Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Six Year Plan Meeting the state targets Region Meeting August 16, 2007.
Advertisements

Updates in IDEA NCLB is the symbol of the paradigm shift to a new mission of universal high achievement From: All children will have universal access.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
What do the Federal Regulations Require?. The federal regulations have been revised to include a number of new systems/reports that are intended to drive.
A Multi-Year Improvement System and Schedule
Teaching and Learning Special Education Secondary Programs Transition Services.
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
IDEA Partnership State – State Meeting March , 2006 Connecting to Data and strategies Connecting to Data and strategies Using Quantitative Data Using.
Disproportionality of Racial and Ethnic Groups in Special Education Significant Disproportionality and EIS versus Disproportionate Representation due to.
State Performance Plan Annual Performance Report SPP/APR State Systemic Improvement Plan SSIP / Indicator 17.
Special Education Data In the Era of Accountability & District Improvement Steve Smith ODE IDEA Data Manager Fall 2007.
State Directors Conference Boise, ID, March 4, 2013 Cesar D’Agord Regional Resource Center Program WRRC – Western Region.
Special Education Data Collection and Reporting Data Collection, Verification, and Reporting Timelines Sara Berscheit / Steve W. Smith 2009 COSA Conference.
1 Early Childhood Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education Early Childhood Special Education Maria Synodi.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
California Stakeholder Group State Performance and Personnel Development Plan Stakeholders January 29-30, 2007 Sacramento, California Radisson Hotel Welcome.
Systems Performance Review & Improvement (SPR&I) Training Oregon Department of Education Fall 2007.
State of the State Texas Education Agency TCASE Midwinter Conference January 2008.
Office of Special Programs WV Department of Education September 8, 2014 Office of Special Programs WV Department of Education September 8, 2014 Results.
Special Ed. Directors’ Meeting September 17, 2009 Graciela Pizzini.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction State Performance Plan (SPP) & Annual Performance Report.
Accountability for Results State Performance Plan improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities…
Using State Data to Inform Parent Center Work. Region 2 Parent Technical Assistance Center (PTAC) Conference Charleston, SC June 25, 2015 Presenter: Terry.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA General Supervision.
Department of Special Education Division of Special Programs in the Office of Academics 1111 W. 6 th Street Phone: (512) Austin, Texas
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Welcome to the Regional SPR&I trainings Be sure to sign in Be sure to sign in You should have one school age OR EI/ECSE packet of handouts You.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
SHAME FEAR I AM NOT SEEN ACCESS I AM SEEN SYSTEMS CHANGE I AM A SPECIAL CITIZEN ACCOUNTABILITY and BUILD CAPACITY I BELONG AND MEANINGFUL LIFE EFFECTIVENESS.
 Indicator 1 – Graduation  Indicator 2 – Dropout Rates  Indicator 3 – Assessment  Indicator 4 – Suspension/Expulsion  Indicator 5 – School Age LRE.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Welcome Stakeholders December 5, 2007 Improving Special Education Services (ISES) December 5,
1 General Supervision. 2 General Supervision (and Continuous Improvement) 1.What are the minimum Components for General Supervision ? 2.How do the Components.
IDEA & Disproportionality Perry Williams, Ph.D. Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.
Letter of Explanation Copy of Data Disproportionality Initial Eligibility 60-day Timeline Early Childhood Transition Secondary Transition Corrected and.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
IDEA 2004 Part B Changes to the Indicator Measurement Table.
Special Education 101 Nori Cuellar Mora, Ed.D. ESC2 Associate Director of Instructional Services December 7, 2007.
District Annual Determinations IDEA Part B Sections 616(a) and (e) A State must consider the following four factors: 1.Performance on compliance.
Spring 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 SPP/APR Update.
West Virginia Department of Education Introducing ……. Policy 2419: Regulations for the Education of Students with Exceptionalities.
ESC Region XI Texas Effectiveness Study PROGRAM UPDATE 2005 Deborah Norris, Project Coordinator Education Service Center Region XI Fort Worth, Texas.
Curriculum Committee Meeting Exceptional Children’s Division Presented by: Sam Dempsey Division Director Exceptional Children’s Division November 20, 2012.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction State of California Annual Performance Report Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.
O S E P Office of Special Education Programs United States Department of Education Aligning the State Performance Plan, Improvement Strategies, and Professional.
Texas Effectiveness Study Mini-Grant Program for LEA Follow-up.
Special Education Performance Profiles and SPP Compliance Indicator Reviews Office for Exceptional Children.
LEA Self-Assessment LEASA: Presentations:
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs General Supervision: Developing an Effective System Implications for States.
State Performance Plan ESC-2 Presentation For Superintendents September 19, 2007.
6/18/2016 DES / AzEIP 2011 Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA General Supervision.
THE APR AND SPP--LINKING SPECIAL EDUCATION DATA TO ACCOUNTABILITY FOR EDUCATION RESULTS Building a Brighter Tomorrow through Positive and Progressive Leadership.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
KCMP Quarter 3 Indicators 1, 2, 4, and 20 November - January.
General Supervision and School Improvement: Utilizing all relevant data to inform statewide efforts for scaling up David Guardino Manager, School Improvement.
What is “Annual Determination?”
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004
Improved Results for Students
Guam Department of Education
Assessment, Evaluation and Support
Special Education Leadership Network Meeting
Monitoring Child Outcomes: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
SPR&I Regional Training
Presentation transcript:

Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 In the beginning… or at least since 2000

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 State Performance Plan Integrated Monitoring Activities Policies, Procedures, and Effective Implementation Data on Processes and Results Improvement, Correction, Incentives, & Sanctions Effective Dispute Resolution Targeted Technical Assistance & Professional Development Fiscal Management Effective General Supervision

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 State Performance Plan (SPP) State Performance Plan Stakeholders are actively involved SPP leads to improved results SPP is the blueprint for systems change

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 What is the State Performance Plan? IDEA 2004 requires each State to develop a six-year performance plan ( ). The State Performance Plan (SPP) evaluates the State’s efforts to implement the requirements and purposes of IDEA and illustrates how the State will continuously improve upon this implementation.

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 What is the State Performance Plan? States will submit on an annual basis to the USDE Office of Special Education Programs an annual performance report (APR) and report publicly the performance of LEAs against the targets in the APR.

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 Monitoring Priority a prioritized area in which State and Local Education Agencies’ performance is measured (set by USDE) What is the State Performance Plan?

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 FAPE in the LRE (includes Parent) Disproportionality Effective General Supervision Effective Transition Monitoring Priorities in SPP What is the State Performance Plan?

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 Indicator a statement used to help quantify and/or qualify a monitoring priority (set by USDE) What’s in the State Performance Plan?

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 What’s in the State Performance Plan? Indicators in the SPP FAPE in the LRE 1.Graduation 2.Dropout 3.Adequate Yearly Progress 4.Suspension and Expulsion 5.Educational Environment, Educational Environment, Early Childhood Outcomes 8.Parent Participation Disproportionality 9.Disproportionality in Special Ed 10.Disproportionality by Specific Disability Effective General Supervision 11.Child Find Effective Transition 12.Early Childhood Transition 13.Secondary Transition 14.Post-School Outcomes

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 What’s in the State Performance Plan? Indicators in the SPP Effective General Supervision / General Supervision 15.Effective General Supervision 16.Complaint Investigation Timeline 17.Due Process Hearing Timeline 18.Resolution Sessions 19.Mediation Agreements 20.State Data Reporting

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 What’s in the State Performance Plan? Indicators in the SPP Student performance 1. Graduation 3. Adequate Yearly Progress Student outcomes 7. Early Childhood Outcomes 14. Post-school Outcomes Student placement 5. Educational Environment 2. Dropout 6.Preschool LRE Student identification 9. and 10. Disproportionality Indicators reflect:

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 What’s in the State Performance Plan? Indicators in the SPP Indicators reflect: Student disciplinary action 4. Suspension/Expulsion LEA compliance 11. Child find 12. Early Childhood Transition 13. Secondary Transition Parent participation 8. Parent Involvement

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 What’s in the State Performance Plan? Indicators in the SPP Indicators reflect: State performance in its “state supervisory” responsibilities including: Identifying noncompliance and ensuring correction within one year (Monitoring) Completing complaint investigations, due process hearings within timelines Offering resolution sessions and mediation Reporting federally required data timely and accurately

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 What’s in the State Performance Plan? Measurement Specific measures, determined by USDE or State, used to quantify or qualify given indicators Data Information reported by LEAs, used in measurements to determine performance for indicators

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 Where does the data come from? Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Dataset State Supervision Data New Data Systems

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 What’s in the State Performance Plan? Explanation of Progress or Slippage Analysis of data for each indicator Improvement Activities / Timelines / Resources Plans to address slippage through adjustments or improvements made in State programs, policies, or practices

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 What’s in the State Performance Plan? Target Desired level of performance to be reached for each year of the State Performance Plan Set by State, with stakeholder input or aligned to existing legislative performance measure Set by OSEP in the case of compliance indicators, either 0% or 100%

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 Public Input Meetings ImprovementPlanning Two-way Flow of Data Self-Assessment Process / Texas Steering Committee 1. Self-Assessment Process / Texas Steering Committee 2. Public Input Meetings 3. Improvement Planning 4. Texas Continuous Improvement Process Federal Region District Campus State

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008  Improved Results for Students General Supervision Secondary Transition FAPE / LRE Parent Involvement Early Childhood Transition State Supervision Committee Early Childhood Committee Post-School Results Committee Parent Training Committee Access to General Curriculum Committee Discipline Committee CSPD Leadership Council TCIP | Improvement Groups

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 General Supervision Secondary Transition FAPE / LRE Parent Involvement Early Childhood CSPD Leadership Council State Supervision Parent Training Early Childhood Post-School Results Access to General Curriculum Behavior and Discipline Management Child-Centered Framework (ESC 18) CSPD Leadership Council (ESC 6) Services for the Deaf (ESC 4, 10, 11, 20) Parent Coordination (ESC 9) Texas Effectiveness Study (ESC 11) Transition (ESC 11) Access to General Curriculum (ESC 20) Evaluation (ESC 12) Assistive Technology (ESC 4) Technical Assistance and Training—VI (ESC 11) Behavior/Discipline Management (ESC 4) Three Low Incidence Disabilities (ESC 2) Texas Autism Conference (ESC 2) Multicultural and Diverse Learners (ESC 1) Autism (ESC 13) Disproportionate Representation (ESC 1) Alignment of TCIP Improvement Groups and ESC Statewide Leadership Functions & Projects with cluster areas/indicators of the State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report CSPD Leadership Council 3 = SPP Indicator Improved Results for Students More information on the TEA website at:

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 What does this mean to me?

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 Making the Connection

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 State Performance Plan Integrated Monitoring Activities Policies, Procedures, and Effective Implementation Data on Processes and Results Improvement, Correction, Incentives, & Sanctions Effective Dispute Resolution Targeted Technical Assistance & Professional Development Fiscal Management Effective General Supervision

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 Cluster 1 Indicator 1Graduation Indicator 2Dropout Indicator 13Secondary Transition Indicator 14Post School Outcomes

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 Cluster 2 Indicator 4Suspension & Expulsion Indicator 9/10Disproportionality Indicator 20State Report Data

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 Cluster 3 Indicator 16Complaint Timelines Indicator 17DPH Timelines Indicator 18Resolution Sessions Indicator 19Mediation Agreements

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 Cluster 4 Indicator 8Parent Involvement Indicator 11Child Find

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 Cluster 5/6 Indicator 12Preschool Transition Indicator 6Preschool LRE Indicator 7Preschool Outcomes

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 Cluster 7 Indicator 3Assessment (AYP) Indicator 5LRE 6-21

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 Public Reporting Disproportionate Representation Significant Disproportionality Determinations Related Requirements

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 Texas Continuous Improvement Process APR Submission Feb Data 1, 2, 3A-C, 4A, 5A-C, 6, 9, 10,15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 Feb Data 1, 2, 3A-C, 4, 5A-C, 6, 9, 10, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 Feb Data 1, 2, 3A-C, 4, 5A-C, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 States are required to make “Determinations” annually under 616(d) on the performance of LEA programs. Pursuant to 616(a)(1)(C)(i) and (a): Meets requirements Needs assistance Needs intervention Needs substantial intervention

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 Texas Continuous Improvement Process State Performance Plan Annual Performance Report

Texas Education Agency TCASE Leadership Academy| Fall 2008 Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results Leadership