APEX Septum Analysis G.M. Urciuoli. Comparison between PREX septum field (from SNAKE input), and APEX septum field (from TOSCA simulations). Y axis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA Experimental Overview The.
Advertisements

Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
1 A novel method of looking for the parity violation signal N. N. Ajitanand (SUNYSB Nuclear Chemistry) for the PHENIX Collaboration Joint CATHIE/TECHQM.
E : HRS Cross Section Analyses Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology GMp Collaboration Meeting September 24 th, 2012.
Jin Huang & Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology Boson 2010 Workshop Sept 20, JLab.
Coordinates. You are used to reading and plotting coordinates in this quadrant This is called the first quadrant.
Emittance Measurement Simulations in the ATF Extraction Line Anthony Scarfe The Cockcroft Institute.
Transverse optics 2: Hill’s equation Phase Space Emittance & Acceptance Matrix formalism Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
Emittance–momentum matrix1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, MICE Video Conference, 21 January Initial 4D.
SLIDE Beam measurements using the MICE TOF counters Analysis meeting, 23 September 2008 Mark Rayner.
Slide 1 MICE Beamline Design and Commissioning Review 16 th Nov 2007 Simulation comparison / tools / issues Henry Nebrensky Brunel University There are.
1 September 09Mark Rayner – Emittance measurement by The TOFs1 Emittance measurement by the TOFs Via trace space reconstruction of individual muons. Complementary.
Beam line characterization with the TOFs1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, CM26 California, 24 March Initial.
Beamline-to-MICE Matching Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 2 August 2004 MICE performance with ideal Gaussian beam JUNE04 beam from ISIS beamline (Kevin.
1 Validation and Verification of Simulation Models.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
Bogdan Wojtsekhowski, Jefferson Lab Experimental search for A’ for APEX collaboration 1.
The LiC Detector Toy M. Valentan, M. Regler, R. Frühwirth Austrian Academy of Sciences Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna InputSimulation ReconstructionOutput.
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
HLab meeting 10/14/08 K. Shirotori. Contents SksMinus status –SKS magnet trouble –Magnetic field study.
Pion test beam from KEK: momentum studies Data provided by Toho group: 2512 beam tracks D. Duchesneau April 27 th 2011 Track  x Track  y Base track positions.
Measurement of through-going particle momentum by means of Multiple Scattering with the T600 TPC Talk given by Antonio Jesús Melgarejo (Universidad de.
Possible Spectrometer for eA Collider Seigo Kato Faculty of Science, Yamagata University, Yamagata , Japan Presented to the workshop "Rare-Isotope.
Determination of R – matrix Supervisors: Prof. Nikos Tsoupas Prof. Manolis Benis Sándor Kovács Murat Yavuz Alkmini-Vasiliki Dagli.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
A Study of Mapping for g2p instead of Reconstruction? Jixie Zhang Nov 27, 2012.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
Hypernuclear Physics in Hall A E Status John J. LeRose December 16, 2009.
Spectrometer Optics John J. LeRose. The Basics Charged particles moving through static magnetic fields.  Magnetic Rigidity Local radius of curvature.
Jin Huang M.I.T. Hall A Analysis Workshop Dec 14, JLab.
GEM MINIDRIFT DETECTOR WITH CHEVRON READOUT EIC Tracking Meeting 10/6/14 B.Azmoun, BNL.
SHMS Optics Studies Tanja Horn JLab JLab Hall C meeting 18 January 2008.
Statistical Description of Charged Particle Beams and Emittance Measurements Jürgen Struckmeier HICforFAIR Workshop.
Preparation for E Pi0 Collaboration Meeting Tuesday Feb R.Lindgren.
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
Background Subtraction and Likelihood Method of Analysis: First Attempt Jose Benitez 6/26/2006.
Update on the Hall C Monte Carlo simulation for 12 GeV Mark Jones.
7 May 2009Paul Dauncey1 Tracker alignment issues Paul Dauncey.
Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
GlueX Two Magnet Tagger G. Yang University of Glasgow Part 1, 3 D Tosca analysis. Part 2, Preliminary Drawings. Part 3, Proposed Assembly Procedures (i)
V0 analytical selection Marian Ivanov, Alexander Kalweit.
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
Geant4 Simulation of the Beam Line for the HARP Experiment M.Gostkin, A.Jemtchougov, E.Rogalev (JINR, Dubna)
Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set R. Burrell, G.P. Gilfoyle University of Richmond, Physics Department CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating.
Adam Blake, June 9 th Results Quick Review Look at Some Data In Depth Look at One Anomalous Event Conclusion.
Lecture 4 - E. Wilson - 23 Oct 2014 –- Slide 1 Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
Electron Spectrometer: Status July 14 Simon Jolly, Lawrence Deacon 1 st July 2014.
ESTIMATING THE 6m TAGGER ACCEPTANCE Thomas Schörner-Sadenius, UHH ZEUS Collaboration meeting DESY, 27 February 2006.
SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors G. Burtin, R.J. Colchester, G. Ferioli, J.J. Gras, R. Jung,
LiC Detector Toy Liverpool SiLC MeetingM. Regler, M. Valentan, R. FrühwirthLiverpool SiLC MeetingM. Regler, M. Valentan, R. Frühwirth The LiC Detector.
Spectrometer optics studies and target development for the 208Pb(e,e’p) experiment in Hall A at Jefferson Lab, GUIDO M. URCIUOLI, INFN, Roma, Italy, JUAN.
Particle identification by energy loss measurement in the NA61 (SHINE) experiment Magdalena Posiadala University of Warsaw.
Lecture 4 - E. Wilson –- Slide 1 Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
Jin Huang Brookhaven National Lab ● Optics General ● Test Run Calibration ● Comment on Full Runs Trying to collect materials from three years ago. May.
Monte Carlo simulation of the particle identification (PID) system of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Mice is mainly an accelerator physics.
Min Huang g2p/GEp Collaboration Meeting April 18, 2011.
y x Vincenzo Monaco, University of Torino HERA-LHC workshop 18/1/2005
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Rectangular Coordinates
M. Kuhn, P. Hopchev, M. Ferro-Luzzi
Using MICE to verify simulation codes?
Results of dN/dt Elastic
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
Yuhui Li How to edit the title slide
Toy Monte Carlo for the Chromatic Correction in the Focusing DIRC Data
MATRICES MATRIX OPERATIONS.
PIXEL Slow Simulation Status Report
Presentation transcript:

APEX Septum Analysis G.M. Urciuoli

Comparison between PREX septum field (from SNAKE input), and APEX septum field (from TOSCA simulations). Y axis along the direction of the scatterd particles. Z vertical axis.

OPTIC performances Optic simulations performed mainly through SNAKE.

Spectrometer Acceptance According to simulations performed with SNAKE, the «rectangular» acceptance is: -4.1% < P < 4.1% rad < Theta < rad rad < Phi < 002 Theta and Phi are the vertical and horizontal scattering angle respectively. The Phi acceptance seems a little too small and has to be checked. Outside the rectangular acceptance no ray exits HRS. Inside the rectangular acceptance about 80% of the rays survives. The global acceptance is hence 80% of the rectangular acceptance.

Focal Plane at VDC APEX septum is very close to the septum used by PREX. However PREX run with a focal plane located m downstream with respect to the VDCs. To find the correct HRS quadrupole setting that places the focal plane at VDC position one has to change HRS quadrupole fields (mainly Q3 one) in order to change the focal plane position with respet to PREX. The focal plane is at VDC position when the X spot size, produced by rays at the centre of the HRS momentum and horizontal angle acceptance, but spanning all over the vertical (Theta) scattering angle acceptance has its minimum at VDC position. This because, at focus, X is independent of Theta scattering angle. To place the focal plane at VDC position one has to reduce the Q3 field with respect to PREX setting of 13% (at the same momentum setting).

Distributions on the focal plane and Momentum resolution First step: simulating rays spanning the whole momentum acceptance but with scattering angles = 0. Momentum resolution calculated reconstructing momenta of the same rays used to determine the polynomials of the Transport Matrix (to check how good the Matrix is). Transport matrix calculated with «MUDIFI». Momentum Resolution defined as: (P_ True – P_ Reconstructed )/P_ True

Second step 1000 rays randomly chosen in the momentum range but with scattering angles still equal to zero. Their momenta reconstructed through the Transport Matrix deduced in indipendent way with MUDIFI during the previous step. During the reconstruction process, the ray coordinates on the focal plane were broadened according gaussian distributions. The sigmas of these gaussian distributions of the coordinates in the focal plane were: σx = 2.3*10- 4 m σy = 2.5*10- 4 m σϑ = 2.95*10- 4 rad σϕ = 4.0*10- 4 rad

Third Step Spanned all the momentum and vertical (theta) angle to derive a new Transport Matrix. The Matrix was used to trace back the same rays employed to derive it (see Momentum Resolution plot in next slide). The ray coordinates on the focal plane broadened according gaussian distributions Now the resolution is worsend by the fact that X Focal Plane and Theta Focal Plane are extremely correlated and the simultaneous use of both of them in the determination (throug MUDIFI) of the Transport Matrix without elminating their correlation (not yet performed) can even worsen things. Netherteless the Momentum resolution is still very good.

Fourth Step 1000 rays random chosen in the momentum range and vertical range. Their momenta reconstructed through the Transport Matrix deduced in indipendent way with MUDIFI during the previous step. The ray coordinates on the focal plane broadened according gaussian distributions (with respect to the corresponding plot of the third step, the momentum resolution plot has a different binning). The resolution still well less than 5*10 -4.

To be done For momentum resolution: optical simulations that span rays also in the horizontal angle scattering acceptance. Check on horizontal angle acceptance. Simulations that take into accounts the target length. Simulations that take into accounts the fact that the incident beam is rastered. Scattering angle resolution estimation. Vertex reconstruction. Target straggling etc. effects

Conclusions The analysis has not yet be completed. Nevertheless APEX septum features seem to be pretty good. HRS outstanding performances (above all it momentum resolution) seem not to be spoiled by the introduction of the septum.