Topic 8 Insanity. Topic 8 Insanity Introduction In order to establish a defence on the grounds of insanity, it must be clearly proved that at the time.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mental State at the Time of Offense Assessments and the Insanity Defense --- Hawaii State Hospital July 7, 2010 Marvin W. Acklin, PhD, ABPP Board-certified.
Advertisements

Legal Principles Essentially a test of fairness Essentially a test of fairness “It is a cardinal rule of our law that no man can be tried for a crime unless.
COMMITMENT 1. CIVIL COMMITMENT – COMMITTMENT BECAUSE OF MENTAL ILLNESS ITSELF 2. CRIMINAL COMMITMENT – COMMITMENT BECAUSE NGRI (NOT GUILTY BY REASON.
Chapter 6 Defenses to Criminal Liability: Excuse Joel Samaha, 9th Ed.
Topic 10 Intoxication Topic 10 Intoxication. Topic 10 Intoxication Introduction A defendant can become intoxicated by means of alcohol or drugs or both.
Defences Alibi Best defence possible Best defence possible Proof that the accused could not have possibly committed the offence Proof that the accused.
CHAPTER 2: CRIME Area of Study 2: Criminal Law. The need for criminal law Read The need for criminal law, Definition of a crime, Elements of a crime,
Introduction to Criminal Law Trials. The criminal justice system is a system of rules, roles, and procedures that determine whether or not someone has.
+ The Criminal Trial Process. + The Charter Section 11(d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that a person charged with an offence is to be.
Defences 3 In this lecture, we will consider: The nature of automatism The scope and operation of automatism Self-induced sane automatism The distinction.
Chapter 13: Criminal Justice Process ~ Proceedings Before Trial Objective: The student should be able to identify the required procedures before a trial.
Diminished Responsibility ALL will be able to identify where the defence of diminished responsibility comes from MOST will be able to explain the effect.
Topic 12 Attempts Topic 12 Attempts. Topic 12 Attempts Introduction If a defendant fully intends to commit a crime but for some reason fails to complete.
MPC §4.01  As a result of a mental disease or defect he or she lacked substantial capacity to: –Appreciate the criminality (wrongfulness) –Conform his.
Criminal Law INTRO TO DEFENCES. What is a defence?
The Elements of a Crime Law 120 – Intro Unit. The Elements of a Crime  Two conditions must exist for an act to be a criminal offence: actus reus and.
Elements of Criminal Liability
ELEMENTS OF A CRIME An overview – Law 12 MUNDY 2007.
Tanisha Hill-Jarrett Forensic Neuropsychology July 21, 2014 Diminished Capacity Standards.
WHAT IS CRIME? IT IS SENSATIONALIZE BY TV, NEWSPAPERS AND MYSTERY NOVELS. CRIMINALS CAUSE GRIEF AND SUFFERING TO THEIR VICTIMS AND COST THE TAXPAYERS BILLIONS.
 The term "automatism" describes unconscious, involuntary behaviour.  The legal rules governing the use of automatism evidence vary with the cause of.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Ethical and Legal Issues.
Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 18 Mental Health and the Law.
Psychology and the Law Civil and Criminal Commitment.
Chapter 8: Defences. What is a defence? A lawful excuse for committing an offence. Evidence that you lacked the mens rea or that you lacked the actus.
Liam & Sarah.  Mental illness or insanity is a complete defence that is only available where the accused can prove that they were in fact mentally incapacitated.
Legal and Ethical Issues Kimberley Clow
Defences Self-defence/Prevention of Crime. Lesson Objectives I will be able to state the definition of the defence of self-defence/prevention of crime.
Topic 7 Self-defence. Topic 7 Self-defence Introduction There are three situations where the use of force may be justified: Self-defence: this is a common-law.
Chapter 1 The Pursuit of Justice Unit #1 Notes Packet.
Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 18 Mental Health and the Law.
Defences to crimes against the person Chapter 2.5.
The Criminal Trial Process Section 11 (d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that each person charged with an offence is to be ‘presumed innocent.
Law 12 MUNDY – What are defences used for? Two purposes: 1. to prove that accused is not guilty of offence being tried 2. to prove that accused.
Defences For the Accused
Topic 9 AutomatismInsanity Topic 9 Automatism. Topic 9 Automatism Introduction The basis of this defence is the defendant’s inability to control his or.
Criminal Defences Acceptable defences to a charge in Canada.
Criminal Defences CLN4U. Defences Every person is entitled to present a defence at trial Every person is entitled to present a defence at trial A defence.
Defences. Alibi An alibi is proof that the accused could not have committed the actus reus as they were not near the crime scene. Some alibis are better.
DEFENCES. Types of defences:  JUSTIFICATIONS  Self-defence - Criminal Code allows one to defend oneself, those under one’s protection, and one’s property.
Insanity Recap. Key Points Available for all offences except ones of strict liability Available for all offences except ones of strict liability Key test.
Underlying principles of criminal liability
Criminal Law Chapter 3 Part II. Elements of a Crime A crime is defined by 2 elements:  The criminal act  The required state of mind.
Voluntary manslaughter
Defences For The Accused Adapted from Halifax Regional School Board.
Twelve Angry Men. Introduction Twelve Angry Men is a play written by Reginald Rose, who actually wrote the drama based on his real-life experience in.
The defendant may present evidence to show that (1) no criminal act was committed: –Example: he did not commit rape because he woman consented. (2) no.
Defences Insanity. Lesson Objectives I will be able to explain the meaning of the defence of insanity I will be able to distinguish between insanity and.
Diminished Responsibility.  The Homicide Act 1957 s2(1) provides a defence where D:  ‘...was suffering from such abnormality of mind (whether arising.
Kissing in public is not a crime in Australia, however in Middle Eastern Countries such as Saudi Arabia, kissing someone of the opposite sex in public.
Defences Legal Studies 3C. Defences  A person who admits to a criminal offence may adopt a defence that justifies or excuses their actions.  Specific.
LS507 Understanding Criminal Responsibility Defenses Unit 8 Dr. Christie L. Richardson Kaplan University.
Revision of Defences. What is A Defence? Arguing a complete defence successfully will mean that the D is acquitted of the charge.The defendant’s liability.
ALL (E GRADE): Will be able to state what the law is MOST (C GRADE): Will be able to explain at least 2 of the prompts SOME (A GRADE): Will be able to.
Trial Procedures: DEFENCES. 1. AUTOMATISM Act must be voluntary in order to be criminal Acts committed in an unconscious state are not voluntary Therefore.
The Criminal Process Criminal Courts
Rules of criminal law and theory in criminal law
Capacity defences of insanity and intoxication
Diminished Responsibility
Rules and Theory of Criminal Law Criminal Process
Bell Ringer 09/25/2013 For a proper claim of Self Defense, what three things need to be established?
Chapter 10.1 Defences.
Insanity.
Defences Automatism.
Defences for the Accused
Law of Evidence Burden and standard of proof.
Marvin W. Acklin, PhD, ABPP
Key concepts in the Victorian Criminal Justice System
Criminal Defences CLN4U.
An overview – Criminal Law Mr. Goldsack 2017 Welcome Back!!!
Presentation transcript:

Topic 8 Insanity

Topic 8 Insanity Introduction In order to establish a defence on the grounds of insanity, it must be clearly proved that at the time of committing the act the party accused was labouring under such a defect of reason, caused by a disease of the mind, that he or she either did not know the nature and quality of the act he or she was committing, or did not know that what he or she was doing was legally wrong.

Topic 8 Insanity Elements (1) Defect of reason The defendant must show that he or she was suffering from a defect of reason; in other words, that his or her ability to reason was impaired. This is because the basis of the defence is the defendant’s deprivation of the power of reasoning. Thus, a defendant who still possessed those powers but failed to use them cannot be classed as insane.

Topic 8 Insanity Elements (2) Disease of the mind In this context, ‘disease of the mind’ is a legal term and not a medical term. This has caused problems at times, since the legal definition does not always match the medical definition. This is apparent when looking at the types of conditions that the courts have accepted as constituting a disease of the mind. Following M’Naghten, delusional states are covered by this, but the inclusion of certain other conditions, such as arteriosclerosis, epilepsy and diabetes, has caused controversy.

Topic 8 Insanity Elements (3) Did not know the nature and quality of the act or that the act was wrong The defect of reason caused by a disease of the mind must mean either that the defendant does not know the nature and quality of his or her act or, if he or she does, he or she does not know that the act is legally wrong. In terms of the ‘nature and quality of the act’, the defendant would be unaware of his or her actions. An example that is often given is of a defendant who thinks that he or she is cutting a loaf of bread but who is in actual fact cutting the victim’s throat. If the defendant is aware of what he or she is doing, it is still possible to rely on the defence if he or she does not know that what he or she is doing is legally wrong.

Topic 8 Insanity Burden and standard of proof The defendant must prove that he or she was suffering from insanity when he or she committed the offence. This must be proved on the balance of probabilities.

Topic 8 Insanity Effect If a plea is successful, it leads to a special verdict, and the defendant will be deemed ‘not guilty by reason of insanity’. Until the introduction of the Criminal Procedure Act 1991, this automatically meant an indefinite hospital stay, but now this only applies to murder. If the defendant is charged with another crime, the judge can make a hospital order, a guardianship order, a supervision and treatment order, or an absolute discharge.

Topic 8 Insanity Evaluation (1) The burden of proof rests with the defendant Critics have argued that it is unfair that the burden is on the defendant to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that he or she was suffering from insanity. They say that this undermines the notion that the defendant is innocent until proven guilty by the prosecution.

Topic 8 Insanity Evaluation (2) The use of a legal rather than a medical definition Perhaps the major flaw in this defence is that the courts use a legal definition of insanity rather than a medical one. In addition, the legal definition dates from 1843 and fails to take account of the huge medical advances that have occurred since then.

Topic 8 Insanity Evaluation (3) The rules are too broad The classification of diabetics, epileptics and sleepwalkers as insane has been criticised for suggesting that those suffering from such conditions are a danger to the public, whereas this is far from the truth in the vast majority of cases. Most people with such conditions are able to control them by taking medication.

Topic 8 Insanity Evaluation (4) The rules are too narrow The defence can rule out those who are medically insane if they know the nature and quality of their act or that it is legally wrong but are nonetheless unable to stop themselves from committing it. Thus, those at whom the defence should be aimed are unable to rely on it.

Topic 8 Insanity Reform (1) Place the burden of proof on the prosecution The Butler Committee and the Criminal Law Revision Committee have suggested that, since it is part of mens rea, the burden of proof should be reversed and placed on the prosecution rather than the defendant.

Topic 8 Insanity Reform (2) A new defence Critics argue that the only way forward is to abolish the M’Naghten rules altogether. Instead, a new defence should be introduced. The Butler Committee suggested that this should apply to defendants with a mental disorder and should result in a verdict of ‘not guilty on evidence of a mental disorder’. This would avoid the defendant being labelled insane. Others suggest that there is no need for such a defence at all and that those suffering from insanity should be dealt with outside the criminal justice system.