Business Informatics Group Institute of Software Technology and Interactive Systems Vienna University of Technology Favoritenstraße 9-11/188-3, 1040 Vienna,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright © Open Applications Group, Inc. All rights reserved 1 © Copyright 2009 Open Applications Group Improving OAGIS with Ontology Technology.
Advertisements

Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET T2.4: Business Process Re-engineering.
1 University of Namur, Belgium PReCISE Research Center Using context to improve data semantic mediation in web services composition Michaël Mrissa (spokesman)
UN/CEFACT UN/CEFACT Registry Specification ICG (Information Content Management Group) 17 March 2005 Mike CONROY, Francis BERTHOMIEU, Fabrice BOURGE, Yao-ming.
Business Informatics Group Institute of Software Technology and Interactive Systems Vienna University of Technology Favoritenstraße 9-11/188-3, 1040 Vienna,
Slide 1 The Universal Business Language International, royalty-free library of electronic transaction documents. Designed in an open and accountable vendor-neutral.
Copyright © Open Applications Group, Inc. All rights reserved 11 David Connelly CEO, Open Applications Group,
e-Framework Components and Responsibilities.
Designing Electronic Messages UNESCAP / ECO TF Workshop SIPS : Supplychain Information Platform Study group General Secretariat : Hisanao Sugsamata
A summary of ebXML (the new World Standard for e-Business) Dave Welsh Collaborative Domain Corporation.
Introduction to ebXML Mike Rawlins ebXML Requirements Team Project Leader.
TMG Report to the Plenary UN/CEFACT TMG Report Chair: Gunther Stuhec Vice Chair: Christian Huemer.
Business Informatics Group Institute of Software Technology and Interactive Systems Vienna University of Technology Favoritenstraße 9-11/188-3, 1040 Vienna,
Electronic Commerce Group Institute for Software Technology and Interactive Systems Vienna University of Technology Favoritenstraße 9-11/ Vienna.
UN/CEFACT‘s Modeling Methodology (UMM 1.0) towards UMM 2.0 DissertantInnen Seminar – Mo, Christian.
EGov Interop'05 - Feb 23-24, Geneva (Switzerland) OBSERVATORY ON INTEROPERABLE eGOVERNMENT SERVICES eGov-Interop'05 Annual Conference February.
U NITED N ATIONS C ENTRE F OR T RADE F ACILITATION A ND E LECTRONIC B USINESS United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UN/CEFACT UN/CEFACT Core Components.
14 May th UN/CEFACT Plenary1 Applied Technologies Group Chair Mark Crawford Vice Chairs Gait Boxman Jostein Frømyr
Business Informatics Group Institute of Software Technology and Interactive Systems Vienna University of Technology Favoritenstraße 9-11/188-3, 1040 Vienna,
1 SBDH 3.0 Project Session SBDH 3.0 Project leader Shingo Sakaguchi Oslo, Norway June 2010.
Copyright © Open Applications Group, Inc. All rights reserved 1 © Copyright 2009 Open Applications Group Improving OAGIS with Ontology Technology.
Titel1 ePortfolio 2.0 ePortfolio 2.0 luk vervenne empowerment of the Human Factor t rends & perspectives.
UN/CEFACT Forum Wednesday, 16 March 2005 Lunch & Learn ATG XML NDR Mark Crawford ATG2 Chair U NITED N ATIONS C ENTRE F OR T RADE F ACILITATION A ND E LECTRONIC.
UN/CEFACT TMG Closing Plenary Syndey Face-to-Face Interim Meeting 9-13 January 2006 at Newport Mirage Hotel.
th UN/CEFACT Forum ● TMG Closing Plenary1 7th UN/CEFACT Forum: Lyon, France Techniques & Methodologies Group (TMG) Closing Plenary 30 September.
David Webber, NIEM Team, Oracle Public Sector Rapid NIEM XML Exchange Design, Semantics and UML Models NIEM Test Model Data Deploy Requirements Build Exchange.
EBusiness Government & Trade Overview United Nations Centre for Trade Facilitation and Electronic Business.
Applied Technologies Group Report Chair: Mark Crawford Vice Chair: Jostein Frømyr Vice Chair: Gait Boxman.
February 2006UNeDocs Overview Michael Dill / GEFEG mbHSlide 1 What is this specific TBG2 project about? What is CEFACT TBG2 ‚ Digital Paper? What is the.
1 TBG17 Progress Report TBG6 Meeting New Delhi Forum October 2 - 6, 2006.
UN/CEFACT Common Methodologies Mark Crawford, SAP Mike Rowell, Oracle Philipp Liegl, TUWIEN.
Discussion of UPCC comments UN/CEFACT Forum Meeting Geneva, –
UN/CEFACT TMG Closing Plenary  New Delhi, IndiaSlide 1 UN/CEFACT TMG Closing Plenary New Delhi, India 02 – 06 October 2006.
National Information Exchange Model Update for the Global Advisory Committee Spring 2008 Meeting April 10, 2008 NIEM Technical Architecture Committee (NTAC)
Metamodel Layer Model Layer Instance Layer CCTSXML Schema CCTS Model XML Schema Instance XML Instance XML Instance Metamodel Mapping Model Mapping Instance.
UN/CEFACT TMG Closing Plenary  Zurich, SwitzerlandSlide 1 UN/CEFACT TMG Closing Plenary Zurich, Switzerland 10 – 14 December 2007 Gunther Stuhec,
Austrian Research Centers GmbH - ARCIntelligent Business Process Management Group 1 Modeling e-Government processes with UMM Dr. Klaus Gschwendtner Philipp.
Oracle, OAGIS and Open Standards October 21-22, Walldorf, Germany Garret Minakawa, Director.
NIEM Information Exchange Package Documentation (IEPD) Mini Kanwal NIEM Technical Advisor Department of Homeland Security September, 7 th 2006.
UN/CEFACT Technical Update AFACT TMC 16Jun2015 Tehran, Iran.
CSDAT Question 10 Peter Potgieser Sue Probert Mary Kay Blantz.
U NITED N ATIONS C ENTRE F OR T RADE F ACILITATION A ND E LECTRONIC B USINESS Under the auspices of United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UN/CEFACT.
U NITED N ATIONS C ENTRE F OR T RADE F ACILITATION A ND E LECTRONIC B USINESS Under the auspices of United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UN/CEFACT.
UCM Team Update on 13th UN/CEFACT Forum Senegal November 2008 (condensed from closing plenary) Scott R. Hinkelman.
DLMS XML Update Supply PRC May 18, 2007 Thomas Lyons.
UN Economic Commission for Europe 18 th UN/CEFACT PLENARY Methodology & Technology Programme Development Area Report Peter Amstutz & Tim McGrath UN/CEFACT.
UN/CEFACT TMG Closing Plenary  Dublin, IrelandSlide 1 UN/CEFACT TMG Closing Plenary Chair: Gunther Stuhec Vice Chair: Christian Huemer Secretary:
The Business Choreography Language (BCL) A Domain-Specific Language for Global Choreographies Institute for Software Technology and Interactive Systems.
U NITED N ATIONS C ENTRE F OR T RADE F ACILITATION A ND E LECTRONIC B USINESS Under the auspices of United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UN/CEFACT.
Syntax and Methodology Issues Chris Hassler Kevin Smith.
TC 57 TC 57 UML/XML Workshop Report for CIM user Group Jun 2007 Netherlands (ARNHEM) EDF R&D.
Dictionary based interchanges for iSURF -An Interoperability Service Utility for Collaborative Supply Chain Planning across Multiple Domains David Webber.
Leveraging UBL for Developing Justice XML (GJXDM) Reference Documents John Ruegg County of Los Angeles Information Systems Advisory Body GJXDM User Conference.
Copyright © Open Applications Group, Inc. All rights reserved Open Applications Group OAGIS Core Components WG Tax Component
UBL Library Content Semantics Ontology –Background presentation at lunchtime –Subteam to develop position paper UDEF –MHP project example Controlled vocabulary.
E-Gov Language Processing Requirements, Approach, References.
UN/CEFACT Structure TBG Subgroups Internal & External Compliant Process Models, Core Components, Business Information Entities BPM=Business Process Model.
Some experiences from development and implementation of standards from UN/CEFACT, OASIS UBL, ISO20022 and WCO Martin Forsberg.
For Semantic Interoperability EDICOM 2012 AFACT TMC: Technology and Methodology Committee Hisanao Sugamata.
UN/CEFACT TMG Closing Plenary  Vancouver, CanadaSlide 1 UN/CEFACT TMG Closing Plenary Vancouver, Canada 12 – 17 March 2006.
UN/CEFACT Mission Role of Architecture and Deliverables.
July 11, 2008OASIS SET TC OASIS Semantic Support for Electronic Business Document Interoperability (SET) TC Overview.
EbXML Semantic Content Management Mark Crawford Logistics Management Institute
Questions to be addressed by the „Architecture“ How does the architecture and the deliverables contribute to the mission of CEFACT? Who is the audience.
UBL Library Content Closing Plenary Report Jan 25 th 2002.
UCM Walldorf Notes UN/CEFACT Unified Context Methodology Project January
U NITED N ATIONS C ENTRE F OR T RADE F ACILITATION A ND E LECTRONIC B USINESS Under the auspices of United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UN/CEFACT.
The Systems Engineering Context
UN/CEFACT Standards Development Advisory Team (CSDAT)
M2AP Methodology For Message Assembly Profile Improving traceability, reusability and instance interoperability in CIM XML message content schema design.
Presentation transcript:

Business Informatics Group Institute of Software Technology and Interactive Systems Vienna University of Technology Favoritenstraße 9-11/188-3, 1040 Vienna, Austria phone: +43 (1) (secretary), fax: +43 (1) Q8: Which technologies do we use for which purpose? UN/CEFACT Standard Development Advisory Team Conference Call, 03 rd February 2010 Philipp Liegl

UN/CEFACT technologies at a glance 22 Core Component Technical Specification (CCTS) UML Profile for Core Components (UPCC) based on Core Component Library (CCL) conforms to use core component definitions derive XML-Schema Naming and Design Rules (NDR) conforms to define unambiguous derivation rules Core Data Type Catalogue UN/CEFACT's Modeling Methodology (UMM) UN/CEFACT Context Methodology

Open issue: There is currently no core component registry implementation 33 Core Component Technical Specification (CCTS) UML Profile for Core Components (UPCC) based on Core Component Library (CCL) conforms to use core component definitions derive XML-Schema Naming and Design Rules (NDR) conforms to define unambiguous derivation rules Core Data Type Catalogue UN/CEFACT's Modeling Methodology (UMM) UN/CEFACT Context Methodology Missing registry implementation

Open issue: Due to the missing Core Component Registry the integration into modeling tools is not possible 44 Core Component Technical Specification (CCTS) UML Profile for Core Components (UPCC) based on Core Component Library (CCL) conforms to use core component definitions derive XML-Schema Naming and Design Rules (NDR) conforms to define unambiguous derivation rules Core Data Type Catalogue UN/CEFACT's Modeling Methodology (UMM) UN/CEFACT Context Methodology Missing registry integration

Core Component Library issues Core Component Library is only available as Excel Sheet Registry specification of ICG currently on hold due to lack of contributors CCL still based on CCTS 2.01 Different views within CEFACT of what should be stored in the library and what is should not be stored in the library (CC only, or contextualized BIEs as well?). Different views of the TBGs (17) and the TMG

Open issue: Core Component Registry efforts are there, but what about a registry for process artifacts? 66 Core Component Technical Specification (CCTS) UML Profile for Core Components (UPCC) based on Core Component Library (CCL) conforms to use core component definitions derive XML-Schema Naming and Design Rules (NDR) conforms to define unambiguous derivation rules Core Data Type Catalogue UN/CEFACT's Modeling Methodology (UMM) UN/CEFACT Context Methodology No registry for process artifacts

Registry for process artifacts and correct representation of context in the registry 7 ebRIM based registry may in principle store any format of choice Storage format for core components in the registry must be defined (most likely XML4CCTS) However, how do we unambiguously represent UMM artifacts for the registry (problem of different XMI flavors) Technology aspects such as registry federation still an open issue How to unambiguously use the UCM in the context of the registry – annotation of process and document artifacts. Conclusion: registry specification of UN/CEFACT should not be limited to Core Components only

Open issue: Context Methodology development is on the way – other projects should start to think about the integration of context concepts 88 Core Component Technical Specification (CCTS) UML Profile for Core Components (UPCC) based on Core Component Library (CCL) conforms to use core component definitions derive XML-Schema Naming and Design Rules (NDR) conforms to define unambiguous derivation rules Core Data Type Catalogue UN/CEFACT's Modeling Methodology (UMM) UN/CEFACT Context Methodology Integration of context concepts

We develop where effective standards, but do not really work together very well – CSDAT shall help to overcome that 9 ATG TMG ICG FMG CSDAT

The purpose of CSDAT – hold together and bring in line 10 Process perspective Document perspective Context (UCM) UN/CEFACT registry CSDAT NDR SBDH UPCC CCTS UPCC …

Second purpose of CSDAT: How to I effectively use the different CEFACT Technologies to reach my goal? 11