Steven Meyers, Marwan Mokhtar, Peter Armstrong, Matteo Chiesa

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Computer Vision Radiometry. Bahadir K. Gunturk2 Radiometry Radiometry is the part of image formation concerned with the relation among the amounts of.
Advertisements

Using a Radiative Transfer Model in Conjunction with UV-MFRSR Irradiance Data for Studying Aerosols in El Paso-Juarez Airshed by Richard Medina Calderón.
Local Reflection Model Jian Huang, CS 594, Fall 2002.
Angle of incidence effects on the energy conversion behavior of polycrystalline silicon photovoltaic cells. R.J. Beal 1, B.G. Potter, Jr. 1,2 and J.H.
Spectral Reflectance Curves
RESEARCH ON FPAR VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION IN DIFFERENT GEOMETRY MAIZE CANOPY Dr.Liu Rongyuan Pro. Huang Wenjiang
Measuring BRDFs. Why bother modeling BRDFs? Why not directly measure BRDFs? True knowledge of surface properties Accurate models for graphics.
Characterisation of the BRDF (HDRF) of snow surfaces at Dome C, Antarctica, for the inter-calibration and validation of satellite remote sensing products.
.. Solar thermal power plants use the sun's rays to heat a fluid, from which heat transfer systems may be used to produce steam. The steam, in turn, is.
Power Generation from Renewable Energy Sources
Foundations of Computer Graphics (Spring 2012) CS 184, Lecture 21: Radiometry Many slides courtesy Pat Hanrahan.
CPSC 641 Computer Graphics: Radiometry and Illumination Jinxiang Chai Many slides from Pat Haranhan.
Radiometry. Outline What is Radiometry? Quantities Radiant energy, flux density Irradiance, Radiance Spherical coordinates, foreshortening Modeling surface.
Spectral Reflectance Curves Lecture 5. When specular reflection occurs, the surface from which the radiation is reflected is essentially smooth (i.e.
Scattering property of rough surface of silicon solar cells Bai Lu a, b, *,Wu Zhensen a, Tang Shuangqing a and Pan Yongqiang b a School of Science, Xidian.
Atmospheric effect in the solar spectrum
University of British Columbia CPSC 314 Computer Graphics Jan-Apr 2008 Tamara Munzner Lighting/Shading II Week.
Measuring the Temperature of Hot Solar Flare Plasma with RHESSI Amir Caspi 1,2, Sam Krucker 2, Robert P. Lin 1,2 1 Department of Physics, University of.
Spectral Bidirectional Reflectance of Antarctic Snow Measurements and Parameterisation Stephen R. Hudson Coauthors: Stephen G. Warren, Richard E. Brandt,
More complex material models. Taxonomy 2 Single-wavelength Scattering function = 8D Bidirectional Texture Function (BTF) Spatially-varying BRDF (SVBRDF)
ASIC3 WorkshopLandsdowne, VA May 16-18, 2006 J. Harder Page 1 Calibration Status of the Solar Irradiance Monitor (SIM) : The Present and the Future Jerald.
METO 621 Lesson 13. Separation of the radiation field into orders of scattering If the source function is known then we may integrate the radiative transfer.
3-D Computer Vision CSc83029 / Ioannis Stamos 3-D Computer Vision CSc Radiometry and Reflectance.
Computer Graphics (Fall 2008) COMS 4160, Lecture 19: Illumination and Shading 2
Introduction to Computer Vision CS / ECE 181B Tues, May 18, 2004 Ack: Matthew Turk (slides)
Modelling Bottom Reflectance Image by Fred Voetsch, Death Valley, To develop an analytical.
METO 621 Lesson 12. Prototype problems in Radiative Transfer Theory We will now study a number of standard radiative transfer problems. Each problem assumes.
Computer Graphics (Fall 2004) COMS 4160, Lecture 16: Illumination and Shading 2 Lecture includes number of slides from.
Light Scattering Rayleigh Scattering & Mie Scattering.
ESTEC July 2000 Estimation of Aerosol Properties from CHRIS-PROBA Data Jeff Settle Environmental Systems Science Centre University of Reading.
Lecture 20: Light, reflectance and photometric stereo
Eusoballoon optics characterisation Camille Catalano and the Toulouse team Test configuration Calibration of the beam Exploration of the focal plan.
Ch. 5 - Basic Definitions Specific intensity/mean intensity Flux
TRB 2000Photometry for Traffic Engineers1 Photometry for Traffic Engineers... Workshop presented at the annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board.
Now That I Know That… What Do I Do? (Analyzing your Microtop Solar Radiometry Data)
Multiple Scattering in Vision and Graphics Lecture #21 Thanks to Henrik Wann Jensen.
SeaDAS Training ~ NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group 1 Level-2 ocean color data processing basics NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group Goddard Space Flight.
The Limits of Light Diffusion Approximation Robert Scott Brock(1), Jun Qing Lu(1), Xin-Hua Hu(1), David W. Pravica(2) Department of Physics,(1) Department.
MIT EECS 6.837, Durand and Cutler Local Illumination.
CSC418 Computer Graphics n Illumination n Lights n Lightinging models.
Fresnel Lens Seen in lighthouses- used to form a concentrated beam of light.
The aerogel radiator: optical characterization and performances L.L. Pappalardo INFN - University of Ferrara 1 CLAS12 RICH Review – JLab - September 5-6.
THE RAY MODEL OF LIGHT Section 11.4.
Soe Hlaing *, Alex Gilerson, Samir Ahmed Optical Remote Sensing Laboratory, NOAA-CREST The City College of the City University of New York 1 A Bidirectional.
Geometric and Radiometric Camera Calibration Shape From Stereo requires geometric knowledge of: –Cameras’ extrinsic parameters, i.e. the geometric relationship.
SCM 330 Ocean Discovery through Technology Area F GE.
Eusoballoon optics test Baptiste Mot, Gilles Roudil, Camille Catalano, Peter von Ballmoos Test configuration Calibration of the light beam Exploration.
DECam Daily Flatfield Calibration DECam calibration workshop, TAMU April 20 th, 2009 Jean-Philippe Rheault, Texas A&M University.
Optical Characterization of Nonimaging Focusing Heliostat First version published: NON-IMAGING, FOCUSING HELIOSTAT Solar Energy, Vol. 71, No. 3, pp. 155–164,
Course 10 Shading. 1. Basic Concepts: Light Source: Radiance: the light energy radiated from a unit area of light source (or surface) in a unit solid.
Announcements Office hours today 2:30-3:30 Graded midterms will be returned at the end of the class.
Photo-realistic Rendering and Global Illumination in Computer Graphics Spring 2012 Material Representation K. H. Ko School of Mechatronics Gwangju Institute.
December 11, 2002MVA20021 Determining Shapes of Transparent Objects from Two Polarization Images Daisuke Miyazaki Masataka Kagesawa Katsushi Ikeuchi The.
CSCE 641 Computer Graphics: Reflection Models Jinxiang Chai.
Coating Workshop, Caltech, March 21, 2008 G R 1 First Results from the Syracuse University Scatter Imaging Lab Joshua Smith, Matt West, Dave Evans,
1 CSCE 441: Computer Graphics Lighting Jinxiang Chai.
FCC-hh: First simulations of electron cloud build-up L. Mether, G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo FCC Design meeting.
Interactions of EMR with the Earth’s Surface
Radiometry of Image Formation Jitendra Malik. A camera creates an image … The image I(x,y) measures how much light is captured at pixel (x,y) We want.
Understanding the effect of lighting in images Ronen Basri.
BIOMASS SUPPORTED SOLAR THERMAL HYBRID POWER PLANT
Radiometry of Image Formation Jitendra Malik. What is in an image? The image is an array of brightness values (three arrays for RGB images)
1 CSCE 441: Computer Graphics Lighting Jinxiang Chai.
Reflection Models (1) Physically-Based Illumination Models (2)
Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. Performance of a 100 kW th Concentrated Solar Beam-Down Optical Experiment J. Sol. Energy.
Electromagnetic Radiation Principles: Reflectance
SOLARIS CONFERENCE 2017   Sun tracking study and preliminary design of heliostat field in solar power towers Solaris 2017, 26 – 27 July 2017, Brunel University.
REMOTE SENSING EM Radiation Interactions with Earth Surface Features
Zhang Hailong, Xin Xiaozhou, Liu Qinhuo
Validating CERES calibration and ADMs Using Data from East Antarctica
Presentation transcript:

Flux Mapping of the Beam Down Solar Thermal Concentrator at Masdar City Steven Meyers, Marwan Mokhtar, Peter Armstrong, Matteo Chiesa Laboratory of Energy and Nano-Science (LENS) Solar Energy Group

Outline Flux Mapping Basics Beam Down Solar Thermal Concentrator Initial Results Forward Optical Model Bidirectional Reflectivity Distribution Function Convolution Model Results Discussion

Flux Mapping Basics Flux Mapping – A method to determine the distribution and quantity of concentrated solar radiation generated by a CSP facility Three Basic Tools CCD Camera Diffuse Reflector (Lambertian) Heat Flux Sensor (HFS) CCD Camera –Luminance Map (cd/m2) 300-750 nm HFS – Discrete flux measurement (kW/m2) 300-3000 nm Conversion ratio (kW/cd) Yields a continuous flux map of (kW/m2) Kaluza and Neumann, 1998 SolarPACES 2011

Source: www.odforce.net Diffuse Surface Lambert’s Cosine Law (Lambertian surface) The measured radiation intensity by an ideal diffusing surface is directly proportional to the cosine of the angle between the observer’s line of sight and the surface normal (Photometria, 1760). If the surface obeys Lambert’s Cosine Law, the radiation angle of incidence (AOI) and azimuth are inconsequential However, if the surface does not perfectly follow the Law, the reflected radiation to a stationary observer will change based on the radiation AOI and azimuth Source: www.odforce.net SolarPACES 2011

The Beam Down Solar Thermal Concentrator (BDSTC) Central Reflector Structure CCD Camera Location Heliostat Field Target Receiver 1 5 HFS Location N E W 3 7 Designed by Tokyo Tech, constructed by MES 100 kW/m2 peak flux at a net incident energy of 100 kWt Flux measurement instrumentation Thermally regulated CCD camera (Konika Minolta CS-2000) Eight in-situ calibrated (Mokhtar et al. 2011) Head Flux Sensors (Medtherm - Gardon, Schmidt-Boelter) Diffuse Reflecting Target (sandblasted unglazed tile) Goal – Determine the conversion coefficient to generate a flux map (HFS/CCD) SolarPACES 2011

Initial Results Increasing trend due to spectral sensitivity differences between CCD camera and HFS (Kaluza and Neumann. 1998, Ulmer et al. 2002) AM (blue) PM (red) SolarPACES 2011

Beam Down Optics The 360 degree field of heliostats contribute significantly different radiation quantities over the day Not observed in north field dominant towers and dishes due limited changes in cosine loss Needed to quantify the changing levels of radiation contribution from each heliostat over the day SolarPACES 2011

Optical Model Combined heliostat efficiency Radiation Angle of Incidence on the Receiver Radiation Azimuth direction Mean AOI and Azimuth Assumed Gaussian flux profile (no astigmatism) CCD Camera HFS X HFS Y HFS Y CR X CR Z CR AOI rec φrec CR Mirror SolarPACES 2011

Optical Model SolarPACES 2011

BRDF Lambertian assumption? A Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) was constructed Source: NIST SolarPACES 2011

BRDF Results indicated a significant backscatter reflectance, consistent with a rough diffuse surface (Oren-Nayar model) SolarPACES 2011

BRDF θ South East North West L L Sun – Afternoon CCD Camera Peak Reflection Reflected Ray Measured by CCD Camera South East North West L L SolarPACES 2011

Convolution By convoluting the optical forward model with the BRDF, we can estimate the quantity of light which is measured by the CCD camera (Fmodel )and compare that to predicted light assuming a true Lambertian surface (Flambertian) SolarPACES 2011

Results Fmodel / (Flambertian) Original Data West East West East AM (blue) PM (red) SolarPACES 2011

Discussion The AM/PM trend correlates to the HFS located on the East or West side of the Diffuse Surface By applying this methodology to many points across receiver (x,y), compensation for any non-Lambertian reflections allows for proper extraction of the flux levels on the surface and not the light levels reflected to and measured by the CCD camera A homogeneous Diffuse Surface BRDF is critical to the success of this method 𝑘𝑊 𝐶𝑑 𝑥,𝑦, 𝜔 𝑠 = 𝐻𝐹𝑆 𝐶𝐶𝐷 𝜔 𝑠 ∗ 𝐹 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙 𝑥,𝑦, 𝜔 𝑠 𝐹 𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑛 𝑥,𝑦, 𝜔 𝑠 SolarPACES 2011

Limitations Assumed Gaussian flux distribution and no astigmatism Modeled BRDF function valid for only one location, not entire surface Inconsistent inter-HFS/CCD ratios due to non-uniform tile surface (poor conditioning) HFS 2 had minimal AM/PM difference Measured BRDF was very Lambertian HFS 5 had significant AM/PM difference Measured BRDF showed large back scattering reflection Due to non-uniform tile surface, we were unable to generate an accurate flux map SolarPACES 2011

Conclusion Method can be used to minimize errors caused by non-ideal Lambertian surfaces Simple forward optical model and BRDF can provide significant insight into the changing radiation measured by the CCD camera Allows for less precise (cheaper, more rugged) surfaces to be used for flux analysis, as long as they are homogeneous SolarPACES 2011

Thank you Questions?