal
Submission Title: [TGn Report Nov08] Date Submitted: [13Nov08]
Signaling of intolerance for 40 MHz transmissions
Additional 40 MHz Scanning Proposal
Protection Assurance Method
Extended Channel Switch Announcement for TGn
Signaling of intolerance for 40 MHz transmissions
LB97 Coex: Duplicate DSSS
April 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 July 2010
Interference Signalling Enhancements
Month Year doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0
Month Year doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [LECIM Coexistence Considerations] Date Submitted:
July 2008 doc.: IEEE /1021r0 November 2008
Additional 40 MHz Scanning Proposal
Channelization for China’s Spectrum
TGn-LB115-CID 5097 Date: Authors:.
Greenfield protection mechanism
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 August 2019
Proposed Evaluation Methodology Additions
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /1101r3 Submission September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 1 Additional 40 MHz Scanning Proposal Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /1101r3 Submission September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 2 Abstract Due to the number of negative comments that have been cast in the recent letter ballot regarding use of 40 MHz channels in 2.4 GHz spectrum, it is proposed to add scanning requirements to clause for FC HT AP 19 and FC HT ATA 19 devices to detect presence of non radios operating in 2.4 GHz spectrum and set the Forty MHz Intolerant field to 1 in transmitted HT Capabilities elements if detection is positive. This should be sufficient to resolve all of the latest negative comments (9304, 9044, 9041, 9009, and unresolved comments from earlier ballots).

doc.: IEEE /1101r3 Submission September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 3 Coexistence with other IEEE 802 Standards Current draft n provides substantial coexistence language for legacy IEEE devices via mandatory scanning prior to enabling operation of 40 MHz channels. 40MHzIntolerant bit is used to inform other devices in BSS that operation of 40 MHz channels is not allowed. Adding mandatory scanning for non-IEEE devices operating in 2.4 GHz should satisfy negative letter ballot comments and improve the draft.

doc.: IEEE /1101r3 Submission September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 4 Current Coexistence Language Normative: – : “ An FC HT AP 19 that detects either of the BSS channel width trigger events TE-B or TE-C or that determines that the value of its variable 20/40 Operation Permitted has changed from TRUE to FALSE shall set the Secondary Channel Offset field to SCN in transmitted HT Operation elements beginning at the next DTIM or next TBTT if no DTIMs are transmitted to indicate that no secondary channel is present (i.e., that the BSS operating width is 20 MHz). ” Informative: –T.5.2: “ Before starting a 20/40 MHz BSS, an 40 MHz capable HT AP is required by the rules defined in to examine the channels of the current regulatory domain to determine whether the operation of a 20/40 MHz BSS might unfairly interfere with the operation of existing 20 MHz BSSs. The AP (or some of its associated HT STAs) is required to scan all of the channels of the current regulatory domain in order to ascertain the operating channels of any existing 20 MHz BSSs and 20/40 MHz BSSs. ”

doc.: IEEE /1101r3 Submission Current Coexistence Language (2) Informative: –T.5.2: “An additional constraint on establishing a 20/40 MHz BSS includes the allowance for any device to explicitly prohibit the operation of the 20/40 BSS mode due to other considerations. For example, if an WPAN device is operating in the area, that device is likely to be unable to communicate successfully with a paired receiver if the number of available WPAN channels falls below a given threshold. Operation of a 20/40 MHz BSS in the 2.4 GHz band can contribute to the reduction of the number of available WPAN channels, possibly pushing the available channels below that threshold.” September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 5

doc.: IEEE /1101r3 Submission Over the Air Measurements Confirms that devices are negatively affected Number of retransmissions for A2DP increase by a factor of 15. (Increases energy requirements) Number of error free packets reduced by a factor of 2. (Reduces throughput) Number of available hopping channels reduced to 27% of normal (79 to 22 channels). (Reduces noise immunity and ability to share channel) Results in numerous stereo audio drop outs. Adaptive Frequency Hopping (AFH) enabled, but typical detection algorithms can’t handle 100% larger channels and intermittent use of that channel. September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 6

doc.: IEEE /1101r3 Submission Current Negative Comments Suggest Resolution: –Clause , line 22, replace "When using 40 MHz channels, it can operate in the channels defined in and " to "When using 40 MHz channels, it can operate in the channels defined in " Rationale: –Due to the large number of devices based on IEEE Std ™ (e.g., > TWO Billion Bluetooth wireless devices), the probability of sharing the spectrum with n devices will be high. September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 7

doc.: IEEE /1101r3 Submission 40 MHz Effect on IEEE Std ™ Two interference measurement tests have shown that it is necessary to remove 67% of the available 2.4 GHz spectrum to allow applications to operate without degradation from 40 MHz channels in 2.4 GHz: – n mhz-11n-interference-on-bluetooth.ppt – n-11n-40-mhz-and-bt-coexistence-test-results.ppt This does not reflect reasonable coexistence per accepted IEEE 802 definitions. IEEE and should have equal protection from 40 MHz operation as does legacy BSSs. September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 8

doc.: IEEE /1101r3 Submission Alternative Proposal Add clause to /40 MHz BSS Operation: –FC HT AP 19 and FC HT STA 19 devices shall perform a “non radio scan” prior to establishing/joining a 20/40 MHz or 40 MHz BSS and at least once per dot11BSSWidthTriggerScanInterval seconds during operation of a 20/40 MHz or 40 MHz BSS. A positive scan result shall cause the 20/40 Operation Permitted local variable to be set to FALSE in an FC HT AP 19 and the dot11FortyMHzIntolerant MIB attribute set to TRUE. A negative scan result shall have the opposite effect. FC HT STA 19 devices that already have the dot11FortyMHzIntolerant MIB attribute set or are exempt from OBSS scanning ( ) are not required to perform this scan. –Note that the exact integration of scan event results may also be integrated into clause September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 9

doc.: IEEE /1101r3 Submission “non radio scan” Add clause defining “non radio scan”: –The “non radio scan” shall be able to detect presence of 1 MHz GFSK transmissions in channels centered on f=2402+k MHz for k=0..78 with a power level greater than –35 dBm that appear on at least 20 channels in a 10 mSec time period, and 5 MHz DSSS O-QPSK transmissions with a 2 MHz chip rate in channels centered on f= (k-11) MHz for k=11-26 with a power level greater than –38 dBm that appear on channels affected by the proposed 40 MHz channel in a 10 mSec time period. If either transmissions are detected “non radio scan” result is positive otherwise it is negative. September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 10

doc.: IEEE /1101r3 Submission Background - “non radio scan” Front end of n radio can be used to detect features of and radios with minimal cost impact. IEEE (Bluetooth) wireless devices utilize a low cost scanning mechanism to detect presence of frequency hopping signals with pseudo-random hopping sequences. IEEE (Zigbee) wireless devices use energy detection and feature recognition to detect devices. A combination of these methods can be used to define the “non radio scan” algorithm and detection limits. –Similar to DFS algorithm used for radar detection –Detection limits based on expected signal level of non radio within range of likely interference by 40 MHz n transmissions (e.g., 2-3m). –Confirmation of algorithm and detection limits from at least Bluetooth SIG and Zigbee Alliance. September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 11

doc.: IEEE /1101r3 Submission Process TGn develops language for insertion of “non radio scan” into clause and other clauses as necessary. Bluetooth SIG and Zigbee Alliance provide details on detection of their radios and recommended detection limits. TGn approves detection method clause referenced by changes to clause for inclusion in n draft. Sponsor Ballot... September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 12

doc.: IEEE /1101r3 Submission September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 13 References 000n-tgn-lb134-coex-comments.xlshttps://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/ n-tgn-lb134-coex-comments.xls 000n-coex-40-mhz-comments.dochttps://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/ n-coex-40-mhz-comments.doc 000n mhz-11n-interference-on-bluetooth.ppthttps://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/ n mhz-11n-interference-on-bluetooth.ppt Draft P802.11n_D pdf pdf

doc.: IEEE /1101r3 Submission n Transmit Spectral Mask September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 14 Skirts detected by AFH.

doc.: IEEE /1101r3 Submission Coexistence Alternatives Fair and reasonable cooperative solution allows reasonable sharing of 2.4 GHz spectrum with multiple radio systems: –802.11n 40 MHz BSSs provide advertised performance when possible. –Consumers have no complaints about devices failing to work at odd times. Everyone for themselves: –802.11n only protects legacy devices –Other radio systems adapt to increased levels of interference: devices raise transmitted power level and turn off AFH to maintain necessary QoS. Allowed to transmit up to 100mW devices would increase frequency of transmissions due to larger number of retransmissions required to get message passed n 40 MHz BSSs fail to provide advertised performance due to increased levels of interference. September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 15