Single Top Search ~ New Kinematics Fitter and ttbar bkg~ K Nakamura.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Search for Charged Higgs in the Decay of Top Quarks at D0.
Advertisements

Regina Demina, University of Rochester 02/08/2012 Forward-backward asymmetry in top-antitop production in proton-antiproton collisions.
Effect of b-tagging Scale Factors on M bb invariant mass distribution Ricardo Gonçalo.
CDF でのWH  lνbb チャンネルを用い た ヒッグス粒子探索 Outline Introduction Analysis & Current Upper Limit on WH Conclusion & Tevatron Results 増渕 達也 筑波大学 February 21 th 2007.
Higgs Searches using Vector Boson Fusion. 2 Why a “Low Mass” Higgs (1) M H
Summary of Results and Projected Sensitivity The Lonesome Top Quark Aran Garcia-Bellido, University of Washington Single Top Quark Production By observing.
Ijaz AhmedNational Centre for Physics, Islamabad Top Anti-Top pair Production, Decays and Branching ratios at LHC.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
Top Physics at the Tevatron Mike Arov (Louisiana Tech University) for D0 and CDF Collaborations 1.
Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.
On the Trail of the Higgs Boson Meenakshi Narain.
Search for resonances The fingerprints of the Top Quark Jessica Levêque, University of Arizona Top Quark Mass Measurement Top Turns Ten Symposium, Fermilab,
Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) Introduction to Single-Top The measurement.
Gen 5 MC validation… ( top mass template )  Rec. Mtop - Pythia vs (-0.9) - Herwig vs (-0.7) - Herwig vs (+3.3)
Top Results at CDF Yen-Chu Chen/ 陳彥竹 中央研究院物理所 Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica Taiwan, ROC For the CDF collaboration ICFP /10/03-08.
Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Veronique Boisvert, Fabrizio Salvatore, Tao Wu LCWS 08, Chicago, 18 November 2008 Sensitivity to the Higgs self-coupling.
Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Veronique Boisvert, Fabrizio Salvatore, Tao Wu ILD Workshop, Cambridge, 12 September 2008 Sensitivity to the Higgs.
Tevatron Searches in Top Decays Junji Naganoma Waseda University For the CDF and D  Collaborations DIS 2008, London, April 09, 2008.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
A. Martyniuk a, P. Miyagawa b, M. Owen c, O. Trifis c, V. Chavda c, and U.K. Yang c a: University of Victoria b: University of Sheffield c: University.
Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.
Gideon Bella Tel Aviv University On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration ATL-PHYS-PUB ATL-PHYS-PUB Prospects of measuring ZZ and WZ polarization.
Standard Model Higgs Searches at the Tevatron (Low Mass : M H  ~140 GeV/c 2 ) Kohei Yorita University of Chicago The XLIIIrd Rencontres de Moriond EW.
Section of experimental particle physics Per Hansson Top D0 Summer Physics Workshop June Top Charge Measurement using Jet Charge Templates.
Experimental aspects of top quark physics Lecture #2 Regina Demina University of Rochester Topical Seminar on Frontier of Particle Physics Beijing, China.
Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal – University of Udine ATLAS Week, Prague, Sep 2003.
Janice Drohan, Simon Dean, Nikos Konstantinidis UCL Christmas Meeting 12/12/2005 Search for Low Mass SM Higgs in the Channel ttH(H  bb)
H ➝ bb search and b-tagging Ricardo Gonçalo on behalf of the Higgs subgroup 5.
Sensitivity Prospects for Light Charged Higgs at 7 TeV J.L. Lane, P.S. Miyagawa, U.K. Yang (Manchester) M. Klemetti, C.T. Potter (McGill) P. Mal (Arizona)
1 ttbar Cross-Section Studies D. Jana*, M. Saleem*, F. Rizatdinova**, P. Gutierrez*, P. Skubic* *University of Oklahoma, **Oklahoma State University.
Single Top Search ~ New Kinematics Fitter ~ K Nakamura.
Searches for the Standard Model Higgs at the Tevatron presented by Per Jonsson Imperial College London On behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations Moriond.
Moriond QCD 2001Enrico Piotto EP division CERN SM Higgs Search at LEP in Channels other than 4 Jets Enrico Piotto EP Division, CERN SM Higgs Search at.
Measurements of Top Quark Properties at Run II of the Tevatron Erich W.Varnes University of Arizona for the CDF and DØ Collaborations International Workshop.
Liu Minghui Nanjing MC study of W polarization and ttbar spin correlation Liu Minghui, Zhu Chengguang April 27, 2008.
Single Top Production Search at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics III May Vanderbilt University, Tennessee Julien Donini University of Padova.
CIPANP, June 2012 David Toback, Texas A&M University – CDF Collaboration Top Quark Properties with the Full Run II Dataset 1 October 2011 David Toback,
Single Top Quark Studies, L. Li (UC Riverside) ICHEP 08, July Liang Li University of California, Riverside for the CDF, DØ and H1 Collaborations.
B. Resende Top WG 28/10/05 Polarization studies in ttbar events 1 Polarization studies in tt events with full simulation 1.Physics motivations 2.Full simulation.
Jet Prob optimization for the s-channel search Hideki Maehashi University of Tsukuba 7/28/2008 Contents 1.Single Top Search 2.Jet Probability 3.Event Selection.
E. Devetak - IOP 081 Anomalous – from tools to physics Erik Devetak Oxford - RAL IOP 2008 Lancaster‏ Anomalous coupling (Motivation – Theory)
October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar1 David Toback Texas A&M University For the CDF Collaboration CIPANP, June 2012.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
Searching for the Higgs boson in the VH and VBF channels at ATLAS and CMS Dr. Adrian Buzatu Research Associate.
Single top quark physics Peter Dong, UCLA on behalf of the CDF and D0 collaborations Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallee d’Aoste Wednesday, February.
On the Brink of Revelation and Revolution: Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in 2008 Rick St. Denis – Glasgow University.
Summary of Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal, University of Udine Top Working Group, CERN October 29 th, 2003.
Jessica Levêque Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2006 Page 1 Measurement of Top Quark Properties at the TeVatron Jessica Levêque University of Arizona on behalf.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
EPS Manchester Daniela Bortoletto Associated Production for the Standard Model Higgs at CDF D. Bortoletto Purdue University Outline: Higgs at the.
Search for a 4 th generation t’ quark in p-p collision at ATLAS -Suyog Shrestha, Iowa State University.
1 Reinhard Schwienhorst, MSU Top Group Meeting W' Search in the single top quark channel Reinhard Schwienhorst Michigan State University Top Group Meeting,
SEARCH FOR DIRECT PRODUCTION OF SUPERSYMMETRIC PAIRS OF TOP QUARKS AT √ S = 8 TEV, WITH ONE LEPTON IN THE FINAL STATE. Juan Pablo Gómez Cardona PhD Candidate.
Single Top Quark Production at D0, L. Li (UC Riverside) EPS 2007, July Liang Li University of California, Riverside On Behalf of the DØ Collaboration.
Marcello Barisonzi First results of AOD analysis on t-channel Single Top DAD 30/05/2005 Page 1 AOD on Single Top Marcello Barisonzi.
Studies for the Single Top Quark t-channel measurement with the ATLAS experiment 1 Ph. Sturm D. Hirschbühl, W. Wagner Bergische Universität Wuppertal BND.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Investigation on CDF Top Physics Group Ye Li Graduate Student UW - Madison.
The Top Quark at CDF Production & Decay Properties
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
Top mass measurements at the Tevatron
An Important thing to know.
W Charge Asymmetry at CDF
W boson helicity measurement
Higgs Vector Boson Fusion Production and Detection at the Tevatron
Single Top at the Tevatron
Greg Heath University of Bristol
Measurement of the Single Top Production Cross Section at CDF
Presentation transcript:

Single Top Search ~ New Kinematics Fitter and ttbar bkg~ K Nakamura

Pointed out previous meeting… MET fit function Top specific correction factor W boson direction at the W* rest frame lepton direction at the Top rest frame Use Kinematics likelihood to the event selection Mbb distribution for the event selection ttbar background ttopvl: Mtop=175 GeV Generated by Pythia MC version spring summer2005 version Contents

S-channel single top CM Frame W* t b b l ambiguity Selection of bjet from top quark t-channel : tagged jet -> 95% s-channel : tagged jet -> 53% CDFNOTE top mass resolution +15 GeV Selection of neutrino Pz solution 30% … no solution M l b : for 4 cases This Top Mass constraint gave some bias to Mlnb distribution??

Likelihood Function for neutrino Pz To define a Likelihood as the function of Neutrino Pz Move three parameters: METx METy P Z 2 solution case 0 or 1 solution case

Likelihood Function for bbbar ambiguity  is the angle of Wstar Rest Frame

MET Double Gaussian with single mean value (5 parameter)

Top Specific Correlation gen bPt [GeV] rec bPt [GeV] Rec P gen P

Top Specific Correlation Factor distribution p0=2.12 p1=23.3 p2=0.057 p0=1.83 p1=24.8 p2=0.032 p0=1.31 p1=25.0 p2=0.081 Rec P gen P – Rec P Xaxis value of each bin is weighted mean From takeuchi-san

Mlnb distribution Sim Lev -- top -- other

W boson direction at the W* rest frame Dominant channel of Wbb background is t-channel like upper right feynman diagram. -> W boson direction is close to p or pbar direction

PP W*- t b b W W*+ t b +Z  Wstar Rest Frame W b d u ud Signal Wbb Rest Frame PP W b +Z   b du bb W ud du ud

Signal Wbb  e ttbar Bkgs ?? W+ W-

lepton direction at the Top rest frame PP b l- b l+ +Z t t udud  Top Rest Frame Top quark is polarizing the d-type-quark direction at the top rest frame. -> lepton is boosted d-type-quark direction

W*+ W*- correct wrong cos  lep distribution

Use Kinematics likelihood to the event selection Similar distribution…

Mbb distribution for the event selection -> bb invariant mass in the Wbb background looks much smaller than signal…

Mbb distribution We can use this variable for event selection !

ttbar background Mlnb distribution normalized by # of events of CDFnote At least 1 b-tag

B-tag 64.3% 29.5% 52.4% 19.7% 45.9% 37.6% Signal W(mu)bb 57.2% 20.9% 36.5% ttbar

At least 1 b-tagS+S S+J double tag Double tag…

} S/B=7.02/96.6=0.07 S/sq(B)=0.71 S/B=15.3/534.5=0.03 S/sq(B)=0.66 improvement

Backup

S-channel single top CM Frame W* t b b l ambiguity Selection of bjet from top quark t-channel : tagged jet -> 95% s-channel : tagged jet -> 53% CDFNOTE top mass resolution +15 GeV Selection of neutrino Pz solution 30% … no solution M l b : for 4 cases This Top Mass constraint gave some bias to Mlnb distribution??

Neutrino solution

Likelihood Function for neutrino Pz To define a Likelihood as the function of Neutrino Pz Move three parameters: METx METy P Z 2 solution case 0 or 1 solution case

P ---- W* W* - To have pronounced tendency to separate W*+ and W*- PP W*- t b b l- W*+ t b b l+ +Z correct wrong

P Z *Q ---- correct ---- wrong

W* t b b l M W* 2 > M t 2 +M b 2 ~ M t 2 M W* =q 2 =s ^ W* has the mass as small as possible to keep larger than Mt…?? W* mass

M Using L5 jet No b jet correction

Likelihood … correlation check M W* P Z *Q lep

MET Gaussian Double Gaussian We use this one !

Result of the Likelihood fitting

bbbar ambiguity

Likelihood Function for bbbar ambiguity  is the angle of Wstar Rest Frame

B-jet Pt distribution W* t b b l Using L5 jet No b jet correction Gen LevSim Lev -- top -- other -- top -- other Use these distribution as the Probability Density Function

M lb distribution W* t b b l Using L5 jet No b jet correction Gen LevSim Lev -- top -- other -- top -- other Use these distribution as the Probability Density Function

cos  b x Q lep PP W*- t b b l- W*+ t b b l+ +Z tb production process has the V-A coupling, so it is easy for the b-jet to be produced in the direction of quark in proton, and bbar-jet to be produced in the direction of anti-quark in the Wstar rest frame.  Wstar Rest Frame cos  angle shown in upper figure times lepton charge is the powerful variable to select b-jet which is directory produced form Wstar.

cos  b distribution Gen Lev Sim Lev topother topother ---- W* W* -

cos  b x Q lep distribution Gen Lev -- top -- other Sim Lev -- top -- other Use these distribution as the Probability Density Function

Parameter correlation These figure shows some correlations between the Likelihood parameters…… But Likelihood is only used as the choosing bbbar ambiguity, so we use this likelihood !

Top Specific Correction for b-jet

Correlation Factor as the function of Pt Eta

After Correction check

Top Mass Distribution Linear ScaleLog Scale

Wbb background Shape ---- Wbb ---- Signal Normalization is not correct… Use MC Wbb+0j bkg

---- Wbb ---- Signal Mlnb distribution normalized by # of events of CDFnote Wbb events s-channel events At least 1 b-tag

64.3% 29.5% 52.4% 19.7% B-tag 45.9% 37.6% SignalW(mu)bb

---- Wbb ---- Signal At least 1 b-tagS+S S+J double tag Double tag… ---- Wbb ---- Signal Enhancement !?

Conclusion  We developed new likelihood fitter without using top mass constraint Make Likelihood fitter like blow : For the 75.2% events of the 2 solution events we can choose the correct solution.  After decided neutrino Pz, we can choose the correct b-jet from the top quark for the 81% of the total events.  But Mlnub distribution is not so improved…  We will try to check correlation between the likelihood variables and top mass 2 solution case 0 or 1 solution case

Backup

W* t b b l wrong correct P ---- W* W* - Bug is Fixed !

P Z *Q ---- correct ---- wrong

W* t b b l wrong correct M

Probability Density Function

Neutrino Solution Check Choose Correct Solution Result of the Likelihood fitting What?? P Z =0 ??

-2Log L distribution as the function of P Z First 6 events…

Likelihood distribution for the case of P Z =0 Most likely P Z is really 0 ?? Is this correct??

---- correct ---- wrong corr wrong 72.7% 75.2% Likelihood for Solution corr wrong