FRPA Resource Evaluation Program FREP Purpose and Objectives Highlights of 2003 Plans for 2004 Development of indicators Use of indicators Indicator review.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Advertisements

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Accounting and finance Evaluating ratio analysis.
Role of Senior Management
Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Framework and Toolkit for UN Coherence, Effectiveness and Relevance at Country Level: Step 2 – Prioritize and set outcomes.
SAI Performance Measurement Framework
FRPA Resource Evaluation Program and Resource Stewardship Monitoring Quality Assurance 2005/06 Quality Assurance update March 1, 2006.
FRPA Data Collection, Management and Reporting Defining the Business Requirements RSM Pilot Review Workshop February 2005.
USDA FOREST SERVICE Technology & Development Program National Soil Quality Monitoring Field Guide.
Cumulative Effects Management: Why We All Need to be Involved
PNW Strategic Plan: Developing a Blueprint for Future Direction Research for Resources.
Social and Community Based Initiatives and the NE MN Landscape Plan.
Cutblock Level Soil RSM Pilot Results Sandy Currie Soil Resource Value Team Lead.
Arkansas ACSIP Pilot Project (Indistar)
Continuous Improvement Objectives Pillar Workshop 2009.
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
Forest Practices Code Transition Larry Pedersen Chief Forester, MOF.
J.B. Speed School of Engineering University of Louisville KEEPS Energy Management Toolkit Step 4: Create an Action Plan Toolkit 4: Create an Energy Management.
FPSC Safety, LLC ISO AUDIT.
Community Sector Governance Capability Framework
Visual Resources Visual Resources Effectiveness Evaluation Progress Report Good Visual Stewardship Poor Visual Stewardship.
District Operational Monitoring Initiative By the DOMI Team A presentation at the PFIT Post FSP Workshop by Brian Westgate on the MoFR’s DOMI monitoring.
Quote for today “Sometimes the questions are complicated and the answers are simple” - ?? ????? “Sometimes the questions are complicated and the answers.
Common framework Guidelines for Pilot Actions Debrecen 2013 Municipality of Debrecen Department of Sociology University of Debrecen External expert.
Forest and Range Evaluation Program Five Year Strategic Plan Agathe Bernard Kevin Kilpatrick Jack Sweeten Michael Pelchat Peter Bradford.
Results of Implementation and Testing Soils and Riparian – What Did We Learn?
The WLP must be consistent with these objectives 1.maintaining or enhancing an economically valuable supply of commercial timber from the woodlot licence.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Forest and Range Evaluation Program (FREP)
Implementing QI Projects Title I HIV Quality Management Program Case Management Providers Meeting May 26, 2005 Presented by Lynda A. O’Hanlon Title I HIV.
Decision-making 2: Dilemmas in Designing Forest Practices Rules 1
Range Planning 1 & Objectives & Objectives The Focus is on Results.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
Water Stewardship and Multifunctional Measures: More than Water alone.
Competitive Play Committee. WHAT IS THE COMPETITIVE PLAY COMMITTEE? The Competitive Play Committee is responsible for the following:  LUFC Evaluations.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
RSM Training 2007 “Preparing for Effectiveness Evaluations” By Dean McGeough and Frank Barber FREP’s CI Workshop Victoria Feb. 28, 2007.
ISO MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT. ISO Environmental Management Systems2 Lesson Learning Goals At the end of this lesson you should be.
Focused Review of Improvement Indicators A Self-Assessment Process SPP Stakeholder Meeting December 16, 2009.
District Leadership Team Process. Leadership Team Active Coordination FUNCTIONS Implementation support Data-based action plan Coordination Capacity building.
ESA ODFCB # 4 Peter Granseuer1 ESA ODFCB Charter Peter Granseuer MSM-EOI
FREP Vision: Sustainability through science and stewardship.
Rangeland Inventory & Monitoring. Rangeland Management is:  The use and stewardship of rangeland resources to meet goals and desires of humans.  You.
FRPA Data Management/Reporting System (Data Collection and Reporting) Building Your New System: Business Requirements Suggestions and Questions RSM Pilot.
Report Performance Monitor & Control Risk Administer Procurement MONITORING & CONTROLLING PROCESS.
Scientific Coordination Project 3.2. Scientific coordination: from ESPON I to ESPON II ● Data ● Guidance on policy relevance and recommendations ● Research.
Module 4 – Evaluation: General Characteristics. 25/02/20162 Overview of the Module Definitions Purposes Milestones Stakeholders A win-win exercise.
Puget Sound Partnership Action Agenda: Roadmap to Completion.
Workshop and Steering Committee Meeting Globally-important Ingenious Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) Project Rome, 7-9 June 2004 Components and Processes.
1 RESULTS BASED CODE. 2 Results Based Code Timeframes Introduce “package” this session –F&RPA –Amendments to FPC (streamlining) –Biologist’s Act –Amendments.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
Criteria and Indicators as Framework for Sustainable Forest Management Ruth McWilliams USDA – Forest Service Workshop on Sustainable Forest Management.
Implement Projects Data collection Analysis Interpretation Recommendations FREWG, RSMT and RVTs Review and make recommendations (Policy and regulation.
OSU Extension’s Master Watershed Steward Program Derek Godwin Watershed Management Specialist.
Forest Stewardship Plan Result or Strategy Effectiveness Analysis Report 2014 North Island Central Coast Forest Management Leadership Team Meeting January.
Rangeland NRI: 2002 and Beyond Presentation given to NRCS State Conservationists NRI Exec. Committee Northwest Watershed Research Center, Boise.
Evaluation in the SDG era: lessons, challenges and opportunities for UNEG EPE, 26 April 2016, Geneva.
National Quality Center Evaluating Your CQM Program and Improvement Efforts Kevin Garrett, MSW Lori DeLorenzo, RN, MSN May 19, 2016.
Crown expectations for small stream outcomes under FRPA
Draft Strategy To Optimize Resource Management of Storm Water
Lean Six Sigma DMAIC Improvement Story
Using Evidence to Refine a Partnership
A Snapshot in Time Prepared for: Prince George FREP Overview
Information Sharing and
District Operational Monitoring Initiative
CBP Organizational Structure
Presentation transcript:

FRPA Resource Evaluation Program FREP Purpose and Objectives Highlights of 2003 Plans for 2004 Development of indicators Use of indicators Indicator review Evaluation types Evaluation intensities

FREP Purpose: Assess effectiveness of FRPA Identify implementation issues Continuous improvement FRPA Resource Evaluation Program

FREP Objectives: Evaluate status, trends and causal factors Determine if practices are sustainable Identify options for change PBRADFOR: effectiveness in achieving stewardship of 11 resopurce values implementation issues re; policies, practices and legislation PBRADFOR: effectiveness in achieving stewardship of 11 resopurce values implementation issues re; policies, practices and legislation FRPA Resource Evaluation Program

Highlights of the past year: Working Group Charter Indicators Evaluation questions Evaluation projects PBRADFOR: indicators soils, riparian, WLT visuals, water, biodiversity, karst projects -- noxious weend, WLT II, cutblock size PBRADFOR: indicators soils, riparian, WLT visuals, water, biodiversity, karst projects -- noxious weend, WLT II, cutblock size FRPA Resource Evaluation Program

Protocols Roles and responsibilities Extension note PBRADFOR: protocols -- RVTL, stakeholder involvement, partnership PBRADFOR: protocols -- RVTL, stakeholder involvement, partnership Web site Course Communication plan Data management plan Highlights of the past year continued: FRPA Resource Evaluation Program

Indicators Evaluation questions Evaluation projects Course PBRADFOR: indicators -- develop more, test existing, implement refine questions PBRADFOR: indicators -- develop more, test existing, implement refine questions Stakeholder involvement Evaluation questions Forest Practices Board Plans for 2004: FRPA Resource Evaluation Program

Use of Routine and extensive indicators: Forest Practices Board FREP Others FRPA Resource Evaluation Program

Indicator review: Improve indicators Document lessons learned Tools for other teams Consistent terminology FRPA Resource Evaluation Program

That the sum of effective forest practices at the site scale may equal the desired result at the watershed scale Premise

Compliance –Did they follow the legal requirements? Implementation –Did they implement the desired forest practise? Effectiveness –Are the forest practices achieving the desired result? Validation –Are the assumptions about the desired results scientifically valid? Evaluation types: FRPA Resource Evaluation Program

Effectiveness Evaluation intensities: Routine – visual qualitative data, Yes-No checklists Extensive –categorical data with comparisons to templates Intensive –continuous data with comparisons to controls FRPA Resource Evaluation Program

Development of indicators to date: Working Groups Board pilots FRPA Resource Evaluation Program