March 8, 2007March APS Meeting, Denver, CO1 Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis Yang Yang and Sima Setayeshgar Department of Physics Indiana.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jeremy S. Bradbury, James R. Cordy, Juergen Dingel, Michel Wermelinger
Advertisements

NCF LOGO Casey Henderson and Necmettin Yildirim Sensitivity Analysis Computer Algebra Operon Application to TRP Math Modeling Introduction Conclusion Modeling.
5/10/2015Yang Yang, Candidacy Seminar1 Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis Yang Yang and Sima Setayeshgar Department of Physics Indiana University,
Signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis Lengeler et al. pp
Bacterial chemotaxis Dr. habil. Kőhidai László 2012.
Sept 25 Biochemical Networks Chemotaxis and Motility in E. coli Examples of Biochemical and Genetic Networks Background Chemotaxis- signal transduction.
Marcus Tindall Centre for Mathematical Biology Mathematical Institute St Giles’ Oxford. PESB, Manchester, 2007.
Strategies to synchronize biological synthetic networks Giovanni Russo Ph.D. Student University of Naples FEDERICO II Department of Systems and Computer.
Surface to Surface Intersection N. M. Patrikalakis, T. Maekawa, K. H. Ko, H. Mukundan May 25, 2004.
Sites of regulation. Feedback inhibition Mechanism of allosteric inhibition.
Chemotaxis: Another go Chrisantha Fernando Systems Biology Centre Birmingham University Chrisantha Fernando Systems Biology Centre Birmingham University.
BioNetGen: a system for modeling the dynamics of protein-protein interactions Bill Hlavacek Theoretical Biology and Biophysics Group Los Alamos National.
Modeling the chemosensing system of E. coli
2 component regulatory systems Maltose=effector, BUT if signal not DIRECTLY involved, but needs to be transmitted and changed = signal transduction Sensor.
Bacterial Chemotaxis Dr. Chrisantha Fernando Systems Biology Centre University of Birmingham, UK March 2007 Dr. Chrisantha Fernando Systems Biology Centre.
Systems Biology Ophelia Venturelli CS374 December 6, 2005.
BIOC3800 Sensory Transducers Dr. J.A. Illingworth.
Cell Signaling Networks From the Bottom Up Anthony M.L. Liekens BioModeling and BioInformatics Anthony M.L. Liekens BioModeling and BioInformatics.
E. coli exhibits an important behavioral response known as chemotaxis - motion toward desirable chemicals (usually nutrients) and away from harmful ones.
Bacterial chemotaxis lecture 2 Manipulation & Modeling Genetic manipulation of the system to test the robustness model Explaining Ultrasensitivity and.
Computational Biology, Part 15 Biochemical Kinetics I Robert F. Murphy Copyright  1996, 1999, 2000, All rights reserved.
1 Introduction to Biological Modeling Steve Andrews Brent lab, Basic Sciences Division, FHCRC Lecture 1: Introduction Sept. 22, 2010.
Efficient Integration of Large Stiff Systems of ODEs Using Exponential Integrators M. Tokman, M. Tokman, University of California, Merced 2 hrs 1.5 hrs.
The chemotaxis network is able to extract once the input signal varies slower relative to the response time of the chemotaxis network. Under an input signal.
The Mathematical Model Of Repressilator where i = lacl, tetR, cl and j = cl, lacl, tetR. α 0 : the number of protein copies per cell produced from a given.
Overview of next five lectures: How is directional motility accomplished at the single cell level? An emphasis on experimental approaches for testing models.
Adaptation Essential for sensory perception Nearly universal Salmonella How to move towards unseen food?
Robustness in protein circuits: adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis 1 Information in Biology 2008 Oren Shoval.
Optimal Strategy in E. coli Chemotaxis: An Information Theoretic Approach Lin Wang and Sima Setayeshgar Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington,
Fig 7.1. Fig 7.2 The bacteria flagella motor [source: Berg HC, Ann. Rev. Biochem 2003] Fig 7.3.
L17. Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis response
12/24/2015Yang Yang, Candidacy Seminar1 Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis Yang Yang and Sima Setayeshgar Department of Physics Indiana University,
L 7: Linear Systems and Metabolic Networks. Linear Equations Form System.
1/2/2016Yang Yang, Candidacy Seminar1 Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis Yang Yang and Sima Setayeshgar Department of Physics Indiana University,
Optimal Strategy in E. coli Chemotaxis: An Information Theoretic Approach Lin Wang and Sima Setayeshgar Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington,
Computer-Aided Design of LIVing systEms CADLIVE automatically converts a biochemical network map to a dynamic model. JAVA application Client-Server System.
Lin Wang Advisor: Sima Setayeshgar. Motivation: Information Processing in Biological Systems Chemical signaling cascade is the most fundamental information.
How cells make decisions?. The cell is a (bio)chemical computer Information Processing System Hanahan & Weinberg (2000) External signals outputs.
Electrical Wave Propagation in a Minimally Realistic Fiber Architecture Model of the Left Ventricle Xianfeng Song, Department of Physics, Indiana University.
In-silico Implementation of Bacterial Chemotaxis Lin Wang Advisor: Sima Setayeshgar.
Approach…  START with a fine-tuned model of chemotaxis network that:  reproduces key features of experiments (adaptation times to small and large ramps,
Nonlinear balanced model residualization via neural networks Juergen Hahn.
The chemotaxis network is able to extract as much as information possible once the input signal varies slower relative to the response time of the chemotaxis.
BCB 570 Spring Signal Transduction Julie Dickerson Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Tuning the Responsiveness of a Sensory Receptor via Covalent Modification Dunten and Koshland Journal of Biological Chemistry Vol 266 Number 3 pp
Advanced Aspects of Chemotactic Mechanisms:
Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis
Bacterial Chemotaxis Bacteria swim toward attractants and away from repellents. Their motion is a biased random walk due to control of tumbling frequency.
Module 2: Robustness in Biochemical Signaling Networks
Xianfeng Song Lin Wang Sima Setayeshgar
Bacterial Chemotaxis Bacteria swim toward attractants and away from repellents. Their motion is a biased random walk due to control of tumbling frequency.
F. Matthäus, M. Jagodič, J. Dobnikar  Biophysical Journal 
Finite Volume Method for Unsteady Flows
Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis
Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis
Defining Network Topologies that Can Achieve Biochemical Adaptation
The biochemistry of memory
Yang Yang & Sima Setayeshgar
Mechanism of chemotaxis in E
Mathematical Models of Protein Kinase Signal Transduction
Defining Network Topologies that Can Achieve Biochemical Adaptation
Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis
Covalent Modification Regulates Ligand Binding to Receptor Complexes in the Chemosensory System of Escherichia coli  Guoyong Li, Robert M. Weis  Cell 
Protein Cascades. Protein Cascades Cascades Activator Output.
Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis
Simulating cell biology
Robustness of Cellular Functions
Bacterial chemotaxis Current Biology
Presentation transcript:

March 8, 2007March APS Meeting, Denver, CO1 Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis Yang Yang and Sima Setayeshgar Department of Physics Indiana University, Bloomington, IN

March 8, 2007March APS Meeting, Denver, CO2 Chemotaxis in E. coli Increasing attractants / decreasing repellent Run Tumble Courtesy of Howard Berg Lab

March 8, 2007March APS Meeting, Denver, CO3 Chemotaxis Signal Transduction Network in E. coli ; CheB CheACheWCheZ CheR CheY

March 8, 2007March APS Meeting, Denver, CO4 Robust Perfect Adaptation

March 8, 2007March APS Meeting, Denver, CO5 This Work: Outline  New computational scheme for determining  conditions  numerical ranges for parameters allowing robust (near-)perfect adaptation in the context of the E. coli chemotaxis network  Comparison of results with previous works  Extension to other chemotaxis networks, with additional protein components  Conclusions and future work

March 8, 2007March APS Meeting, Denver, CO6  Ligand binding  Methylation  Phosphorylation T3T4 T2 T4pT2pT3p LT3 LT4 LT4p LT2 LT3pLT2p phosphorylation methylation Ligand binding Biochemical Signaling Network

March 8, 2007March APS Meeting, Denver, CO7  START with a fine-tuned model of chemotaxis network that:  reproduces key features of experiments  is NOT robust  AUGMENT the model explicitly with the requirements that:  steady state value of CheYp  values of reaction rate constants, are independent of the external stimulus, s, thereby achieving robustness of perfect adaptation. : state variables : reaction kinetics : reaction constants : external stimulus Numerical Scheme

March 8, 2007March APS Meeting, Denver, CO8 Decretizing s into H points Augmented system The steady state concentration of proteins in the network must satisfy: The steady state concentration of CheYp must satisfy: At the same time, the reaction rate constants must be independent of stimulus: : allows for near-perfect adaptation = CheYp

March 8, 2007March APS Meeting, Denver, CO9 Near-perfect Adaptation

Implementation Newton-Raphson, to solve for the steady state of augmented system: Dsode (stiff ODE solver), to verify Time dependent behavior of proteins for different ranges of external stimulus by solving: March 8, March APS Meeting, Denver, CO

Pairwise result: 3D surface result: Relative change of CheYp: less than 5% and greater than 3% less than 3% and greater than 1% less than 1% pairwise trajectory E.coli Autophosphorylation rate of T4 (k10) LT2 methylation rate (k3c) Autophosphorylation rate of T4 (k10) T4 demethylation rate (km2) parameter spaces of E. coli March 8, March APS Meeting, Denver, CO

DSODE solutions for NR parameters set(3) March 8, 2007March APS Meeting, Denver, CO12

9% k 1c : 0.17 s -1  1 s -1 1% k 1c : 0.17 s -1  1 s -1 k 8 : 15 s -1  12.7 s -1 Violating and restoring perfect adaptation At 250s, giving step stimulus from 0 to 1e-6M (1,15) (1,12.7) Methylation rate of T2 (k1c)Autophosphorylation rate of T2 (k8) March 8, March APS Meeting, Denver, CO

Condition 2 Autophosphorylation rate of LT2 (k12) Methylation rate of LT2 (k3c) Autophosphorylation rate of T2 (k8) Methylation rate of T2 (k1c) Autophosphorylation rate of LT3 (k13) Methylation rate of LT3 (k4c) Autophosphorylation rate of T3 (k9) Methylation rate of T3 (k2c) Methylation rate autophosphorylation rate

Condition 2-continue Autophosphorylation rate of T3 (k 9 ) Demethylation rate of T3 (k m1 ) Autophosphorylation rate of T4 (k10) Demethylation rate of T4 (k m2 ) Autophosphorylation rate of LT3 (k 12 ) Demethylation rate of LT3 (km3) Autophosphorylation rate of LT4 (k 13 ) demethylation rate of LT4 (km4) demethylation rate (autophosphorylation rate) 2

Condition 4 demethylation rate/phosphorylation rate autophosphorylation rate T3 autophosphorylation rate T3 demethylation rate/ T2 methylation rate T4 autophosphorylation rate T4 demethylation rate/ T3 methylation rate LT3 autophosphorylation rate T3 demethylation rate/ T2 methylation rate LT4 autophosphorylation rate LT4 demethylation rate/ LT3 methylation rate

Condition 5 *The parameter value are normalized to the literature value( Peter A. S., John S.P. and Hans G.O., A model of excitation and adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis, biochemistry 1997) while the inset is not since the literature value is zero CheB phosphorylation rate / literature value CheY phosphorylation rate / literature value (L)T n autophosphorylation rate / literature value ● T2 ● T3 ● T4 ● LT3 ● LT4 ● T2 ● T3 ● T4 ● LT3 ● LT4 CheB phosphorylation rate LT 2 autophosphorylation rate CheY phosphorylation rate LT 2 autophosphorylation rate CheB, CheY phosphorylation rate autophosphorylation rate

March 8, 2007March APS Meeting, Denver, CO18 Two CheY system Rhodobacter sphaeroides, Caulobacter crescentus have multiple CheYs while lack of CheZ protein. Similar chemotaxis behaviors.

Two CheY system Our work: Reproduce the key feature of chemotaxis behavior in two CheY system by replacing CheZ with CheY2. CheY1 p (µM) Time(s)

parameter spaces comparison of two and single CheY case

March 8, 2007March APS Meeting, Denver, CO24 Conclusions Complete construction of manifolds in parameter space, allowing insight into parameter dependence giving rise to robustness Work in progress

March 8, 2007March APS Meeting, Denver, CO25 Future work Applying the method to other cellular signal transduction networks exhibiting robust homeostasis, such as phototransduction Signal flow in visual transduction, Leon Lagnado and Denis Baylor,Neuron,1992

March 8, 2007March APS Meeting, Denver, CO26 Conclusions  Successful implementation of a novel method for elucidating regions in parameter space allowing precise adaptation  Preliminary results for two- and three-dimensional projections of (near-) perfect adaptation manifolds in parameter space for the E. coli chemotaxis network, allowing determination of  conditions required for perfect adaptation, consistent with previous works  numerical ranges for unknown or partially known kinetic parameters  Extension to modification of the E. coli chemotaxis network, consistent with absence of CheZ homolog and presence of multiple CheY copies in rhizobacteria

March 8, 2007March APS Meeting, Denver, CO27 Future Work