Dominique Ladiray Gian Luigi Mazzi Q2008, Roma, 9-11 July 2008 Assessing the Quality of the Euro-Indicator Database.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
United Nations Statistics Division Revision policy and dissemination practices Training Workshop on the Compilation of Quarterly National Accounts for.
Advertisements

Enhancing Data Quality of Distributive Trade Statistics Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive.
What is the standard deviation good for? Numerical data that come from an experiment carry inherently some “unit of measure”, for example How long a battery.
13 October 2009 Eurostat data visualization tools Rosa Ruggeri Cannata Unit D5 Key indicators for European policies Fourth Joint EU-OECD Workshop on Business.
OECD Short-Term Economic Statistics Working PartyJune Impact and timing of revisions for seasonally adjusted series relative to those for the.
OECD Short-Term Economic Statistics Working PartyJune Analysis of revisions for short-term economic statistics Richard McKenzie OECD OECD Short.
CHAPTER 18 Models for Time Series and Forecasting
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall7-1 Chapter 7: Forecasting.
J. Khélif Insee July 2008 A quality report for seasonally and trading day adjusted French IIP.
13-Jul-07 European Statistical System guidelines on seasonal adjustment: a major step towards PEEIs harmonisation C. Calizzani – G.L. Mazzi – R. Ruggeri.
8-11-Jul-07 How to increase quality of Principal European Economic Indicators? Roberto Barcellan, Brian Newson, Klaus Wurm Eurostat.
REFERENCE METADATA FOR DATA TEMPLATE Ales Capek EUROSTAT.
4 May 2010 Towards a common revision for European statistics By Gian Luigi Mazzi and Rosa Ruggeri Cannata Q2010 European Conference on Quality in Official.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division Seasonal Adjustment Process with Demetra+ Anu Peltola Economic Statistics Section, UNECE.
Eurostat Overall design. Presented by Eva Elvers Statistics Sweden.
Publishing Seasonally Adjusted Data Anu Peltola Economic Statistics Section, UNECE UNECE Workshop on Seasonal Adjustment 20 – 23 February 2012, Ankara,
Eurostat – Unit D5 Key indicators for European policies European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics, Q2010 Helsinki, 4-6 May 2010.
20 May 2009 Indicators for long-term developments Unit D5 - Key Indicators for European policies Ottawa, May, 2009 Pieter Everaers, Eurostat.
9 th Euroindicators Working Group Luxembourg, 4 th & 5 th December 2006 Eurostat - Unit D1 Key Indicators for European Policies.
1 C. ARRIBAS, D. LORCA, A. SALINERO & A. COLMENERO Measuring statistical quality at the Spanish National Statistical Institute.
9 th Euroindicators Working Group Luxembourg, 4 th & 5 th December 2006 Eurostat - Unit D1 Key Indicators for European Policies.
Eurostat – Unit D5 Key indicators for European policies Third International Seminar on Early Warning and Business Cycle Indicators Annotated outline of.
1 OECD Workshop on Business and Consumer Tendency Surveys, Rome, 19 September 2006 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND TO WORKSHOP.
9 th Euroindicators Working Group Luxembourg, 4 th & 5 th December 2006 Eurostat - Unit D1 Key Indicators for European Policies.
Rome, 8-11 July 2008 QUALITY 2008 An application to the Italian IIP Revision analysis to detect possible weakness in the estimation procedures A. Ciammola,
Data requirements and summary statistics for revisions analysis Performing revisions analysis for sub-annual economic statistics Michela Gamba, Statistics.
General Recommendations on STS Carsten Boldsen Hansen Economic Statistics Section, UNECE UNECE Workshop on Short-Term Statistics (STS) and Seasonal Adjustment.
September 14-15, 2005OECD-Eurostat Expert Meeting1 OECD-Eurostat Expert Meeting on Trade in Services Statistics Eurostat: Metadata, data production and.
WORKING PARTY ON NATIONAL ACCOUNTS Paris, 3-5 October 2007 The situation of QUARTERLY NATIONAL ACCOUNTS data transmission to the OECD Document STD/CSTAT/WPNA(2007)6.
Anna Ciammola and Donatella Tuzi ISTAT - Italy Internal Coherence in Seasonally Adjusted Chain Laspeyres Indices An Application to the Italian Hourly Labour.
1 SUMMARY OF ISSUES EMERGING SINCE 2003 STESEG MEETING SUMMARY OF ISSUES EMERGING SINCE 2003 STESEG MEETING SHORT-TERM ECONOMIC STATISTICS EXPERT GROUP.
Compilation of External Trade Statistics by Enterprise Characteristics: Progress Report Karo Nuortila European Commission/DG Eurostat/ Unit G3 International.
Seasonal Adjustment Center of Excellence Quality Report for JD+ Towards a versatile quality report SAEG Meeting - December 7 th, 2015 SACE 1.
1 Quality reporting within the Eurostat and the ESS metadata systems August Götzfried and Håkan Linden Eurostat Unit B6: Reference databases and metadata.
Are the Standard Documentations really Quality Reports? European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics Helsinki, 3-6 May 2010 © STATISTIK AUSTRIA.
INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON TIMELINESS, METHODOLOGY AND COMPARABILITY OF RAPID ESTIMATES OF ECONOMIC TRENDS Session 6 Summary.
March 2011 UNECE Statistical Division 1 Challenges & Problems of Short- Term Statistics (STS) Based on the UNECE paper on Short-Term Economic Statistics.
Forecast 2 Linear trend Forecast error Seasonal demand.
United Nations Statistics Division Overview of handbook on cyclical composite indicators Expert Group Meeting on Short-Term Economic Statistics in Western.
Discussion: Timely estimates of economic indicators – Session C3 –
Status of OECD’s International Trade Statistics databases
Artur Andrysiak Economic Statistics Section, UNECE
Shohreh Mirzaei Yeganeh United Nations Industrial Development
Regional Workshop on Short-term Economic Indicators and Service Statistics September 2017 Chiba, Japan Alick Nyasulu SIAP.
3rd Euro-SICS Working Group meeting.
Bettina Wistrom OECD Statistics Directorate
Quality Reporting with JD+
Euro-indicators Working Group
TF meeting 7 October '15 Luxembourg
6.1 Quality improvement Regional Course on
LAMAS Working Group January 2016
CESS 2016 – Session B5 "Globalisation and productivity growth"
European Central Bank – DG Statistics
Euro-indicators Working Group
Euro-indicators Working Group
Euro-indicators Working Group
LAMAS Working Group October 2014
Quality Criteria Initial Ideas.
Sub-Regional Workshop on International Merchandise Trade Statistics Compilation and Export and Import Unit Value Indices 21 – 25 November Guam.
Data validation handbook
WORKING PARTY ON NATIONAL ACCOUNTS 12 – 15 October 2004
Statistics Vocabulary Continued
Quality Reporting in CBS
Statistics Vocabulary Continued
Prodcom Working Group Item Quality reporting and indicators
Model Selection, Seasonal Adjustment, Analyzing Results
Quality of MIP indicators: Assessment of data and metadata
European Statistical Cooperation Joint EFTA/ECE/SSCU seminar “Economic Globalisation: a Challenge for Official Statistics” 3-6 July 2007, Kiev Inna Steinbuka.
Selective Editing Techniques and Seasonal Adjustment of STS
ESS conceptual standards for quality reporting
Presentation transcript:

Dominique Ladiray Gian Luigi Mazzi Q2008, Roma, 9-11 July 2008 Assessing the Quality of the Euro-Indicator Database

Q2008, Roma Assessing the Quality of the Euro-Indicator Database Outline › The Euro-Indicator Database –Domains, tables and indicators › History of the Database –A few hints on its evolution › Some Quality Indicators –Relevance, Coherence, Timeliness, Completeness, Accuracy, Transparency › Towards a Synthetic Quality Indicator –Measuring the progress –Principal Component Analysis

Q2008, Roma Assessing the Quality of the Euro-Indicator Database The Euro-Indicator Database › Objective: to provide a comprehensive and detailed portrait of the short-term economic situation in the UE and its main partners › Important dates –1999: Euro-SICS project –2002: complete redesign of the database –2005: redesign of the External Trade domain –Enlargements of the UE › Today –About 55,000 time series –8 domains (BP, BS, CP, ET, IS, LM, MF and NA) –47 tables (sub-domains) –44 countries and European aggregates

Q2008, Roma Assessing the Quality of the Euro-Indicator Database Evolution of the database size since 2000

Q2008, Roma Assessing the Quality of the Euro-Indicator Database Timeliness Indicators › T1: Timeliness (announced publication date – end of reference period ) –Target: Small, EU delay target (40 days?) –% of series with timeliness <= 40 days › T2: Database timeliness (date of the first appearance in the database – end of reference period) –Target: Small, EU delay target but Eurostat needs time to control data and compute aggregates (45 days?) –% of series with timeliness <= 45 days

Q2008, Roma Assessing the Quality of the Euro-Indicator Database Relevance Indicators › R1: Rate of available statistics over series –Ratio between the number of available indicators and the maximum expected number of indicators (27 MS + European aggregates: moved through time). –Target: 100% › R2: Length of series –% of series of 15 years length or more (to get 2-3 business cycles). –Target: 100%

Q2008, Roma Assessing the Quality of the Euro-Indicator Database Accuracy Indicators › A1: Number of revisions –Number of times a value is revised over the last year. › A2: Absolute size of revisions –Average computed on the year following the release. › A3: Relative size of revisions –Average computed on the year following the release. › Note: A indicators require a historical database › Note: lack of references (What is the optimum?)

Q2008, Roma Assessing the Quality of the Euro-Indicator Database Accessibility and clarity indicators › AC1: Number of database accesses and downloads –Target? › AC2: Number of series with SDDS metadata files –Target: 100%

Q2008, Roma Assessing the Quality of the Euro-Indicator Database Other possible indicators › Number of outliers (and missing values?) in the series –Target: less than 5% (?) › Percentage of SA series with residual seasonality –Target: 0% › Percentage of WDA series with residual TD effect –Target: 0% › Size of the irregular –Target: ?

Q2008, Roma Assessing the Quality of the Euro-Indicator Database How to summarize the information? › We can compute these n indicators for each occurrence of the database (about 55,000 series) or for each domain (8) and/or tables (47) › Checking the situation by computing the distance to the target for each domain and/or table –Root Mean Square Deviation –Mean Absolute Deviation –Note: the MAD is “more optimistic” –But none of the 2 indicators is “fair”

Q2008, Roma Assessing the Quality of the Euro-Indicator Database Quality of the EuroInd Database

Q2008, Roma Assessing the Quality of the Euro-Indicator Database How to summarize the information? › In fact the quality has increased: more information with the same global quality index. –Weighting with the number of “active series”?

Q2008, Roma Assessing the Quality of the Euro-Indicator Database Evolution over the last year

Q2008, Roma Assessing the Quality of the Euro-Indicator Database How to summarize the information? › Checking the evolution using PCA or MFA: –We can project the 8 domains and/or 47 tables and/or 44 geographical aggregates (centers of gravity) on the first factorial plan

Q2008, Roma Assessing the Quality of the Euro-Indicator Database Evolution over the last year BP MF NA IS BS LM CP ET