Location Tranformation Document Authors: Roger Marshall, Robins George, James Polk.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2006 NEC Corporation - Confidential age 1 November SPEERMINT Security Threats and Suggested Countermeasures draft-ietf-speermint-voipthreats-01.
Advertisements

ICN RG Proposed Charter IETF–81 July 2011 Börje Ohlman & Dirk Kutscher.
Service Bus Service Bus Access Control.
Applicability of Instant Messaging in the Military Command and Control Systems Author: Juha Vermaja Superviser: Jorma Jormakka Instructor: Marko Luoma,
RFC 3489bis Jonathan Rosenberg Cisco Systems. Technical Changes Needed Allow STUN over TCP –Driver: draft-ietf-sip-outbound Allow response to omit CHANGED-
TTCN-3 Test Case Generation from arbitrary traces Capture & Replay Bogdan Stanca-Kaposta & Theofanis Vassiliou-Gioles (Testing Technologies)
Extended REFER draft-olson-sipping-refer-extensions-01 draft-mahy-sip-remote-cc-01 François Audet
IETF ECRIT update Marc Linsner 5/11/10. ECRIT Charter (or a piece of it) ………The group will show how the availability of location data and call routing.
CDNi Control - Initialization and Bootstrapping draft-choi-cdni-control-init-bootrapping-01.txt Taesang Choi Young-IL Seo
Understand Web Services
XML Technologies and Applications Rajshekhar Sunderraman Department of Computer Science Georgia State University Atlanta, GA 30302
Internet Real-Time Lab, Columbia University Emergency Calling for VoIP Wonsang Song, Jong Yul Kim, and Henning Schulzrinne.
SIP, Session Initiation Protocol Internet Draft, IETF, RFC 2543.
SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions (SIMPLE) Reporter : Allen.
Lecture 5 Geocoding. What is geocoding? the process of transforming a description of a location—such as a pair of coordinates, an address, or a name of.
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (ECRIT) Marc Linsner Roger Marshall IETF 92 - Dallas March 24, 2015.
Developing A Sip User Agent Using The Jain Sip Stack. Robert.V Masango Supervisors: Alfredo Terzoli, Ming Hsieh.
1 © 2004, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. VVT-A01 © 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Public SIP Location Conveyance draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance-04.txt.
Direction of PIDF-LO Profile James Winterbottom. Problems PIDF-LO profile has suffered from feature creep Base level GML is designed to define complex.
James Holladay, Mario Sweeney, Vu Tran. Web Services Presentation Web Services Theory James Holladay Tools – Visual Studio Vu Tran Tools – Net Beans Mario.
Status and Development of VoIP based emergency calls Alexander Mayrhofer, nic.at GmbH The 1st European Security and Safety Summit Brussels, June 2007.
Internet Protocol-based In- Vehicle Emergency Call draft-rosen-ecrit-ecall-06.txt.
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP). What is SIP? An application-layer protocol A control (signaling) protocol.
HELD-02 James Winterbottom. What is HELD? HELD is an application layer location acquisition protocol Designed to provide location in the form of a PIDF-LO.
FGDC Address Standard Update: What's Next? Address Standard Working Group Martha Wells, GISP Carl Anderson, GISP Sara Yurman, GISP Ed Wells, GISP Hilary.
Similar Location Extension to LoST Document Authors: Roger Marshall, Jeff Martin IETF80.
United Nations Statistics Division Registry of national Classifications.
The NMWG Framework A (very) brief introduction Raphael Dourado 13/04/20121.
IETF #82 DRINKS WG Meeting Taipei, Taiwan Fri, Nov 18 th
The State of SIP Application Development Brian Schwarz VP – Engineering RedSky Technologies, Inc.
EAP Extensions for EAP Re- authentication Protocol (ERP) draft-wu-hokey-rfc5296bis-01 Yang Shi Qin Wu Zhen Cao
Quiz Problem – Draw Ladder Diag. INVITE SIP/ :19: INFO SIP ::send_sip_udp Send to: udp: :5060.
IETF #81 DRINKS WG Meeting Québec City, QC, Canada Tue, July 26 th, 2011.
IETF GEOPRIV Status Richard L. Barnes BBN Technologies GEOPRIV Secretary Emergency Services Workshop October 2008.
July 2006IETF66 - ECRIT1 LoST: A Location-to-Service Translation Protocol draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-00 Ted Hardie Andrew Newton Henning Schulzrinne Hannes.
Similar Location Extension to LoST Document Authors: Roger Marshall, Jeff Martin, Brian.
HTTP Geolocation Header draft-thomson-geopriv-http-geolocation-00 IETF 80, Prague.
WG Document Status 192nd IETF TEAS Working Group.
Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) v. 1.0 Emergency Management Technical Committee.
NG9-1-1 Core Architecture: i3 v3 TERRY REESE BRIAN ROSEN.
XML Presented by Kushan Athukorala. 2 Agenda XML Overview Entity References Elements vs. Atributes XML Validation DTD XML Schema Linking XML and CSS XSLT.
BRIAN ROSEN NEUSTAR draft-rosen-ecrit-completed-data.
IEEE Emergency Services DCN: Title: 802 Location Report Date Submitted: May 06, 2011 Presented at IEEE
SAML for SIP Hannes Tschofenig, Jon Peterson, James Polk, Douglas Sicker, Marcus Tegnander.
March 2004GEOPRIV - IETF 59 (Seoul)1 GEOPRIV Policy draft-ietf-geopriv-policy draft-ietf-geopriv-common-policy Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University.
Web Services An Introduction Copyright © Curt Hill.
LoST A Location-to-Service Translation Protocol draft-hardie-ecrit-lost-00.txt.
End-to-middle Security in SIP draft-ono-sipping-end2middle-security-04 Kumiko Ono IETF62.
1 We apologize for not using open source software 1 IP-based Tool Requirements for MPLS Networks Tom Nadeau George Swallow
ECRIT IETF 70 December 2007 Vancouver Hannes Tschofenig Marc Linsner Roger Marshall.
Introduction to Web Services Presented by Sarath Chandra Dorbala.
SIP file directory draft-garcia-sipping-file-sharing-framework-00.txt draft-garcia-sipping-file-event-package-00.txt draft-garcia-sipping-file-desc-pidf-00.txt.
7 March 2005IETF-62 Applications Area Open Meeting Jabber Room: Ted Hardie Scott Hollenbeck.
SIP Event Lists Adam Roach 3/17/2003. Major Changes No longer a template; now simply an extension (using Supported/Require). Arbitrary nesting of lists.
Slide #1 Nov 6 -11, 2005SIP WG IETF64 Feature Tags with SIP REFER draft-ietf-sip-refer-feature-param-00 Orit
Emergency Text Messaging using SIP MESSAGE draft-kim-ecrit-text-00
1 SIPREC Protocol draft-portman-siprec-protocol Virtual interim meeting Dec 16, 2010 Authors: L. Portman, H. Lum.
ATOCA & Security Hannes Tschofenig. Two Phases 2 Subscription Alert Delivery Re-use of Common Mechanism.
© 2015 Airbus DS Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. Lights, Camera, NG9-1-1 Diana Gijselaers/ Solutions Engineer – NG9-1-1 GIS and Core Services.
1 Personal Mobility Management for SIP-based VoIP Services 王讚彬 國立台中教育大學資訊工程學系
SIPREC Requirements for Media Recording using SIP IETF 77, Anaheim Ken Rehor on behalf of the team Draft authors: K. Rehor, A. Hutton, L. Portman, R. Jain,
WREC Working Group IETF 49, San Diego Co-Chairs: Mark Nottingham Ian Cooper WREC Working Group.
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (ecrit) Hannes Tschofenig, Marc Linsner IETF 66, Montreal, June 2006.
Nokia Internal Use Only Outline Status of the PAWS protocol document Open Issues – Review extensibility and IANA registries.
FGDC Address Data Standard Scope, Status, and Structure  United States Street, Landmark, and Postal Address Data Standard"  Scope: Street, landmark,
ECRIT Architectural Considerations
Web Ontology Language for Service (OWL-S)
draft-ietf-ecrit-rough-loc
Dept. of Computer Science
Presentation transcript:

Location Tranformation Document Authors: Roger Marshall, Robins George, James Polk IETF80 – Prague 3/28/2011

Status Goal, to describe a standard (protocol) mechanism useful in exchanging one form of location for another Combines parts of earlier drafts and garnered support in previous IETF face-to-face mtgs. – draft-george-geopriv-address-translation – draft-polk-ecrit-losts-transformations-urn

History Promotes use of LoST for a discovery process – Location & Service URN as inputs – e.g., Anytown, Country + urn:service:transform.location (tbd) One issue is that this makes discovery have to be location based – Are there other ideas?

A Few Examples Consider a protocol that could: – Take Civic Location as input, and returns a geodetic transformation (lat/lon) (yes, this is simple geocoding – but in a standard way, over the Internet) – Given a lat/lon based on NAD83, this mechanism could be used to return a “transformed” WGS84 lat/lon (handy, since hundreds of datums exist worldwide)

A Few More… Examples, continued: – Input: Geo Position AND base layer constraint (e.g., parcel polygon layer), returns the “associated” civic location (reverse geocoding with specific layer flexibility) – Given a municipal survey (real estate) description as input, it returns a complete WGS84 Geo Polygon – Input: Postal Civic form of address, Output: Dispatch ready address format

Many Transformations of Location b) Converting between (Geo) Datums Location Transformation Response Service a) Converting between (Civic) Location types Dispatch Address Location Transformation Request Postal Address WGS84 (x,y)’ NAD83 (x,y) 123 Main Street Seattle, WA … 123 Main St. Ballard, WA

Civic, Geo and Geo data layer in PIDF-LO MESSAGE SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP transform1.domain.com;branch=z1pG2bK996sdkfse Max-Forwards: 70 From: To: Call-ID: Geolocation: ;routing-allowed=yes Supported: geolocation Accept: application/pidf+xml, application/common-alerting-protocol+xml CSeq: 1 MESSAGE Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=boundary1 Content-Length: set of points PIDF-LO ! discrete --polygon PIDF-LO ! Data layer

Additional Ideas Many applications are possible Additional examples? Location specific – e.g., not meant to be a unit conversion tool

Next Steps? Protocol framework is currently missing, to be supplied soon in subsequent revision Ideas on protocol structure, RelaxNG, etc. Some initial comments received, more welcome