GIVE ME ODDS FORECASTING ENSEMBLE. KEY POINTS THERE ARE INEVITABLE UNCERTAINTIES IN NWP DUE TO UNCERTAINTIES IN INITIAL CONDITIONS AND MODEL FORMULATION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RSMC La Réunion activities regarding SWFDP Southern Africa Matthieu Plu (Météo-France, La Réunion), Philippe Arbogast (Météo-France, Toulouse), Nicole.
Advertisements

Report of the Q2 Short Range QPF Discussion Group Jon Ahlquist Curtis Marshall John McGinley - lead Dan Petersen D. J. Seo Jean Vieux.
A Brief Guide to MDL's SREF Winter Guidance (SWinG) Version 1.0 January 2013.
KMA will extend medium Range forecast from 7day to 10 day on Oct A post processing technique, Ensemble Model Output Statistics (EMOS), was developed.
Statistical post-processing using reforecasts to improve medium- range renewable energy forecasts Tom Hamill and Jeff Whitaker NOAA Earth System Research.
Gridded OCF Probabilistic Forecasting For Australia For more information please contact © Commonwealth of Australia 2011 Shaun Cooper.
NOAA/NWS Change to WRF 13 June What’s Happening? WRF replaces the eta as the NAM –NAM is the North American Mesoscale “timeslot” or “Model Run”
Improving Excessive Rainfall Forecasts at HPC by using the “Neighborhood - Spatial Density“ Approach to High Res Models Michael Eckert, David Novak, and.
14th ALADIN Workshop, Innsbruck 1-4 June 2004 First LAMEPS experiments at the Hungarian Meteorological Service Edit Hágel and Gabriella Szépszó Hungarian.
Description and Preliminary Evaluation of the Expanded UW S hort R ange E nsemble F orecast System Maj. Tony Eckel, USAF University of Washington Atmospheric.
The NCEP operational Climate Forecast System : configuration, products, and plan for the future Hua-Lu Pan Environmental Modeling Center NCEP.
1 Intercomparison of low visibility prediction methods COST-722 (WG-i) Frédéric Atger & Thierry Bergot (Météo-France)
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Evaluation of WRF Using High-Resolution Soil Initial Conditions from the NASA Land.
CSTAR Update: New Tools for More Efficient Use of Ensembles in Operations Brian A. Colle, Minghua Zheng, and Edmund K.M. Chang, School of Marine and Atmospheric.
MOS Performance MOS significantly improves on the skill of model output. National Weather Service verification statistics have shown a narrowing gap between.
Introduction to Numerical Weather Prediction and Ensemble Weather Forecasting Tom Hamill NOAA-CIRES Climate Diagnostics Center Boulder, Colorado USA.
The 10th annual Northeast Regional Operational Workshop, Albany, NY Verification of SREF Aviation Forecasts at Binghamton, NY Justin Arnott NOAA / NWS.
Exploitation of Ensemble Output (and other operationally cool stuff) at NCEP HPC Peter C. Manousos NCEP HPC Science & Operations Officer
Ensemble Post-Processing and it’s Potential Benefits for the Operational Forecaster Michael Erickson and Brian A. Colle School of Marine and Atmospheric.
A Regression Model for Ensemble Forecasts David Unger Climate Prediction Center.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Using Short Range Ensemble Model Data in National Fire Weather Outlooks Sarah J. Taylor David Bright, Greg Carbin, Phillip Bothwell NWS/Storm Prediction.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2014 WE-01 Jim Caughey THORPEX IPO.
Performance of the MOGREPS Regional Ensemble
1 LAM EPS Workshop, Madrid, 3-4 October 2002 Ken Mylne and Kelvyn Robertson Met Office Poor Man's EPS experiments and LAMEPS plans at the Met Office.
SRNWP workshop - Bologne Short range ensemble forecasting at Météo-France status and plans J. Nicolau, Météo-France.
Warn on Forecast Briefing September 2014 Warn on Forecast Brief for NCEP planning NSSL and GSD September 2014.
Applications of Ensemble Prediction - a Historical Perspective Steve Tracton Office of Naval Research Arlington, VA (Formally of NWS/NCEP)
DEMETER Taiwan, October 2003 Development of a European Multi-Model Ensemble System for Seasonal to Interannual Prediction   DEMETER Noel Keenlyside,
Short-Range Ensemble Prediction System at INM José A. García-Moya & Carlos Santos SMNT – INM COSMO Meeting Zurich, September 2005.
How can LAMEPS * help you to make a better forecast for extreme weather Henrik Feddersen, DMI * LAMEPS =Limited-Area Model Ensemble Prediction.
NOAA’s National Weather Service National Digital Forecast Database: Status Update LeRoy Spayd Chief, Meteorological Services Division Unidata Policy Committee.
Where the Research Meets the Road: Climate Science, Uncertainties, and Knowledge Gaps First National Expert and Stakeholder Workshop on Water Infrastructure.
Data assimilation and observing systems strategies Pierre Gauthier Data Assimilation and Satellite Meteorology Division Meteorological Service of Canada.
The Australian Community Climate Earth-System Simulator The Australian Community Climate and Earth System Simulator Kamal Puri (ACCESS Group Leader)
Improving Ensemble QPF in NMC Dr. Dai Kan National Meteorological Center of China (NMC) International Training Course for Weather Forecasters 11/1, 2012,
Celeste Saulo and Juan Ruiz CIMA (CONICET/UBA) – DCAO (FCEN –UBA)
Ensemble Forecasting and You The very basics Richard H. Grumm National Weather Service State College PA
Requirements from KENDA on the verification NetCDF feedback files: -produced by analysis system (LETKF) and ‘stat’ utility ((to.
CPPA Past/Ongoing Activities - Ocean-Atmosphere Interactions - Address systematic ocean-atmosphere model biases - Eastern Pacific Investigation of Climate.
PARTNERING WITH THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Michael C. Morgan Director, Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences National Science Foundation.
Hydrometeorological Prediction Center HPC Experimental PQPF: Method, Products, and Preliminary Verification 1 David Novak HPC Science and Operations Officer.
Short-Range Ensemble Prediction System at INM José A. García-Moya SMNT – INM 27th EWGLAM & 12th SRNWP Meetings Ljubljana, October 2005.
Interoperability at INM Experience with the SREPS system J. A. García-Moya NWP – Spanish Met Service INM SRNWP Interoperability Workshop ECMWF –
Plans for Short-Range Ensemble Forecast at INM José A. García-Moya SMNT – INM Workshop on Short Range Ensemble Forecast Madrid, October,
. Outline  Evaluation of different model-error schemes in the WRF mesoscale ensemble: stochastic, multi-physics and combinations thereof  Where is.
3 rd Annual WRF Users Workshop Promote closer ties between research and operations Develop an advanced mesoscale forecast and assimilation system   Design.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG 4 activities.
APPLICATION OF NUMERICAL MODELS IN THE FORECAST PROCESS - FROM NATIONAL CENTERS TO THE LOCAL WFO David W. Reynolds National Weather Service WFO San Francisco.
1 Proposal for a Climate-Weather Hydromet Test Bed “Where America’s Climate and Weather Services Begin” Louis W. Uccellini Director, NCEP NAME Forecaster.
OSSEs and NOAA’s Quantitative Observing Systems Assessment Program (QOSAP) Bob Atlas, Craig MacLean, Lidia Cucurull (NOAA, USA) Sharan Majumdar, Tom Hamill.
Typhoon Forecasting and QPF Technique Development in CWB Kuo-Chen Lu Central Weather Bureau.
1 Probabilistic Forecast Verification Allen Bradley IIHR Hydroscience & Engineering The University of Iowa RFC Verification Workshop 16 August 2007 Salt.
Deutscher Wetterdienst Preliminary evaluation and verification of the pre-operational COSMO-DE Ensemble Prediction System Susanne Theis Christoph Gebhardt,
Short-Range Ensemble Prediction System at INM García-Moya, J.A., Santos, C., Escribà, P.A., Santos, D., Callado, A., Simarro, J. (NWPD, INM, SPAIN) 2nd.
Verification of ensemble precipitation forecasts using the TIGGE dataset Laurence J. Wilson Environment Canada Anna Ghelli ECMWF GIFS-TIGGE Meeting, Feb.
2015 Production Suite Review: Report from NHC 2015 Production Suite Review: Report from NHC Eric S. Blake, Richard J. Pasch, Andrew Penny NCEP Production.
Proposed THORPEX/HEPEX Hydrologic Ensemble Project (THEPS) Presentation for 3 rd THORPEX Science Symposium September 14-18, 2009 Prepared by John Schaake,
An Ensemble Primer NCEP Ensemble Products By Richard H. Grumm National Weather Service State College PA and Paul Knight The Pennsylvania State University.
Diagnostic verification and extremes: 1 st Breakout Discussed the need for toolkit to build beyond current capabilities (e.g., NCEP) Identified (and began.
NCEP CMC ECMWF MEAN ANA BRIAN A COLLE MINGHUA ZHENG │ EDMUND K. CHANG Applying Fuzzy Clustering Analysis to Assess Uncertainty and Ensemble System Performance.
CFI GROUP WORLDWIDE ANN ARBOR ATLANTA BUENOS AIRES KUALA LUMPUR LONDON MADRID MELBOURNE MILAN PARIS PORTO ALEGRE SEOUL SHANGHAI STOCKHOLM National Weather.
Fly - Fight - Win 2 d Weather Group Mr. Evan Kuchera HQ AFWA 2 WXG/WEA Template: 28 Feb 06 Approved for Public Release - Distribution Unlimited AFWA Ensemble.
VERIFICATION OF A DOWNSCALING SEQUENCE APPLIED TO MEDIUM RANGE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTIONS FOR GLOBAL FLOOD PREDICTION Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood and.
The Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting Component of the 2011 NOAA Hazardous Weather Testbed Spring Experiment David Novak 1, Faye Barthold 1,2, Mike.
Climate Mission Outcome A predictive understanding of the global climate system on time scales of weeks to decades with quantified uncertainties sufficient.
Hydrometeorological Predication Center
Sub-seasonal prediction at ECMWF
SWFDP Key Issues for GIFS-TIGGE
Short Range Ensemble Prediction System Verification over Greece
Presentation transcript:

GIVE ME ODDS FORECASTING ENSEMBLE

KEY POINTS THERE ARE INEVITABLE UNCERTAINTIES IN NWP DUE TO UNCERTAINTIES IN INITIAL CONDITIONS AND MODEL FORMULATION WEATHER FORECASTING, THEREFORE, IS INHERENTLY STOCHASTIC, NOT DETERMINISTIC IN NATURE ENSEMBLE PREDICTION - REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE IN THE THRUST OF OPERATIONAL NWP (“WAVE OF THE FUTURE”) - CONSISTS OF MULTIPLE PREDICTIONS FROM SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT INITIAL CONDITIONS AND/OR WITH VARIOUS VERSIONS OF MODELS, THE OBJECTIVES BEING TO: –IMPROVE SKILL THROUGH ENSEMBLE AVERAGING, WHICH ELIMINATES NON-PREDICTABLE COMPONENTS –PROVIDE RELIABLE INFORMATION ON FORECAST UNCERTAINTIES (E.G., PROBABILITIES) FROM THE SPREAD (DIVERSITY) AMONGST ENSEMBLE MEMBERS REALITY - POSITIVE RESULTS ON BOTH COUNTS WITH OPERATIONAL GLOBAL MODEL ENSEMBLE SYSTEM; EXPERIMENTAL REGIONAL MODEL ENSEMBLES ENCOURAGING (OPERATIONAL EARLY 2000?) –NET RESULT - ENHANCE UTILITY OF NWP FOR VIRTUALLY ALL APPLICATIONS REALIZING THE PRACTICAL UTILITY OF ENSEMBLES ACCOMPLISHED VIA A VARIETY OF NEW PRODUCTS DESIGNED TO CONDENSE AND MAXIMIZE INFORMATION CONTENT FOR USERS; USER FEEDBACK ESSENTIAL AND ENCOURAGED!!!

KEY CONSIDERATIONS STRATEGIES FOR CREATING ENSEMBLES – PROCDEDURES FOR GENERATING INITIAL STATE PERTURBATIONS RANDOM TIME LAGGING ANALYSES FROM OTHER CENTERS “BREEDING” SINGULAR VECTORS – PERTURBING MODEL (E.G., CONVECTIVE PARAMETERIZATION) AND/OR MULTI-MODEL ENSEMBLES – MODEL CONFIGURATION? RESOLUTION PHYSICAL SOPHISTICATION DOMAIN – ENSEMBLE SIZE NOTE: OPTIMUM STRATEGY UNKNOWN (NO CONCENSUS)!! IDEAL: EFFECTIVE/EFFICIENT SAMPLING OF ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS, I.E., PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS. LIMITED COMPUTER RESOURCES GENERALLY REQUIRE COMPROMISES RELATIVE TO PERCEIVED OPTIMUM, E.G., MODEL RESOLUTION VERSUS ENSEMBLE SIZE)

KEY CONSIDERATIONS(CONT.) PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE: CONDENSE LARGE AMOUNTS OF OUTPUT INTO A “USER FRIENDLY” FORM THAT PROVIDES RELIABLE ESTIMATES OF THE RANGE AND LIKLIHOOD OF ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS – PRODUCTS CAN RANGE FROM DISPLAY OF ALL FORECASTS THROUGH MEANS/SPREAD AND CLUSTERS TO FULL PROBABILITIY DISTRIBUTIONS DISPLAYED IN VARIOUS FORMATS STATISTICAL POSTPROCESSING (E.G., BIAS CORRECTIONS, CALIBRATION OF PROBABILITIES ENSEMBLE OUTPUT STATISTICS CONTINUAL INTERACTION AMONGST DEVELOPERS AND USERS ADDITIONAL/ALTERNATIVE PRODUCTS CONTINUAL INTERACTION AMONGST DEVELOPERS AND USERS VALIDATION – STANDARD SKILL SCORES – MEASURES OF SPREAD – MEASURES OF RELIABILITY EDUCATION AND TRAINING – COMET SYMPOSIUM – TRAINING MODULES – ON SITE VISITS – WEB BASED – ??

N-AWIPS GRAPHICAL PRODUCTS (GEMPAK META FILES) SPAGHETTI CHARTS –500 Z –1000Z –1000/500 TCK –MSLP –850 T –700 RH SPREAD –1000 Z –500 Z CLUSTERS –1000 Z –500 Z PROBABILITIES –500 Z > THRESHOLDS –700 RH > 70% –TCK <540 –250 V > THRESHOLDS –850 T > 0C MSLP CENTERS

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT INCLUDES PROBABILITIES –VIRTUALLY ALL RELEVANT AND MODEL DERIVED PARAMETERS, E.G., SEVERE WEATHER INDICES AVIATION WINDS > THRESHOLD SENSIBLE WEATHER ELEMENTS (MODEL DERIVED/INFERRED CIRCULATION INDICES (E.G., BLOCKING) EXPANDED CLUSTERED PARAMETERS AND FOR SPECIALIZED REGIONS VERTICAL PROFILES METEOGRAMS ENSEMBLE DERIVED MOS TROPICAL STORM TRACKS –DIRECT FROM ENSEMBLES –BACKGROUND FOR GFDL MODEL ENSEMBLES

SOME APPLICATIONS ENHANCE THE UTILITY OF FORECASTS FORECASTS OF ENSEMBLE MEAN, SPREAD, PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS, ETC. OF ANY MODEL FIELD/PARAMETER OR QUANTITIES DERIVED THEREFROM ENHANCE THE UTILITY OF FORECASTS APPLICABLE TO MODELS FROM VERY SHORT RANGE CLOUD SCALE THROUGH REGIONAL MESOSCALE SHORT RANGE AND GLOBAL MEDIUM RANGE TO COUPLED OCEAN/ATMOSPHERE CLIMATE PREDICTION SYSTEMS IMPROVE DATA ASSIMILATION SYSTEMS ADAPTIVE/TARGETED OBSERVATIONS DATA SETS FOR FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH ON PREDICTABILITY ISSUES NOTE: LARGE CURRENT USER COMMUNITY (OPERATIONAL GLOBAL SYSTEM) INCLUDES NCEP SERVICE CENTERS, WFO’S, USAF, OH, PRIVATES/BROADCASTERS

CLUSTER ANALYSIS OBJECTIVELY GROUP TOGETHER FORECASTS WHICH ARE SIMILAR ACCORDING TO SOME CRITERIA GOAL: IDENTIFY EXTREMES, GROUPINGS (CLUSTERS) WITHIN ENVELOPE OF POSSIBILITIES (“ATTRACTORS”) ISSUES: – QUANTITY MSLP 500 Z ETC. – MEASURE ANOMALY CORRELATION CIRCULATION PARAMETERS PATTERN RECOGNITION PHASE-SPACE MEASUREMENTS – REGION

EVALUATION/VERIFICATION SITUATIONAL AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL CASE STUDIES (E.G., CYCLOGENESIS, FLOOD POTENTIAL) STATISTICAL – STANDARD AC, RMS, SCORES (E.G., APPLIED TO ENSEMBLE MEAN VS. CONTROL, RELATIVE CLOSENESS OF MEMBERS TO ANALYSIS) – “TALAGRAND” (VERIFICATION RANK) DIAGRAMS - MEASURES OF BIASES IN DISTRIBUTION OF ENSEMBLE MEMBERS INCLUDING FREQUENCY OF OUTLIERS) – BRIER, RANKED PROBABILITY SCORES (PROBABILITY SKILL SCORES) – RELIABILITY DIAGRAMS (OBSERVED VERSUS FORECAST FREQUENCIES; ENABLES CALIBRATION OF PROBABILITIES) – MOS VERSUS ENSEMBLE POPS – RELATIVE OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS (ROC); (EXPLICIT COMPARISON OF THE RELATIVE UTILITY OF DETERMINISTIC AND ENSEMBLE PREDICTIONS)

SHORT RANGE ENSEMBLE FORECASTING (SREF) OBJECTIVE: DEVELOP A REGIONAL MODEL, SHORT- RANGE (0-3 DAYS) ENSEMBLE PREDICTION SYSTEM TO PROVIDE OPERATIONALLY RELEVANT AND USEFUL GUIDANCE ON THE PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION OF WEATHER ELEMENTS OR EVENTS, ESPECIALLY FOR QPF GOAL: IMPLEMENT INITIAL OPERATIONAL PRODUCTION OF A REGIONAL MODEL BASED ENSEMBLE SYSTEM AND PRODUCT SUITE (SREF-I) BY ~ JANUARY, 2000 –TARGET SYSTEM: ETA PLUS RSM MULTI-MODEL 10 MEMBER 40 KM RESOLUTION ~ETA DOMAIN RUN TWICE PER DAY PERTURBATIONS; REGIONAL “BREEDING” –PRODUCT SUITE: ENSEMBLE MEAN/SPREAD CHARTS SPAGHETTI CHARTS PROBABILITY CHARTS METEOGRAMS STATUS MILESTONES CONDUCT PILOT STUDIES (10/96-3/98) PARTICIPATE IN STORM AND MESOSCALE ENSEMBLE EXPERIMENT (SAMEX) (3/98-11/98) SOME ISSUES –ALTERNATIVE PERTURBATION STRATEGIES –TRADEOFFS; RESOLUTION, ENS SIZE/DOMAIN –PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT –VALIDATION PROCEDURES –DATA/PRODUCT DISSEMINATION –EDUCATION AND TRAINING

STATUS/MILESTONES COMPLETED (PILOT STUDIES) MAJOR TASKS/ACCOMP (CONT.)MAJOR TASKS/ACCOMP (CONT.) –ILLUSTRATE SIGNIFICANCE OF UNCERTAINTIES IN SREF –DEMONSTRATE THE POTENTIAL OF SREF TO PROVIDE OPERATIONALLY USEFUL INFORMATION –PROVIDE BASIS FOR A PROTOTYPE OPERATIONAL SYSTEM

STATUS/MILESTONES COMPLETED (PILOT STUDIES) SOME KEY FINDINGS SOME KEY FINDINGS –ENHANCED DIVERSITY OF SOLUTIONS (SPREAD) WITH: MULTI-MODEL ENSEMBLEMULTI-MODEL ENSEMBLE HIGHER RESOLUTIONHIGHER RESOLUTION GLOBAL BRED (VS “RANDOM”)GLOBAL BRED (VS “RANDOM”) REGIONAL ENHANCEMENTREGIONAL ENHANCEMENT

STATUS/MILESTONES COMPLETED (PARTICIPATE IN SAMEX) BOTTOM LINE:BOTTOM LINE: –MUCH GAINED, ACCOMPLISHED, LEARNED –RESULTS GENERALLY FAVORABLE –SOME DISSAPPOINMENTS RELATIVE TO EXPECTATIONS, BUT WE UNDERSTAND WHY –REMAIN COMMITED TO BASIC STRATEGY

STATUS/MILESTONES COMPLETED (PARTICIPATE IN SAMEX) SOME KEY FINDINGS SOME KEY FINDINGS –IMPROVED ENS MEAN SKILL, RELIABILITY, RPSS WITH MULTI-MODEL APPROACH –INSUFFICENT SPREAD DOMAIN TOO SMALL - NEGATIVE IMPACT OF BC’SDOMAIN TOO SMALL - NEGATIVE IMPACT OF BC’S –PRECIPITATION FORECASTS “WOEFUL” WEAK FORCING, SUMMER LIKE PATTERNWEAK FORCING, SUMMER LIKE PATTERN

SAMEX DOMAIN LARGE SMALL SAMEX SYSTEM: MULTI-MODEL (ETA/RSM) 10 MEMBERS 32 KM RESOLUTION SAMEX DOMAIN REGIONAL ENHANCEMENT

NCEPUR: THREAT SCOS NCEPUR: THREAT SCOS