Low p T Muon trigger studies for J/       Supreet Pal Singh (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Prof. J.B.Singh (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Prof.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tracey Berry1 Looking into e &  for high energy e/  Dr Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.
Advertisements

1  trigger optimization in CMS Tracker Giuseppe Bagliesi On behalf of  tracking group Workshop on B/tau Physics at LHC Helsinki, May 30 - June 1, 2002.
1D. Dutta, BARC CMS Ann HI Meet 20 th June 2008 Z 0 studies in CMS:Status &Workplan Dipanwita Dutta NPD, BARC, Mumbai.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
High Level Trigger of Muon Spectrometer Indranil Das Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics.
1 CMS Tracker Alignment and Implications for Physics Performance Nhan Tran Johns Hopkins University CMS Collaboration SPLIT
A data-driven performance evaluation method for CMS RPC trigger system & Study of Muon trigger efficiencies with official Tag & Probe package for ICHEP.
APS Meeting April 5-8, 2003 at Philadelphia Chunhui Luo 1 Chunhui Luo Inclusive J/ψ Production at DØ.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
Ji Hyun Kim Korea University. Introduction Results of Trigger Study – Event generation – Trigger efficiency Trigger rates and Statistics 25 – 26 Sep.
T.C. Jude D.I. Glazier, D.P. Watts The University of Edinburgh Strangeness Photoproduction At Threshold Energies.
Experimental Research on School of Physics, Peking University at the CMS Bo ZHU  Motivation  Results of MC  Conclusion.
1 Perspectives for quarkonium production in CMS Carlos Lourenço, on behalf of CMSQWG 2008, Nara, Japan, December 2008.
Mock Data Challenge PbPb collisions - July 2010 Prashant Shukla Nuclear Physics Division BARC, Mumbai India 1 India CMS, July 2010, BARC, Mumbai.
Report of our of Physics activities (update on status) Supreet Pal Singh Sunil Bansal (P.U.Chandigarh) (P.U.Chandigarh) Jasbir Singh Kajari Mazumdar (P.U.Chandigarh)
Archana Sharma, Suman Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan Updates on the RPC trigger efficiency work with data driven.
 production in p+p and Au+Au collisions in STAR Debasish Das UC Davis (For the STAR Collaboration)‏
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
Prompt J/  and b ➝ J/  X production in pp collisions at LHCb Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay & CERN, 7 Dec 2010 For the LHCb Collaboration KRUGER 2010 Workshop.
Quarkonia spectra in PbPb at 2.76 TeV Abdulla Abdulsalam (Dr. Prashant Shukla) BARC, Mumbai Outline Motivation Event selection Kinematic cuts Acceptance.
Study of L1 and HLT efficiency in VBTF Monika Jindal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Jasbir Singh (panjab University, Chandigarh), Kajari Mazumdar (TIFR,
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Don Lincoln Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration Don Lincoln.
Quarkonia production at LHC Preliminary FAMOS results on signal and CMSSW_1_2_0 Gobinda Majumder India-CMS meeting Jan 2007.
1 Triggering on Diffraction with the CMS Level-1 Trigger Monika Grothe, U Wisconsin HERA-LHC workshop March 2004 Need highest achievable LHC Lumi, L LHC.
Status of RPC trigger analysis and Muon Trigger efficiencies for W-> μν study By Archana Sharma, Suman B. Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS Meeting.
Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.
CMS Week Sept '07Leonard Apanasevich (UIC) Pedrame Bargassa (Rice) 1 Physics Priorities for Trigger Development Leonard Apanasevich (UIC) Pedrame Bargessa.
Drell-Yan study in CMS at 10 TeV, with 100 pb -1 Monika Jindal K.Mazumdar, D. Bourilkov, J.B. Singh 1LHC Physcis meeting.
Γ +Jet Analysis for the CMS Pooja Gupta, Brajesh Choudhary, Sudeep Chatterji, Satyaki Bhattacharya & R.K. Shivpuri University of Delhi, India.
29,30 July 2010 India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai 1 Update on Z’-> τ τ->τ jet+ τ jet analysis Nitish Dhingra(P.U.,India) Kajari Mazumdar(TIFR,India) Jasbir.
Current Analysis Activity/Results (Only brief overview) Sunil Bansal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Approved results marked.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
1 Guannan Xie Nuclear Modification Factor of D 0 Mesons in Au+Au Collisions at √s NN = 200 GeV Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of Science.
1 Jet Triggers and Dijet Mass Selda Esen and Robert M. Harris Fermilab TTU Weekly HEP Group Meeting Feb 16, 2006.
DN/d  and dN/dp T analysis status Gabor Veres for the working group QCD meeting, Jan 12, 2010.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.
HI July Exercise and Muon DQM preparation Mihee Jo Mihee Jo / Lab meeting.
1 First results from PbPb collisions at CMS Prashant Shukla Nuclear Physics Division BARC, Mumbai India CMS collaboration India-CMS Meeting, 17 January,
Study of B s         Supreet Pal Singh Prof. Kajari Mazumdar Prof. J.B.Singh 1India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Living Long At the LHC G. WATTS (UW/SEATTLE/MARSEILLE) WG3: EXOTIC HIGGS FERMILAB MAY 21, 2015.
Low Mass Vector Mesons Nuclear Modification Factors in d+Au 200GeV Lei Guo Los Alamos National Laboratory PHENIX Collaboration.
Exotic Quarkonium Spectroscopy & Production Jane Nachtman on behalf of the CMS Collaboration University of Iowa, USA Charm 2013, 31 August – 4 Sept, 2013,
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
Study of B s         Supreet Pal Singh Prof. Kajari Mazumdar Prof. J.B.Singh 1India LHC weekely meeting.
QWG Sept 20-22, Jundong Huang Indiana University 1 DØ Quarkonium Production at DØ Jundong Huang Indiana University Quarkonium Workshop FermiLab September.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
Introduction 08/11/2007 Higgs WG – Trigger meeting Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL.
Ultra-peripheral heavy ion results from CMS Michael Murray, DIS2015, 29 th April 2015 CMS: HIN :
Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
ATLAS B trigger Overview of B trigger Di-muon algorithms Performance (efficiency/rates) Menu for data taking experience 7/1/20101ATLAS UK Meeting,
Roberto Covarelli (CERN) on behalf of the CMS collaboration
Tatia Engelmore, Columbia University
Quarkonium production in ALICE
CMS Physics Analysis in China
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
Plans for checking hadronic energy
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
CMS Physics Analysis in China
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb-1
Samples and MC Selection
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
b and c production in CMS and ATLAS
Presentation transcript:

Low p T Muon trigger studies for J/       Supreet Pal Singh (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Prof. J.B.Singh (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Prof. Kajari Mazumdar (TIFR, Mumbai) 1India-CMS Meeting 29th-30th July 2010

Motivation Study of quarkonium production at high energy collision is always interesting  testing ground of non-relativistic QCD including the technique of factorisation:  production of heavy quark-antiquark pair calculated in perturbative method.  non-perturbative effects which bind the heavy quark pair into a quarkonium  various models try to describe this, eg., colour singlet, colour octet, etc. Final state polarisation depends on the model as well as the transverse momentum of the produced J/ψ. Experimental data till now is unable to resolve various issues  at LHC physics of J/ψ will be pursued hot through differential cross-section d  (J/ψ)/ dP T, polarisation measurements, etc. 2India-CMS Meeting 29th-30th July 2010

New Trigger paths at HLT proposed At LHC startup the actual instantaneous luminosity is lower than anticipated  low p T physics can be studied using softer triggers than planned earlier. At high instantaneous lumi, low threshold triggers will have to be prescaled. J       event statistics should be high enough to be competitive with other experiments at the early stage of CMS. Need as low P T J  event sample as possible  produced in mid- rapidity regions atleast. In 70% of J  dimuons that CMS can reconstruct in minimum bias events, one of the muon can be only a tracker muon, and NOT a global muon Thus GT and TT samples are crucial to cover low pT range, especially for |  ~ India-CMS Meeting 29th-30th July 2010

Way out in CMS: devise a double muon trigger at HLT to catch low pt tracks from J/ ψ  Start with standard L1 info  L1 firmware remains unchanged Combine Global Muon + track of J/ψ  trigger rate < 10 Hz, tolerable. Distribution of J/ψ dimuons in phase space.

HLT_MuX_Track0_Jpsi  A new trigger configuration where a single L3 muon is combined to tracker track within invariant mass window of GeV/c 2. Different trigger configurations possible with transverse momentum cut on L3 muon.  HLT_Mu0_Track0_Jpsi : L3 Muon pT > 0 GeV/c,  HLT_Mu1p5_Track0_Jpsi : L3 Muon pT > 1.5 GeV/c,  HLT_Mu2_Track0_Jpsi : L3 Muon pT > 2 GeV/c,  HLT_Mu3_Track0_Jpsi : L3 Muon pT > 3 GeV/c,  HLT_Mu5_Track0_Jpsi : L3 Muon pT > 5 GeV/c,  This lowers the trigger rate and the signal statistics are not reduced much. Exercise for detremining gain of new path, evaluating trigger rates etc. during April, May, June of this year, strategy validated, trigger in place More work in progress.

p T distributions for different trigger Configurations Dimuon combinations: GG  global-global muons (black) GT  global-tracker muons (red) ; TT  tracker-tracker muons (blue) Global muons  Reconstruction starts from muon stations and matched to a track in tracker. Tracker muons  Reconstruction starts in tracker and matched to a tracklet in muon station. 6India-CMS Meeting 29th-30th July 2010

Muon trigger rate will change with evolving luminosity Maximum trigger rate should be about 25 Hz with change in trigger path once a month, almost.

Efficiencies and trigger rates for different trigger configurations of “HLT_MuX_Track0_Jpsi” pT min [GeV/c] of L3 Muon Trigger Rate [Hz] Going from Mu0 to Mu3 the trigger rates drops very strongly (good) but the signal efficiency also suffers. We could set the muon pT threshold at 2.0 Gev/c instead of 3.0 GeV/c, to keep a good low pT coverage for a longer period. 8India-CMS Meeting 29th-30th July 2010

Effect of changing the pT cut on pixel and tracker track (matched to L3 muon) in HLT_Mu0_Track0_Jpsi. Presently pT cut on pixel and tracker track  3.0 GeV To improve the signal efficiency new cuts on pixel and tracker track pT pixel > 2.2 GeV/c pT tracker > 2.5 GeV/c 9India-CMS Meeting 29th-30th July 2010

Efficiencies for different configurations of HLT for various pT cuts increase in the efficiency 10India-CMS Meeting 29th-30th July 2010 Before After

pT & rapidity distributions and the corresponding Efficiencies for various HLT triggers for CMS Data run numbers (certified) “Reference” trigger: HLT_L1MuOpen, Efficiencies of other trigger paths are calculated relative to the same for events passing the HLT_L1MuOpen trigger 11India-CMS Meeting 29th-30th July 2010

Mass distributions and the corresponding efficiencies CMS Data run numbers (certified) HLT_L1MuOpen is prescaled after run rumber  cannot be taken as a “default” trigger. HLT_Mu3 is good only for pT > 3 GeV. HLT_L1DoubleMuOpen is very efficient  can be taken as reference to study HLT_Mu0_Track0_Jpsi till it is prescaled. 12India-CMS Meeting 29th-30th July 2010

pT & rapidity distributions and the corresponding Efficiencies for HLT_Mu0_Track0_Jpsi for CMS Data run numbers (certified) India-CMS Meeting 29th-30th July 2010

2D efficiency plot of the HLT_Mu0_Track0_Jpsi trigger path w.r.t. HLT_L1DoubleMuOpen trigger HLT_Mu0_Track0_Jsi trigger is best suited for mid-rapidity region  No requirement for 2 nd muon in DT, while HLT_L1DoubleMuOpen require hits in at least “two” DT segments. HLT_L1DoubleMuOpen is efficient  but effected by background, cannot be used as unprescaled for long. HLT_Mu0_Track0_Jpsi  “Cleaner” trigger. 14India-CMS Meeting 29th-30th July 2010

Keep ψ(2S) in the game ! Increase HLT mass window from GeV to 2.7 – 3.9 GeV  the rate incrases by a factor of 1.5 Work in porgress

Summary New J  triggers in CMS: looser muon triggers (eg. no pt threshold) HLT_Mu0 + track in the J/  mass window  Good for all physics analyses with a J/  in the final state  Also gives a handle to measure all muon related efficiencies. Trigger rate for the different trigger configurations of HLT_Mu0_Track0_Jpsi has to be monitored carefully. The efficiency can be increased further by changing the pT cut on the pixel and tracker track to 2.2 GeV/c and 2.5 GeV/c. Data has started coming and HLT_Mu0_Track0_Jpsi has been included in the official HLT trigger paths. Favorable for polarization studies of low pT dimuons from J/   more statistics can be accumulated. Good Time ahead for physics with J/   muons 16India-CMS Meeting 29th-30th July 2010