Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Sustaining Excellence in Radiological Operations Through Peer Surveillance C. Schaefer, CHP D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

Quality Management Branch Cady Clark, MSN, RN Branch Manager Claudia Himes-Crayton, BSN, RN Patricia Palm, MS, RNC Nurse Consultants.
Infection Control Program
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
PRINCIPLES OF A CALIBRATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA Regions 9 & 10 and The Federal Network for Sustainability 2005
CONSOLIDATED PROGRAM REVIEW COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR TITLE I, PART C, MIGRANT EDUCATION PROGRAM MEP STATE CONFERENCE AUGUST 2013.
ORGANIZATION. 2 Problem scenario  Develop an organizational chart for your laboratory showing lines of authority from the head of the organization to.
ORGANIZATION. 2 Purchasing & Inventory Assessment Occurrence Management Information Management Process Improvement Customer Service Facilities & Safety.
1 The aim…. ‘to enable assessors to objectively assess a laboratory’s compliance with the new standards’
Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Responsibility for Radiation Safety Day 8 – Lecture 4.
State Assessment Observations Tressa Madden, MPH, RES CSO/Standards Implementation Staff FDA Tuesday, March 11, :00 am – 10:00 am.
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 7—Mass Care What Is It And How Will We Measure It? For sound, click on the megaphone and then move arrow.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
22000 Food Safety Management Systems
Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)
Gauges and well logging
Office of Inspector General (OIG) Internal Audit
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
Responsible CarE® Employee health and Safety Code David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 2010.
Developing a Chemical Risk Management Program
Radiation Safety Training WSU Radiation Safety Program Washington State University Radiation Safety Office.
Purpose of the Standards
BS EN ISO 14001:2004 Madlen King BSc MSc MIEMA EMS Lead Assessor Lloyd’s Register Quality Assurance Ltd BS EN ISO 14001:2004.
Seafood HACCP Alliance for Training and Education Chapter 10 Principle 6: Establish Verification Procedures.
REVIEW AND QUALITY CONTROL
Radiation Protection Technology High Radiation Area Access and Control Radiological Safety and Response RPT-243-PE-7.
Energy Facility Contractors Group Safety Working Group Industrial Hygiene / Industrial Safety Technical Team Dina Siegel, Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Loss Control Program Compliance Audits An overview of the purpose and procedures of program auditing.
The Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable Ralph Covington David Wang.
Advantages of Using External Assessors C. Schaefer, BNL H. Kahnhauser, BNL.
Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities Inspections.
OCCUPATION EXPOSURE INFORMATION AND TRAINING PURPOSE To outline methods to inform and train personnel regarding occupation exposures.
Summary of Assessment Reports and Gap Analysis
Occurrence Reports. An occurrence report is a document used to record an event when it occurs Occurrences are reported each time an occurrence occurs.
Environmental Restoration Projects Methods for Safety Culture Realization November 30, 2007.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
Work-Specific Hazard Checklist (WSHC) May 20, 2013 Mark Berkheimer, CHMM ORAU EH&S Specialist 3/Chemical Hygiene Officer 1.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Inspection Part II.
1 Thank you for visiting our site and welcome to the “Introduction to ISO 22000” Presentation that you requested. For more information.
Prime Responsibility for Radiation Safety
Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.
OSU-CHS ALARA Statement The OSU-CHS radiation safety program will be conducted in such a manner so that exposure to faculty, staff, students, the public,
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Standards, administrative controls, programs and processes, procedures, 10 CFR 50 Appendix B, INPO , NRC Guide 1.33.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Edward T. Lessard ESHQ.
Equitable Services, Part 2 Planning for Equitable Services Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title I.
DOE Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Conference Knoxville, TN August 24-27, 2009 Colette Broussard, DOE-HQ Office of Quality Assurance Policy.
Procedure Writing ALARA Radiological Safety and Response RPT-243-PE-2.
Integrating EM QA Performance Metrics with Performance Analysis Processes August 26, 2009 Robert Hinds, Manager, Quality Assurance Engineering & Greg Peterson,
Guidance Training (F520) §483.75(o) Quality Assessment and Assurance.
Ray Karol Collider-Accelerator Department ESSHQ Division Head August 19, 2009 Human Performance Initiative at Collider-Accelerator Department.
Office of Human Research Protection Georgia Health Sciences University.
1 City of Shelby Wastewater Treatment Division Becomes State’s Second Public Agency to Implement a Certified Environmental Management System CERTIFICATION.
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections Gerald A. Schlapper, PhD, PE, CHP Health Physicist Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Region I.
HPT Rev. 2 Page 1 of 17 TP-1 TVAN Technical Training Health Physics (RADCON) Initial Training Program CORE RADIOLOCICAL INSTRUCTIONS HPT
Most Common Deficiencies Cheryl O. Morton Managing Director, AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC.
Program Manager’s Review Name of Program: Radiation Protection Field Operations Group Program Manager: Jim Allan Date: 19 September 2005.
Revision N° 11ICAO Safety Management Systems (SMS) Course01/01/08 Module N° 9 – SMS operation.
Safety and Health Program Don Ebert- Risk Manager (509)
Quality Improvement and Quality Assurance, Additional Information, and Professional Liability Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH, LHCRM LCDR Shayna Wilborn, RN,
Internal Audit Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.), authorizes the Inspector General to review.
Table 1. The Five Medical Laboratory Case Studies Jan Martin et al. Transnational Evaluation of a New Continuing Professional Development Activity for.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
Tracheostomy Audit Clinical Audit DepartmentNovember 2011 Head and Neck Airways Team.
Enhancement of Radiological Safety Culture within Ignalina NPP and Contractors Viktor PLETNIOV Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant Lithuania Gintautas KLEVINSKAS.
The Most Important Element to Assure That Your Sales and Marketing Compliance Program is Working Effectively: Monitoring and Auditing Kelly B. Freeman,
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections
ESL/Title III Consultants
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections
Presentation transcript:

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Sustaining Excellence in Radiological Operations Through Peer Surveillance C. Schaefer, CHP D. Ryan, CHMM

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 2 Surveillance vs. Assessment n A sufficient amount of data must be collected on an on-going basis to establish that a management system is uniformly implemented, functioning well and continually improving n Periodic compliance assessments typically do not provide enough data to allow this conclusion to be drawn

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 3 Surveillance vs. Assessment (cont.) n 10CFR is the driver for BNL’s Triennial Assessment Program n All functional elements (19) must be audited for both content and implementation every 36 months n These assessments demonstrate compliance to requirements, but have limited impact on improving: consistency of implementation organizational performance in radiological operations

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 4 RCD’s Peer Surveillance Program n Surveillances are checklists containing questions developed directly from implementing procedures (removes ambiguity from the surveillance process) n Effective mechanism for identifying trends or recurrences n Designed to be used by field-deployed professionals and Radiological Control Technicians n Typically require 2-4 hours to complete n Can be used when observing work or reviewing field program documents (e.g., RWPs, surveys, ALARA records, etc.)

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 5 RCD’s Peer Surveillance Program n RCD has eleven (11) approved Surveillance Checklists: Posting and Labeling Sealed Source Control & Radiation Generating Device Programs Radiological Work Control & Area Monitoring Programs Radioactive Material Control Airborne Radioactivity Sampling and Analysis Radiological Records ALARA & Bioassay Programs Radiological Survey Program

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 6 RCD’s Peer Surveillance Program n Each surveillance is available electronically through the RCD Homepage to improve document control (no hoarding of outdated surveillance forms on individual PCs) n Surveillance questions are answered either as “Yes”, “No” or “N/A” n In most cases, a “No” response means a procedural requirement is not being implemented n A “No” response requires the assessor to provide written comments

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 7 RCD’s Peer Surveillance Program n RCD Self-Assessment web page RCD Self-Assessment web page

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 8 RCD’s Peer Surveillance Program n The assessor provides comments and suggestions to improve programs, implementing procedures, and/or clarifications to surveillance questions. n After signing the surveillance, the assessor forwards it to the RCD Quality Assurance representative for review. n RCD Self-Assessment web page RCD Self-Assessment web page

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 9 RCD’s Surveillance Process n 7 Facility Support Representatives (field- deployed professionals) are assigned to conduct a quarterly surveillance of their assigned facilities n 7 Radiological Control Technicians conduct quarterly surveillances of peer facilities n Total: 14 surveillances per quarter which generate ~ radiological control program sampling events

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 10 RCD’s Surveillance Process n Completed surveillances are turned in to the Division’s Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) n The QAR assigns a tracking #, trends low-level issues, signs each surveillance and forwards the surveillance to the Facility Support (FS) Manager n QAR periodically provides RCD Management with surveillance trending results so that appropriate follow up action(s) can be taken

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 11 RCD’s Surveillance Process n FS Manager reviews and signs each surveillance, and assists the RCD Manager in developing corrective actions and follow up to opportunities for improvement n RCD Manager reviews each surveillance for PAAA applicability, approves each surveillance, and forwards appropriate surveillances to the BNL PAAA Coordinator n RCD Manager forwards approved surveillances to the RCD FATS Coordinator for tracking of corrective actions n The FS Manager periodically disseminates results to FS personnel during staff meetings

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 12 Recent Surveillance Program Issues n RWP dose estimates not always completed IAW procedure requirements n No objective evidence that the FS Rep. and Line Management annually reviewing individuals for inclusion in the BNL Confirmatory Bioassay Program n PPE Donning and Doffing instructions not always posted at work sites n PPE Donning and Doffing instructions not always consistent with RWP PPE requirements

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 13 Recent Surveillance Program Issues n Frisking instructions not always posted at Frisking Stations (some confusion when RCT continuous coverage provided) n Radiation Generating Device (RGD) User Lists not always available n Dose rate (mrem/hr) and exposure rate (mR/hr) units recorded on radiological surveys inappropriate for the instrumentation used n BNL Sealed Source Database contains outdated information

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 14 Recent Opportunities for Improvement n To improve consistency, all ERP radiological area postings modified to state “Contact HP for RWP” n Posting surveillance identified opportunity to reduce Collider-Accelerator Radiation Area footprint in Bldg. 912 n Sealed Source Database does not reflect recent BNL organizational changes (e.g., transfer of PET from Chemistry to Medical) n Some organizations not using BTMS to track staff qualifications (share with Training Coordinator) n Include BNL ALARA Program Coordinator on distribution of monthly safety meeting minutes

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 15 Recent Opportunities for Improvement n Simplify the RGD Program by merging the System-Specific Checklist and Authorized Users List (completed 11/2007) n Clarify requirements for participation in BNL Confirmatory Bioassay Program (Plant Engineering TBD approved in 2007) n Review proper response to EPD alarms as part of pre-job briefing when EPDs are worn for RWP work in High Radiation Areas

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 16 Conclusion n RCD’s Surveillance Program provides several advantages: Provides Management with additional data on management system performance Allows for early identification of adverse trends Helps promote uniformity of implementation across multiple organizations Provides field-deployed staff with a venue for offering Opportunities for Improvement

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 17 Questions?