An Integrated Intensity Frontier Strategy Steve Holmes & Bob Tschirhart LBNE Reconfiguration Workshop April 25, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project X Experimental Facilities Target Facilities PASI 2013 WG1 P. Hurh (FNAL)/D. Asner (PNNL) w/ several slides stolen from R. Tschirhart (FNAL)
Advertisements

The US 5 Year Muon Acceleration R&D Program To Boldly Go… MICE Collaboration Meeting Harbin January, 2009.
Fermilab E = Mc 2 Opening Windows on the World Young-Kee Kim Fermilab and the University of Chicago June 1, 2010.
Beyond the ALCPG David B. MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Director for PPA.
Muon Collider 2011 Workshop Jun 27-July 1 in Telluride, CO Gollwitzer & Nagaitsev presented Attending: Ankenbrandt, Lebedev, Pasquinelli, Popovic, and.
Project X: News & Strategy Steve Holmes Project X Working Group Meeting November 19, 2009.
F Future of Neutrino Program at FNAL NuMI Off-Axis Meeting Hugh Montgomery January 12, 2004.
Nufact09-IIT 107/24/2009 Project X and a Muon Facility at Fermilab Milorad Popovic FNAL.
Project X Update Steve Holmes SPAFOA Meeting November 13, 2012
R. Tschirhart Fermilab Oct 15 th 2012 PX Stage 1 Physics Case: Preparations for Snowmass / Minnesota.
Project X: Project Status Steve Holmes Project X Working Group Meeting December 15, 2011.
Greetings to Veljko from Fermilab December 9, 2010.
American Neutrino Strategy: Consequences of P5 Report Jim Strait, LBNE Project Director NuFact August 2014.
Proton Plans at Fermilab Robert Zwaska - Fermilab Science and Engineering at Henderson- DUSEL Capstone Workshop Stony Brook University May 5, 2006 Outline.
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
Fermilab Neutrino Program Jim Strait Neutrino Discussion at CERN 26 November 2013.
Project X: A Multi-MW Proton Source at Fermilab Manfred Wendt & Steve Holmes SPL/ESS Collaboration Meeting Lund June 30, 2010.
Steve Holmes and Brendan Casey DPF Project X Forum August 10, 2011 Project X: A 5 MW Proton Accelerator Accelerator and Particle Physics.
R.G. 7/09/20101 Options for neutrinos. R.G. 7/09/20102 Conventional beam from the SPS (1/3) Neutrinos using the SPS Nominal CNGS 732 km baseline from.
Staging Opportunities for Project X Steve Holmes on behalf of the PX Team Accelerator Physics and Technology Seminar May 8, 2012.
Neutrino Physics Opportunities for Fermilab Steering Group 6/12/07 Andy Lankford UC Irvine.
Report from Fermilab Presentation to ICFA Symposium Daegu, Korea September 2005 Pier Oddone.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 International Linear Collider In August 2004 ICFA announced their technology selection for an ILC: 1.The.
Project-X Physics Opportunities R. Tschirhart Fermilab March 18 th, 2010.
Mu2e, August 15, 2007 E Prebys 1 The Steering Group and mu2e Eric Prebys.
Fermilab Proton Driver Project Weiren Chou for Bill Foster Fermilab, U.S.A. October 20, 2004 Presentation at the Proton Driver Session ICFA-HB2004, Bensheim,
Fermilab Proton Driver and Muons David Johnson Fermilab Neutrino Factory Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting March 14, 2006.
PIP-II: Why a new accelerator? Paul Derwent Fermilab Community Advisory Board 23 July 2015.
Proton Improvement Plan: View from the Directorate (and the DOE) Stuart Henderson PIP Meeting Jan 3, 2012.
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
Fermilab Perspective: Where are We Going with Project-X, and How Can it Benefit Nuclear Energy? Stuart Henderson PASI Meeting April 5, 2013.
Fermilab: Prospects and Plans Giorgio Apollinari Fermilab New Opportunities in Physics May 10-13, 2009.
News Y2K June 25, Summary of June 12 Face-to-Face Meeting.
Fermilab: Present and Future Young-Kee Kim Data Preservation Workshop May 16, 2011.
F A Fermilab Roadmap Dave McGinnis May 28, f Fermilab Roadmap - McGinnis Timelines  Divide the road map into three parallel paths  ILC - Energy.
Status of Project X Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Winter Meeting - March 1, 2011.
Steering Group Meeting 10:30 – 12:30 am CDT Monday, July 23, 2007 Y2K.
Protons for Neutrinos: Mid-Term and Project-X Bob Zwaska Fermilab Intensity Frontier Neutrino Working Group Meeting October 24, 2011.
Project X Update Steve Holmes Accelerator Advisory Committee Meeting November 7, 2011.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
Overview of Project X ICD and RD&D Plans David Neuffer material from Paul Derwent & Sergei Nagaitsev (AAC Meeting, February 3, 2009)
Project X: Accelerators Sergei Nagaitsev September 2, 2011.
Project X: Technology, Perspectives, and Applications Steve Holmes on behalf of the Project X Team IEEE-Nuclear Science Symposium Anaheim, CA November.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Fermilab SRF Linac Development Steve Holmes Workshop on High Intensity Proton Accelerators October 19, 2009.
U.S. Plans for High Power Proton Drivers Steve Holmes Fermilab Workshop on Physics with a Multi-MW Proton Source CERN May 25, 2004.
Project X Research Program R. Tschirhart Project X Machine Advisory Committee March 18-19, 2013.
Intensity Frontier Physics with a Mega-Watt Proton Source R. Tschirhart Fermilab Science & Technology Review November
F Sergei Nagaitsev (FNAL) Aug Project X ICD2 Briefing.
The Fermilab Roadmap, Project X, and Muon Facilities Steve Holmes NFMCC Meeting March 17, 2008.
Fermilab: Introduction Young-Kee Kim DOE KA12 (Electron Research)Review June 22-23, 2010.
Science Requirements and Instrumentation for Future Neutrino Experiments Gina Rameika, Fermilab Instrumentation Frontier Community Planning January 9 –
Opportunities from the Intensity Frontier to the Energy Frontier J.P.Delahaye/SLAC.
Presenter : Yang Wu McMaster University Work conducted at IHEP.
The High Intensity Horizon at Fermilab R. Tschirhart Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory IPAC 2012, New Orleans, USA. May 23 rd, 2012.
Project X as a Muon Facility Platform Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee November 7-9, 2011.
Project X: Introduction, Strategy, and Collaboration Meeting Goals Steve Holmes Project X Collaboration Meeting September 11, 2009.
Project X/ILC/SRF Integrated Plan Steve Holmes Fermilab DOE Annual Science & Technology Review July 12-14, 2010.
The High Intensity Horizon at Fermilab R. Tschirhart Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory IPAC 2012, New Orleans, USA. May 23 rd, 2012.
R. Tschirhart Fermilab NuFact Meeting William & Mary July 25 th 2012 The Project X Research Program: Muons.
Welcome! Robert Zwaska 23 November 2015 Workshop on Booster Performance and Enhancements.
Particle Physics Sector Young-Kee Kim / Greg Bock Leadership Team Strategic Planning Winter Workshop January 29, 2013.
1 Sam Childress. 2 S. Childress NNN11 Existing Fermilab Neutrino Beams 120 GeV NuMI 8 GeV BNB 2 J. Strait.
Steve Holmes DNP Meeting/Santa Fe November 6, 2010 Project X: A Multi-MW Proton Source at Fermilab.
Fermilab Project-X Overview
A Muon-based Accelerator Staging Scenario (MASS)
Energy (ILC) and Intensity (Project X) SRF Cavity Needs
Short-Baseline Plans at Fermilab Steve Geer European Strategy for Neutrino Oscillation Physics – II May 14-16, 2012.
Superbeams with SPL at CERN
A Superconducting Proton/Electron Linac
Presentation transcript:

An Integrated Intensity Frontier Strategy Steve Holmes & Bob Tschirhart LBNE Reconfiguration Workshop April 25, 2012

LNBE Reconfiguration Workshop - April 2012Page 2

Staging Options Accelerator Configuration Stage 1 –1 GeV × 1 mA CW linac injecting into existing Booster –Power to LBNE × 1.5; to Mu2e × 10; World-leading kaon experiment, 900 kW for edm and ultra-cold neutron research. Stage 2 –Add 1-3 GeV × 1 mA CW linac –300 kW for rare kaon program; 300 kW to 2 nd generation Mu2e –Minimal competition to LBNE for MI beam Stage 3 (Reference Design: Project X docdb #658 ) Project X docdb #658 –Add 3-8 GeV × 1 duty factor pulsed linac injecting into (upgraded) Recycler/MI –2 + MW to LBNE Stage 4 (Beyond the Reference Design) –Upgrade power to 4 MW at 8 GeV: New low-energy neutrino source. –Neutrinos: 4 MW for short baseline + long baseline/ –Muon Collider & Neutrino factory platform PX Collaboration Meeting, April S. HolmesPage 3

M.B, S.Z.; Physics working group April 16 th minutes.

M.B, S.Z; Physics working group April 16 th minutes.

M. B., S.Z.; Physics working group April 16 th minutes.

M. Bishai, 2011 Project X studies, presented at Intensity Frontier Workshop

A Roadmap for a World Leading Intensity Frontier Program * Operating point in range depends on MI energy for neutrinos. ** Operating point in range is depends on MI injector slow-spill duty factor (df) for kaon program. LNBE Reconfiguration Workshop - April 2012Page 8 Program: Stage-0: Proton Improvement Plan Stage-1: 1 GeV CW Linac driving Booster & Muon, EDM programs (MI>80 GeV) Stage-2: Upgrade to 3 GeV CW Linac (MI>80 GeV) Stage-3: Project X RDR (MI>60GeV) Stage-4: Beyond RDR: 8 GeV power upgrade to 4MW MI neutrinos kW** kW** 1200 kW2300 kW kW 8 GeV Neutrinos 15 kW kW**0-40 kW* kW**0-40 kW*85 kW3000 kW 8 GeV Muon program e.g, (g-2), Mu2e-1 20 kW0-20 kW* 85 kW 1000 kW 1-3 GeV Muon program kW1000 kW Kaon Program 0-30 kW** (<30% df from MI) 0-75 kW** (<45% df from MI) 1100 kW Nuclear edm ISOL program none0-900 kW Ultra-cold neutron program none kW Nuclear technology applications none0-900 kW # Programs: Total* power: kW kW 4230 kW 5490 kW 11300kW

Summary Considerations of LBNE staging must be integrated within a larger strategy for providing world leadership on the Intensity Frontier for decades. The physics reach of LBNE and the capabilities of the accelerator complex are inextricably linked since the potential of long-baseline neutrino experiments is ultimately limited by beam power. Hence consideration of LBNE in the context of a campaign must incorporate consideration of the Project X campaign which can quantitatively and qualitatively broaden the physics reach of LBNE. LNBE Reconfiguration Workshop - April 2012Page 9

FAQs Are you proposing that LBNE be deferred until after Stage 1 of Project X is realized? No, we are proposing that the two initiatives evolve together, since their final goals are co-dependent on each other. And yes, this would mean that Stage 1 of LBNE would evolve more slowly. If you don't build LBNE as fast as possible, then neutrino physicists will abandon us for the competition. The most effectuve way to keep the research community engaged is to commit to a long term program that will provide continually improving accelerator and detector performance. Physics reach is the product of detector-mass × beam-power, and doubling the detector mass is cheaper than doubling the beam power. So why should we invest in beam power? Beam power is a facility cost, detector mass is costed to a particular experiment. The broader a program the facility serves the more insulated a particular experiment becomes from facility costs LNBE Reconfiguration Workshop - April 2012Page 10