Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Journey to the Core This material was developed for use by participants in the Common Core Leadership.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
California Common Core Standards for Mathematics
Advertisements

Go Math!/Common Core State Standards for Mathematics K-5 Leadership Training.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Shifts and Implications for Math Instruction Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Shifts and Implications.
Empowering Learners through the Common Core State Standards
Professional Development on the Instructional Shift of Focus Lets Focus on Focus.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Focus Grade 3.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Coherence Grade 3.
Common Core State Standards What’s It All About? Karen Kennedy, Ed.D. Mathematics Consultant.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Multiplication of Fractions Part 1 January 29, 2013 Common.
Comparison Situations and Tape Diagrams
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Common Core Development Initially 48 states and three territories signed on As of November 29, 2010,
1 Common Core Lite Mathematics Brought to you by….
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Common Core Development Initially 48 states and three territories signed on As of December 1, 2011, 45.
CCSS Math Breakout Session. Where Are You? Get a Post-It Note Write your favorite math topic on it Find the Consensograph on the wall Place your post-it.
Common Core State Standards—Mathematics Introduction/Overview 1 Cathy Carroll
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
History & Vision.  The new standards are rigorous, research- based, and designed to prepare every student for success in college and the workforce. 
Overview 1 © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association Mathematics General Overview.
Common Core State Standards Mathematics Digital Learning Cadre Renee Parsley James Dick Mathematics Education Associate Mathematics Education Associate.
Overview 1 © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association Mathematics General Overview.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: The Key Shifts.
K–8 Session 3: Exploring the Domain Progressions in Grades K–8 Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics High School Session 2: Matching Clusters of Standards to Critical Areas in one.
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Transitioning to the Common Core.
Three Shifts of the Alaska Mathematics Standards.
Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.
K-12 Mathematics Common Core State Standards. Take 5 minutes to read the Introduction. Popcorn out one thing that is confirmed for you.
Background Information The CCSSM were a result of a state-led initiative in June 2009 by the Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governor’s.
Standards for Mathematics Standards for Mathematical Practice Apply across all grade levels Describe habits of mind of a mathematically proficient student.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
The Importance of Coherent Lessons in Elementary Mathematics Linda Schoenbrodt, MSDE, Elementary Programs Specialist October, 2014.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
Strategies for Teaching, Supporting and Assessing Students’ Understanding and Development of Algebra and Function Concepts, Operations and Skills Leading.
The Common Core State Standards emphasize coherence at each grade level – making connections across content and between content and mathematical practices.
Teachers today must prepare students for a world of possibilities that may not currently exist. The workforce of tomorrow must be flexible, motivated,
The Common Core State Standards August Common Core Development Initially 48 states and three territories signed on Final Standards released June.
Making Sense Of The New Standards K-12 Alliance Staff Developer Training January 25, 2013.
Are We Ready to Implement the Common Core Standards in Mathematics ? Katy White based on a presentation by DR. WESLEY BIRD
+ Sunnyside District Day One Math Training Focus 2; Training for Teachers by Math Leaders; Fall 2014.
Journey to the Core Focus, Coherence, and Understanding in the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Sunnyside School District
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Standards Development Process College and career readiness standards developed in summer 2009 Based on the college and career readiness standards, K-12.
Common Core High School Mathematics: Transforming Instructional Practice for a New Era 1.1.
AMTNJ Common Core State Standards Mathematics CCSSM December 6, 2011 Todd Lindbloom Senior Curriculum Specialist Pearson Northeast Region School Group.
TEACHING WITH THE CORE A Journey Toward Mathematical Understanding, Focus, and Coherence Dr. DeAnn Huinker Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership University.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards March 2012 These slides were taken from: and I have deleted.
Elementary Math: Grade 5 Professional Development Fall 2011.
West Virginia’s Adoption of the Common Core State Standards for High School Mathematics Lou Maynus, NBCT Mathematics Coordinator Office of Instruction,
Mathematics Common Core State Standards Thursday, August 16 th, 2012.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Multiplication of Fractions Part 2 February 12, 2013 Common.
Addition and Subtraction of Fractions Part 2
High School Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Word problems…. No problem! Class 5 November 13, 2012 This.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer Institute 2012 Fractions: Teaching with Understanding Part 2 This.
Insights About the Grade 1 Learning Expectations in the CCSS Topic #1: The meaning of the equal sign Presented by the Office of Curriculum, Instruction.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Multiplication of Fractions Part 3.5 March 5, 2013 Common.
Mt. Olive Elementary School February 9, 2015 Joyce Bishop, Ph.D.
Overview Dr Kwaku Adu-Gyamfi Stefanie Smith. 2  Work with your group  Who did you work with?  What did you learn about them?  Their knowledge of.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Engaging In and Analyzing Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
April 14, Welcome  Internet Connect to CLIU CO; passkey: cliu1 Keystone Commons ○
Secondary Math Olympia School District Fall 2015.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
Palmyra Area School District Summer Goals  Develop an understanding of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in the area of Math, including the.
Fractions and CCSSM joe georgeson february 26, 2014 UW-Milwaukee WSMI
Single-Digit Addition Fluency Grades K-2
Pathways to Teacher Leadership in Mathematics Monday, June 30, 2014
Jeanette Grisham March 28, 2012
Presentation transcript:

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Journey to the Core This material was developed for use by participants in the Common Core Leadership in Mathematics (CCLM^2) project through the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Use by school district personnel to support learning of its teachers and staff is permitted provided appropriate acknowledgement of its source. Use by others is prohibited except by prior written permission.

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Shared, the same for everyone Essential, fundamental knowledge and skills necessary for student success Adopted and maintained by States; not a federal policy Benchmarks of what students are expected to learn in a content area

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 45 states, D.C., & 3 territories

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee A Long Overdue Shifting of the Foundation For as long as most of us can remember, the K-12 mathematics program in the U.S. has been aptly characterized in many rather uncomplimentary ways: underperforming, incoherent, fragmented, poorly aligned, narrow in focus, skill-based, and, of course, “a mile wide and an inch deep.” ---Steve Leinwand, Principal Research Analyst American Institutes for Research in Washington, D.C

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee But hope and change have arrived! Like the long awaited cavalry, the new Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSS) presents us a once in a lifetime opportunity to rescue ourselves and our students from the myriad curriculum problems we’ve faced for years. ---Steve Leinwand, Principal Research Analyst American Institutes for Research in Washington, D.C Make no mistake, for K-12 math in the United States, this IS a brave new world. --Steve Leinwand

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee For over a decade, research of mathematics education in high-performing countries have pointed to the conclusion that the math curriculum in the United States must become substantially more focused and coherent in order to improve mathematics achievement in this country.

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Focus: Unifying themes and guidance on “ways of knowing” the mathematics. Coherence: Progressions across grades based on discipline of mathematics and on student learning. Understanding (Rigor): Deep, genuine understanding of mathematics and ability to use that knowledge in real- world situations.

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Make sense of problems Reason quantitatively Viable arguments & critique Model with mathematics Strategic use of tools Attend to precision Look for and use structure Look for regularity in reasoning K-8 Grade Levels HS Conceptual Categories Standards for Mathematical Practice Standards for Mathematics Content Standards Domains Clusters

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee  Mathematics content  Teaching of mathematics  Student “knowing” of mathematics Digging in… Begin to unearth some discoveries:

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 2NBT9. Explain why addition and subtraction strategies work, using place value and the properties of operations. 3OA3. Use multiplication and division within 100 to solve word problems in situations involving equal groups, arrays, and measurement quantities, e.g., by using drawings and equations with a symbol for the unknown number to represent the problem. Reflecting…

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 4NF2. Compare two fractions with different numerators and different denominators, e.g., by creating common denominators or numerators, or by comparing to a benchmark fraction such as 1/2. Recognize that comparisons are valid only when the two fractions refer to the same whole. Record the results of comparisons with symbols >, =, or <, and justify the conclusions, e.g., by using a visual fraction model. Reflecting…

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 4NF2. Compare two fractions with different numerators and different denominators, e.g., by creating common denominators or numerators, or by comparing to a benchmark fraction such as 1/2. Recognize that comparisons are valid only when the two fractions refer to the same whole. Record the results of comparisons with symbols >, =, or <, and justify the conclusions, e.g., by using a visual fraction model. Reflecting…

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Which is larger? or Find a common numerator! Rename or

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Focus and Coherence

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee CCSS “design principles” Focus Coherence

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee The Hunt Institute Video Series Common Core State Standards: A New Foundation for Student Success Helping Teachers: Coherence and Focus Dr. William McCallum Professor of Mathematics, University of Arizona Lead Writer, Common Core Standards for Mathematics

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Features of Focus and Coherence “Give more detail than teachers were used to seeing in standards.” Fewer Topics Progressions More Detail Show how ideas fit with subsequent or previous grade levels. “Free up time” to do fewer things more deeply.

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Unifying ThemesDetails DomainsClustersStandards

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee GradeDomainsClustersStandards K Unifying ThemesDetails GradeDomainsClustersStandards

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Conceptual Category DomainsClustersStandards All Standards Advanced Number & Quantity Algebra Functions Geometry Statistics & Probability Modeling Unifying ThemesDetails

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Conceptual Category DomainsClustersStandards All Standards Advanced Number & Quantity Algebra Functions Geometry Statistics & Probability Modeling **** Unifying ThemesDetails

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Content Standards: Reflect hierarchical nature & structure of the discipline. – Progressions – Ways of Knowing Practice Standards: Reflect how knowledge is generated within the discipline. Reflects what we know about how students develop mathematical knowledge. Reflects the needs of learners to organize and connect ideas in their minds (e.g., brain research). Discipline of mathematics Research on students’ mathematics learning Coherence

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee CCSSM Progression Documents (draft) by The Common Core Standards Writing Team ime.math.arizona.edu/progressions Comprehensive discussions on: Intent of specific standards. Development within and across grades. Connections across domains. Suggested instructional approaches.

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Domains and Clusters as unifying themes within & across grades. Detail in the standards give guidance on “ways of knowing” the mathematics Focus and Coherence Embedded progressions of mathematical ideas.

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Understanding the Mathematics “Rigor”

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Understanding in CCSSM… WordNumber of instances Understand(s)147 Understanding 92 Understandings 21 Understood 3 TOTAL263

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee These Standards define what students should understand and be able to do in their study of mathematics... But what does mathematical understanding look like? One hallmark of mathematical understanding is the ability to justify, in a way appropriate to the student’s mathematical maturity, why a particular mathematical statement is true or where a mathematical rule comes from. CCSSM, p. 4

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Task Select a grade level. Find the list of Clusters in CCSSM. Read through the clusters and count the occurrences of “understand.” Highlight one example of particular significance.

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Mathematical understanding and procedural skill are equally important, and both are assessable using mathematical tasks of sufficient richness. CCSSM, p. 4

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee SBAC States…

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee PARCC States…

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee And so the journey begins…

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee I really hope these standards will help teachers be more creative in the classroom, engender the mathematical practices, and free up time to really focus on teaching mathematics. --Bill McCallum

Dr. DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee CCSSM Progression Understanding Focus Coherence