News from KM3NeT Uli Katz ECAP / Univ. Erlangen 13.10.2013 MANTS Meeting, Garching, 14-15 October 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CDR Feb 2006Mar 2008Dec 2009 Mar Design Study Preparatory Phase TDR tendering construction data taking governance legal entity pre-production.
Advertisements

R.Shanidze, B. Herold, Th. Seitz ECAP, University of Erlangen (for the KM3NeT consortium) 15 October 2009 Athens, Greece Study of data filtering algorithms.
Trigger issues for KM3NeT the large scale underwater neutrino telescope the project objectives design aspects from the KM3NeT TDR trigger issues outlook.
Jan 2009 U. Katz: Astroparticle Physics 1 What is KM3NeT – the Vision  Future cubic-kilometre sized neutrino telescope in the Mediterranean Sea  Exceeds.
The Multi-PMT Optical Module P.Kooijman, University of Amsterdam University of Utrecht Nikhef.
Kay Graf University of Erlangen for the ANTARES Collaboration 13th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics Moscow, August 23 – 29, 2007 Acoustic.
The KM3NeT Project Uli Katz ECAP / Univ. Erlangen Astroteilchenphysik in Deutschland: Status und Perspektiven Zeuthen, Februar 2010.
Status of the ANTARES Neutrino-Telescope Alexander Kappes Physics Institute University Erlangen-Nuremberg for the ANTARES Collaboration WIN´05, 6.–11.
Neutrino Astronomy with KM3NeT  The KM3NeT physics case  What happened so far  The KM3NeT Conceptual Design Report  The Preparatory Phase: Towards.
A. BELIAS, NESTOR Institute, Pylos, Greece TeVPA 2009, July 13-17, SLAC1 KM3NeT, a deep sea neutrino telescope in the Mediterranean Sea KM3NeT objectives.
Kay Graf Physics Institute University of Erlangen TeV Particle Astrophysics II Madison, WI, USA August 28 – 31, 2006 Towards Acoustic Detection of UHE.
Status of the KM3NeT Project  What happened so far  The KM3NeT Conceptual Design Report  The Preparatory Phase: Towards Implementation 3rd Workshop.
P. Sapienza, NOW 2010 The KM3NeT project  Introduction & Main objectives  The KM3NeT Technical Design Report  Telescope physics performance  New developments.
The KM3NeT Neutrino Telescope Uli Katz ECAP / Univ. Erlangen th International Workshop on Ring-Imaging Cherenkov Detectors (RICH 2010) Cassis,
Neutrino Astronomy with KM3NeT Uli Katz ECAP / Univ. Erlangen Vulcano Workshop 2010: Frontier Objects in Astrophysics and Particle Physics Vulcano,
Neutrino Astronomy with KM3NeT was: Mediterranean Neutrino Telescopes - Status and Future Uli Katz ECAP / Univ. Erlangen International School.
The ANTARES Neutrino Telescope Mieke Bouwhuis 27/03/2006.
A feasibility study for the detection of SuperNova explosions with an Undersea Neutrino Telescope A. Leisos, A. G. Tsirigotis, S. E. Tzamarias Physics.
Antares/KM3NeT M. de Jong. neutrinos  p Scientific motivation: – origin cosmic rays – birth & composition relativistic jets – mechanism of cosmic particle.
Deep-sea neutrino telescopes Prof. dr. Maarten de Jong Nikhef / Leiden University.
KM3NeT IDM/TeVPA conference 23  28 June 2014, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Maarten de Jong on behalf of the KM3NeT collaboration The next generation neutrino.
Paolo Piattelli - KM3NeTIAPS - Golden, 6-8 may 2008 KM3NeT: a deep-sea neutrino telescope in the Mediterranean Sea Paolo Piattelli - INFN/LNS Catania (Italy)
KM3NeT The Birth of a Giant V. Popa, KM3NeT Collaboration Institute for Space Sciences, Magurele-Bucharest, Romania.
Hanoi, Aug. 6-12, 2006 Pascal Vernin 1 Antares Status report P.Vernin CEA Saclay, Dapnia On behalf of the Antares collaboration P.Vernin
Coincidence analysis in ANTARES: Potassium-40 and muons  Brief overview of ANTARES experiment  Potassium-40 calibration technique  Adjacent floor coincidences.
High-Energy Neutrino Searches Uli Katz ECAP / Univ. Erlangen Celebrating the 60th Birthday of Werner Hofmann Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik,
PINGU – An IceCube extension for low-energy neutrinos Uli Katz on behalf of the PINGU Collaboration European Strategy for Neutrino Oscillation.
Status and performance R. Coniglione for KM3NeT collaboration INFN- Laboratori Nazionali del Sud Catania - Italy R. Coniglione Marseille 4-6 April
C.DistefanoCRIS 2008 – Salina, September The KM3Net Consortium Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Laboratori Nazionali del Sud Towards a km3-scale.
Apostolos Tsirigotis Simulation Studies of km3 Architectures KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting April 2007, Pylos, Greece The project is co-funded by the.
Status of KM3NeT (Detector Design Optimisations) Christopher Naumann, CEA Saclay – IRFU / SPP for the KM3NeT consortium 44 th Reconcontres de Moriond,
Neutrinos as Cosmic Messengers in the Era of IceCube, ANTARES and KM3NeT Uli Katz ECAP / Univ. Erlangen Vulcano Workshop 2012 Frontier Objects.
Piera Sapienza – VLVNT Workshop, 5-8 october 2003, Amsterdam Introduction and framework Simulation of atmospheric  (HEMAS and MUSIC) Response of a km.
V.Bertin CPPM / ANTARES Coll. - Moriond ANTARES : A deep-sea 0.1 km² neutrino telescope Vincent Bertin - CPPM-Marseille on behalf of the Antares.
XXIII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics 2008 Christchurch, New Zealand Contacts:
SINP MSU, July 7, 2012 I.Belolaptikov behalf BAIKAL collaboration.
A sensor architecture for neutrino telescopes on behalf of the KM3NeT consortium Els de Wolf Thank you, Claudio!
The KM3NeT Project Uli Katz ECAP / Univ. Erlangen Conference on Recent Developments in High Energy Physics and Cosmology 25–28 April 2013, University.
KM3NeT International Solvay Institutes 27  29 May 2015, Brussels, Belgium. Maarten de Jong Astro-particle and Oscillations Research with Cosmics in the.
KM3NeT ‑ The Next Generation Neutrino Telescope Alexander Kappes IceCube Particle Astrophysics Symposium Union South, Madison, May 13, 2013.
KM3NeT Pylos meeting, April, 2007 Some preliminary studies for the positioning calibration of KM3NeT Miguel Ardid Universitat Politècnica de València.
Alexander Kappes Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics for the ANTARES collaboration IAU GA, SpS 10, Rio de Janeiro, Aug Status of Neutrino.
Neutrino Astronomy with KM3NeT  The KM3NeT physics case  What happened so far  The KM3NeT Conceptual Design Report  The Preparatory Phase: Towards.
Sebastian Kuch, Rezo Shanidze Preliminary Studies of the KM3NeT Physics Sensitivity KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting Pylos, Greece, April 2007.
Neutrinos and the sea Els de Wolf NIKHEF Ilias Meeting, Prague, February 8 th 2005.
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
The ORCA option for KM3NeT Uli Katz ECAP / Univ. Erlangen XV International Workshop on Neutrino Telescopes, Venice 15 March 2013.
Calibration of Under Water Neutrino Telescope ANTARES Garabed HALLADJIAN October 15 th, 2008 GDR Neutrino, CPPM, Marseille.
The ORCA option for KM3NeT Uli Katz ECAP / Univ. Erlangen XV International Workshop on Neutrino Telescopes, Venice 15 March 2013.
STATUS AND PHYSICS GOALS OF KM3NET Paolo Piattelli P. Piattelli, ICHEP14 Valencia INFN – LNS, Catania (Italy)
Isabella Amore VLV T08, Toulon, France April 2008 International Workshop on a Very Large Volume Neutrino Telescope for the Mediterranean Sea Results.
Status and Perspectives of the BAIKAL-GVD Project Zh.-A. Dzhilkibaev, INR (Moscow), for the Baikal Collaboration for the Baikal Collaboration September.
KM3NeT – Stautus and Future Uli Katz ECAP / Univ. Erlangen th International Workshop on Next Generation Nucleon Decay and Neutrino Detectors.
Mechanical design of the Pre-Production Detector Unit Model of KM3NeT Mario MUSUMECI and Riccardo PAPALEO KM3NeT PP DU subgroup coordinators.
The Neutrino Telescope of the KM3NeT Deep-Sea Research Infrastructure Robert Lahmann for the KM3NeT Consortium Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics.
Status report Els de Wolf Annual Meeting 2011, Nikhef.
Alexander Kappes ECAP, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg for the KM3NeT Consortium 2009 EPS HEP, Krakow, 16. July 2009 The KM3NeT project: Towards a km 3 -scale.
KM3NeT Neutrino conference 2-7 June 2014, Boston, U.S.A. Maarten de Jong on behalf of the KM3NeT collaboration The next generation neutrino telescope in.
KM3NeT: Status and Prospects Juan José Hernández ‒ Rey Instituto de Física Corpuscular (CSIC- Univ. of Valencia) On behalf of the KM3NeT Collaboration.
Overview of the KM3NeT project: an underwater multi ‐ km 3 detector M. Spurio University of Bologna and INFN RICAP Roma, May
KM3NeT P.Kooijman Universities of Amsterdam & Utrecht for the consortium.
Deep-sea neutrino telescopes
KM3NeT multi-km3 neutrino telescope: perspectives
P.Kooijman, UVA-GRAPPA, UU, Nikhef
Sebastian Kuch University Erlangen-Nürnberg
Concluding remarks E. Migneco
Robert Lahmann VLVnT – Toulon – 24-April-2008
Els de Wolf 20 February 2012, Catania
Prospects and Status of the KM3NeT Neutrino Telescope E. Tzamariudaki
on behalf of the NEMO Collaboration
Presentation transcript:

News from KM3NeT Uli Katz ECAP / Univ. Erlangen MANTS Meeting, Garching, October 2013

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, The plan for the next 15 minutes: Decisions taken: Technology and sites Tests and prototypes Next steps Summary Not included: Physics aspects & ORCA case study

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, Decisions taken

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, Which architecture to use? (strings vs. towers vs. new design) Design of photo-detection units? (large vs. several small PMs, directionality,...) Readout and data acquisition? (how to implement? custom-built ASIC vs. FPGA, …) Deployment technology? (2 types of “Compactify and unfurl” vs. traditional) And finally: (path to) site decision. Flashback end-2009 (after Design Study): 2013: All solved and decided!

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, KM3NeT: a distributed Research Infrastructure Centrally managed Common hardware Common software, data handling and operation control Sites in France, Greece, Italy Consistent with funding structure (regional sources)

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, KM3NeT Sites KM3NeT-France: Toulon KM3NeT-Italy: Capo Passero KM3NeT-Greece: Pylos Long-term site characterisation measurements performed

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, The building block concept Building block: 115 detection units Segmentation enforced by technical reasons Sensitivity for muons independent of block size above ~75 strings One block ~ half IceCube Geometry parameters optimised for galactic sources (E cut-off) Technical feasibility verified KM3NeT includes 6 building blocks Simulated configuration: 115 DUs, 90m distance on average

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, Mooring line: Buoy (probably syntactic foam) 2 Dyneema © ropes (4 mm diameter) 18 storeys (one OM each), 36m distance, 100m anchor-first storey Electro-optical backbone (VEOC): Flexible hose ~ 6mm diameter Oil-filled fibres and copper wires At each storey: connection to 1 fibre+2 wires Break out box with fuses at each storey: One single pressure transition Detection units: Strings

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, OM with many small PMTs 31 3-inch PMTs in 17-inch glass sphere (cathode area~ 3x10” PMTs) 19 in lower, 12 in upper hemisphere Suspended by plastic structure (D)31 PMT bases (total ~140 mW) (D) (B,C)Front-end electronics (B,C) (A)Al cooling shield and stem (A) Single penetrator 2mm optical gel A B C C D PMT

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, Advantages of the KM3NeT DOM Increased photocathode area 1 KM3NeT DOM = 3 ANTARES OMs Reduces numbers of penetrations/connectors (expensive & risky) Reduces number of optical modules and their infrastructure (expensive) 1-vs.-2 photo-electron separation Better sensitivity to coincidences / background suppression Information at online data filter level Directionality Additional input to reconstruction and veto algorithms Identification of downgoing events (PMTs are also looking upwards) Reduction of random background (K40, bioluminescence)

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, How does a neutrino telescope work? Talk by O. Kalekin: PMT availability 

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, KM3NeT Lauching vehicle for Optical Modules (LOM) Deploying strings string rolled up for self-unfurling:

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, Tests and prototypes

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, String mechanical deployment tests Successful demonstration of deployment concept DOMs are horizontal VEOC cable  no leaks Some issues with penetrators (understood) Second test towards end of year Several deployments 2-12 April 2013 at a depth of 1000m (NIOZ boat) 20 miles off the coast of Motril, Spain

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, Fully equipped DOM (31 PMTs + acoustic positioning sensors + time calibration LED beacon) Mounted on the Instrumentation Line of ANTARES (2475m deep) Internal reference: “PPM-DOM” Deployed and connected with ROV on 16 April 2013 PPM-DOM fully operational and working well PPM-DOM installed on the instrumentation line of ANTARES Line installed on the deployment ship Final integration tests in dedicated dark box The Pre-production Optical Module

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, K 40 coincidence rate  PMT efficiencies   Up to 150 Cherenkov photons per decay e - (β decay) 40 K 40 Ca Concentration of 40 K is stable (coincidence rate ~5 Hz on adjacent PMTs) PRELIMINARY PPM-DOM: K40 Coincidences Coincidence rate on 2 adjacent PMTs Peak position  time offsets

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, PPM-DOM: Atmospheric Muons Number of coincident hits in a DOM Zenith angle of hit PMTs in events with more than 6 coincident hits >5 coincidences within 20ns ⇒ reduced K40 contribution, dominated by atmospheric muons More upper PMTs in multi-hit events ⇒ directional information from single storey PRELIMINARY

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, KM3NeT-Italy: site qualification Connected by ROV March 23, 2013 Long term monitoring of site characteristics NEMO tower First continuous rate measurements

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, Next steps

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, KM3NeT Phase-1 40 M€ available (out of ~220 M€ estimated for full KM3NeT) Substantial part: European Regional Development Funds Must be spent by end of 2014  Use or lose! KM3NeT decided to embark on first construction phase Transformation consortium  collaboration early 2013, management established, MoU endorsed by collaboration. Construction will start at Toulon and Capo Passero sites, very tight time schedule Common technology, software, data handling, operation, governance Goals: Provide Northern-hemisphere NT with unprecedented sensitivity Demonstrate feasibility, operability, stability, resolutions, sensitivity Provide infrastructural environment for phase-2

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, Seabed infrastructure Shore distances: 15km-100km  exact design site-dependent Power via main electro-optical cable (MEOC) short distances (intra-detector): AC; long distances (shore-detector): DC Optical fibres Example: KM3NeT-France 3 nodes per MEOC 20 strings per node sets of 4 strings in series

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, Start with 8 towers (necessary to match spending profile and to demonstrate construction activity) Add 24 strings until 2015 High-level tower-string data combination KM3NeT-Italy installation plans (phase-1)

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, KM3NeT-Greece (beyond phase-1) Application pending If successful: Site development and first detector construction Time scale for decision and implementation unclear Full installation (phase-2) No firm commitments yet Financial construction part of phase-1 program; EU funding sources (structural funds; Horizon2020; …) ERIC planned (headquarter in Amsterdam) Future of neutrino astronomy will have global dimension Towards KM3NeT phase-2

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, Summary

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, KM3NeT will be a distributed, networked research infrastructure. Technical design is fixed and decided. Intense prototyping and test program ongoing; very encouraging results so far. First construction phase will start 2014 (KM3NeT phase-1). Path towards full implementation to be defined during phase-1. Considering global dimension for future planning will be crucial for neutrino astronomy. Summary

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, Backup

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, What is KM3NeT ? Future research infrastructure in the Mediterranean Sea Includes cubic-kilometre scale neutrino telescope Exceeds Northern-hemisphere telescopes by factor ~50 in sensitivity Exceeds IceCube sensitivity by substantial factor Provides node for earth and marine sciences

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, South Pole and Mediterranean fields of view > 75% > 25% Galactic coordinates 2  downward sensitivity assumed (true below some 10 TeV) In Mediterranean, visibility of given source can be limited to less than 24h per day Galactic sources expected at energies below 100 TeV  Mostly visible from Northern hemisphere For any given energy, the fields of view are complementary Figure courtesy A. Kappes

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, Sensitivity to Galactic sources Supernova Remnants RXJ (prime example) Vela X (exciting option after update of H.E.S. data) Priority physics objective of KM3NeT  Talk Paul Kooijman Fermi Bubbles  Talk Paolo Piattelli H.E.S.S.: RXJ1713 in gamma-rays

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, Discovery potential for Supernova remnants Simulation results for 2 x 310 strings 5  discovery in less than 5 years for RXJ (unbinned analysis) Even higher sensitivity for Vela X SNR neutrino fluxes (E -2 spectrum with cutoff) used for detector optimisation unbinned analysis binned analysis RXJ1713 sensitivity for different string distances

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, The Fermi bubbles E -2, no cut-off E -2, 100 TeV cut-off E -2, 30 TeV cut-off 3 50% 5 50% expected flux Two extended regions above/below centre of Galactic plane Fermi detected hard  emission (E -2 ) up to 100 GeV Origin and acceleration mechanisms under debate – if hadronic, hot neutrino source candidate Could be first source detected by KM3NeT Astropart.Phys.42(2013)7

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, KM3NeT and the new IceCube results For Technical Design Report and design optimisation we focused on Galactic sources (µ channel, up-going)  Cascade reconstruction and starting track analysis not yet available.  In depth-studies under way (high priority).  No results ready for this workshop. Required: Assumption on the nature of the signal  Isotropic (?)  Flavour-symmetric  E -2 flux with cutoff around 2 PeV (?) Detector re-optimisation possible for phase-2, not for phase-1

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, DUs move under drag of sea current Currents of up to 30cm/s observed Mostly homogeneous over detector volume Deviation from vertical at top about 150m at 30cm/s (can be reduced by extra buoyancy) Critical current ~45cm/s (anchor starts to move) Hydrodynamic stability

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, Light collection device 20 ‒ 40% gain in effective photocathode area Low power <10 W / DOM FPGA readout for each individual PMT sub-ns time stamping time over threshold Calibration LED & acoustic piezo Optical fibre data transmission DWDM with 80 wavelengths Gb/s readout More on the KM3NeT digital OM (DOM)

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, Readout: time-over-threshold From the analogue signal to time stamped digital data: … Threshold Time Amplitude t1t1 t2t2 Implemented for each PMT through FPGA on central logic board (CLB) contained in optical module All data to shore via optical fibres Time synchronisation and slow control  see presentations by D. Real and G. Kieft

U. Katz: KM3NeT, MANTS13, Deployment strategy Compact package – deployment – self-unfurling Eases logistics (in particular in case of several assembly lines) Speeds up and eases deployment; several units can be deployed in one operation Self-unfurling concept being thoroughly tested and verified Connection to seabed network by ROV