USING TEACHER EVALUATION TO IMPROVE TEACHING Melinda Mangin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

Thinking and Learning Together. Developing a thinking culture in classrooms involves processes and strategies which: Are responsive and respectful towards.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
PORTFOLIO.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Appraisal and performance management
Agenda Overview Problems of Practice – (same triads) – Break School Visits – Personal reflection – Partner share Research overview On PLCs and the connection.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
COLLEGE-READY LEARNER CRITICAL THINKER ADAPTABLE & PRODUCTIVE LEADERRESPONSIBLE DECISION MAKER SKILLED COMMUNICATOR HISD.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
CIV 1 Lincoln County Administrators Total Instructional Alignment.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
School Administrators of Iowa Annual Conference August 5-6, 2014.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Timberlane Regional School District
DASA Policy and Practice Conference June 24, 2015.
1 PROFESSIONAL LEARNING within a COLLABORATIVE INQUIRY FRAMEWORK The professional learning cycle: serves as a process for professional learning is driven.
Authentic Learning and Assessment Erin Gibbons Five Standards of Authentic Instruction  Higher-Order Thinking  Depth of Knowledge  Connectedness to.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
NCATE Standards for Professional Development Schools Doug MacIsaac Stetson University Cynthia Hutchinson University of Central Florida.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
CULTURES OF COACHING AND MENTORING Principal’s role in Coaching and Mentoring teachers.
Professional Development for High-Poverty Schools Joseph F. Johnson, Jr., Ph.D. MSP Conference January 10, 2007 Phoenix, AZ.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Assessment Formats Charlotte Kotopoulous Regis University EDEL_450 Assessment of Learning.
Learning4Life or Lifelong learning? Warren Goetzel, PhD GaETC – CTO Clinic Atlanta, GA 2013.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Maxey Elementary December 9 and 10, 2013.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
Student Success  What is it?  How can we assess it?  Whose responsibility is it?  What role do you play?
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Principles of High-Quality Professional Development Dean Richards January 15, 2009.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Dolores Esposito, Executive Superintendent of Leadership Developing Social and Emotional Skills in our Schools.
EDU827 : EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP
February 21-22, 2018.
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Multiple background possibilities
Presentation transcript:

USING TEACHER EVALUATION TO IMPROVE TEACHING Melinda Mangin

Graduate School of Education Setting the Context… Modern teacher evaluation policies demand that school leaders’ time and energy is consumed by evaluation. But evidence suggests: This is a task they can not adequately complete, that has questionable validity –“capacity to conduct observations” is key challenge – more “random noise” than “true signal” 2

Graduate School of Education Opportunity Costs Time spent on (dubious) teacher evaluation is time that could be spent leading for learning. “In essence, leading for learning means creating powerful, equitable learning opportunities for students, professionals, and the system, and motivating or compelling participants to take advantage of these opportunities.” (Knapp, Copland, et. al., 2003, p. 18) 3

Graduate School of Education Three Learning Agendas 4

Graduate School of Education Leading for Learning 1.Establishing a Focus on Learning : establishing shared values & expectations that set the foundation for learning. –Theories of intelligence that promote equitable education –Knowledge necessary to build shared vision –Commitment to a culture of teacher learning 2.Building Learning Communities : creating a collaborative culture focused on learning as means to develop teacher capacity. –Professional learning situated within context –Structures that facilitate collaborative interdependencies –Trust necessary to facilitate hard feedback 5

Graduate School of Education Leading for Learning 3.Monitoring Teaching and Learning : using data and collaborative inquiry in the process of improving teaching and learning. Examining data to: a) identify and define problems, b) develop an evidence-based plan for improvement, c) assess progress toward goals and, d) provide means for reflection for continuous improvement. 4.Acquiring & Allocating Resources for Learning: managing and aligning financial, physical, and human resources to advance student learning. –For teachers: investing in professional development 6

Graduate School of Education Leading for Learning 5.Engaging External Environments that Matter for Learning : Developing relationships that support student learning: a)in the immediate external community (parents, neighbors, school volunteers, & the district office) b)in the broader external community (business organizations, other schools, policymakers, the professional community) as a means to leverage stakeholder support and attend to multiple contexts for learning and their intersections. 6.Sharing Leadership –Treating teachers as a resource 7.Creating Coherence –Vertical and horizontal alignment across subsystems 7

Graduate School of Education Learning Culture Learning IS the work Evaluation is a tool to meet learning goals and not the goal itself Where learning is the priority, evaluation will follow as an inherent part of the learning process as learners engage in inquiry, reflection, collaboration and constructive feedback. 8

Graduate School of Education References Knapp, M. S., Copland, M. A., Ford, B., Markholt, A., McLaughlin, M. W., Milliken, M. Talbert, J.E. (2003). Leading for learning sourcebook. University of Washington: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy. 9

Graduate School of Education 10