1 Progress of the J-PARC Shoji Nagamiya Director, J-PARC Center at KEK/JAEA July 6, 2007 50 GeV PAC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 J-PARC and T2K 1.Accelerator construction status and commissioning 2.Accelerator upgrade plan in first 5 years 3.Experiments with slow extracted beam.
Advertisements

November 16, 2002 Greetings to CLSI Users A Time of Transition W. Thomlinson CLSI Executive Director.
Summary of the Design Report and Next Steps Edda Gschwendtner for the CERN AWAKE Project Team Edda Gschwendtner, CERN1.
Fermilab E906 Schedule Paul E. Reimer 20 June 2008.
Costing Meeting Ajit Kurup 13 th June Page 2 Costing Meeting 13 th June 2011 Ajit Kurup Summary of CERN costing workshop. Proposed Level 3 breakdown.
Accelerator Systems Division FACET Project Management John Seeman for the FACET Study Group PPA Directorate Stanford Linear Accelerator Center DOE FACET.
1 J-PARC Overview Shoji Nagamiya J-PARC Center High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) October 15, 2008 ATHIC2008,
Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration and Meson Lab Setup
Jefferson Lab Status Hall A collaboration Dec. 16, 2013 R. D. McKeown Deputy Director For Science.
Multiplicity and Energy of Neutrons from 233U(nth,f) Fission Fragments
GlueX Collaboration Meeting February 2011 Jefferson Lab Our 30’th Collaboration Meeting.
CERN LBNE Test Experiment. Plan view of Bat
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Grigori SHIRKOV Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Russia International Intergovernmental Organization 18.
Introduction and Charge to the Review of ESS Target building and Instrument Hall design requirements Roland Garoby November 2014, Lund
J-PARC: Where is it? J-PARC (Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex) Tokai, Japan 50 GeV Synchrotron (15  A) 400 MeV Linac (350m) 3 GeV Synchrotron.
NuMI NuMI Overview NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) 14 March ‘02 NuMI / MINOS Overview.
June 20, 2008Shin'ya Fermilab E9061 J-PARC and Dimuon Experiments Shin’ya Sawada KEK (High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Japan)
SuperB. SuperB has been approved as the first in a list of 14 “flagship” projects within the new national research plan. The national research plan has.
Original plan for secondary line installation. Hadron hall beamlines in Phase1 Hadron hall secondary beamlines ① ② ③ ④.
What is the Joint Project ? Sciences with the Joint Project Recent Progress and the Future Project Plan Issues for Nuclear and Particle Physics KEK-JAERI.
Physics at JParc Seonho Choi Seoul National University.
Virtual Accelerator at J-PARC 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron H. Harada*, K. Shigaki (Hiroshima University in Japan), H. Hotchi, F. Noda, H. Sako, H. Suzuki,
050928ICFA seminar Daegu 1 Inter-University Research Institute Corporation High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK Yoji Totsuka.
1 Status and Plans at J-PARC Linac Kazuo Hasegawa J-PARC Center/Japan Atomic Energy Agency Collaboration meeting between CERN and J-PARC December 18, 2013,
CERN Strategy Group WS at Zeuthen Input from Japan Mitsuaki NOZAKI (KEK)
JLab preparations for upgrade, FY05 budget Elton Smith Hall D Collaboration Meeting May 20-22, 2004.
JPARC- Decay Volume M.Sakuda (KEK) 11 November Decay Volume Requirements Design 2. Construction Status 3. Summary and schedule In collaboration.
Q&A on T2K construction of beam line near detectors budget collaboration (contribution from each) T2KK.
January LEReC Review 12 – 13 January 2015 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.
Atsuto Suzuki. 1. Toward ILC Construction : Japanese Activities 1. Toward ILC Construction : Japanese Activities.
Contractor Assurance System Peer Review April Page 1 NSTAR 2011 May 16, 2011 Jefferson Lab Hugh Montgomery.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Recommendations on the scientific programme The PAC endorsed the main lines of the proposed long-term programme. The draft document is expected.
Jefferson Lab Update R. D. McKeown Jefferson Lab HPS Meeting June 16, 2014.
Fermilab Presentation Greg Bock, Pepin Carolan, Mike Lindgren, Elaine McCluskey 2014 SC PM Workshop July 2014.
Asian Test Beam Facilities Satoru Uozumi Kyungpook National University Mar-29 th 2010 Beijing China IHEP Beijing TBF Russia.
Report from ILCSC Shin-ichi Kurokawa KEK ILCSC Chair GDE meeting at Frascati December 7, 2005.
February 21-21, 2008JINR Scientific Council 103-d session IREN project status.
MICE Status & Plans MICE-UK paul drumm 15 th September 2004.
10/25/2007GlueX Collaboration Meeting1 October 25-27, 2007 Jefferson Lab This is approximately our 20’th such meeting.
HWDB: Operations at the Spallation Neutron Source Workshop on Accelerator Operations August 6-10, 2012 Glen D. Johns Accelerator Operations Manager.
Proton Plan PMG 7/7/05 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status June Report Eric Prebys.
Status and plans for role of Japan in HL-LHC Katsuo Tokushuku Institute of Particle Nuclear Studies (IPNS) High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
29 September 2006M.Sakuda NuFact06 Asian Regional Outlook (Japan) -by Y.Kuno (Osaka) (1) SuperBeam (T2K) (2) J-PARC current upgrade plan (3) T2HK or T2KK.
CD FY09 Tactical Plan Status FY09 Tactical Plan Status Report for Neutrino Program (MINOS, MINERvA, General) Margaret Votava April 21, 2009 Tactical plan.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
1 Integration and Milestones Elton Smith Hall D Detector Review October 20-22, 2004.
News Y2K June 25, Summary of June 12 Face-to-Face Meeting.
Plan to go forward Peter Wilson SBN Program Coordinator 27 September 2014.
Status of facility design Activities of the IPNS Nuclear/Particle Physics group Basic information for the working sessions Activities of Nuclear and Particle.
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
Lau Gatignon. The open session of this meeting was fully dedicated to the AD program with 6 presentations by AEGIS, ACE, GBAR, ASACUSA, ATRAP and ALPHA.
Overview on the Proposal for a new Gamma Irradiation Facility at CERN GIF++ Mar CAPEANS April 29 th, 2009 April 29, 091M.C.
High Intensity Neutrino Source Program Overview for CD Controls Management Meeting Bob Webber October 6, 2006.
Proton-Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration CERN Project Structure Edda Gschwendtner, CERN Lisbon Meeting, 22 June 2012Edda Gschwendtner, CERN2.
1 Report of PAC for Particle Physics T. Hallman Presented by P. Spillantini JINR Scientific Council Meeting June 5-6, 2003 Dubna, Russia.
1 Heavy-Ion Physics at J-PARC Shoji Nagamiya RIKEN / KEK / JAEA January 20, 2016 Tokai 1) Motivation 2) J-PARC vs. FAIR.
HISTORY OF SNS DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY CHOICES PROJECT X WORKSHOP NOVEMBER 12-13, 2007 R. KUSTOM.
The machine status and operating mechanism of BEPCII CAO, Jianshe Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS April 16, 2013 The 4th Accelerator.
1 J-PARC Status - Conquering the earthquake disaster and a new step forward to MW J-PARC operation - Yujiro Ikeda J-PARC Center JAEA & KEK
J-PARC Site Visit Summary – 03/09 S. Childress (Accelerator, T2K Primary) J. Hylen (T2K Target Hall, Decay, Absorber & Near Detector)
Fermilab-India Agreements and Collaboration Shekhar Mishra Project-X, International Collaboration Coodinator Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia,
Development Plan for Reliable Card-size IOC N. Kamikubota and S.Yamada, J-PARC/KEK May 2015 in MSU, kami, KEK/J-PARC.
GlueX Collaboration Meeting
Jefferson Lab Overview
Status of SuperKEKB May 11, 2007 SuperB Workshop Masa Yamauchi KEK.
X-Ray Endstations Update
SOLID Collaboration Meeting
SNS-PPU upgrades the existing accelerator structure
Presentation transcript:

1 Progress of the J-PARC Shoji Nagamiya Director, J-PARC Center at KEK/JAEA July 6, GeV PAC

2 3 GeV Linac Materials & Life Experimental Hall Neutrino Target Hadron Experimental Hall

3 Linac Tunnel

4 Klystron Area at the Linac

5 3 GeV Tunnel

6 3 GeV RF Acceleration

7 50 GeV Tunnel

8 Experimental Devices Muon Experimental Area Neutron Scattering Area Materials & Life Experimental Facility Neutron Beam Lines (23 total) Neutron Beam Lines (23 total) Target Station Scattered Neutrons Proton Beam Proton Beam

9 Early Days of Construction for MLF

10 Present View

11 Neutron Source

12 Muon Beam Production Area

13 Neutrino Beamline Decay Volume Area in the Construction Days Neutrino Target Area

14 Superconducting Magnet for Neutrino Line

15 Hadron Experimental Hall

16 Highlights during the Past One Year

17 Recent Highlights Significant Progress in Accelerator Development –Injection and extraction of the first beam at the Linac. –Technical issues like RF cavities have almost been solved. Construction: almost on schedule. Construction budget is reasonable. Two experimental halls (hadron, materials&life) were completed. –Peak in the construction budget in JFY2006. –Creation of the operational budget at KEK by closing the KEK-PS from JFY2006. J-PARC Center started in February It was expanded significantly in April of A big review by the Committee (appointed by the Government) was held from December of 2006 through June of –Review items  Organizational Structure at the Operational Stage (J-PARC Center)  PAC, Beam-Time Fee  Usage of Neutron Beam Lines by Industries  Linac Energy Recovery, Phase 2 projects  Operational Budget  Internationalization of the J-PARC –Nine meetings plus a site tour were held. –The report was published in June.

18 Linac Beam on January 24, 2007

19 Measurement of Beam Energy Design Spec. Immediately after SDTL1 After SDTL15 E (Measured after SDTL15) = 181.3MeV Beam Beam Monitors Time-of-Flight (TOF) was measured. Velocity and, thus, the energy was measured.

20 Recent Highlights Significant Progress in Accelerator Development –Injection and extraction of the first beam at the Linac. –Technical issues like RF cavities have almost been solved. Construction: almost on schedule. Construction budget is reasonable. Two experimental halls (hadron, materials&life) were completed. –Peak in the construction budget in JFY2006. –Creation of the operational budget at KEK by closing the KEK-PS from JFY2006. J-PARC Center started in February It was expanded significantly in April of A big review by the Committee (appointed by the Government) was held from December of 2006 through June of –Review items  Organizational Structure at the Operational Stage (J-PARC Center)  PAC, Beam-Time Fee  Usage of Neutron Beam Lines by Industries  Linac Energy Recovery, Phase 2 projects  Operational Budget  Internationalization of the J-PARC –Nine meetings plus a site tour were held. –The report was published in June.

21 Construction Budget Now Budget Profile

22 Construction Schedule Construction Start Facility Operation

23 Recent Highlights Significant Progress in Accelerator Development –Injection and extraction of the first beam at the Linac. –Technical issues like RF cavities have almost been solved. Construction: almost on schedule. Construction budget is reasonable. Two experimental halls (hadron, materials&life) were completed. –Peak in the construction budget in JFY2006. –Creation of the operational budget at KEK by closing the KEK-PS from JFY2006. J-PARC Center started in February It was expanded significantly in April of A big review by the Committee (appointed by the Government) was held from December of 2006 through June of –Review items  Organizational Structure at the Operational Stage (J-PARC Center)  PAC, Beam-Time Fee  Usage of Neutron Beam Lines by Industries  Linac Energy Recovery, Phase 2 projects  Operational Budget  Internationalization of the J-PARC –Nine meetings plus a site tour were held. –The report was published in June.

24 研究開発部門 量子ビーム応用研究部門 研究開発拠点 ○○ 部門 KEK JAEA 陽子加速器施設開発ユニット 東海研究開発センター 中性子関連ユニット J-PARC Center Division X ・・ ・ Organization under MOU ・・ ・ Section A Section B Division A J-PARC Center is ranked to the same level of other institutions J-PARC Center is one of 11 Major Units (At Tokai, One of Two Units) Member: Representatives from both KEK and JAEA + Director of the J-PARC Center KEK Director General JAEA President Presentation of Important Issues Agree ment J-PARC Steering Committee J-PARC Center & Two Organizations

25 J-PARC Center in February of 2006 J-PARC Center: To operate the entire J-PARC by one responsible organization. [Construction team: Two institutions carry full responsibilities for funded items.] The first Agreement was signed on August 8, A) JAEA Particle Nuclear These groups started in February, 2006 (62 members) S. Nagamiya T. Miura Y. Yamazaki Y. Oyama M. Takasaki M. Murasawa Y. Totsuka Y. Tonozuka

26 J-PARC Center in April of 2007 J-PARC Center: To operate the entire J-PARC by one responsible organization. [Construction team: Two institutions carry full responsibilities for funded items.] The first Agreement was signed on August 8, Organization in JFY2007 S. Nagamiya T. Miura Y. Yamazaki Y. Oyama M. Takasaki M. Murasawa K. Nishikawa Y. Ikeda JAEA : 174 KEK : 170 Total Number : 344 JAEA:76 KEK:33 JAEA:0 KEK:78 JAEA:60 KEK:25 JAEA:11 KEK:19 JAEA:13 KEK:6 A) JAEA Particle Nuclear A. Suzuki T. Okazaki

27 Recent Highlights Significant Progress in Accelerator Development –Injection and extraction of the first beam at the Linac. –Technical issues like RF cavities have almost been solved. Construction: almost on schedule. Construction budget is reasonable. Two experimental halls (hadron, materials&life) were completed. –Peak in the construction budget in JFY2006. –Creation of the operational budget at KEK by closing the KEK-PS from JFY2006. J-PARC Center started in February It was expanded significantly in April of A big review by the Committee (appointed by the Government) was held from December of 2006 through June of –Review items  Organizational Structure at the Operational Stage (J-PARC Center)  PAC, Beam-Time Fee  Usage of Neutron Beam Lines by Industies  Linac Energy Recovery, Phase 2 projects  Operational Budget  Internationalization of the J-PARC –Nine meetings plus a site tour were held. –The report was published in June.

28 J-PARC PAC System and Beamtime Charge PAC for Particle & Nuclear Proposals PAC for Materials & Life Proposals Beamtime Charge

29 Linac Energy Recovery The Committee recommended strongly to start the energy recovery immediately after the completion of Phase 1. JFY2008 JFY2009 JFY2010 JFY2011 JFY2012JFY2013 Phase 1 Completion

30 Phase 2 Project Phase 2 Items –Neutron equipments, Muon equipments, Hadron hall expansion, Energy boost to 50 GeV. –The total cost of about Oku Yen was discussed. –The committee is favorable to proceed into the Phase 2 by assigning an explicit priority among the proposed items. –Priority setting must be done by the discussions among the communities.  The first discussions were held at the Users Consultative Committee on June 18. –The nuclear transmutation: The review must be done at the Atomic Energy Commission in Japan.  A positive discussion was done at the Atomic Energy Commission meeting on July 3. 2 km Detector for T2K –The 2 km detector for T2K was not included in Phase 2 items in the present review. –I recommend this detector be proposed (if the PAC supports it) to the Government after the first data are taken by the present configuration of T2K.

31 Operational Cost of J-PARC Total: 187 Oku Yen ( Other personnel's: About 30 Oku Yen ) Outsourcing manpower 19 Oku Electric Power & Water 70 Oku Maintenance 53 Oku Improvement 13 Oku Building Maintenance 8 Oku Safety, Computer 12 Oku Experiments 11 Oku The Committee understood the reason why this budget is needed. However, an effort to reduce the cost was also recommended. 200 day data taking

32 Budget Request for JFY2008 JFY2007 JFY2008 JFY2007 JFY2007 Team→ MEXT→ Final MEXTFinancial Dept. Answer (now)(August) (Dec) Oku Yen [JAEA] Phase 1 Construction Linac Energy Recovery Neutron Equipment Research Bldg., etc Operational [KEK] Construction (Equipment) Construction (Civil Eng.) Lodging, etc Operational (Expts Preparation) Operational Metal Price Compensation KEK Operational : Over 35 Oku Yen increased budget request as compared to JFY Metal Price compensation !

33 Hadron Experimental Hall K0 and K1.1 –Scientific evaluation is needed. –Desired scenario is shown on the next page. –Would like to encourage to have both of K0 an K1.1 beamlines, but we have to wait for the budget status. –Close to 3 Oku Yen was requested next year. Obtaining an enough budget for JFY2008 is particularly very difficult. Phase 2 Project (expansion of the Hadron Hall as Phase 2) –60m to 100 m. One production target to two production target, etc. –The cost would be about 59 Oku Yen. –Need input from PAC. –Would like to send a proposal for JFY2009, if this proposal is endorsed by the communities and, at the same time, approved by many committees at the J-PARC, such as the J-PARC Council. –Competition exists within Phase 2: Neutron, Muon. Other competition within the J-PARC: Neutrino 2 km. Competition outside J-PARC: Many new projects are lined up.

34 Desired Scenario

35 Office Space, Lodging, New Gate, etc. Office Space –NTT: Ibaraki Prefecture will purchase it. KEK (plus JAEA) will rent and/or purchase a part of the space. A few 100 can be accommodated. –This area will be used for the Users Office. New Lodging –30 rooms with kitchens plus 16 rooms exist. We are negotiating with JAEA to be available to J-PARC. –Hotel plan near the Tokai Station. Gate –New Gate will be planned for the J- PARC.

36 Summary News during the Past One Year –Construction for both equipments and facilities: A slight delay, but almost on schedule.  Peak in the construction budget in JFY2006 。 –J-PARC Center started and expanded. –Shutdown of KEK-PS from JFY2006. Review by the Governmental Committee on J-PARC –How to grow the organizational structure at the operational stage (J- PARC Center)? –Realistic operational budget. –Installation of PAC within J-PARC, Free beamtime charge, etc. –Linac energy recovery has to be done. Phase 2 is encouraged. –Mechanisms for an easier industrial usage have to be introduced. –Internationalization of the J-PARC Project. Hadron Hall –Timing of K0 and K1.1: Depends of the budget. –Phase 2 expansion: Evaluation will be needed at the next PAC.