Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Il Project Cycle Management :A Technical Guide The Logical Framework Approach 1 1.
Advertisements

Results Based Monitoring (RBM)
1 Establishing Performance Indicators in Support of The Illinois Commitment Presented to the Illinois Board of Higher Education December 11, 2001.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
UNSW Strategic Educational Development Grants
Improve your Club’s project design and implementation Presented by: Ulrike Neubert SIE PD Ann-Christine Soderlund SIE APD.
Ray C. Rist The World Bank Washington, D.C.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
A brief overview What is program evaluation? How is an evaluation conducted? When should it be used? When can it be used? Used with Permission of: John.
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
1 Designing a Monitoring and Evaluation System for a Rural Travel and Transport Project Michael Bamberger Gender and Development Group The World Bank RTTP.
Gender Aware Monitoring and Evaluation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands Presentation overview This presentation is comprised of the following sections:
HOW TO WRITE A GOOD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR FOR EVALUATION Programme Management Interest Group 19 October 2010 Pinky Mashigo.
Monitoring & Evaluation in World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Operations SASAR Monitoring & Evaluation Workshop New Delhi; June 20, 2006.
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Dr. G. Johnson, Program Evaluation and the Logic Model Research Methods for Public Administrators Dr. Gail Johnson.
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
Capacity Building for Better Agricultural Statistics Misha Belkindas and Graham Eele Development Data Group, World Bank.
Striving for Quality Using continuous improvement strategies to increase program quality, implementation fidelity and durability Steve Goodman Director.
A Sourcebook for Monitoring and Evaluating Agricultural and Rural Development Measuring Results in less-than-ideal Conditions Global Donor Platform for.
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
Understanding Project Management. Project attributes  The project has a purpose  Project has a life cycle like an organic entity  Project has clearly.
Lesson 3: Monitoring and Indicator Macerata, 23 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
Monitoring and Evaluation for Adult Education Programmes Module 1 © 2013 PRIA International Academy | Appreciation Courses Monitoring and Evaluation for.
MONITORING AND EVALUATION A GENERAL OVERVIEW A PRESENTATION AT ISSER 28 June, 2013 By Bruno B. Dery.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
Strategic Planning Session David Rudder, Ph.D. Rudder Consultants, LLC. May 17, 2006.
Developing Indicators
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
The LOGICAL FRAMEWORK Scoping the Essential Elements of a Project Dr. Suchat Katima Mekong Institute.
2013 NEO Program Monitoring & Evaluation Framework.
1 Analysing the contributions of fellowships to industrial development November 2010 Johannes Dobinger, UNIDO Evaluation Group.
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
Workshop II Monitoring and Evaluation INTERACT ENPI Annual Conference December 2009 | Rome.
Monitoring & Evaluation: The concepts and meaning Day 9 Session 1.
MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?
Aaron Zazueta Chief Evaluation Officer 2013 EVALUATION IN THE GEF.
Project Cycle Management for International Development Cooperation Indicators Teacher Pietro Celotti Università degli Studi di Macerata 16 December 2011.
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project Management Learning Program 7-18 May 2012, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Writing Project Report Multi-Purpose Reporting.
Screen 1 of 22 Food Security Policies – Formulation and Implementation Policy Monitoring and Evaluation LEARNING OBJECTIVES Define the purpose of a monitoring.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
1 Results-based Monitoring, Training Workshop, Windhoek, Results-based Monitoring Purpose and tasks Steps 1 to 5 of establishing a RbM.
0 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute While there is no prescribed format for a good delivery plan, it should answer 10 questions What a good delivery.
AUDIT COMMITTEES’ PERSPECTIVE ON PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND INSIGHTS INTO THEIR OVERSIGHT ROLE.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.
Project Monitoring and Evaluation A useful Tool for Research Projects’ Administrators and Managers Folajogun V. Falaye. (Professor of Educational Research.
Folie 1 Sarajevo, October 2009 Stefan Friedrichs Managing Partner Public One // Governance Consulting Project Management in the Public Sector Monitoring.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 11. Reporting.
WORKSHOP ON PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT (PCM) Bruxelles 22 – 24 May 2013 Workshop supported by TAIEX.
Project monitoring and evaluation
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Session 9 Recap on LFM and IL.
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
Group work on challenges Learning oriented M&E System
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
Presentation transcript:

Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation

Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-based monitoring takes in the whole results chain, from inputs, via activities and outputs through to the outcomes and impacts. The distinctive feature is that this kind of monitoring focuses not only on what has been done, but attempts to identify the changes generated by what has been done.

Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand

Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand For impact monitoring, one has to clearly differentiate the three levels of the LogFrames: What are the goods and services to be provided by your programme/ component? (This is to be found in the activities and output statements) How are your immediate target groups expected to make use of these goods and services, to apply or utilise them (utilisation)? Statements of this logical level represent the first level of impacts, usually labelled Immediate Objectives, Purpose, or Outcomes. Which kind of benefits can be directly attributed to the utilisation of the programme/component services by the immediate target groups? This is impact level 2, usually labelled Development Objective.

Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Past Programm / Project Initiatio n Planning Programme / Project Implementa tion Primary Role of Monitori ng and/ or Evaluati on In the Cycle Evaluatio n: Providing lessons learned: successes and failure of the past Monitoring: Assessing progress of programme/ project in achieving its objectives Obtaining early indications of potential problems and/or success as a basis for decision- making Mid-term or Terminal Evaluation Providing a basis for decision- making and identifying initial lessons learned Completi on and Follow up Construction of baseline date Clarify of objectives Agreement on results, indicators and performance targets Allocation of budget and responsibilities for monitoring and evaluation Ex-post Evaluation: Measuring and assessing actual impact Identify lessons learned for disseminat ion as best practices Prerequisit e of Effective Monitoring and Evaluation Future Program me / Project

Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand M&E and Program Initiation Pre-Formulation: Searching for Lessons Learned

Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Project Planning: Preparing and Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Monitoring and Evaluation Planning Framework Construct baseline date on problems to be addressed. Clarify programme or project objectives and set specific targets. Establish stakeholders’ consensus on indicators. Define date collection process requirements and usage. Agree on the generation and utilization of information. Specify reporting requirement (format, frequency, distribution). Establish monitoring and evaluation schedule. Assign monitoring and evaluation responsibilities. Provide adequate budget for monitoring and evaluation.

Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Project Implementation: M & E as Support to Decision-Making and Learning Monitoring: Assessing progress of programme/ project in achieving its objectives Obtaining early indications of potential problems and/or success as a basis for decision- making Mid-term or Terminal Evaluation Providing a basis for decision-making and identifying initial lessons learned

Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Project Completion: Dissemination of Lessons Learned Ex-post Evaluation: Measuring and assessing actual impact Identify lessons learned for dissemination as best practices

Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Relevance Performance SUCCESS Substantive Focus Program Quality

Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Key criteria relevance – the degree to which the objectives of a programme remain valid and significant; performance – progress of a programme towards achieving its objectives, in terms of effectiveness, efficiency and timeliness; success – attaining a measurable level of benefits that can be directly attributed to the programme, in terms of impact, sustainability and capacity development.

Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand M&E Standard Criteria Relevance  Development Issues  Target Groups  Direct Beneficiaries Performance  Effectiveness  Efficiency  Timeliness of inputs and results Success  Impact  Sustainability  Contribution to Capacity Development

Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand SELECTION OF INDICATORS What are the objectives of the programme or project? Who are the target groups and what are their needs and expectations? What changes are anticipated as a result of the programme or project? To what extent and how efficiently is the programme or project achieving its objectives? What are the criteria for judging the success of the programme or project?

Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand SMART Indicators Specific Measurable Attainable Relevant Trackable A good balance should be achieved between theory and practice, i.e., between what should be and what can be measured Indicators are "yardsticks" that can be used to demonstrate that changes have (or have not) taken place. They provide meaningful and comparable information on changes.