Evaluation Approaches, Frameworks & Designs HSC 489 – Chapter 14.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using the CDC Evaluation Fwork to Avoid Minefields on the Road to Good Evaluation Presented to: 2002 National Asthma Conference October 24, 2002 By: Thomas.
Advertisements

Engaging Your Community in Practical Program Evaluation Stephanie Welch, MS-MPH, RD, LDN Knox County Health Department Phone (865)
“Mixed Methods in Program Evaluation” Presented by Tom Chapel
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
Program Evaluation Webinar Series Part 2:
Measuring Value: Using Program Evaluation to Understand What’s Working -- Or Isn’t Juliana M. Blome, Ph.D. , MPH Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation.
What You Will Learn From These Sessions
Designing an Effective Evaluation Strategy
Summative Evaluation The Evaluation after implementation.
Program Evaluation and Measurement Janet Myers. Objectives for today… To define and explain concepts and terms used in program evaluation. To understand.
وزارت جهاد کشاورزی مرکز آموزش عالی امام خمینی(ره) کرج- بهمن ماه 1386 دوره آموزش ضمن خدمت ارزشیابی برنامه محمد حسن محقق معین نحوه تخصیص امتیاز ارزیابی فراگیران.
Gathering Credible Data Seattle Indian Health Board Urban Indian Health Institute Shayla R. Compton, MPH University of Washington School of Public Health.
Everyday Program Evaluation Sheena Cretella MSPH SC DHEC Diabetes Division Program Evaluator 1.
Reality Check For Extension Programs Deborah J. Young Associate Director University of Arizona Cooperative Extension.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Evaluating Health Promotion Programs
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
CDC Evaluation Process Harlen Hays, MPH Office of Health Promotion, KDHE.
Program Evaluation M9205 November 28, Columbia University School of NursingM6920, Fall, 2000 Program evaluation: a special case l Often done by.
“Walking Through the Steps and Standards” Presented by: Tom Chapel Focus On…
University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Unit 2: Developing an evaluation plan.
Evaluation: A focus on Title I, Part A Julie E. McLeod
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
Narrowing the Gap between Evaluation and Developmental Science: Implications for Evaluation Capacity Building Tiffany Berry, PhD Research Associate Professor.
Measuring Outcomes: Potential Approaches in Evaluating Public Health William M. Sappenfield, MD, MPH MCH EPI Program Team Leader Division of Reproductive.
Too expensive Too complicated Too time consuming.
My Own Health Report: Case Study for Pragmatic Research Marcia Ory Texas A&M Health Science Center Presentation at: CPRRN Annual Grantee Meeting October.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Program Evaluation EDL 832 Jeffrey Oescher, Instructor 6 June 2013.
Evaluation Assists with allocating resources what is working how things can work better.
Setting the Stage: Workshop Framing and Crosscutting Issues Simon Hearn, ODI Evaluation Methods for Large-Scale, Complex, Multi- National Global Health.
Monitoring & Evaluation Presentation for Technical Assistance Unit, National Treasury 19 August 2004 Fia van Rensburg.
EVALUATION THEORY AND MODEL Theory and model should have symbiotic relationship with practice Theory and model should have symbiotic relationship with.
TYPES OF EVALUATION Types of evaluations ask different questions and focus on different purposes. This list is meant to be illustrative rather than exhaustive.
Neal D. Kohatsu, MD, MPH Medical Director May 17, 2012 Evaluation and Quality Improvement.
Evaluating Title IIID Programs. November 8, :00-2:00 PM Webinar conference line toll free number (888) Code Login information
S519: Evaluation of Information Systems Result D-Ch10.
 Now we are ready to write our evaluation report.  Basically we are going to fill our content to the checklist boxes we learned in lec2. S519.
HMP Evaluation Overview and Tools UNE-CCPH June 22, 2011 Presenters: Kira Rodriguez Michelle Mitchell Patrick Madden Pamela Bruno-MacDonald.
The Major Steps of a Public Health Evaluation 1. Engage Stakeholders 2. Describe the program 3. Focus on the evaluation design 4. Gather credible evidence.
Program Evaluation.
Chapter 6 Training Evaluation
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas A Framework for Program Evaluation.
Copyright © 2008 Delmar. All rights reserved. Chapter 15 Program Development and Evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Introduction to Program Evaluation Frances Stillman, EdD Institute for Global Tobacco Control Johns.
Evaluation design and implementation Puja Myles
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
Program Evaluation Planning Taylor-Powell, E., Steele, S., & Douglah, M. (1996). Planning a program evaluation. Retrieved from University of Wisconsin-Extension-Cooperative.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
Data Driven Planning and Decision-making for Continuous School Improvement: Developing a Program Evaluation Plan Leadership for Innovative Omani Schools.
Erik Augustson, PhD, National Cancer Institute Susan Zbikowski, PhD, Alere Wellbeing Evaluation.
Evaluation and Implementation 21 October 2015 PUBH 535.
Unit 9: Evaluating a Public Health Surveillance System #1-9-1.
EVALUATION RESEARCH To know if Social programs, training programs, medical treatments, or other interventions work, we have to evaluate the outcomes systematically.
Analyzing Data Module 8. 2 Where are we in the Cycle? Resources Establish Need Analyze Data Interpret Data Communicate Results Use Results Plan Collect.
Demonstrating the Value of Stakeholder Input for Evaluation Design, Implementation and Dissemination Yvonne Abel, MS Abt Associates Inc. AEA Annual Conference,
Yvonne Abel, Abt Associates Inc. November 2010, San Antonio, TX Enhancing the Quality of Evaluation Through Collaboration Among Funders, Programs, and.
Chapter 10 Understanding and Planning Reports and Proposals 10-1.
A Systematic Approach for Evaluating Health Related Programs: Adaptation for Community- based Participatory Research and Clinical Application to Reduce.
Evaluating the Quality and Impact of Community Benefit Programs
Right-sized Evaluation
Community program evaluation school
MaryCatherine Jones, MPH, Public Health Consultant, CVH Team
EVALUATION THEORY AND MODEL
Business Retention and Expansion
Evaluative Research Key Terms Evaluative Research Key Terms.
A Framework for Program Evaluation
Chapter 18 Evaluator.
Evaluation Research Defined as the process of making judgments about the merits, value, or worth of any component of education. (e.g. best text books to.
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation Approaches, Frameworks & Designs HSC 489 – Chapter 14

Approaches to Evaluation Each approach: Represents a certain way of thinking Which defines the evaluation questions to ask

Frameworks & Designs Evaluation Framework: The skeleton of a plan that can be used to conduct an evaluation (steps to be followed) Evaluation Design: Used to organize the evaluation Provides for planned, systemic data collection, analysis, and reporting

Evaluation Approaches Systems Analysis Objective-Oriented Goal–Free Management-Oriented Others

Systems Analysis Approach Determines most effective programs Focuses on organization of resources to goal and non-goal activities Economic evaluations Cost identification Cost-benefit Cost-effectiveness Cost utility

Objective Oriented Approach Data is collected to determine if the predetermined goals have been met Success or failure is based on if goals are met or not Based on behaviors participants should exhibit at end of intervention

Goal-Free Approach Evaluator searches for outcomes and is unaware of program goals Evaluator presents a judgment of what actually happens in the program Mostly qualitative methods, interviews (staff/clients), visits program sites Most useful in combination with other approaches

CDC Evaluation Frameworks for Public Health Programs 1.Engage the Stakeholders 2.Describe the Program 3.Focus the evaluation design 4.Gathering credible evidence 5.Justifying conclusions 6.Ensuring use & shared lessons learned

Standards from Framework Utility – information needs of eval users are satisfied Feasibility – eval is viable & pragmatic Propriety – eval is ethical Accuracy – eval produces findings that are considered correct

Selecting an Evaluation Design 1: Orientation to the situation 2: Defining the problem 3: Basic design decision 4: Plans for: Measurement, data collection, analysis & reporting of results