One Massachusetts Ave., NW – Suite 800 Washington, DC 20001 North American Sugar Markets and Policies Agricultural Outlook Forum 2012 February 24, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
North American Free Trade Agreement
Advertisements

Global Sugar Policy Reform John Beghin and Amani El-Obeid Economics and CARD Iowa State University Silverado Symposium on Agricultural Policy Reform University.
Outlook for the U.S. Dairy Sector in 2011 Roger Hoskin Dan Marti Economic Research Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Presented at the 2009 USDA Outlook.
Introduction to Business
1 The Benefits of NAFTA for U.S. Agriculture A. Ellen Terpstra, Administrator Foreign Agricultural Service U.S. Department of Agriculture April 20, 2004.
Outlook for the U.S. Livestock and Poultry Sectors in 2011 Presented By Shayle D. Shagam World Agricultural Outlook Board, USDA USDA Outlook Forum Washington,
Globalization. What is a global society? Globalization refers to the process by which one society becomes integrated with other nations around the world.
Agriculture and International Trade
WTO, Bilaterals and Mediterranean product policy Pierluigi Londero – Dangiris Nekrasius Agricultural Trade Policy Analysis DG for Agriculture and Rural.
Agriculture and International Trade Chapter 16. Discussion Topics Growth and instability in agricultural trade The importance of agricultural trade The.
The U.S. and World Sugar Industries under the EU and DOHA Trade Liberalization Won W. Koo   Chamber of Commerce Distinguished Professor and Director  
Sugar Policy in the United States: Pressures For Reform, Lessons From Europe German Marshall Fund November 10, 2005 Thomas Earley Executive Vice President.
New Trade Agreements: Implications for U.S. Sugar P. Lynn Kennedy Louisiana State University.
The NAFTA Sugar Balance & Outlook Presentation to the International Sweetener Colloquium Orlando, Florida – February 9, 2009 by Dr. William Tierney LMC.
International Law Sources of International Law: Treaties.
North American Free Trade Agreement MEG AND ALICIA.
Outlook for the U.S. Dairy Sector in 2012 Milton Madison Farm Service Agency U.S. Department of Agriculture Presented at the 2012 USDA Outlook Forum Washington,
The United States and the Global Economy
Chapter 7.1 Trade Between Nations.
Trade Programs, Policies, and Outlook 2014 Farm Bill Education Conference Luis A. Ribera Associate Professor and Extension Economist.
Analyzing the Impacts of Biofuel Mandates on World-Wide Grain, Livestock, and Oilseed Sectors Richard Stillman, Jim Hansen, Ralph Seeley, Dave Kelch, Agapi.
International Trade.  Exists because countries need to trade with one another.  Continues to expand Because of the reduction in trade restrictions 
Glossary of Key Terms balance of payments. An account of the flow of goods, services, and money coming into and going out of the country. capital. Money.
Tailoring the U.S. Sugar Program for the Future Jackie Theriot Louisiana Farm Bureau – Executive Committee Sec./ Treasurer.
Near Term Prospects for the U.S. Sugar Industry Edward Evans, Sikavas Na Lampang and John VanSickle International Agricultural Trade and Policy Center.
Food Chain Disruptions & Trade 2005 Agricultural Outlook Forum Washington, D.C. February 25, 2005 Parr Rosson Professor & Director Center for North American.
1 The Benefits of NAFTA for U.S. Agriculture May 2005.
TOPIC #7 Canada and International Trade Agreements.
Can Traditional Approaches to Agricultural Policy Meet Domestic and International Policy Goals? Anne Effland, Edwin Young, and Paul Westcott Economic Research.
International Policy Live in a global economy where: –Interdependence means that any policy decisions made by one country has a impact on the U.S. –Many.
Chapter 17 International Trade. Why Do Nations Trade? There is an unequal distribution of resources There is an unequal distribution of resources High.
Global Trade. Global trade is increasing Why? What is good about it? -it makes better technology available -it creates more jobs (importers-exporters)
Chapter 6: The United States in the Global Economy
The 2002 Farm Bill: Implications for North American Trade Relationships North American Trade Relationships:Policy Challenges for 2002 and Beyond Chicago.
Mexico.  Capital: Mexico City  Size: 3x size of Texas  31 states.
NAFTA North American Free Trade Agreement. Canada, United States, and Mexico This agreement lifted tariffs between the three member countries.
 Background Information  Disadvantages of NAFTA  Advantages of NAFTA  Trouble in Juarez  Conclusion.
North American Free Trade Agreement
THE CENTRAL AMERICAN SUGAR INDUSTRY: EFFICIENCY AND COMPETITIVENESS.
Prosperity Through Trade North American Agri-Food Integration Session II - The European Perspective Discussant Liam McCreery, President Canadian Agri-Food.
+ Foreign Trade U.S. Trading with other Countries.
Mr. Weiss Unit 6 Vocabulary Words 1. imports; 2. specialization; 3. flexible exchange rate; 4. balance of trade; _____difference between the value of.
International Sweetener Colloquium Orlando, Florida February 9, 2009 U.S. Sugar Policy in the 2008 Farm Bill: Why Congress Made Some Changes Jack Roney.
CH. 26 ECONOMIC SYSTEMS STANDARD EE 1.1, 1.2, 2.3.
Global Market Dynamics February 7, Commodity.
OECD World Forum “Statistics, Knowledge and Policy”, Palermo, November
Fashion and Economics.
Defining North American Economic Integration Raymond Robertson Macalester College St. Paul, MN.
U.S.-Mexico Agricultural Trade Relationship. NAFTA Has Benefited Both Countries’ Ag Sectors NAFTA trading relationship continues to provide benefits and.
International Agriculture Negotiations: Indian Perspective Manoj Joshi Counsellor(Economic) Embassy of India.
NAFTA North American Free Trade Agreement. NAFTA Background NAFTA stands for North America Free Trade Agreement and is a Trade Area NAFTA stands for North.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE VOCABULARY Import – a product purchased from another country. Export – a product sold to another country. Global interdependence –
Trading with other Nations
Corn and Wheat Market Overview and Outlook by Cory G. Walters Southern Regional Outlook Conference Agricultural Economics.
Dutch presidency agenda on ensuring industrial competitiveness Erik Janssen, Ministry of Economic Affairs The Netherlands.
Natuurwetenschap & SamenlevingScience, Technology & Society Large Scale International Bio-energy Trade - Perspectives, Possibilities and Criteria; introduction.
NAFTA. What is NAFTA? North American Free Trade Agreement Participants include U.S., Mexico, and Canada Established in 1994 under the Clinton administration.
FTAA, WTO, FARM LEGISLATION MAY23-24,2002
Question What do you want to do for a living when you grow up?
The Agricultural Market Information System (AMIS)
North American Free Trade Agreement
Global Trade and Regulations
Sugar Situation.
North American Free Trade Agreement
ICF Conference, Coimbatore Presented by: Sandeep Hota
Agricultural Markets 101 Climate Prediction Applications Science Workshop Des Moines, Iowa Feb. 21, 2011 Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist.
The EU-US Agricultural Framework Agreement
North American Free Trade Agreement
Trading with other Nations
Trade, Tariffs, & the Ag Economy
Presentation transcript:

One Massachusetts Ave., NW – Suite 800 Washington, DC North American Sugar Markets and Policies Agricultural Outlook Forum 2012 February 24, 2012

Mexico in U.S. Balance Sheet Largest single import source since 07/08 07/08-11/12F: Average 1.08 million STRV –Range 694,000 to 1,705,000 Year% of Total U.S. Imports % of Total U.S. Supply 2007/ / / / /12F

Sweeteners: A NAFTA Success Important new unrestricted supply source Available to meet growing demand as U.S. production stable, TRQ imports lower TRQ restrictions in ‘08 farm bill make Mexican supplies essential Pre-NAFTA fears of “import flood” wildly overblown, not borne out HFCS growth helps corn sector, trade balance

Mexico in Current U.S. Policy Framework Only unrestricted source of supply Only element of U.S. policy not designed to short markets Source of refined sugar when WTO TRQ extremely small Has made USDA more cautious on TRQs –Only downside from users’ standpoint

SUA Policy NAFTA working, should not be re-opened Re-export program should be preserved Information-sharing should be improved

NAFTA & USDA Policy Goals USDA has stated goal of more transparency – SUA agrees Stocks target would enhance transparency, provide information to markets Should this be U.S. or North American stocks target?

NAFTA Stocks Target? Market not yet completely integrated –Blended target may give distorted view Prices not identical in U.S., Mexico Most imports from Mexico don’t go directly to end users –Only 11% by one estimate, so availability to users different Differences in packaging, delivery mode, transportation in 2 markets

Mexico TRQs NAFTA allows both countries to import from third countries No violation of NAFTA alleged Mexico Imports Year% of Total Mexico Supply % of U.S. 3 rd Country Imports 2010/ /

Mexico TRQ If U.S. involved in Mexico TRQ decisions – Mexico helps USDA set WTO TRQ? –39 potential plaintiffs “Back-filling?” –No, but even if so … simply reflects draw of high, distorted U.S. prices

Re-Export Programs Fully consistent with NAFTA –Specifically mentioned in agreement; no provision to phase out Mexico can terminate trade any time Benefits U.S. refiners via added throughput Provides jobs in low-income border region If halted, trade wouldn’t return to U.S.

NAFTA: Working for Sweeteners U.S., Mexico governments have good communications, forums –Should continue government-to-government to help resolve multi-commodity problems Government should work together to supply both markets adequately, at reasonable prices Keep NAFTA working