Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2007 Lecture # 6.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Milk Marketing AS 472, AVS 472 Fall 2008 John Swain Lecture 2 Dec 8, 2010.
Advertisements

THE DOMESTIC MARKET. US POPULATION FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE DOMESTIC DEMAND A LOOK AT LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS.
Agricultural Policy and Outlook Conference Series Cameron Thraen, OSU-AEDE Extension State Specialist Dairy Markets & Policy AEDE/OSU:
Growing The U.S. Livestock Economy: The Environmental (Phosphorous Assimilation) Challenge Tyler Mark, Louisiana State University Mike Boehlje, Allan Gray,
Economics of Food Demand Dr. George Norton Agricultural and Applied Economics, College of Agriculture & Life Sciences, Virginia Tech International Agricultural.
Wisconsin Dairy Farms by Herd Size, 2007 Source: USDA/NASS, Farms, Land in Farms, and Livestock Operations Summary.
The Economics of Regulations of Hen Housing in California William Matthews University of California Agricultural Issues Center SAEA Annual Meeting February.
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2009 Lecture # 7.
Outlook for the U.S. Livestock and Poultry Sectors in 2011 Presented By Shayle D. Shagam World Agricultural Outlook Board, USDA USDA Outlook Forum Washington,
IFIF/FAO Business Meeting - Rome 2006 Agriculture and the Animal Feed Industry.
Retail Distribution of Dairy Products Bob Cropp Dairy Marketing and Policy Specialist University of Wisconsin-Madison April 2001.
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2009 Lecture #19.
Lectures in Microeconomics-Charles W. Upton Applying Demand Functions.
Ag Policy, Lecture 11 Knutson, Penn, & Flinchbaugh, Chapter 7 & 5 Dairy Programs Livestock Impact Supply & Demand for Trade.
The University of Georgia College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences Dr. Tommie L. Shepherd Dr. Tommie L. Shepherd Center for Agribusiness and Economic.
Food Marketing u The performance of all business activities involved in the flow of food products and services from the point of initial production until.
Potential Impacts From the Growth of New Mexico Dairies By Terry L. Crawford USDA-ERS at “Dairy Fair” At ENMU-Roswell, New Mexico August 7, 2000.
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338a Fall 2007 Lecture # 15a.
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338a Fall 2009 Lecture # 4.
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2007 Lecture # 7.
Outlook for the U.S. Dairy Sector in 2012 Milton Madison Farm Service Agency U.S. Department of Agriculture Presented at the 2012 USDA Outlook Forum Washington,
Return to Competitive Pay Pricing For the Class III Formula Daniel Smith, Esq. Special Counsel, MDIA Ryan Miltner, Esq. Counsel, DPNM Paul Christ Consultant,
Econ 339X, Spring 2010 ECON 339X: Agricultural Marketing Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2009 Lecture # 9.
UNIT B8-2 Animal Science and the Industry. Lesson 2 Consumer Preferences.
The Incidence of Taxation. The incidence of taxation Indirect taxes.
Let’s See What You Know: Draw the outline of the United States Draw California Identify and label our three major bodies of water Star the location of.
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2009 Lecture #23.
Extension Summer Outlook Conference | Connecting Cows, Cooperatives, Capitol Hill, & Consumers | August 2015 C o n n e c t i n gC o w s,C o o p e r a t.
Econ 337, Spring 2013 ECON 337: Agricultural Marketing Chad Hart Associate Professor Lee Schulz Assistant Professor
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338a Fall 2007 Lecture # 3.
New York is an Agricultural State Courtesy of the USDA, National Agricultural Statistical Service, New York Field Office.
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338a Fall 2009 Lecture # 5.
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2009 Lecture #10.
©CSCOPE 2007 Economic Regions of the United States Economic Regions of the United States.
Effect of a tax on price and quantity S + tax S O P1P1 Q1Q1 D P Q.
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2009 Lecture # 8.
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2007 Lecture # 9.
“Market first, then produce the product” Chapter 3 – Agricultural Production and Marketing.
Agriculture and the Economy: A View from the Chicago Fed May 12, 2016 Detroit, MI David Oppedahl Senior Business Economist
The New Dynamics of Produce Buying & Selling The 2001 Becker Forum February 12, 2001 Research Conducted by Food Industry Management Program at Cornell.
Created by Tad Mueller Northeast Iowa Community College.
Created by Tad Mueller Northeast Iowa Community College.
REGIONS OF THE UNITED STATES
Derived Demand & Supply
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2009 Lecture # 15.
Market Situation & Outlook l Interpret market factors that impact prices and resulting marketing and management decisions l Analyze changing supply and.
Cattle Market Update Derrell S. Peel
1994 Microeconomics Question 3.
2014 Economic Analysis of Animal Agriculture
Lecture outline Characteristics of ag production that make agricultural marketing different from manufacturing. Nature of product and production Cycle.
Livestock and meat industry
Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2009 Lecture # 6
Agricultural Marketing
Regions of the United States
1950 U.S. population 154 million 5.6 million farms
Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2007 Lecture #18
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338a Fall 2007 Lecture # 13.
Agricultural Marketing
Today’s Dairy Market and Financial Situation
Impacts of Biofuels on the South
Presentation transcript:

Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2007 Lecture # 6

Elasticity of Supply n Percent change in quantity supplied that results from a 1% change in price n Determines how much more producers will put on the market when price increases n Determines how much less producers will put on the market when price falls

PoPo P1P1 QoQo Q1Q1 Supply Price $/# Quantity # of milk Relatively Inelastic Supply

PoPo P1P1 QoQo Q1Q1 Supply Price $/# Quantity # of milk Relatively Elastic Supply

Shifts in the Supply Curve n If we relax the assumption that all else is equal the supply curve can shift n For example assume that input costs decrease for all producers –Producers will be willing to supply more product at all points on the supply curve –The supply curve will shift downward and to the right

P1P1 Q1Q1 SoSo Price Quantity DoDo S1S1 PoPo QoQo Factors that can shift supply: 1. New technology 2. Changes in input costs 3. Raw material or resource availability 4. Legal or government program constraints on production

Shifts in the Supply Curve n If we relax the assumption that all else is equal the supply curve can shift n For example assume that the cost of feed to all producers increases –Producers will reduce the amount of milk they are willing to produce for any given price –The supply curve will shift upward and to the left

P1P1 Q1Q1 SoSo Price Quantity DoDo S1S1 PoPo QoQo Factors that can shift supply: 1. New technology 2. Changes in input costs 3. Raw material or resource availability 4. Legal or government program constraints on production

Production Costs By Region n How do the different regions in the U.S. compare with respect to production costs and net returns? n What effects are the differences in cost structure likely to have on where U.S. production takes place?

Statistical Regions MILK: NORTHEAST: New York, Pennsylvania and Vermont SOUTHEAST: Florida and Georgia UPPER MIDWEST: Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin CORN BELT: Iowa, Missouri and Ohio SOUTHERN PLAINS: Texas PACIFIC: Arizona, California and Washington Source: ERS, USDA

Production Costs & Returns Per Cwt., 2000 Source: ERS, USDA

Source: USDA, ERS

Regional Production Returns Per Cwt., 2003 Source: ERS, USDA

Production Costs & Returns Per Cwt., Heartland Region Source: ERS, USDA

Production Costs & Returns Per Cwt., Pacific Region Source: ERS, USDA

Production Costs & Returns Per Cwt., Pacific Region n How is it possible for the operations in California to have lower feed costs than the Heartland operations? n It costs $.30 to $.40 per Bushel ( or about $10 to $12 per ton) to ship corn to West Coast users.

FEED COST PER CWT – IMPACT OF VOLUME Of Milk Per Cow California = $145.00/mo to feed/cow 23,000# Iowa = $135.00/mo to feed/cow Average Annual Feed Cost / CWT. CA=$145/mo*12 mo = $1740  23,000#= $7.56/cwt Iowa=$140/mo*12 mo = $1560  20,000# = $8.40/cwt Iowa=$135/mo*12 mo = $1200  20,000# = $8.10/cwt Iowa=$130/mo*12 mo = $1140  20,000# = $7.80/cwt Iowa=$125/mo*12 mo = $1080  20,000#=$7.50/cwt

# of Milk Produced Average Cost/Cwt. Average Cost Curve

Supply  Concludes the Supply Section  QUESTIONS?

Total U.S. Milk Production and Total Commercial Disappearance, Sources: Agricultural Statistics, NASS, USDA & Livestock, Dairy & Poultry, ERS, USDA

DEMAND  MAJOR PRODUCTS  PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION  PRODUCTION REGIONS

U.S. Milk Utilization (Excl. Exports) Source: Agricultural Statistics, NASS, USDA

Total U.S. Milk Supply Source: Agricultural Statistics, NASS, USDA

Total Manufactured Dairy Products, U.S. Source: Agricultural Statistics, NASS, USDA

Total Milk Available for Fluid Products, U.S. Source: Agricultural Statistics, NASS, USDA

22% of the Population 34% of the Marketings Source: Federal Milk Market Administrator, Tulsa, May, 1999.

78% of the Population 66% of the Marketings Source: Fereral Milk Market Administrator, Tulsa, May, 1999.

GENERAL MILK FLOWS DIAGRAM Producer 85%-90%? Coop Handler

GENERAL MILK FLOWS DIAGRAM Producer 10%-15%? 85%-90%? Coop Handler Independent Processor

GENERAL MILK FLOWS DIAGRAM Producer 10%-15%? 85%-90%? Coop Handler Coop Processor Independent Processor

GENERAL MILK FLOWS DIAGRAM Producer 10%-15%? 85%-90%? Coop Handler Coop Processor Independent Processor Governed by FMMO if Grade A

GENERAL MILK FLOWS DIAGRAM Producer 10%-15%? 85%-90%? Coop Handler Coop Processor Independent Processor Governed by FMMO if Grade A Various types of market outlets

GENERAL MILK FLOWS DIAGRAM Producer 10%-15%? 85%-90%? Coop Handler Coop Processor Independent Processor Governed by FMMO if Grade A Various types of market outlets Final consumers

GENERAL MILK FLOWS DIAGRAM Producer 10%-15%? 85%-90%? Coop Handler Coop Processor Independent Processor Governed by FMMO if Grade A Government Various types of market outlets Government Final consumers

The Milk Flow Diagram Oversimplifies A Very Complex System n Numerous Manufacturing Processes n Numerous Products n Numerous Distribution Channels

MARKET OUTLETS FOR PROCESSED MILK Traditional Supermarket and Convenience-store retailers Food service and restaurants Ingredients to food manufacturers Mass market retailers Health food stores Animal feed Industrial users

SUPERMARKETS & C-STORES (Products) Fluid products (Class I) Extended Shelf Life (ESL) fluid product Cheeses Class II products NMP based products Specialty products (eg. Frappuccino) Diet beverages (Slim Fast)

SUPERMARKETS & C-STORES (Concentration) The Structure of the Supermarket Industry Has Changed Radically in the Past Decade The Industry Has Become Very Concentrated Since the Late 1990’S This Has Had and Continues to Have Significant Implications for Producers

Grocery Store Consolidation in the Late 1990’s n Kroger n Albertson’s n Safeway n Ahold n Super Value n Fleming n Food Lion n Shaws/Sainsbury n Fred Meyer, Smith’s, Smitty’s, QFC & Hughes n Ralph’s & Food 4 Less n Albertson’s: Buttrey, Smitty’s, Seessel’s + Brunos n American Stores: Jewel, Ames, Lucky n Von’s, Dominicks, Randalls n Bi-Lo, Tops, Stop & Shop, Edwards, Finast, Giant, Giant & U.S. Foodservice, Peapod (Online Grocery) n Wetterau, Richfoods n Scrivner n Kash N’ Karry, Hannaford n Star Markets Grocery Acquisition, Expansion & Format Variations

Top Grocery Firms Sources: Wall Street Journal, 8/4/98 Customer Estimates, 1998 Marketing Guidebook, SuperMarket News, 6/14/99.

Questions?