PSD/Nonattainment Review You can do this! Marc Sturdivant Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Source Review NSR Reforms Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Council Presented by Matt Paque, Attorney, ODEQ - AQD April 20,
Advertisements

NETTING Rick Goertz, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2013 NETTING.
New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics
Richard (Rick) Goertz, P. E
PSD/NNSR Applicability Examples
Major Sources Pollutant Federal NSR 112(g) Major Major ROP Major PSD Major Offset Attainment Pollutants 250 or 100 NANA100 Non-Attainment Pollutants NA100NA100.
David K. Paylor Director, Department of Environmental Quality May 27, 2014 VEDP Lunch & Learn Environmental Permitting 101.
Part of NSR Program Applicable to Major Sources in Areas Not Attaining the NAAQS Nonattainment NSR Program (NA NSR)
1 Air Quality Impact Analysis and Other PSD Requirements Donald Law U.S. EPA Region 8.
Implementation of SB 700 (Florez) Seyed Sadredin Director of Permit Services San Joaquin Valley APCD November 4, 2003.
Sean O’Brien Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced Air Permitting Seminar 2014.
New Source Review in the SCAQMD November 2, 2005 Judy B. Yorke Yorke Engineering, LLC x25
Air Permitting Overview.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Nonattainment Area New Source Review Updates Rule Development Workshop Chapters and October.
New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics and Highlights of the Proposed Tribal Major Nonattainment and Minor NSR Rules Laura McKelvey, Jessica Montañez,
Air Construction Permitting Services Sarah Piziali, Construction Permit Section Supervisor.
Overview of the Tribal New Source Review (NSR) Rule U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) Research.
Clean Air Act and Permits
Implications of Proposed Ozone Standards in Southeast Missouri (SEM) SMRPC Meeting, Perryville, MO April 24, 2015 Joletta Golik.
NEGOTIATING ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS Steven Lacoste Lee, Futrell & Perles, LLP September 2014 – University of New Orleans.
1 PSD - Case #1 Case #1: –A simple cycle natural gas power plant with PTE NOx of 300 tpy and GHGs of 150,000 tpy CO2e receives a PSD permit addressing.
PERMITTING ELECTRIC GENERATING UNITS Jim Linville & Erik Hendrickson Air Permits Division.
Indiana New Source Review Reform Plantwide Applicability Limitations (PALs) IDEM/Office of Air Quality September 7, 2004.
Part of NSR Program Applicable to Major Sources in Areas Attaining the NAAQS Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Program.
Air Quality 101 Kansas Air Quality Program overview.
© Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP 1 Programmatic New Source Review November 2, 2005 Malcolm C. Weiss Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP 1900 Avenue.
Proposed Rulemaking 25 Pa. Code Chapter 121. General Provisions Chapter 127 Subchapter E. New Source Review John Slade, Chief Division of Permits Bureau.
Air Quality Policy Division D P A Q PM 2.5 Final NSR Implementation Rule Nat’l Tribal Air Assoc. July 16, 2008.
Regulatory Update New Source Review Permitting Case Studies & Regulatory Updates August 26, 2009 ARIPPA Technical Symposium trinityconsultants.com.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION (PSD) NSR PROGRAM Donald Law U.S. EPA Region 8.
ANPR: Transition to New or Revised PM NAAQS WESTAR Business Meeting March 2006.
Best Available Retrofit Technology Rule - Colorado David R. Ouimette Colorado Air Pollution Control Division.
Improving Air Quality: Controlling Stationary Sources Chapter 12.
Clean Air Initiatives in the 109th Congress: Clear Skies, or Not-So-Clear Skies Clean Air Initiatives in the 109th Congress: Clear Skies, or Not-So-Clear.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training PSD Applicability Example Landfill Applicability Examples John Calcagni, EPA Region 4.
Jessica Montanez Environmental Protection Agency NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR) PROGRAM.
1 Non-Attainment NSR Program Donald Law EPA Region 8.
Minor NSR Program and Highlights of the Proposed Tribal Major Nonattainment and Minor NSR Rules Jessica Montañez U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office.
New Source Review Rules Update Jessica Montanez U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Air Quality Policy Division.
Best Available Control Technology/Lowest Achievable Emission Rate Evaluation Sarah Fuchs Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Emissions Banking and Trading (EBT) Overview/Update Melissa Ruano Air Quality Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced Air Permitting.
Clean Air Act SAFE 210. Purpose Protect public health and regulate air emissions Addresses both stationary and mobile sources.
1 NSR Rule Review and Guidance 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121. General Provisions Chapter 127 Subchapter E. New Source Review The Allegheny Mountain Section.
Permitting and National Ambient Air Quality Standards Changes Rick Goertz, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
Carrie Paige – EPA Region 6, Dallas David Cole – EPA OAQPS, RTP, NC Introduction to Air Permits Introduction to Air Permits.
2005 NSR Regulation Changes Dwight Wylie. Old Units vs. New Units  There is a broad disparity between air pollution control requirements and emissions.
Aggregation Issues Jesse Lovegren, Ph.D. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced Air Permitting Seminar 2015.
New Source Review Reform & the PAL Tom Wood September 18,2003.
Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee Meeting September 27, 2006 Virendra Trivedi Chief, New Source Review/Title V Section Division of Permits Bureau.
NSR—Minor New Source Review Darrel Harmon U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation.
Resource Management Planning Air Quality Brock LeBaron Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
Air Quality Division Emissions Inventories SAW: May 3, 2016 Page 1 Point Source Emissions Inventories Air Quality Division Susan Wampler May 3,
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
PSD/Nonattainment Applicability Arturo J. Garza Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2016.
PSD Background Presentation
Ozone Redesignation Substitutes for the HGB and DFW Areas
New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics
PSD/Nonattainment Permitting
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
Nonattainment NSR Permitting Process
Overview of New Source Review (NSR)
Major New Source Review (NSR) Part 2
Enforcing the NAAQS Case Study Sean Taylor
Major New Source Review (NSR)—Part 1
Uinta Basin General Conformity
PSD / Nonattainment Review / Netting Basics
Presentation transcript:

PSD/Nonattainment Review You can do this! Marc Sturdivant Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2015

Getting Oriented

NAAQS  Criteria pollutants:  CO, NO X, SO 2, Ozone (NO X /VOC)  PM 10, PM 2.5, and Pb  Primary NAAQS:  Protect public health  Secondary NAAQS:  Protect public welfare

Important Terms  Attainment:  In compliance with NAAQS  Nonattainment:  Out of compliance with NAAQS

Lead Nonattainment Area DFW Ozone Nonattainment Area – 1997 Serious – 2008 Moderate Moderate PM 10 Nonattainment Area Wise Wise County (DFW) – Ozone Nonattainment Area Attainment Moderate (Effective 7/20/12) HGB Ozone Nonattainment Area – 1997 Severe – 2008 Marginal Current Nonattainment Areas

Minor & Major NSR State (Minor) NSR  NSR permit  Standard permit  PBR  De minimis Federal (Major) NSR PSD Nonattainment Federal (Major) NSR  PSD  Nonattainment

PSD Program

PSD Program Overview  New major sources  Major modifications of existing major sources  Criteria pollutants that are in attainment  Certain non-criteria pollutants

PSD Program Major Source Definition:  Named Source > 100 tpy (includes fugitives)  Un-named Source > 250 tpy

PSD Program Major Modification Significant Emission Rates for Criteria Pollutants: CO≥100tpy NO X ≥40tpy SO 2 ≥40tpy VOC≥40tpy PM≥25tpy PM 10 ≥15tpy PM 2.5 ≥10tpy Pb≥0.6tpy

PSD Program Major Modification Significant Emission Rates for Non-Criteria Pollutants: Fluorides≥ 3 tpy Sulfuric acid mist≥ 7 tpy Hydrogen sulfide≥10 tpy Total reduced sulfur≥10 tpy Plus others

PSD Program Review Requires:  Major for one regulated pollutant, major for all  Application of BACT  Air quality analysis (modeling)  If within 100 km of a Class I area, inform FLM  PM 10, PM 2.5 include filterable and condensable

Nonattainment Program

Nonattainment Program Overview  Applies only to pollutants for which the area is designated as nonattainment  New major sources  Major modifications of existing major sources  Most commonly encountered area – ozone:  Regulated through NO X and VOC

DFW - Serious Major Source ≥ 50 TPY Major Mod. ≥ 25 TPY Wise County (DFW) - Moderate Major Source ≥ 100 TPY Major Mod. ≥ 40 TPY Wise HGB - Severe Major Source ≥ 25 TPY Major Mod. ≥ 25 TPY Current Nonattainment Areas

Nonattainment Program Ozone Review Requires:  Must be a major source or major modification for either NO X or VOC  NO X and VOC are evaluated independently  Application of LAER  Application of offsets

Nonattainment Program Offset:  An actual emission reduction, greater than or equal to the project’s potential emission increase  The amount of offset depends on the nonattainment classification

DFW - Serious Major Source ≥ 50 TPY Major Mod. ≥ 25 TPY Offset Ratio = 1.2 to 1 Wise Wise County (DFW) - Moderate Major Source ≥ 100 TPY Major Mod. ≥ 40 TPY Offset Ratio = 1.15 to 1 HGB - Severe Major Source ≥ 25 TPY Major Mod. ≥ 25 TPY Offset Ratio = 1.3 to 1 Current Nonattainment Areas

PSD & Nonattainment Review  Is it possible to trigger both PSD and nonattainment for the same pollutant?  Yes, it is. NO X is an ozone precursor and has a NAAQS of its own.

New/Modified Equipment -Where is it located?  In an attainment or nonattainment area?  At an existing major source?

New/Modified Equipment -Where is it located?  At a grassroots or an existing minor source?  If so, the potential project increase must be major by itself to trigger major NSR.

Example 1

Example 1 Info. Company A is a minor source in a severe nonattainment area. Current PTE = 20 tpy NO X Proposed PTE = 40 tpy NO X Major Source = 25 tpy NO X Current PTE=20 tpy NO x Proposed PTE=40 tpy NO x Major Source =25 tpy NO x

Example 1 Potential Increase Current PTE = 20 tpy Proposed PTE = 40 tpy Major Source = 25 tpy 40 tpy – 20 tpy = 20 tpy The project is not a major source by itself or equal to 25 tpy for a severe nonattainment area. Major NSR is not triggered, but minor NSR permitting requirements do apply. severe nonattainment area). (greater than or equal to 25 tpy for Major Source = 25 tpy

Modified equipment at an existing major source? To trigger major NSR at an existing major source, the net project emission increase must be greater than or equal to the major modification significant emission rate for the pollutant.

Determine Emissions

Determine Emissions Steps  Determine the project increase for each pollutant.  Compare project increase to netting significance levels. If the increase is greater than the netting significance levels, netting is required.  If net project increase exceeds significance levels, major NSR is triggered.

Determine Emissions Project Emission Increase + Planned Emission Rate (project increases only) -Baseline Actuals (affected facilities) = Project Emission Increase Planned Emission Rate (project increases only) Project Emission Increase Baseline Actuals (affected facilities)

Determine Emissions Planned Emission Rate Either the...  Potential to emit, or  Projected actual emission rate

Determine Emissions Baseline Actual Emission Rate Emissions, in tons per year, actually emitted during a consecutive 24-month period out of...  The previous 10 years, or  The previous 5 years for electric utilities

Determine Emissions Baseline Timeline 2015 Jan 1, Application Submittal year window for selecting 24-month Baseline Actual Emission Rate

Determine Emissions Project Emission Increase + Planned Emission Rate (project increases only) -Baseline Actuals (affected facilities) = Project Emission Increase Planned Emission Rate (project increases only) Project Emission Increase Baseline Actuals (affected facilities)

Netting

Netting Netting Applicability Required if the project increase equals or exceeds the netting significance level for the pollutant. Planned Emission Rate minus Baseline Actual ≥ Netting Significance Level Planned Emission Rate (increases only) > Baseline Actual Netting Significance Level

Netting Netting Significance Levels  PSD: same as PSD major modification significance levels  Nonattainment:  Serious & Severe: ≥ 5 tpy  Moderate: ≥ 40 tpy

Netting Why do we do it?  Applies to existing major sources only  Applicability step to determine if major NSR has been triggered  Ensures smaller projects do not add up to be a major modification

Netting How to do it  Conducted for each pollutant in which netting is triggered  An evaluation of:  The current project, plus  Increases and decreases within the contemporaneous period (netting window)

Netting Contemporaneous Period/ The Netting Window Five years before start of construction to proposed start of operation

Netting Contemporaneous Period Example Start of Construction Start of Operation

Netting Modifications Identified Within the Window  May be based on:  The date the modification was authorized, or  The date the change is operated  Must be used consistently  Indicate which method is used

Netting Creditable Emissions  Occur during the contemporaneous period  Cannot have been relied upon in issuing a major NSR permit for the source  Sources/activities authorized by the major NSR permit are not in operation when the current increase is authorized  Rely on Emissions Inventory

Netting Creditable Increases  The new level of emissions exceeds the Baseline Actual Emission Rate (PTE – Baseline = Increase)  Does not include emission increases at facilities under a plant-wide applicability limit (PAL)

Netting Creditable Decreases  The Baseline Actual Emission Rate exceeds the new level of emissions  Enforceable at and after the time that project modification begins to operate (must be enforceable and real before the unit starts operation)

Netting Determining Increases and Decreases... ...for each project within the contemporaneous window are based on a comparison of:  Baseline Actual Emission Rate and  The PTE of that project (projected actuals are not used in this step except for the current project)

Netting Baseline Actual Emission Rate Emissions, in tons/year, actually emitted during a consecutive 24-month period out of the previous 10 years (previous 5 years for electric utilities) from the date the project is authorized or modifications are operated

Netting Using an Allowable to Allowable Comparison Situation #1: the Baseline Actual > Current PTE Situation #2: a new facility is within two years of its initial start-up date

Netting Netting Window Example Years 2009 Project Baseline Actual Emissions

Netting Net Emissions Increase Project increase +Non-project source-wide creditable contemporaneous emission increases - Source-wide creditable contemporaneous emission decreases (including the current project)= The amount that exceeds zero Project increase Emission increases Emission decreases Amount that exceeds zero Source-wide creditable contemporaneous (including the current project) Non-project source- wide creditable contemporaneous

Netting Triggering Major NSR  Compare the net increases to the appropriate significant emission rate  If the increase is greater than or equal to the significant emission rate for the pollutant, major NSR is required

More Examples

Example 2 Info. Company B is a major source in a severe nonattainment area. Current PTE = 50 tpy NO X Proposed PTE = 52 tpy NO X Baseline Actual = 48 tpy NO X Project Increase = 4 tpy NO X Current PTE=50 tpy NO x Proposed PTE=52 tpy NO x Baseline Actual=48 tpy NO x Project Increase = 4 tpy NO x

Example 2 Netting Required? Major Source; Severe Nonattainment Area; Current PTE = 50 tpy; Proposed PTE = 52 tpy; Baseline Actual = 48 tpy; Project Increase = 4 tpy The project increase of 4 tpy does not exceed the netting significance level of 5 tpy for a severe nonattainment area. Netting is not required.

Example 3 Info. Company C is a major source in a serious nonattainment area. Current PTE = 50 tpy NO X Proposed PTE = 60 tpy NO X Baseline Actual = 47 tpy NO X Project Increase = 13 tpy NO X (Proposed PTE minus Baseline Actual) Current PTE=50 tpy NO x Proposed PTE=60 tpy NO x Baseline Actual=47 tpy NO x Project Increase =13 tpy NO x (Proposed PTE - Baseline Actual)

Example 3 Netting Required? Major Source; Serious Nonattainment Area; Current PTE = 50 tpy; Proposed PTE = 60 tpy; Baseline Actual = 47 tpy; Project Increase = 13 tpy Emissions increase exceeds the netting significance level of 5 tpy. Netting is required!

Example 3 Table 3F NO x

Example 3 Finding Total Increase Current Project 13 tons/year increase plus 11/2010 Project 5 tons/year plus 10/2011 Project 0.25 tons/year minus 4.25 tons/year Total Increase: 14 tons/year 13 tons/yr increase 5 tons/yr (increase) 0.25 tons/yr (increase) 4.25 tons/yr (decrease) 14 tons/yr Current Project 11/2010 Project 10/2011 Project Total Increase

Example 3 Nonattainment Review?  The major modification significant emission rate for a serious nonattainment area is 25 tpy.  Total increase (from previous slide) is 14 tpy.  Since 14 tpy is less than the major modification significant emission rate of 25 tpy, the project is not a “major modification” and  major NSR (nonattainment review) is not required.

Example 4 Info. Company D is a major source in an attainment area. Current PTE = 200 tpy NO X Proposed PTE = 210 tpy NO X Baseline Actual = 190 tpy NO X Project Increase = 20 tpy NO X Current PTE=200 tpy NO x Proposed PTE=210 tpy NO x Baseline Actual=190 tpy NO x Project Increase = 20 tpy NO x

Example 4 PSD Required? Major Source;Attainment Area; Current PTE = 200 tpy; Proposed PTE = 210 tpy; Baseline Actual = 190 tpy; Project Inc. = 20 tpy The project increase of 20 tpy does not exceed the major modification significance level of 40 tpy for NO X. Netting is not triggered. PSD review is not required.

Check Your Calculations!

Contact Info. Air Permits Division (512)