Chapter 13 STR Genotyping Issues ©2002 Academic Press.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fundamentals of Forensic DNA Typing
Advertisements

Forensic DNA Analysis (Part II)
DNA Analysis Chapter 12. General DNA Information Double helix—two coiled DNA strands Composed of nucleotides—units containing a sugar molecule (deoxyribose),
Explain how crime scene evidence is
TrueAllele ® Casework Validation on PowerPlex ® 21 Mixture Data Australian and New Zealand Forensic Science Society September, 2014 Adelaide, South Australia.
Fundamentals of Forensic DNA Typing Slides prepared by John M. Butler June 2009 Chapter 13 Quality Assurance.
Chapter 17: Variable-Number Tandem Repeats Profiling.
explain how crime scene evidence is
1 Chapter 7 Chapter 7 DNA Fingerprinting Learning Goals: o Explain how crime scene evidence is collected and processed to obtain DNA o Describe how radioactive.
DNA Criminalist and Court Appearance
More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics ©
310 Data Collection Software Controls 310 run conditions Translates light on CCD camera into electropherogram (raw data) Sample sheets and injection lists.
Chapter 12 The Hitachi FMBIO II Fluorescence Imaging System ©2002 Academic Press.
DNA Profiling in Forensic Science. Introduction DNA Profiling is the analysis of DNA samples to determine if they came from the same individual. Since.
Forensic Biology by Richard Li
Chapter : DQA1/PM Chapter 18: Autosomal STR Profiling.
Forensic DNA Analysis (Part II). Summary What is DNA? Where is DNA found in the body? How does DNA differ among individuals? Forensic DNA Analysis DNA.
Objective 1 - Describe how restriction enzymes are used to manipulate DNA. Run the virtual gel electrophoresis at this web site
Automated STR Data Analysis: Validation Studies Automated Analysis Databasing Validation Casework Studies Mark W. Perlin (Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA)
Chapter 15 New Technologies and Automation ©2002 Academic Press.
Chapter 10 DNA Detection Methods: Fluorescent Dyes and Silver Staining ©2002 Academic Press.
TrueAllele ® Genetic Calculator: Implementation in the NYSP Crime Laboratory NYS DNA Subcommittee May 19, 2010 Barry Duceman, Ph.D New York State Police.
Watson & Crick Discovered the basic shape of DNA
Commonly Used Short Tandem Repeat Markers
Chapter 7 Forensic Issues: Degraded DNA, PCR Inhibition, Contamination, and Mixed Samples ©2002 Academic Press.
Forensic Science: Fundamentals & Investigations, Chapter 7 1 Introduction and History of Biological Evidence in Forensics DNA fingerprinting or DNA profiling,
The ABI Prism 310 Genetic Analyzer
Chapter 8 Additional DNA Markers: Amelogenin, Y-Chromosome STRs, mtDNA, SNPs, Alu Repeats ©2002 Academic Press.
 Types of STR markers- 5 types based on sequence  STR allele nomenclature  Allelic ladder  Serological methods of identity profiling  Identity profiling.
DNA Forensics 352 – O’Dette. Why DNA? DNA is individual evidence DNA links or eliminates a suspect to a crime DNA identifies a victim even if no body.
DNA Fingerprinting Review. Why DNA? DNA is individual evidence DNA links or eliminates a suspect to a crime DNA identifies a victim even if no body is.
HCS 465 Week 4 Individual Evaluating the Research Process To purchase this material click below link
Explain how crime scene evidence is
Chapter 8 Introducing Inferential Statistics.
Explain how crime scene evidence is
A Match Likelihood Ratio for DNA Comparison
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and Its Applications
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Validating TrueAllele® genotyping on ten contributor DNA mixtures
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
DNA identification pathway
DATA ANALYSIS.
Rules for DNA Comparison Analysis
explain how crime scene evidence is
Forensic DNA Analysis (Part I)
History of Biological Evidence in Forensics
Explain how crime scene evidence is
Forensic Biology by Richard Li
Forensic Biology by Richard Li
Explain how crime scene evidence is
Forensic DNA Analysis.
Chapter 22 Recombinant DNA Technology
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
DNA identification pathway
Copyright © 2010 Academic Press Inc.
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
DNA Analysis “The capacity to blunder slightly is the
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Explain how crime scene evidence is
explain how crime scene evidence is
Explain how crime scene evidence is
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 6.
DNA Identification: Mixture Interpretation
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
David W. Bauer1, PhD Nasir Butt2, PhD Jeffrey Oblock2
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 13 STR Genotyping Issues ©2002 Academic Press

GS500-ROX Internal Sizing Standard Example Internal Size Standard ©2002 Academic Press

DNA fragment peaks in sample DNA Size Data Point bp bp DNA fragment peaks are sized based on the sizing curve produced from the points on the internal size standard Process of Sizing DNA Fragments Using an Internal Standard ©2002 Academic Press

Data Collection Peak Identification Data Review by Analyst/Examiner Color Separation Peak Sizing Comparison to Allelic Ladder Confirmation of Results by Second Analyst/Examiner Genotype Assignment to Alleles GeneScan or FMBIO Analysis software Genotyper or StaR Call software Internal sizing standard (e.g., GS500-ROX) Matrix file Allelic ladder sample Steps in STR Genotyping Process ©2002 Academic Press

Three Possible Outcomes Match – Peaks between the compared STR profiles have the same genotypes and no unexplainable differences exist between the samples. Statistical evaluation of the significance of the match is usually reported with the match report. Exclusion – The genotype comparison shows profile differences that can only be explained by the two samples originating from different sources. Inconclusive – The data does not support a conclusion as to whether the profiles match. This finding might be reported if two analysts remain in disagreement after review and discussion of the data and it is felt that insufficient information exists to support any conclusion. ©2002 Academic Press