Sizing Stormwater Control Facilities to Address Stream-Bank Erosion Control Anthony M. Dubin, PE Brown and Caldwell Anthony M. Dubin,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trends in Suspended Sediment Input to the San Francisco Bay from Local Tributaries Presented by Setenay Bozkurt Philip Williams &
Advertisements

Discussion Topics Brief history of structural stormwater management The Low Impact Development (LID) alternative to ponds, ponds, ponds… LID for Hydromodification.
Infiltration Trenches Dave Briglio, P.E. MACTEC Mike Novotney Center for Watershed Protection.
Preparing a Stormwater Control Plan Stormwater C.3 Guidebook 6 th Edition.
UW LID Workshop Permeable Pavement Modeling June 2008 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Simplified Sizing Tool for LID Practices in western Washington Alice Lancaster, PE Herrera Environmental Consultants.
UW LID Workshop Bioretention Flow Control Modeling May 2008
Leah Johanson, Water Environment Services
INLAND EMPIRE ASCE & APWA LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) SEMINAR INLAND EMPIRE ASCE & APWA LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) SEMINAR LID FACILITY DESIGN Prepared.
CHARACTERISTICS OF RUNOFF
Runoff Estimation, and Surface Erosion and Control Ali Fares, PhD NREM 600, Evaluation of Natural Resources Management.
Low Impact Development Overview  Alternative to end of pipe approach to SWM  Maintain hydrologic function of local ecosystem  Treat stormwater close.
Low Impact Development for Stormwater Treatment and Hydrograph Modification Management in California Dan Cloak, Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
Stormwater Management
Why and How; What’s Working and What Isn’t.  How Low Impact Development can mitigate effects of urban drainage  Applying design criteria for bioretention.
1 Quantifying Hydromodification Impacts and Developing Mitigation Using a Four Factor Approach Judd Goodman CASQA Conference November.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Urbanization ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
SDHM Hydromodification Overview
For Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting December 14, 2010 Contra Costa Clean Water Program.
6 th Edition CCCWP Management Committee February 15, 2012.
SUSTAIN Pilot Study April 25, 2012 Curtis DeGasperi King County
FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management
HYDROMODIFICATION: AN INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW Presented by Jeffrey Haltiner, Ph.D., P.E. Philip Williams & Associates, Ltd. San Francisco, CA May2006.
Bioretention Dave Briglio, P.E. MACTEC Mike Novotney Center for Watershed Protection.
WinTR-20 SensitivityMarch WinTR-20 Sensitivity to Input Parameters.
STEP 3: SITING AND SIZING STORM WATER CONTROLS Section 6.
VOLUME CONTROL using Inter-Event Dry Periods by Marty Wanielista, Josh Spence, and Ewoud Hulstein Stormwater Management Academy UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA.
New Stormwater Regulations “C.3” Provisions in effect Feb. 15, 2005.
Stormwater 101 Ohio Lake Erie Commission Best Local Land Use Practices Kirby Date, AICP.
ODOT 2015 Geo-Environmental Conference
Discussion of Proposed MS4 Permit Design Standards Language.
Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Dan Cloak, P.E. Presentation to the San Diego Region Co-permittees Hydromodification Workgroup December 6, 2006 Contra.
Why are we here today? To discuss the challenges we face in meeting NPDES Phase II minimum requirements for stormwater control. The NPDES program requires.
VOLUME CONTROL using Inter-Event Dry Periods Stormwater Management Academy UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA.
Stormwater Water Quality Treatment Options Alvin Shoblom, P.E. Hydraulics Engineer.
Hydrograph Modification Management in Contra Costa County Dan Cloak, P.E. Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
Low impact development strategies and techniques jennifer j. bitting, pe the low impact development center, inc. june 2008.
Stormwater and C.3 Overview Tom Dalziel, Assistant Manager Contra Costa Clean Water Program.
Low Impact Development for Compliance with NPDES Treatment and Hydrograph Modification Management Requirements in Contra Costa County Tom Dalziel, Assistant.
Countywide Model SUSMP July 17, Topics SUSMP Timeline Goals Approach to Compliance NPDES Permit Requirements NPDES Permit Requirements Model SUSMP.
Why Single-Event Modeling Doesn’t Work for LIDs presented at Stormcon 2009 Anaheim, CA August 2009 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
PSGB Ecosystem Conference The Effectiveness of LIDs in Reducing Stormwater Runoff February 9, 2009 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Low Impact Development [presenters name] [presentation date] Integrated Management Practices Controlling Stormwater Quality and Quantity using.
WinTR-20 SensitivityFebruary WinTR-20 Sensitivity to Input Parameters.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
State Board Modeling Needs and Interests Eric Berntsen, PH, CPESC, CPSWQ State Water Resources Control Board CWEMF Hydrology and Watershed Modeling Workshop.
Christie Beeman and Jeff Haltiner Philip Williams & Associates Hydrograph Modification: An Introduction and.
Kitsap County Department of Public Works CRAB – November 04, 2015 Bioretention Stormwater BMP Benson Burleson Design Engineer
Hydromodification Compliance in the Bay Area
Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. LID Hydrology and Hydraulics Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Christie Beeman, Andrew Collison, and Mike Liquori Philip Williams & Associates Options for Flow-Control Compliance.
ASCE LID Conference LID Analysis Considerations in Western Washington November 17, 2008 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Gar Creek in Huntersville LID Requirements in Mecklenburg County What Is The Goal? Why Is It Necessary? Where Is It Required? How Does It Work?
Low Impact Development Practices. What is Low Impact Development (LID)? LID is an approach to land development (or re- development) that works with nature.
Dubin Environmental Consulting Santa Barbara County Stormwater Control Measure Sizing Calculator Introduction and Instructions (Beta Test Version) 12/13/2013.
Construction of On-Site Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Facilities Dan Cloak, P.E. Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
Basic Hydrology & Hydraulics: DES 601
Central Coast Region Stormwater Control Measure Sizing Calculator
L-THIA Online and LID Larry Theller
Hydrology.
SCS Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph
Storm Water Runoff Storm Water Runoff
Central Coast Region Stormwater Control Measure Sizing Calculator
Northern California LID Hydrology and Hydraulics
SCS Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph
Kickoff example Create a new file
Intro MIDS Calculator Use
Doug Beyerlein, P.E., Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
What we have developed is…
Urban Hydrology & Stormwater management
Presentation transcript:

Sizing Stormwater Control Facilities to Address Stream-Bank Erosion Control Anthony M. Dubin, PE Brown and Caldwell Anthony M. Dubin, PE Brown and Caldwell

Major Topics to Address 1.Why Hydrograph Modification Management is important 2.How Low Impact Development controls work 3.Describing the technical analysis that generated the set of pre-sized IMPs

Effects of Urbanization Impervious surfaces produce higher runoff rates, volume and duration of large flows

Effects within the Watershed Urbanization alters the watershed Channels respond with incision and/or armoring

Continuous Hydrologic Modeling Examines Full Range of Local Conditions  Sizing to one ‘design storm’ is not enough

Peak Flow Frequency (Partial Duration Statistics)  Identify all HSPF storms in record and rank

Flow Durations  Rank hourly outputs from HSPF model

Example IMP: In-Ground Planter 18-in sandy loam

Peak Flow Matching Example

Duration Matching Example

BMP Sizing Factor Summary IMPSizing Factors In-Ground PlanterGroup A: 0.08 Group B: 0.11 Group C: 0.06 Group D: 0.05 Flow-Through Planter Group C: 0.06 Group D: 0.05 Vegetated/ Grassy Swale Group A: 0.10 to 0.14 Group B: 0.14 to 0.21 Group C: 0.10 to 0.15 Group D: 0.07 to 0.12 Bioretention BasinGroup A: 0.13 Group B: 0.15 Group C: 0.08 Group D: 0.06 IMPSizing Factors Dry WellGroup A: 0.05 to 0.06 Group B: 0.06 to 0.09 Infiltration Trench Group A: 0.05 to 0.06 Group B: 0.07 to 0.10 Infiltration BasinGroup A: 0.05 to 0.10 Group B: 0.06 to 0.16 Infiltration Only:Under-Drain or Infiltration:

Adjusting IMP Sizing to Account for Rainfall Variability

Sizing Conclusions for Implementation IMPs in Group D soil sites are generally smaller than Group A soil BMPs Steep side walls produce smaller sizing factors Sizing factor may be particularly important for on-site BMPs Swales and Bioretention basin footprint may be less important if BMPs fit into otherwise undeveloped space

Questions?Questions?

Contra Costa Approach to Hydrograph Modification Encourage LID to control stormwater flows HMP is technically rigorous and easy to apply Assumes need to match pre-project condition

BMP Gallery

Instructions for Computing Local Sizing Factors 1.Describe each DMA on the project site, including area, soil type, post-project surface type 2.For DMA's draining to IMPs, select an IMP and configuration (e.g. swale width, dry well depth) 3.Pick the appropriate sizing factor from the summary sizing factor table (see handout) 4.Compute the rainfall adjustment using the regression equations (see handout) 5.Local sizing factor = Sizing Factor x RainAdj