1 Beam Dumping System MPP review 12/06/2015 Jan Uythoven for the ABT team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jan Uythoven, AB/BTLHCCWG, 3 May 2006 Page GeV Commissioning Machine Protection Needs to be commissioned to: Prevent damage with the used, higher.
Advertisements

1 Commissioning ABT Equipment in the LHC Jan Uythoven ABT TCM 13/01/2015.
DS Quench TEST 2  MOTIVATION and METHOD: 1. Achieve 500kW on beam 1 – TCP7 collimators.(so far 500kW with beam 2 and 235kW over 1s with beam 1 were reached.
8:16 SB 25ns dumped by RF; integrated lumi 0.6 nb-1. 9:14 BIC problem in TI8 and CMS recovering their tracker 10:09 Abort gap cleaning commissioning. 16:29.
Etienne CARLIER AB/BT/EC
12/03/2013MPP Workshop Annecy Update on Beam Failure Scenarios Jan Uythoven Thanks to: T.Baer, R.Schmidt, J.Wenninger, D.Wollmann, M.Zerlauth, other MPP.
Beam commissioning strategy Global machine checkout Essential 450 GeV commissioning System/beam commissioning Machine protection commissioning.
LHC progress Thursday 30 th April 2015 Coordination: Mike Lamont, Wolfgang Hofle.
LHC 18 & 19 April 2015 At 450 GeV with bumps, no increased MUFO activity. Beam screen 15R8 warming up to 80 K, ongoing for the day 09:00: Orbit studies.
Friday, h10: Stable beams at 1.38 TeV. 09h03: Beam dump.  One bunch dropped too much in intensity and gave BPMS interlock (dump protection). 10h36:
1 MKBH Erratic Jan Uythoven On behalf of the ABT team (Viliam, Nicolas M., Etienne, Laurent, Francesco etc…..) MPP meeting 8/5/2015.
Failure mode impact studies and LV system commissioning tests
Beam Dumping System – Failure Scenarios Brennan Goddard, CERN AB/BT How the dump system can fail Catalogue of primary failures Failure classes and protection.
21/05/2012LHC 8:30 meeting Overview Week 20 Injectors, LHCb polarity, Beam-Beam Coordinators: Bernhard Holzer, Jan Uythoven.
LHC 30 th and 31 st July :10 Finish scrubbing fill 25 ns trains by operator dump. –No XPOC data … 08:40 Inject for another scrubbing fill 09:09.
LHC progress with beam & plans. Of note since last time Transverse damper Beta beating in the ramp Collimation set-up at 450 GeV & validation LBDS – systematic.
LHC Beam Dumping System Status and Readiness for LHC Run II Evian Workshop 2-4 June 2014 Nicolas Magnin – TE/ABT/EC On behalf of TE/ABT team. Thanks to.
1 LBDS Testing Before Operation Jan Uythoven (AB/BT) Based on the work of many people in the KSL, EC and TL sections.
● 08:30 Loaded by mistake squeeze function to 2 m  Dumped beams ● 10:30-13:00 Test of new algorithm for long. Emittance blow-up to minimize oscillations.
LHC 23 June :07: Started injection cleaning with B1. 08:13: Fault on MKI B2. –MKI Beam 2 in P8 had a breakdown at 07:49 during the SoftStart process.
1 Beam Plans for Accelerator Systems: The Machine Protection System Jan Uythoven On behalf of the MPWG and the MPS Commissioning WG Special thanks to R.Schmidt,
LBDS KICKERS MPP workshop - Annecy Nicolas Magnin TE-ABT-EC.
What will we do for Beam Preparation: Injection and Beam Dump Jan Uythoven Thanks to M.Barnes, E.Carlier, L.Ducimetière, B.Goddard, R.Jones, Y.Kadi, V.Kain,
Status of ABT beam tests preparation 9-Oct-14. Preparation of sector test without beam I MKI: – Open valves, conditioning to 55 kV, softstart – Check.
Simulations of TCT beam impacts for different scenarios R. Bruce, E. Quaranta, S. RedaelliAcknowledgement: L. Lari, C. Bracco, B. Goddard.
LMC 27 November 2013 Status of LBDS LS1 activities and plans for 2014 reliability run Jan Uythoven for the many, many people working on the mentioned equipment.
LHC Beam Dumping System Experience from reliability run and Re-commissioning procedures MPP Nicolas Magnin – TE/ABT/EC.
18 July Reminder Dilution kicker system MKB is staged (2H, 2V) –Limits extracted intensity at 7 TeV to 50% of nominal –For 25ns spacing, this is.
1 Commissioning and Early Operation – View from Machine Protection Jan Uythoven (AB/BT) Thanks to the members of the MPWG.
Overview Extraction tests: TT40 and TT60, week 21 –controls and data, interlocking, extraction, MKE6 transfer function and energy tracking, high intensity,
Last night Lhc closed 15:00 Beam on Ti 8 /Ti2 Prepulse check synchronisation ok with LHCb /RF 17:00 Open Point 4 PC’s and RF 19:00 LBDS energy tracking.
LHC progress Tuesday 28 th April 2015 Coordination: Mike Lamont, Wolfgang Hofle.
LHC machine status ~ Daily Summary ~ Daily beam commissioning meeting Week 42 - October 13 th, 2015 CERN, Geneva, CH M. Lamont and S. Redaelli for the.
Conclusions on UPS powering test and procedure I. Romera Acknowledgements: V. Chareyre, M. Zerlauth 86 th MPP meeting –
1 Commissioning and Operation of the machine protection system L. Ponce Acknowledgements: M. Zerlauth, J. Wenninger, D. Wollmann, V. Chetvertkova, G. Valentino,
Injection and protection W.Bartmann, C.Bracco, B.Goddard, V.Kain, M.Meddahi, V.Mertens, A.Nord, J.Uythoven, J.Wenninger, OP, BI, CO, ABP, collimation,
Outline of 2014/2015 plans V. Kain, M. Lamont, J. Wenninger 6/18/2013Optics Measurement and Correction Review
Commissioning / Reliability Runs / Dry runs 1 Jan Uythoven, LIBD meeting on LBDS Reliability Run 04/02/2014 Nov – Dec 2013 Commissioning individual MKDs.
Saturday 11.9 ● From Friday – Minimum required crossing angle is 100  rad in 2010 – Plenty of aperture at triplets: > 13  (n1 > 10) – Can stay with 170.
MPP Workshop Status of Powering Interlocks I. Romera on behalf of MPE-MS MPP Workshop, 12 June 2015, I. Romera (TE-MPE)1.
LBOCM. ZerlauthMarch 06 th 2012 Acknowledgements : B.Todd, C.Martin, I.Romera, E.Carlier, J.Wenninger, C.Zamantzas, S.Redaelli et al. 1v0 MPS Commissioning.
LHC 8 & 9 May :10: Injection kicker B1 faulty on oil level –Check in UA and RA. Leaks fixed, to be further checked in TS1 10:30: Pre-cycle started.
HL-LHC WP14 2 nd meeting: Intercepting devices and failure cases to be studied Anton Lechner, Jan Uythoven.
Emergency dump update 2. M. Solfaroli – 23/10/2015 Goal 2 GENERAL STRATEGY Force open the BIS loop Generate an internal fault in the LBDS Scrape the beam.
LHC Status Sat Morning 30-June Bernhard Holzer, Jan Uythoven Status Friday Late: preparing restart some issues... LHCb dipole tripped / router problem.
MPP Workshop: Injection System C. Bracco on behalf of ABT Acknowledgments: STI, ABP, BI,LHC and SPS OP.
Session 8: What we will do for beam preparation in 2009 G. Arduini, R. Giachino 1Session 8 – Summary - GA24/02/2009.
Dependability Requirements of the LBDS and their Design Implications
Saturday Coordinators weekend: Mike Lamont, Eva Barbara Holzer
Surviving an Asynchronous Beam Dump?
LHC Beam Dumping System Reliability Run Summary
MKD/MKB Review Meeting Scope and Definition
Jan Uythoven For discussion
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
LHC Risk Review: Kicker Magnet Reliability
Monday 14th March Second fill with pilot + 3 nominal bunches
Monday 11/07: Recovery Plenty of accesses.
Saturday 09:40 Stable beams #1369 (56 bunch scheme)
Initial Experience with the Machine Protection System for LHC
LHC Injection and Dump Protection
Beam Dumping System and Abort Gap
Saturday 2/4/ :00-09:00 Problems with SPS:
Week 35 – Technical Stop and Restart
04-05/08/2010 End of physics at ~11:00 after 18.5 hours ~120 nb-1.
Yesterday morning Held 1647 for a while – SPS kicker problem
Wednesday 09 March …:09:00: beta* measurement (1.5 m) by K-modulation and with AC-dipole excitation. 1/17/2019 LHC 8:30 meeting.
Wednesday 10:00 test of the un-squeeze to 90 m at 4 TeV.
Jan Uythoven For the LBDS Team
Thursday 22nd March 00:20 – 02:40 on longer squeeze function, orbit and chroma correction at 4 TeV 2:40 – 5:30 second cycle with long squeeze 5:46 – 7:00.
Daniel, Gianluca and Belen (for the Collimator team)
Presentation transcript:

1 Beam Dumping System MPP review 12/06/2015 Jan Uythoven for the ABT team

Overview Erratics and other worries  MKD erratic  MKB erratics New after LS1 Outstanding tests  What is left  When should they be done Are we ready? 2 Beam Dumping System, JU MPP Workshop 12/06/2015

MKD Erratic One so far on 4/6/2015  The first asynchronous beam dump of the 3/year/beam announced  All detection and redundancy worked correctly  400 ns needed to re-trigger the adjacent generators Replaced switch and tests following procedures  If tests would not have been successful  replacement of MKD generator No beam in the abort gap  no beam losses 3 Beam Dumping System, JU MPP Workshop 12/06/2015 Erratic type I, slow rise No beam in the gap

MKD erratic: the Sequence 4 Beam Dumping System, JU MPP Workshop 12/06/ :43 Erratic MKD Switch Exchange Energy Scan  new XPOC limits TeV 14:15 Back in remote 19:03 Test dump with 1 bunch at 6.5 TeV Energy

MKD Erratic: Remaining Issues MKD switch dismounted in the lab. Found space between insulators not completely filled with silicon grease – non conformity during mounting This time lucky as no beam in the abort gap (and little beam in the machine) Reference losses on the TCDS and TCDQ have been measured and to be repeated in case of serious losses during an asynchronous beam dump  Check on integrity of absorber blocks etc.  Results of reference measurements to be written down and made easily accessible so checks can also be made in case of absence of experts Simulations with FLUKA / ANSYS of absorbers for “new” Type 2 erratic, also for BCMS beams (collaboration collimation team) 5 Beam Dumping System, JU MPP Workshop 12/06/2015

MKB Erratics: 3x, 1 exchange Lead to a synchronous beam dump  No risk of quenching magnets etc… 26/04/15 08:23:  LBDS dilution kicker MKBH erratic trigger at 6.5 TeV  Caused synchronous beam dump, as it should 27/04/15 09:00:  Second erratic on the same MKBH kicker magnet at 6.5 TeV  Also synchronous dump 27/04/15 11:39  LHC stopped for MKBH switch replacement  18:10 access finished 28/04/15 01:41  System operational again 31/05/15 00:56:36  Erratic on replaced MKB switch, inspection shows piece of glove from previous switch replacement 6 Beam Dumping System, JU MPP Workshop 12/06/2015

MKB in XPOC 7 Beam Dumping System, JU MPP Workshop 12/06/2015 Nominal trigger time The amplitudes of all other MKB magnets are within XPOC limits: dilution close to nominal

Small amplitude Dump actually triggered by BETS surveillance of MKB. Slow reaction time of order of 1 ms, resulting in small amplitude of MKB where erratic took place  So limited impact when in anti-phase with another MKB 8 Beam Dumping System, JU MPP Workshop 12/06/2015

Procedure switch replacement 9 Beam Dumping System, JU MPP Workshop 12/06/2015 Procedure  If two MKB erratics < 4 weeks: exchange the switch For extraction kicker MKD this is after one single erratic, as for the MKD this is an asynchronous dump  Controls tests  HV tests  Energy scan (check XPOC, IPOC limits, energy tracking etc.)  Run at 7.1 TeV for 4 hours in local If this would not have been successful, then complete generator would have been changed. Diagnostics of the switch  Noticed in the tunnel that switch was rather dirty: dust etc. Like noticed for the MKD switches  will be cleaned during TS1  Back in the laboratory switch HV tested, initially very high spark rate, conditioned away to normal rate  Dismounted in the lab, nothing abnormal found

Conclusions on MKD & MKB switch erratics All protection / re-triggering worked as expected The number is still acceptable In 2 out of 3 cases the erratic was related to non conformities of the installed switches  Working on detailed procedures for installation but not completely finished  Should include checklist to be ticked off and signed  Upgrade of MKD switches foreseen for LS2 to make the installation less critical (reduce max electrical fields), to be presented in TE-TM in the coming weeks. Possibly tests of few of them in the machine before LS2. The procedures for switch replacement seems to be effective and was followed twice  Now this procedure to be put in edms, to make it official Reference losses TCDS and TCDQ also to be officially written down so can be done by non-specialists This TS1:  Clean the MKB switches (without demounting)  Endoscope inspection of the most critical MKD switches which had marks on the insulators. Third inspection of same switches to check on any changes 10 Beam Dumping System, JU MPP Workshop 12/06/2015

New Run 2 (BETS) TCDQ  New and longer TCDQ well aligned and set-up  BETS on TCDQ new for Run 2 Problems with arming / interlocking during commissioning when TCDQ functions were not used / available Arming sequence modified Given reset rights to OP Justified as the interlocking is on an actual position (compared to XPOC where the system has to work on command) CIBDS – see later MKD waveform measured for the first time, looks good ! 11 Beam Dumping System, JU MPP Workshop 12/06/2015

MKD waveform 450 GeV 12 Beam Dumping System, JU MPP Workshop 12/06/2015 Matthew Fraser

13 Beam Dumping System, JU MPP Workshop 12/06/2015 MKD waveform measurement Abort gap is 3.0  s, MKD waveform should be 2.8  s rise time (definition ……) and 200 ns margin for timing and synchronisation. Seems rather good.

Outstanding Machine Protection Items UPS / powering failures checks B1 not done  Foreseen to be done in TS1 (modified test as cannot arm) Redundant PSU surveillance by SIS to be checked Direct BLM into LBDS to be tested with beam  Should be done soon after TS1  Check with BI group for step-by-step procedures Procedures in case of non-working beam dump (edms # )  To be checked if they are still valid on paper  To be tried out with pilot beam Interlock on integrated corrector settings (energy) and  f rf Filling pattern still manually edited  problem XPOC Some XPOC modules can be reset by OP and shouldn’t Abort gap cleaning at 6.5 TeV remains to be commissioned BSRA about working but not always …  Automatic abort gap cleaning via SIS to be commissioned Interlocked BPMS non-conformities (see presentation Thibaut) 14 Beam Dumping System, JU MPP Workshop 12/06/2015

CIBDS New link between BIS and LBDS not using the TSU Seems to be working correctly However, automatic check at every XPOC remains to be deployed 15 Beam Dumping System, JU MPP Workshop 12/06/2015 MPS check filled in, basically OK. Should adapt some of the tests to actual situation

Conclusions – Are we Ready ? I think YES No system faults or unexpected malfunction detected Erratics are the main worry, but still within expectation and are not dangerous for the machine as such  High rate was expected from reliability run with new top energy: reliability run was EXTREMELY useful  Some checks on MKB and MKD generators foreseen in TS1  LS2 upgrade of MKD generators being worked on Some tests and developments are outstanding, minor none conformities to be fixed  Should have priority during the intensity ramp up in the coming weeks, so they can be closed before the summer holidays 16 Beam Dumping System, JU MPP Workshop 12/06/2015