Why Are We Pushing for Aggressive Federal Rules to Reduce National/Regional NOx, SO2 and Hg Emissions? NACAA Board Meeting July 31 to August 2, 2010 PREPARED.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reducing Air Pollution Challenges and Opportunities New Jersey Clean Air Council April 14, 2010.
Advertisements

Department of the Environment The Basic Science of Air Pollution Transport Brian J. Hug Division Chief, Air Quality Planning and Policy Division.
Department of the Environment What Will It Take? DG Stakeholder Meeting - June 24, 2013 Meeting the New Ozone Standard.
1 HOW DO WE KNOW IF THE WASHINGTON AREA WILL ATTAIN? The State Implementation Plan (SIP) under development must give EPA the answer to three basic questions:
Southern Environmental Law Center Georgia Air Summit May 4, 2006.
Ozone Modeling over the Western U.S. -- Impact of National Controls on Ozone Trends in the Future Rural/Urban Ozone in the Western United States -- March.
Transportation Conformity and Development of Emission Budgets.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
Overview of Ozone and PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Regional Air Quality Workshop November 17, 2004.
Department of the Environment Tad Aburn - Air Director, MDE June 21, AWMA Meeting - San Antonio, TX Complying With the NAAQS and Beyond -
Template Emission Controls Affecting Northeast Texas Presentation to the NETAC Policy and Technical Committees Sue Kemball-Cook, Krish Vijayaraghavan,
Ozone in Colorado: Issues and Reduction Strategies Presentation to the Colorado Environmental Health Association October 2,
1 Regional Wind Energy Purchase Jim Caldwell Montgomery County Department of Environmental Protection April 5, 2004.
Control Measures for the 8-hour Ozone SIP Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee April 27, 2005.
Department of the Environment The State Implementation Plan Process – Our Next Steps Brian Hug Division Chief, Air Quality Planning and Policy Division.
Department of the Environment What Will It Take? 2013 Power Plant Regulations Stakeholder Meeting - October 21, 2013 Meeting the New Ozone and Sulfur.
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
Department of the Environment A History of Power Plant Controls in Maryland What Did We Learn? – Where do We go Next? Part 1 – Background and Historical.
South Coast AQMP/SIP Ozone & PM2.5 Control Strategy Laki Tisopulos, Ph.D., P.E. Assistant Deputy Executive Officer South Coast Air Quality Management.
ADEM Air Update Ron Gore November, National Issues EPA is delaying many controversial decisions and issues: Implementation of new SO 2 NAAQS Setting.
American Legislative Exchange Council America’s Clean Air Success Story and the Implications of Overregulation November 28, 2012 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E.,
Modeling the Co-Benefits of Carbon Standards for Existing Power Plants STI-6102 Stephen Reid, Ken Craig, Garnet Erdakos Sonoma Technology, Inc. Jonathan.
Ozone Season Summary 2014 Sunil Kumar MWAQC-TAC Meeting, COG September 9, Item #2.
Maryland’s Innovative Measures State Implementation Plan 2004 EPA Air Innovations Conference Brian J. Hug – Chief, Air Quality Policy and Planning Division.
1 EPA’s Proposed Interstate Air Quality Rule Consideration of Issues Associated with Possible Expansion of IAQR to the West Patrick Cummins, WGA Background.
1 Summary of LADCO’s Regional Modeling in the Eastern U.S.: Preliminary Results April 27, 2009 MWAQC TAC June 15, 2009.
Presentation by: Dan Goldberg Co-authors: Tim Vinciguerra, Linda Hembeck, Sam Carpenter, Tim Canty, Ross Salawitch & Russ Dickerson 13 th Annual CMAS Conference.
Henry Hogo Assistant Deputy Executive Officer Mobile Source Division Science and Technology Advancement 2015 International Emission Inventory Conference.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
1 PM2.5 Redesignation Request for the Metropolitan Washington,D.C. Region Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG.
A Simplified Conceptual Model for the Ozone Transport Region OTC Modeling Committee Meeting Tad Aburn, MDE April 26, 2005 Where does our air pollution.
Mobile Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13 th, 2012 Washington, DC 1.
The Clean Air Act First Clean Air Act passed in 1967: 1970 Amendments established current relationship between states and federal government and required.
Why is the Low Level Jet Important to the Baltimore/DC Region? MWAQC-TAC Meeting January 21, 2005.
Expected Ozone Benefits from EGU NOx Reductions Tim Vinciguerra, Emily Bull, Timothy Canty, Hao He, Eric Zalewsky, Michael Woodman, Sheryl Ehrman, Russell.
ICI Boilers EPA Meeting November 21, Why control ICI boilers? Important source of SO 2 and NO x emissions Cost-effective emission reductions achievable.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Maryland May 2013.
National and Regional Programs to Reduce Ozone Transport Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee April 27, 2005.
Putting the Pieces Together OTC Fall Meeting November 2-3, 2005 Planning to Meet the SIP Submittal Deadlines.
Overview of Transboundary Air Management in North America Gothenburg Protocol and Review 20 September 2006 Nav Khera and Kimber Scavo.
PM2.5 Working Group Meeting #2 South Coast Air Quality Management District July 11, 2006.
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
EPA Planning and implementation Update Western Regional Air Partnership November 11, 2009.
CALGRID Modeling Overview A First Look A Modeling Effort by the OTC Modeling Committee Presented by: Jeffrey Underhill, Ph.D. NHDES OTC/MANE-VU Annual.
Fine Particles in the Air: Taking Action, Improving Health Presentation at STAPPA/ALAPCO Meeting Coeur d'Alene, Idaho Tom Curran, EPA Office of Air Quality.
Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.
November 15, Clean Air Act Framework National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) set public health goals Planning process considers science,
Implementation of National Ambient Air Quality Standards Bill Harnett NACAA Fall Meeting September 22, 2009.
OTC Control Strategy Committee Meeting Tad Aburn, Chair, Multi-P Workgroup October 5, 2005 The OTC Multipollutant Model Rule.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Northeastern States July 2013.
PROPOSED FINE PARTICULATE ATTAINMENT/ NONATTAINMENT DESIGNATION RECOMMENDATIONS This proposal is available on the DEP Website at
AOSC 200 Lesson 27. A Typical Day in a Pollution Episode A common severe pollution weather pattern occurs when high pressure is centered just west of.
1 Long Range Transport of Air Pollution Air pollution can travel hundreds of miles and cause multiple health and environmental problems on regional or.
Regional Air Quality Planning in the Upper Midwest
Steve Page Office Director, OAQPS NACAA Spring Meeting 2010
A History of Power Plant Controls in Maryland What Did We Learn
Maryland's Air Quality: Nitrogen Reductions and the Healthy Air Act
Why Are We Pushing for More Federal Rules to Reduce Regional NOx and SO2? NACAA Meeting May 17, 2010.
Planning to Achieve the 8-Hour Ozone Standard
The Role For State and Local Agencies
Clean Air Interstate Rule Office of Air and Radiation
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Ozone in the Tri Cities August 2018.
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
DG Stakeholder Meeting - June 24, 2013
CAIR Update WESTAR October 2, 2008.
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Presentation transcript:

Why Are We Pushing for Aggressive Federal Rules to Reduce National/Regional NOx, SO2 and Hg Emissions? NACAA Board Meeting July 31 to August 2, 2010 PREPARED WITH AN EPA DISCUSSION OR BRIEFING IN MIND

2 Six Highest Priority Categories The Priority Sectors –EGUs –Tougher On-Road Standards (NOx and VOC) –ICI Boilers –Cement Kilns –Marine Engines –Locomotives “A+” level of controls Why? … What’s Our Logic? Multi-Pollutant Sector-Based Controls

3 Understanding How Transport Really Works Every bad ozone day, in the morning hours, a large cloud or reservoir of ozone sits above Maryland and the Mid-Atlantic area waiting to mix down. –Based upon real, measured data –Ozone levels in the reservoir are routinely measured at 60 to 100 ppb. –In the morning, ozone levels at the surface are very low (10 to 20 ppb). Around 10:00 or 11:00 – when the nocturnal inversion breaks down - the ozone (and any precursors) in the reservoir mix down to the surface and degrade air quality. Every bad ozone day, in the morning hours, a large cloud or reservoir of ozone sits above Maryland and the Mid-Atlantic area waiting to mix down. –Based upon real, measured data –Ozone levels in the reservoir are routinely measured at 60 to 100 ppb. –In the morning, ozone levels at the surface are very low (10 to 20 ppb). Around 10:00 or 11:00 – when the nocturnal inversion breaks down - the ozone (and any precursors) in the reservoir mix down to the surface and degrade air quality. Ozone as an Example The Transport Cloud... or the Elevated Ozone Reservoir Could the reservoir be much larger ???

4 The Transport Cloud A Regional Cloud of Pollution - Crashing Down to Earth Measured ozone at aloft monitors in the 60 to 90 ppb range all night long All monitors, ground level and aloft, record ozone levels that are almost identical to what was measured all night long at the aloft monitors

5 How Do We Reduce the Transport Cloud? The NOx SIP Call as an example –OTAG collaboration in late 90’s –EPA finalizes SIP Call in 1998 –Very significant regional NOx reductions across the East in the 2003/2004 timeframe –Dramatic drops in ozone levels Similar story for SO2 controls and PM The NOx SIP Call as an example –OTAG collaboration in late 90’s –EPA finalizes SIP Call in 1998 –Very significant regional NOx reductions across the East in the 2003/2004 timeframe –Dramatic drops in ozone levels Similar story for SO2 controls and PM

6 55.5% of Units 22.3% of Units Controls From the NOx SIP Call Phase I Minimal SCR Units Expect Minimal NO x Reductions Phase II Large Number of SCR Units Installed Expect SIGNIFIANT NO x Reductions Especially after Air Quality should decrease dramatically Data courtesy of The Institute of Clean Air Companies (ICAC).Institute of Clean Air Companies 77.8% of Units Installed between Scheduled Startup Units

7 Regional NOx Emission Reductions Dramatic regional NOx emission reductions in the 2003/2004 time frame NOx reductions from Tier II/LEV II standards also – very gradually - occurring in this same period Dramatic regional NOx emission reductions in the 2003/2004 time frame NOx reductions from Tier II/LEV II standards also – very gradually - occurring in this same period NOx Reductions at NOx Budget Program Sources Thanks: EPA Clean Air Markets

8 Reducing O3 in the Transport Cloud Average ozone levels in the elevated reservoir before 2004 Average ozone levels in the elevated reservoir after 2004

9 Maryland’s 1-Hour Ozone Design Value per Year

10 Maryland’s 8-Hour Ozone Design Value per Year

11 Very Preliminary Ozone Modeling Very rough, preliminary OTC “Screening” modeling – Thanks to NYDEC From a 2007 Base Three scenarios –50% NOx and 30% VOC cuts across all states and all sectors in domain –70% NOx and 30% VOC cuts across all states and all sectors in domain –Federal Measures “Plus” Run Tried to mimic federal rules and local controls being targeted by OTC –“Top 6” Federal Measures across domain »65% cut to stationary NOx »75% cut to on-road mobile NOx (includes post-2007 Tier II benefits) »35% cut to area NOx »30% VOC »In total about a 55% NOx and 30% VOC run –Additional 5% NOx in all OTC states

12 Results – Toughest Monitors in the East NON ATTAINMENT AREAS Monitored Design Value After 50% NOx & 30% VOC Run After 70% NOx & 30% VOC Run After Federal Measures “+“ Run New York - Bayonne NYC/Queens Philadelphia - Camden Bristol Cleveland/A/L -Mayfield Eastlake Columbus - Albany HS Washington - River Terrace Baltimore - Edgewood Getting closer … But still more to do. Majority of monitors < 65ppb

13 Reducing Regional NOx Emissions Works The 6 Priority Categories Represent About 75% of the NOx Left to Regulate

14 The Fine Particle/SO2 Story Similar to Ozone –Regional reservoir of SO2 and PM dominates the East’s problem –Summertime SO2 “westerly” transport dominates Mid-Atlantic PM levels and acts pretty much like Ozone for westerly transport However … –More complex chemistry –Different behavior at night Little debate over the regional nature of SO2 piece of the PM problems in the East

15 Eastern State - SO 2 Controls Some controls driven by Title IV Some controls driven by early CAIR Source: EPA Clean Air Markets

16 SO2 Emission Reductions Thanks: EPA Clean Air Markets

17 Maryland Annual PM 2.5 Trends (μg/m3) Current Annual Standard

18 Maryland PM Hr Trends (μg/m3) Current Daily Standard

19 Reducing Regional SO2 Emissions Works The 6 Priority Categories Represent About 85% of the NOx Left to Regulate

20 What Has This Meant to Maryland? 1-Hour OzoneAnnual Fine ParticulateDaily Fine Particulate8-Hour Ozone *2008 data are preliminary.

21 Just a Little on the Mercury Story Another Major Issue to the States –Joint effort between state water and air programs 319 G Process initiated by Northeast states just beginning Moving towards 4 State/Federal Partnership efforts –National and local controls –Product stewardship –Global/International efforts –Communications

22 Clearly a National Problem Thanks: EPA 319G Meeting

23 U.S. Mercury Emissions (2005) Thanks: EPA 319G Meeting The 6 Priority Categories Represent About 75% of the 2005 national Hg emissions

24 So … Let’s work together on “A+” Multi-Pollutant control programs for the highest priority sectors –We need to do whatever we can to further reduce regional NOx, SO2 and Mercury emissions –Many lives to be saved Again - The Priority Sectors –EGUs –Tougher On-Road Tailpipe Standards (NOx and VOC) –ICI Boilers –Cement Kilns –Marine Engines –Locomotives These categories represent –About 85% of the SO2 that is left to regulate –About 75% of the NOx that is left to regulate and –About 75% of the 2005 national mercury emissions

25 Benefits Many lives to be saved –EPA has estimated the improvements in public health resulting from just the 2004 NOx SIP Call Up to 1800 lives saved through 2008 Significant health benefits to asthmatics and other individuals with lung disease Dramatically help states with old and new Ozone, PM, NO2 and SO2 SIPs Multiple other benefits –Haze/Visibility, Chesapeake Bay, Mercury, other toxics, etc.

26 Next Steps ?Consider a NACAA resolution or letter? ?Have appropriate NACAA Committees develop recommendations on what “A+ Multi-Pollutant Controls” means for 6 priority categories? –Include EPA? –Build from earlier NACAA work and other information LEV III CARB analyses of Locomotives and Marine Engines and LADCO/OTC work on EGUs and ICI Boilers. ?Push for earlier state involvement in national rules as co-regulators? Discussion