THEMIS Project Management 1 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 THEMIS Mission CDR Project Management Peter R. Harvey University of California - Berkeley

THEMIS Project Management 2 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Agenda Project Status Mission Architecture Programmatics Organization Processes Reviews and RFAs Schedule Resources Cost Risks Issues Summary

THEMIS Project Management 3 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Mission Launch Vehicle:Delta II, Eastern Range Injection:305 km x 12 Re, 9.5 degrees inclination Date:October 19, 2006 Space Segment Spacecraft:5 Spinning probes with fuel for orbit/attitude adjust Instruments:3-Axis Electric Field, Magnetic Field 3-D Ion & Electron Particle Detectors Orbit Period(s):1, 2 and 4 days Orientation:Ecliptic normal (South Pointing Antenna) Ground Segment Observatories:20 Northern of All Sky Imaging and Magnetometers Operations Phases:I&T, L&EO (3 mo), Campaigns (Dec-Mar), Deorbit Lifetime:2 years

THEMIS Project Management 4 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Programmatics “PI/GSFC Team” Mode PI Team Provides Space, Ground, Data Segments PI Team Provides Cost, Schedule, Performance Assurance PI Team Provides Education/Public Outreach GSFC to Provide Oversight in QA, Safety, LV, Range interface Cost and Schedule Caps Single Cost Cap for the Mission Launch no later than March 2007 Performance Assurance MIDEX Quality Requirements  Implementation Strategy Use Heritage Instrumentation Coordinate Common Buy Parts Keep Probe/Probe Carrier Simple and Robust

THEMIS Project Management 5 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Organization Mission Manager Frank Snow, GSFC Mission Manager Frank Snow, GSFC Financial Mgr K. Harps, UCB Financial Mgr K. Harps, UCB Launch Vehicle G. Skrobott, KSC Launch Vehicle G. Skrobott, KSC Project Scientist D. Sibeck, GSFC Project Scientist D. Sibeck, GSFC THEMIS PI V. Angelopolous, UCB THEMIS PI V. Angelopolous, UCB Project Manager P. Harvey, UCB Project Manager P. Harvey, UCB Science Co-I’s EPO N. Craig, UCB EPO N. Craig, UCB Subcontracts J. Keenan, UCB Subcontracts J. Keenan, UCB Scheduling D. Meilhan, UCB Scheduling D. Meilhan, UCB Quality Assurance R. Jackson, UCB Quality Assurance R. Jackson, UCB Mission Systems E. Taylor, UCB Mission Systems E. Taylor, UCB Mechanical/ Thermal Systems P. Turin, UCB C. Smith, UCB Mechanical/ Thermal Systems P. Turin, UCB C. Smith, UCB Mag Cleanliness C. Russell, UCLA Mag Cleanliness C. Russell, UCLA Probe/Probe Carrier Management UCB Oversight: D. King Swales Mgr: M. Cully Probe/Probe Carrier Management UCB Oversight: D. King Swales Mgr: M. Cully Instruments P. Berg, UCB Instruments P. Berg, UCB Ground Segment M. Bester, UCB Ground Segment M. Bester, UCB Software Systems D. King, UCB Software Systems D. King, UCB Mission I&T R. Sterling, UCB Mission I&T R. Sterling, UCB

THEMIS Project Management 6 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Organization Instruments P. Berg Instruments P. Berg Electric Field Instrument (EFI) J. Bonnell Electric Field Instrument (EFI) J. Bonnell ElectroStatic Analyser (ESA) C. Carlson ElectroStatic Analyser (ESA) C. Carlson Solid State Telescope (SST) D. Larson Solid State Telescope (SST) D. Larson Instrument Data Processor Unit (IDPU) M. Ludlam Instrument Data Processor Unit (IDPU) M. Ludlam Fluxgate Mag (FGM) U. Auster Fluxgate Mag (FGM) U. Auster Search Coil Mag (SCM) A. Roux Search Coil Mag (SCM) A. Roux Forrest Mozer Greg Delory Art Hull Bill Donakowski Greg Dalton Robert Duck Mark Pankow Dan Schickele Stu Harris Hilary Richard Forrest Mozer Greg Delory Art Hull Bill Donakowski Greg Dalton Robert Duck Mark Pankow Dan Schickele Stu Harris Hilary Richard Robert Abiad Peter Berg Heath Bersch Dorothy Gordon Frank Harvey Selda Heavner Jim Lewis Jeanine Potts Chris Scholz Nestor Castillo Robert Abiad Peter Berg Heath Bersch Dorothy Gordon Frank Harvey Selda Heavner Jim Lewis Jeanine Potts Chris Scholz Nestor Castillo M. Marckwardt Bill Elliott Ron Herman Chris Scholz Heath Bersch M. Marckwardt Bill Elliott Ron Herman Chris Scholz Heath Bersch Robert Lin Davin Larson Ron Canario Robert Lee T. Moreau Robert Lin Davin Larson Ron Canario Robert Lee T. Moreau Hari Dharan Y. Kim Tien Tan Bill Tyler Hari Dharan Y. Kim Tien Tan Bill Tyler TUBS/IWF Uli Auster K.H. Glassmeier W. Magnes TUBS/IWF Uli Auster K.H. Glassmeier W. Magnes CETP Alain Roux Bertran de la Porte Olivier Le Contel Christophe Coillot Abdel Bouabdellah CETP Alain Roux Bertran de la Porte Olivier Le Contel Christophe Coillot Abdel Bouabdellah LASP Robert Ergun Aref Nammari Ken Stevens Jim Westfall LASP Robert Ergun Aref Nammari Ken Stevens Jim Westfall Mag Booms Mag Booms

THEMIS Project Management 7 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Organization Ground Segment Mission Ops Science Ops (Mission Planning) Mission Ops Science Ops (Mission Planning) Ground Based Observatories Manfred Bester Mark Lewis Tim Quinn Sabine Frey Tai Phan John Bonnell Laura Peticolas Manfred Bester Mark Lewis Tim Quinn Sabine Frey Tai Phan John Bonnell Laura Peticolas Stephen Mende Stu Harris Steve Geller Harald Frey Stephen Mende Stu Harris Steve Geller Harald Frey UCLA Chris Russell Joe Means Dave Pierce Bob Snare UCLA Chris Russell Joe Means Dave Pierce Bob Snare All Sky Imagers All Sky Imagers Ground Magnetometers Fielding & Operation (UC&UA) Fielding & Operation (UC&UA) UC Eric Donovan UC Eric Donovan GSFC/GCND David Sibeck Mark Beckman Bob DeFazio David Folta Rick Harman GSFC/GCND David Sibeck Mark Beckman Bob DeFazio David Folta Rick Harman UA J. Samson UA J. Samson

THEMIS Project Management 8 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Organization Organizational Roles and Responsibilities

THEMIS Project Management 9 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Processes Management Responsibilities  Staffing and Facilities, Training and Certification – Ongoing (more to go)  Subcontract Generation and Tracking – Only SAI to be completed  Schedule Generation and Tracking – Bi-weekly & bi-monthly reviews  Budget Generation and Tracking – Monthly  Cost.v. Schedule Compliance – Monthly (see below)  Risk Identification, Risk Tracking, Risk Actions - Weekly Descope Identification, Cost Evaluation, Descope Actions - Complete  Trade Studies Identification, Evaluation, Changes – 13 System changes  Action Item Generation, Distribution and Tracking - Ongoing  Technical & Financial Report Generation – Monthly

THEMIS Project Management 10 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Processes Systems Engineering Responsibilities Requirements Identification and Formalization - Complete Design Coordination, Studies (FTA, FMEA, etc) - Complete  Technical Review Coordination, Informal and Formal - Ongoing ICD Generation - Complete  Configuration Control - Ongoing Verification Matrix Development - Complete  Design Compliance - Coming Up Operations Plan Development - Complete  Action Item Management - Ongoing  Weekly telecons on S/C bus, Instrumentation, Ground Systems - Ongoing  Periodic On-site meetings - Ongoing

THEMIS Project Management 11 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Processes Request for Action Status – not including SC peer reviews

THEMIS Project Management 12 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Processes Performance Assurance Responsibilities Assurance Requirements Identification - Complete Performance Assurance Implementation Plan - Complete Subcontractor Assurance Plan Reviews - Complete System Safety – Complete (to date) Supplier On-Site Inspections of Facilities and Procedures - Complete Parts and Materials Research, Selection - Complete Parts Qualification, Procurement incl. Common Buy Program - Complete  Verification Planning (Oversight) - Upcoming  Inspections and Test Verifications - Upcoming  Failure Report Management - Upcoming  Weekly telecons on S/C bus, Instrumentation, Ground Systems - Ongoing  Periodic On-site meetings - Ongoing

THEMIS Project Management 13 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Processes Independent Verification and Validation IV&V Initial Assessment of Essential Software Bus Avionics Unit: Telecom, Bus Control, Minimal Autonomy - Completed IDPU : Instrument Control, Data Storage, Calculations - Completed Operations: ReUse of GSFC-supplied software – Completed IV&V Recommended Approach / MOA – Completed IV&V Participation in FSW Monthly Status - Ongoing

THEMIS Project Management 14 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Processes Team Communications Day-to-Day List Server FTP sites for documents Expanded Conferencing Weekly Meetings/Telecons Status of Space & Ground Eng Change Notices Cost and Schedule Risks Monthly Meetings and Reports Comprehensive Report Integrating All Internal Status All Development Team Leads Provide Narratives Swales Narrative, Long-Lead and Milestone Schedules, Costs Integrated Reports Available on the THEMIS website

THEMIS Project Management 15 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Schedule Key Features Instrument Development EM Instrument I/F Testing with EM Probe I/F – August 2004 Integrate Instrument Complement at UCB Prior to S/C Integration Instrument Complement F1 Tested First Followed by Pairs Added F1 Pre-Ship Review before F2-F5 Qualification All Instrument Complements are Complete before S/C I&T Begins – Not! Instrument I&T Team Will Be Focusing Upon S/C I&T – Need 2 teams Added Facilities for Qualifying Instruments in Parallel Spacecraft Development Integration and Test of Probe1 Completed Prior to Probes 2-5 – OK Added P1 Pre-Ship Review before P2-P5 Integration Sufficient Manpower and Equipment for Parallel I&T Ground Development Development and Deployment of 5 GBOs 2 in 1Q05, all 20 in 1Q06 Launch No Earlier Than October 19, 2004 – GSFC Requirement

THEMIS Project Management 16 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Schedule **BASED ON SCHEDULE FROM 2/20/04 CY 2005 MILESTONES CY 2004 THEMIS INSTRUMENT TOP LEVEL SCHEDULE STATUS AS OF 6/04/04 MISSION MGR. : FRANK SNOW 1 MAJOR REVIEWS IDPU DEVELOPMENT IDPU ETU DESIGN, FAB, I&T IDPU FLIGHT FABRICATION & I&T 2 EFI SPB / AXB DEVELOPMENT EFI SPB DESIGN, FAB, I&T (ETU & FLT) EFI AXB DESIGN, FAB, I&T (ETU & FLT) 3 ESA DEVELOPMENT ESA ETU DESIGN, FAB, I&T EFI FLIGHT FABRICATION & I&T 4 SST DEVELOPMENT SST ETU DESIGN, FAB, I&T SST FLIGHT FABRICATION & I&T 5 FGM DEVELOPMENT FGM ETU DESIGN, FAB, I&T FGM FLIGHT FABRICATION & I&T 6 SCM DEVELOPMENT SCM EM DESIGN, FAB, I&T SCM FLIGHT FABRICATION & I&T 8 INSTRUMENT I&T INSTRUMENT INTEGRATION & TEST FGM/SCM BOOM FLIGHT FAB & I&T FLT 1 BD FAB/ASSY COMPL BOARD I&T COMPL. IDPU ETU I &T COMPL 10/04 8/12 7/20 11/01 11/16 11/ MISSION PDR 11/12 INSTRU. CDR 4/19-20 MISSION CDR 6/14-18 CRR 2/04 4/22CR M M J JA S A ON DJ FLT I&T COMPL 6 1/ /08 11/01 ETU INSTRU. I &T COMPL 8/12 START FLT INSTRU I&T 7 FGM/SCM CDR 4/06-08 MISSION MGR. : FRANK SNOW PROJECT MGR. : PETER HARVEY F M 3/03 2 4/14 2/ /07 FGE ETU DEL. To GERMANY FGE ETU/F6 I &T COMPL 6/04 3/19 1/31 11/ FLT I&T COMPL FGE/PCB FLT 1-5 DEL to GERMANY 9/13 SC/EM I &T COMPL 6/11 11/10 9/ FLT I&T COMPL CUBE DEL. 7/23 9/30 10/14 10/ FLT I&T COMPL FAB FLT HINGES 7/16 ETU I &T COMPL 7/083/05 12/07 11/09 11/23 ETU COMPL 12/30 6/229/3010/21 11/18 12/ FLT I&T COMPL 8/26 FLT FAB ETU COMPL 5/03 9/28 10/19 11/0911/30 12/ FLT I&T COMPL 7/02 FLT MACH FLT 1-6 BD FAB/ASSY COMPL BOARD I&T COMPL. ESA ETU I &T COMPL DSG COMPL. 11/26 8/26 8/12 3/25 FLT I&T COMPL 10/ BOARD I&T COMPL. SST ETU I &T COMPL DSG COMPL. 6/25 6/11 3/05 11/23 10/01 10/12 10/22 11/02 11/ FLT I&T COMPL FLT 1-6 BD FAB/ASSY COMPL 9/10 6 A M 6 5/18 LEGEND -- ETU Activity -- Flight Activity

THEMIS Project Management 17 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Schedule

THEMIS Project Management 18 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Deliverables Contract Deliverables – PDR-CDR

THEMIS Project Management 19 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Deliverables Contract Deliverables – PDR-CDR

THEMIS Project Management 20 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Deliverables Contract Deliverables – PDR-CDR

THEMIS Project Management 21 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Resources SSL Projects at PDR STEREO Personnel Not Available; MMS Now Starting Up SNAP and MMS Projects Will Help Offload Personnel

THEMIS Project Management 22 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Resources SSL Projects at CDR “Moon/Mars” Delay for MMS & SNAP removes incentive to complete Will Lose Talent Capable of Building MMS unless something done Moon- Mars Gap

THEMIS Project Management 23 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Resources Facilities Chamber Availability at UCB/SSL Numerous Tanks of Varying Sizes & Types – All Still in Use by STEREO! One New Chamber Needed for THEMIS – 3 Being Built/Tested! One Calibration Chamber Needs Parts – Could not be Fixed, Replaced. TV Plan Assumptions 2 Component-Level TV Cycles 6 Instrument Level TV Cycles Schedule has assumed new chambers are ready. Established weekly tag-up meetings on these TV chambers Put people experienced in these systems on the project Have contacted NTS (LA) for availability of chambers as a backup.

THEMIS Project Management 24 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Cost Changes from PDR Additional Management Added Swales/FSW Oversight Growth in Probe/Probe Carrier Added RCS Pressurant System to deal with Mass Growth ESC Compliant Solar Arrays Growth in I&T Costs GSFC Review of P1 Qualification before P2-P5 Integration GSFC Review of F1 Qualification before F2-F5 Qualification Growth in LV Cost All “TLX” separation system recommended by GSFC Disallowed as a Mission Unique by KSC

THEMIS Project Management 25 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Cost Cost Performance v Budget thru MCDR Cumulative Costs + Liens v Budget at +3% Cumulative Costs v Budget alone at –19% Schedule is appx –12% (bracketed by the float)

THEMIS Project Management 26 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Cost Descopes Remaining L1 Requirements Allow Flexibility in Instrumentation Power, Mass, Cost Impacts

THEMIS Project Management 27 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Risk Reduction Activities since PDR Added Thermal Expertise (Paul Cleveland) Added Structural Expertise (Terry Scharton) Added Spacecraft Oversight (David King) Added Bi-Monthly Schedule Reviews with Code 500 Added Monthly Probe Software Status Meetings Increased Fuel Capacity to re-establish adequate margins Added Instrument and Probe #1 Reviews before #2-#5 Changed to the “all TLX” separation system Prioritized Safety Studies and Planning Added ESA HV Enable Plug

THEMIS Project Management 28 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Risk Risk List (UCB view, Top-Down)

THEMIS Project Management 29 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Risk Risk List (UCB, Top Down) P/I Definitions Matrix

THEMIS Project Management 30 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Issues Significant New Issues since PDR Delay in Confirmation Review for 2 months –No LV-to-Spacecraft Interface Definition for CDR Delay in Launch Date for 2 months –Decreased Time to Deploy 5 Probes Before 1 st Winter –Will Switch Science Plans at some point if launch date slips more  Need to have a clear launch-date decision point KSC Determination that TLX be Handled by UCB/Swales –Messy Organizational Interface with Boeing –If there is a mishap, this will be the “root cause.”  Recommend a clear MOU on roles & responsibilities Delay in MMS and SNAP Projects –Difficulty in Offloading Personnel –Potential Cost and Schedule Impacts  PM to develop offloading strategy

THEMIS Project Management 31 UCB, June 14-16, 2004 Summary Stable Science and Mission Concept No Show Stoppers Identified Development or Review Teams Organization is Active in All Development Areas Weekly and bi-weekly Telecons Active in all Major Areas Systems Engineering Reliability Analyses, ICD’s and Verification Plans Complete Review Process in Place Successful Reviews at Subsystem Level RFAs Being Worked Detailed Design Efforts at Full Speed Drawings Complete Board-level Engineering Modeling in Progress Mechanism ETU Testing and Qualifications in Progress