LIGO- G060392-00-Z August 16, 2006August 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 1 Spectral Line Working Group Report Keith Thorne, Chair.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
September 21, 2005Virgo Status – ESF Workshop1 Status of Virgo B. Mours.
Advertisements

8/13/2004 Stefan Ballmer, MIT / LIGO Hanford 1 Length and angular control loops in LIGO Stefan Ballmer Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Hanford.
E3/E4 Line Noise Investigation LIGO-G Z Sergey Klimenko Soma Mukherjee Bernard Whiting Bob Coldwell August 15, 2001 Outline  LLO line noise (E4.
LIGO- G Z March 22, 2006March 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 1 S5 Spectral Line Catalogue Status Keith Thorne (PSU) for the Spectral Line Catalogue.
LIGO Reduced Data Sets E7 standard reduced data set RDS generation for future runs decimation examples LIGO-G Z Isabel Leonor (w/ Robert Schofield)
LIGO-G W Proposed LHO Commissioning Activities in May 02 Fred Raab 29 Apr 02.
1 Status of Unbiased Search for Continuous-Wave Sources Dave Chin, Vladimir Dergachev, Keith Riles (University of Michigan) LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
1 Environmental Disturbances: S4 and Pre-S5 Robert Schofield, U of O Doug Cook, Fred Raab, Richard McCarthy, LHO I.Seismic up-conversion II.Some peak identification.
LIGO-G W Report on LIGO Science Run S4 Fred Raab On behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G M Status of LIGO Barry Barish PAC Meeting Caltech 3-June-04 Upper limits on known pulsar ellipticities.
1 S4 Environmental Disturbances Robert Schofield, U of O John Worden, Richard McCarthy, Doug Cook, Hugh Radkins, LHO Josh Dalrymple, SU I.Pre-S4 “fixes”
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Activities Keith.
LIGO-G Z NSF Review LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Michigan 1 LSC Participation in Initial LIGO Detector Characterization.
Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik Detector Characterization of GEO 600 during.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
G Z LSC Meeting 3/22/ ASIS Closeout Bruce Allen, UWM.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization NeedsK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Detector Characterization Needs Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
3 May 2011 VESF DA schoolD. Verkindt 1 Didier Verkindt Virgo-LAPP CNRS - Université de Savoie VESF Data Analysis School Data Quality and vetos.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
19 Aug 2003, LSC Hannover G Z1 State of the LSC Peter Saulson Syracuse University.
1 Feedback from the executive committee meeting Benno Willke GEO meeting, Glasgow October 2006.
1 GEO outlook Benno Willke (presented by Bernard Schutz) LSC meeting, MIT Nov 2006.
Glitch Group S5 Activities Laura Cadonati for the Glitch Working Group LSC meeting, Hanford March 21, 2006 G Z.
Stefan Hild 1GWDAW 10, Brownsville, December 2005 Status of GEO 600 Stefan Hild, AEI Hannover for the GEO-team.
LIGO-G Z Detchar Introduction (8/16/06)K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 StrainBandsMon and SixtyHertzMon Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
G D Commissioning Progress and Plans Hanford Observatory LSC Meeting, March 21, 2005 Stefan Ballmer.
LIGO-G D What can we Expect for the “Upper Limit” Run Stan Whitcomb LSC Meeting 13 August 2001 LIGO Hanford Observatory A Personal Reading of.
G Z 1 New Glitches seen/studied in Block-Normal Shantanu Desai Pennsylvania State University for Glitch Working Group and many others Detchar.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
G Z Test Mass Butterfly Modes and Alignment Amber Bullington, Stanford University Warren Johnson, Louisiana State University LIGO Livingston Detector.
3/21/06G D S4/S5 Calibration Status Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC March 2006 Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC.
LSC Meeting: 3/14/01Inspiral Upper Limit - Detector Characterization 1 Inspiral Upper Limit: Detector Characterization Needs Nelson Christensen Carleton.
LIGO- G D E7: An Instrument-builder’s Perspective Stan Whitcomb LIGO Caltech LSC Meeting Upper Limits Plenary Session 22 May 2002 LIGO Livingston.
LIGO-G M LIGO Status Gary Sanders GWIC Meeting Perth July 2001.
LIGO-G Z Detchar Introduction (8/16/06)K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 SixtyHertzMon Update Junyi Zhang & Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
LIGO-G Z DMT Status for UL Analysis K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 DMT Monitors -- Status Update for Upper Limits Analysis.
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Issues K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Detector Characterization Issues -- S2 Analysis & S3 Planning.
S.Klimenko, LSC, August 2004, G Z BurstMon S.Klimenko, A.Sazonov University of Florida l motivation & documentation l description & results l.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G ZRai Weiss LSC Session on Scientific Monitoring March 21, 2006 Committee formed by Peter Saulson to: Consider the value and effectiveness.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G Z Introd. to Detect. Charact. Sessions K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to the Detector Characterization.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
S.Klimenko, LSC March, 2001 Line Noise Investigation l Outline Ø Line Noise Investigation task Ø E2 data, line monitoring Ø Documentation Ø Lines observed.
S.Klimenko, LSC meeting, March 2002 LineMonitor Sergey Klimenko University of Florida Other contributors: E.Daw (LSU), A.Sazonov(UF), J.Zweizig (Caltech)
GEO Status and Prospects Harald Lück ILIAS / ETmeeting Cascina November 2008.
LIGO-G Z March 21, 2007 March 2007 LIGO/Virgo Meeting - DetChar 1 S5 Spectral Line Cataloguing Keith Thorne for the Spectral Line Working Group.
All The future of DC work. GEO DC workshop June Restructuring of DC and Detector Work for many reasons the DC work was not very efficient in the.
Data Acquisition, Diagnostics & Controls (DAQ)
Daniel Sigg, Commissioning Meeting, 11/11/16
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
Regression of environmental noise in gravitational-wave detectors.
Analysis of LIGO S2 data for GWs from isolated pulsars
Detector Characterization
LIGO S6 Detector Characterization Studies
KAGRA Control Room Appearance (tentative)
Report on the S2 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Stochastic background search using LIGO Livingston and ALLEGRO
Virgo Update – LSC meeting
Line tracking methods used in LineMon
h(t): are you experienced?
S2 Bilinear Couplings Study
John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech
LIGO Interferometry CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection, Baltimore, May 24, 2005 Daniel Sigg.
P Fritschel LSC Meeting LLO, 22 March 2005
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Michigan
Presentation transcript:

LIGO- G Z August 16, 2006August 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 1 Spectral Line Working Group Report Keith Thorne, Chair

LIGO- G Z August 16, 2006August 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 2 Spectral Line Working Group Now a “working group” under the Detector Characterization Committee Required to contribute to annual white paper, make regular reports. This provides a good opportunity to define our mission, set goals, decide priorities We (may) need better communication, organization within our group »For instance, who are the members of the working group?

LIGO- G Z August 16, 2006August 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 3 Spectral Line Analysis Tools Control Room Investigations »Fourier, Spectral Coherence Tools (Schofield) »DMT Monitors - LineMon, NEW SixtyHertzMon (Riles) Offline Studies »Daily Spectral Line-Finding Summary (KT) –Can also do special runs on any other channels »SFT-based Spectrograms (Dupuis) Results from Search Groups »Narrow Lines seen in Pulsar Group analyses (Mendel, Dergachev) »Broader Coherences seen in Stochastic Group analyses –PEM - DARM_ERR coherences (Mandic, Fotopoulos)

LIGO- G Z August 16, 2006August 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 4 Daily Line-Finding Pipeline in S5 Makes daily summaries of DARM_ERR spectral lines

LIGO- G Z August 16, 2006August 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 5 S5 Coherence Spectrograms Rejean Dupuis compiles spectrograms from SFTs

LIGO- G Z August 16, 2006August 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 6 Spectral Line Successes in S5 H1 - Extended 60 Hz comb »Traced to poor RF distribution cabling - Fixed Feb 9, 2006 L Hz comb »Identified as “bounce-mode” »Solved with new Beam-Splitter de-whitening board - Jan 2, 2006 L Hz Combs - Identified »S. Waldman found strong coherence with optical levers But progress has slowed down in recent months

LIGO- G Z August 16, 2006August 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 7 The 60 Hz mystery The 60 Hz harmonics structure in DARM_ERR does not match that in PEM channels »Causes attempts to regress lines to fail Schofield has investigated magnetic field coherences with PEM injections »Different coherences at ETMY,ETMX,ITMY,ITMX Weiss, Waldman have found LLO harmonics come from magnetic coupling that is not being sensed »From overhead transmission lines

LIGO- G Z August 16, 2006August 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 8 Wandering 960 Hz Line in H1 Seen in July 06 Spectrograms (also in Line-Finder) Co-moving line about 60Hz higher 960Hz DuoTone Violin Mode 3rd harmonics

LIGO- G Z August 16, 2006August 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 9 “Eternal” Spectral Line Mysteries 329 Hz Lines (all IFOs) »Strong enough that 2nd, 3rd harmonics seen »Speculation that they are Beam Splitter (BS) Violin Modes 335 Hz Lines (H1, etc.) »Rung up very strongly when beam power raised prior to science mode »Speculation that they are Recycling Mirror (RM) violin modes Hz Lines (all IFOs) »2nd, 3rd Harmonics often seen »Coherences in other interferometer channels 546,566 Hz Lines (H1 only) »Again, 2nd, 3rd harmonics often seen »Coherent with some WFS channels 2.60, 2.64 Hz combs (H2 only) »Extend from Hz »Seen in ETMX, ETMY shadow sensors

LIGO- G Z August 16, 2006August 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 10 Possible Priorities Mission, charge, plans for annual white paper »Will need input from other groups Pulsar Group needs solid association of spectral artifacts with instrumental causes to remove them »Most PEM coherence studies are too low resolution for this »Needs working group follow-up + commissioning time --> S5 Line Report for next LSC meeting ? Stochastic Group - help identify PEM coherences »Schofield’s PEM injection studies useful Offline monitors »Automate spectrogram, channel coherence studies ?

LIGO- G Z August 16, 2006August 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 11 Possible New Efforts Identifying causes of long-persistent lines »Would require substantial commissioning time »If they aren’t a control or analysis issue, should we bother? Assisting with GEO detector characterization »Run line-finder on GEO h(t) channel? Central repository for Spectral Line info »A Spectral Line Wiki? Understanding multitude of lines below 100 Hz »Do these indicate couplings we are unaware of that contribute to the noise floor? Other suggestions from the floor…