Data Analysis—How will we know to make changes?.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
So I wrote a behavior plan… Now What????. Data Driven Collect baseline data Use data to drive decision Limit what you are collecting data on Keep it simple.
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
PROGRESS MONITORING FOR SOCIAL BEHAVIOR Cynthia M. Anderson, PhD & Nadia Katul Sampson, MA University of Oregon.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Data Based Decision Making
A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida Y3D1 SBLT Tier 3 Problem Identification & Problem.
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
May Dr. Schultz, Dr. Owen, Dr. Ryan, Dr. Stephens.
CA Multi-Tiered System of Supports
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
What help does each student need?. Assess to find out specifically where a child is having problems.
Informal Academic Diagnostic Assessment: Using Data to Guide Intensive Instruction Part 2: Reviewing Graphed Data 1.
DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING USING STUDENT DATA-BECAUSE IT’S BEST PRACTICE & IT’S REQUIRED Dr. David D. Hampton Bowling Green State University.
Program framework 1.Articulate program goals 2.Develop system level model for goal attainment 3.Assess current management efforts – identify gaps 4.Develop.
2008 Student Progress Monitoring & Data-Based Instruction in Special Education Data-Based Instruction.
Comprehensive Curriculum Framework for Tiered Instruction: A Response to Intervention Model Sarah Jackson, M.Ed. Sandra Hess Robbins, M.Ed. Sanna Harjusola-Webb,
The general structure of the facilitation notes will be:
Conducting Effective Performance Appraisals: Be A Coach, Not A Judge Discussion Session #14.
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
1 A Behavior and Reading Improvement Center Presentation Integrating Academic and Behavior Support Richard White and Bob Algozzine Integrated Systems for.
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
What do we do when students don’t learn?.  (How information is delivered) Pace of instruction Mode of delivery Time allocated to activities Positive.
Performance Measurement and Analysis for Health Organizations
RTI at the High School Level JoAnne Malloy, MSW Project Director Institute on Disability/UCED University of New Hampshire Maria Agorastou, MSW Research.
Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution.
How do we deal with behavior issues?.  Students know the right way to behave and are merely choosing to be defiant or insubordinate.  At risk students.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Balanced Scorecard Focus The Balanced Scorecard is a tool that provides another way of looking at School Improvement.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
1 Data analysis. 2 Turning data into information.
D62 Response to Intervention
Using Data for Decisions Points to Ponder. Different Types of Assessments Measure of Academic Progress (MAP) Guided Reading (Leveled Reading) Statewide.
Using Data in the EBIS System Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
Moving Forward!. Responds to identified needs of the district and community, based upon data, and Provides Framework and Vehicle for School Improvement.
High Plains Education Cooperative.  A Multi-Tier System of Supports (MTSS) is a term used in Kansas to describe how schools go about providing supports.
Progress Monitoring for All Student Adapted from the Kentucky Systems of Interventions Guidance Document.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What is Student Progress Monitoring and How Will it Help Me? Laura Florkey.
Educable Mental Retardation as a Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Webinar 1: Overview. 1. Overview  Link to SLD Rule  Multi-tiered Systems of Support (MTSS)  Systems of Assessment 2. Introduction to Tiers  Tier 1:
Monitoring and Evaluation Orientation 17 th May 2011 MCA Namibia.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The foundation of our work with RTI is to support all student needs using a solutions-focused approach. We will utilize evidence-based.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading -DIBELS.
Data-Based Decision Making: Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
1 The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Collecting and Reporting Quality Performance Data.
Direct Behavior Rating: Using DBR for Intervention.
Your Exceptional Child Kaily Osborne. We will cover… IDEA IEP Inclusion RTI.
The Aims and Objectives of Businesses All Businesses can have…. Mission statements Aims & Objectives.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
+ Response to Intervention Ann Morrison Ph.D.. + Two Parts of Response to Intervention To ensure that all students will meet state and district standards.
Math + SRBI: Adding It Up Robin Moore Math Coordinator, Regional School District 6 & Clare Wurm, SERC Consultant.
IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading - AIMS.
The IEP: Progress Monitoring Process. Session Agenda Definition Rationale Prerequisites The Steps of Progress Monitoring 1.Data Collection –Unpack Existing.
Action Planning. This covers at least 2 criteria's You will be required to identify personal targets Then review the targets Hopefully meet the targets.
“Are We at Fidelity?”: Annual Evaluation and Action Planning.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports District-wide Implementation: Ensuring Success Kentucky Center for Instructional Discipline.
Review of the Three - Tier Intervention Process
Scrutiny of RIAs Problem Definition and Objectives
program framework Articulate program goals
Exploring and Implementing the MTSS Framework
PBIS PRACTICES.
Reason to suspect disability
Drilldown into the Universal Screener identifies Tier 1
Unit 1 Lesson 4 Setting Goals and Making Decisions – Skills for Life-Long Achievement.
Unit 1 Lesson 4 Setting Goals and Making Decisions – Skills for Life-Long Achievement.
Presentation transcript:

Data Analysis—How will we know to make changes?

 S—specific, clearly stated, simple  M—measurable based on quantifiable data  A—Attainable and realistic  R—Related to student performance and achievement  T—Time bound

 Baseline: Data before interventions are put in place  Aim line or goal: How much you want to achieve  Graph the data to determine whether or not progress is being made.

 Key features of effective formative evaluation systems  Student performance is measured frequently (e.g., once/week) and results in quantitative data  Progress is monitored toward an observable, measurable, and ambitious goal  Progress is graphed and viewed regularly  Data decision rules are used to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and determine when modifications to interventions are needed

 Valid  Reliable  Fidelity of data

Activity 1

 Comparison  What are you comparing?  What is the standard for comparison?  How do you know if you are making progress?

 How will I know if the student is making adequate progress?  Two general types of decision-making plans 3-Point or 4-Point Decision-Making Trend line Analysis

 How will I know if I need to change interventions?  How will I know if enough progress has been made?  When will I know if the Tier level needs to change?  Do I have appropriate documentation?

 Have we looked at the data?  Class wide  Building wide  District wide  Have we made decisions based on the data?  Class wide  Building wide  District wide

Activity 2

 Needs  What type of professional development do we need?  Who is going to do it?  When are we going to do it?  Length of time needed  Follow-up/Accountability  Options

For more information on MTSS, contact HPEC For additional information on MTSS visit