Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas A Framework for Program Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Engaging Your Community in Practical Program Evaluation Stephanie Welch, MS-MPH, RD, LDN Knox County Health Department Phone (865)
Advertisements

“Mixed Methods in Program Evaluation” Presented by Tom Chapel
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Johns Hopkins University School of Education Johns Hopkins University Evaluation Overview.
Measuring Value: Using Program Evaluation to Understand What’s Working -- Or Isn’t Juliana M. Blome, Ph.D. , MPH Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation.
E-OCVM (Version 2) Explained Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Alistair Jackson EUROCONTROL Episode 3 Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009.
Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Use Your Evaluation Information to Communicate Your Results Your State AgrAbility Project November.
What You Will Learn From These Sessions
The NAR flowchart – the moderation cycle
Designing an Effective Evaluation Strategy
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation – Measuring Success Cheryl Cichowski Kira Rodriguez Michelle Mitchell.
Program Evaluation and Measurement Janet Myers. Objectives for today… To define and explain concepts and terms used in program evaluation. To understand.
2005 North American Pesticide Applicator Certification and Safety Education Workshop 1 Evaluate Your Applicator Training Outcomes Heather H. Boyd, Ph.D.
وزارت جهاد کشاورزی مرکز آموزش عالی امام خمینی(ره) کرج- بهمن ماه 1386 دوره آموزش ضمن خدمت ارزشیابی برنامه محمد حسن محقق معین نحوه تخصیص امتیاز ارزیابی فراگیران.
Gathering Credible Data Seattle Indian Health Board Urban Indian Health Institute Shayla R. Compton, MPH University of Washington School of Public Health.
Everyday Program Evaluation Sheena Cretella MSPH SC DHEC Diabetes Division Program Evaluator 1.
Creating Better Health and Care Services An overview of a Better Health and Care Review process.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
Reality Check For Extension Programs Deborah J. Young Associate Director University of Arizona Cooperative Extension.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
The Nuts and Bolts of Enrollment Design, Implementation and Evaluation Jodi A. Ray, MA PI/Project Director Florida Covering Kids & Families USF Health.
CDC Evaluation Process Harlen Hays, MPH Office of Health Promotion, KDHE.
Program Evaluation M9205 November 28, Columbia University School of NursingM6920, Fall, 2000 Program evaluation: a special case l Often done by.
School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools” Self-Evaluation of Learning and Teaching Self-Evaluation of Learning and.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
“Walking Through the Steps and Standards” Presented by: Tom Chapel Focus On…
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
Narrowing the Gap between Evaluation and Developmental Science: Implications for Evaluation Capacity Building Tiffany Berry, PhD Research Associate Professor.
Argumentation in Middle & High School Science Victor Sampson Assistant Professor of Science Education School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach Florida.
Measuring Outcomes: Potential Approaches in Evaluating Public Health William M. Sappenfield, MD, MPH MCH EPI Program Team Leader Division of Reproductive.
Board Workshop February 13 th Background Journey started with the adoption of the Sterling Management Criteria Pursuing the Baldrige Education Criteria.
Evaluation Basics Principles of Evaluation Keeping in mind the basic principles for program and evaluation success, leaders of youth programs can begin.
Program Evaluation EDL 832 Jeffrey Oescher, Instructor 6 June 2013.
EVALUATION THEORY AND MODEL Theory and model should have symbiotic relationship with practice Theory and model should have symbiotic relationship with.
REAL WORLD RESEARCH THIRD EDITION Chapter 8: Designs for Particular Purposes: Evaluation, Action and Change 1©2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Neal D. Kohatsu, MD, MPH Medical Director May 17, 2012 Evaluation and Quality Improvement.
Evaluation Overview: Rochelle Schultz Spinarski, Rural Health Solutions Community Care Learning Collaborative October 29, 2014.
Evaluating Title IIID Programs. November 8, :00-2:00 PM Webinar conference line toll free number (888) Code Login information
HMP Evaluation Overview and Tools UNE-CCPH June 22, 2011 Presenters: Kira Rodriguez Michelle Mitchell Patrick Madden Pamela Bruno-MacDonald.
The Major Steps of a Public Health Evaluation 1. Engage Stakeholders 2. Describe the program 3. Focus on the evaluation design 4. Gather credible evidence.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Developing an Action Plan.
Evaluation Approaches, Frameworks & Designs HSC 489 – Chapter 14.
Copyright © 2008 Delmar. All rights reserved. Chapter 15 Program Development and Evaluation.
Evaluation Revisiting what it is... Who are Stakeholders and why do they matter? Dissemination – when, where and how?
Evaluation design and implementation Puja Myles
The Achievement Chart Mathematics Grades Note to Presenter:
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Data Collection: Designing an Observational System.
OCR Nationals Level 3 Unit 3.  To identify your project objectives  To state the criteria that will be used to identify if the objectives have been.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Promoting Networking, Coordination, Cooperative Agreements and Collaborative Arrangements Among Organizations.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Organizing a Conference.
Erik Augustson, PhD, National Cancer Institute Susan Zbikowski, PhD, Alere Wellbeing Evaluation.
Unit 9: Evaluating a Public Health Surveillance System #1-9-1.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Measuring Success: Evaluating Community Initiatives.
PESB Standards Standard 4: Program Design. How Standards are Judged Standards are deemed unmet, met or exemplary. A standard is deemed ‘met’ if: A program.
Demonstrating the Value of Stakeholder Input for Evaluation Design, Implementation and Dissemination Yvonne Abel, MS Abt Associates Inc. AEA Annual Conference,
Yvonne Abel, Abt Associates Inc. November 2010, San Antonio, TX Enhancing the Quality of Evaluation Through Collaboration Among Funders, Programs, and.
Fahim Haider Jafari PhD. Learning Objectives Describe what is critical thinking Describe what is lateral thinking Use critical and lateral thinking in.
A Systematic Approach for Evaluating Health Related Programs: Adaptation for Community- based Participatory Research and Clinical Application to Reduce.
Evaluating the Quality and Impact of Community Benefit Programs
Designing Effective Evaluation Strategies for Outreach Programs
Monitoring & Evaluation Processes A A walkthrough of the whole process
Defining and Analyzing the Problem
Data is your friend: how to incorporate evaluation into your research
EVALUATION THEORY AND MODEL
Business Retention and Expansion
A Framework for Program Evaluation
Defining and Analyzing the Problem
Step 1 Stakeholders.
Evaluation Research Defined as the process of making judgments about the merits, value, or worth of any component of education. (e.g. best text books to.
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas A Framework for Program Evaluation

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Program Evaluation Investigation of the merit and significance of activities of community groups Helps clarify program plans Improves communication among partners Gathers feedback needed for program effectiveness

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Evaluating a specific program Decide: What will be evaluated What criteria will judge program performance What standards must be reached for the program to be considered successful What will indicate performance What conclusions are justified

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Steps in program evaluation: Engage stakeholders Describe the program Focus the evaluation design Gather credible evidence Justify your conclusions Ensure use and share lessons learned

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas The four categories of evaluation standards: Utility Feasibility Propriety Accuracy

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.