Matthew Goniwe School of Leadership and Governance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
Data Analysis Chapter 11..powerful professional development tool that can lead to school improvement.
MTSS Trainers: Janet Stephenson Melissa Long School Psychologist: Griselle Zeno.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Using Data Effectively or Why Weigh the Hog If You Aren’t Going To Feed It? Presented by Ronni Ephraim, Chief Instructional Officer Los Angeles Unified.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for professional development.
Leading the Learning The Role of the Instructional Leadership Team ESC, West Instructional Directors July 30, 2014.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 Power Point Presentations for Each Chapter of SuperVision and Instructional Leadership: A Developmental Approach Carl D.
Evaluation Toolkit. Strategies and Tools to Assist You.
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
This product was developed by Florida’s Positive Behavior Support Project through University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Professional Development through the Authentic Academic Achievement Project.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
Timberlane Regional School District
THE SECONDARY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMME CURRICULUM MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT Prof Raj Mestry.
Thank You for Attending! The powerpoint for this webinar is now
February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership in the Common Core February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership for the Common Core NYSED Principal.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Update Cambrian School District March 8, 2012.
Response to Instruction & Intervention Training Banning High School RtI2.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Data-Driven Decision Making and School Leadership: Best Practices for School Improvement Theodore J. Kowalski Thomas J.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Instructional Leadership in Low-Performing Schools Nikolai Vitti September 21, 2009 Florida Association of Staff Developers Tampa, FL.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
Lancaster County School District. Student Learning Objectives are the product of an interest in extending the available data for educators throughout.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Scaling Integration: A Vision for Collaboration across the SLV BOCES Curtis Garcia.
Brinnon School District. Understanding the new standards Understanding the major shifts between the old and new standards within their subject and grade.
Welcome. MTSS S ESSION 2 I MPLEMENTATION G UIDES Clare-Gladwin RESD January 9, 2014.
RtII Response to Instruction and Intervention paTTAN.
Ultranet Readiness & eLearning Co-ordinator Training Semester 2, 2008
Russell Frank, Ph.D. Director II Assessment and Accountability Services Mike Barney Director II Instructional Services Getting LTELs Ready for College.
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Interrelationships: Plans + Funding = Student Proficiency Ingham ISD Curriculum Director’s Meeting November 4, 2015.
NATIONAL EDUCATION EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT UNIT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Presentation to Parliamentary Portfolio Committee 22 May 2012.
Common Core State Standards Implications for Leadership Curriculum Leadership Council Networking Session.
Evaluation and Assessment Mike Fleming. Assessment can be source of disagreement and tension implications for a Framework of reference for Languages of.
ESEA on Teacher Quality Pros Requires licensure, BA/BS, subject area knowledge Provides funding to states for PD Requires annual, measurable objectives.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Transition to the Common Core Sequim School District.
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
Developed by the Southern Alberta Professional Development Consortium (SAPDC) as a result of a grant from Alberta Education to support implementation of.
Growing great schools. What has the most impact?
Arizona Teaching Standards
Inspection and self-evaluation
Introduction:- Instructional technology has become an important part of teaching and learning within the classroom as well as working with fully online.
Common Core State Standards
Tier 1 Assessment/Data Systems
Welcome to the overview session for the Iowa Core Curriculum
Becoming a High-Quality Teacher in a Changing World
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research
4. How do we support staff and monitor progress?
Presentation transcript:

Matthew Goniwe School of Leadership and Governance

 Introduction  Context/Curriculum Reform in SA  Data Informed School Improvement & Subject Improvement Planning  SMT Toolkit  The Three Tier Capacity Building Programme  SMT Tool Kit Cycle  Method  Implementation Analysis Research/Action Research  Grounded Theory Research  Conclusion Slide 2

 Purpose to introduce the development of a Three Tier Capacity Development Programme  Need to shift from Teacher Development towards Whole School Improvement and Subject improvement  Role of SMTs  Data Informed Instruction (DII) Slide 3

 Reform is every where  Curriculum reform  Schools core business  Accountability  Target setting Slide 4

 Levels:  District  School  Classroom  Teacher  Data driven decision making (DDDM)  Use of data to make decisions Slide 5

What is subject improvement? ◦ What is the core business of schools ◦ Curriculum management ◦ Learner performance ◦ School effectiveness and improvement Slide 6

 What is DDDM?  Why DDDM?  Data Everywhere?  What Type of Data is found in schools? ◦ Demographic ◦ Student Learning ◦ Process ◦ Perception Slide 7

 Why the SMT Toolkit?  What is the SMT Tool kit?  Who will use it?  How will be used? Slide 8

What is SMT TOOL KIT Contents Subject Improvement Planning Overview Roles & Responsibilities Curriculum Management Teaching Methodology Assessment Human Resource Management Human Resource Development Managing Resources Parental Involvement Information & Knowledge Management Managing Learners A Safe Learning Environment

Slide 10  Level 1: All schools  Level 2: Priority schools (n = 430)  Level 3: Priority schools less than 60% pass

LEVEL 1 TargetAll Principals ActivitiesSharing Best Practice OutputsQuarterly Meeting s OutcomesCoPs Formation and implementation DesignConversations /Domain, Practice driven Dosage/FrequencyFour Times a Year (Once a Term)

TargetPriority Schools (430) ActivitiesFormal training on SMT Tool Kit by HEIs OutputsModule Training on Tool kit OutcomesSubject Improvement Plan Improved Learner Performance DesignFormal Training Action Learning Practical Dosage/FrequencyOnce a month for 2 years

TargetPriority Schools ≤ 60% ActivitiesSchool Based Support OutputsNeeds Analysis Data analysis OutcomesSubject Improvement Plans DesignMentoring & Coaching Dosage/FrequencyAccording to school context and needs

LevelTargetOutputsOutcomesDesignDosage 1All Secondary schools CoPs 4 Meetings CoPs formation SIP in place Improved pass rate CoPs4 Meetings per annum 2Priority Schools [430] Training 24 Days SIP in place Improved pass rate Training Coaching 24 Days over 2 years 3Less than 60% performanc e priority schools Onsite support SIP Improve pass rate 60% - 80% Mentoring / Coaching According to School Needs

SMT Toolkit Subject Improvement Planning Cycle Adopt/Ada pt Monitor/ Evaluate Diagnostic Tool/ Data Collection Getting Ready Asking Good Questions SCOT /SWOT/SOAR Analysis Context Subject Improvement Plan Development Prioritisati on Data Analysis Implement

 Implementation Analysis Research  Grounded Theory Research Slide 16

 Implications for practice  A collaborative effort  Change takes place in manageable steps Three Tier Capacity Building ProjectSlide 17

Slide 18 Questions