Larceny and Fraud Study Update

Embezzlement Study The Commission conducted a study of felony embezzlement cases to examine the relationship between the amount embezzled and sentencing outcomes. ― Analysis of felony embezzlement cases sentenced under truth-in-sentencing laws between January 1, 1995, and June 30, Since analysis revealed a relationship between dollar amount embezzled and the sentence received, new factors were added to Sections A, B, and C of the Fraud worksheets.

The following year, the Commission conducted a study of larceny and fraud cases to examine the relationship between the amount of money or value of property stolen and sentencing outcomes. The Commission studied a sample of felony larceny and fraud cases sentenced in CY1998 and CY1999. ― Sample excluded embezzlement because it had been examined in the previous study. ― Certain other offenses were also excluded, such as motor vehicle theft and forging public record, since the statutory definition is not tied to value. Larceny and Fraud Study

Final sample was 749 cases (309 larceny; 440 fraud). Supplemental data was collected on factors of interest that were not contained in automated data. − Narratives from the Pre/Post-Sentence Investigation (PSI) reports − Court records Larceny and Fraud Study

Although many variations of the factors were tried, models with factors that were statistically significant were only marginally better than the existing guidelines model. − The best models involved both dollar amount and a factor related to restitution and/or victim type. − Adding such factors would have added a layer of complexity for users when scoring. Larceny and Fraud Study Commission took no action 5

Study

A large sample is preferred, as some cases will be eliminated in subsequent stages. ― Supplemental data may reveal a conviction for an excluded offense. ― Wrong VCC may have been used. ― Available data may be insufficient to include the offender. Strategy is similar to the original Larceny/Fraud Study in Selection of Study Sample: Larceny and Fraud Study

Sample was based on a stratified random sampling technique to under-sample grand larceny cases and over-sample other types of larcenies. − To ensure adequate number of cases for non-grand larceny in the sample Sample includes embezzlement. − Length of time since previous study − Judges frequently cite dollar amount when sentencing above the guidelines Selection of Study Sample: Larceny and Fraud Study

Number of Cases Grand Larceny200 Embezzlement600 Other Larcenies400 Fraud300 Total1,500 For the analysis, the sampled cases will be weighted to reflect each subgroup’s actual proportion in the population. Selection of Study Sample FY FY2013 Larceny and Fraud Study

Dollar value of money or property stolen Type(s) of items Damage of items Money/items recovered Insurance coverage for items Fraud protection for loss Location of offense Duration of offense Number of victims Type and Age of victim(s) Offender relationship to victim Status of restitution at time of sentencing Restitution ordered at sentencing Larceny and Fraud Study Supplemental Data Collection

Pre/Post-Sentence Investigation (PSI) reports ― 42% of the sampled cases were matched to PSI data − Of these, 98% contained information in the offense narrative field − Compared to the previous study, the percentage of sampled cases with available PSI information is much lower Officer of the Court Remote Access (OCRA) System ― Contains scanned copies of court records ― Of the sampled cases, 60.2% occurred in a court with OCRA The majority of sampled cases (78.7%) either had a PSI or occurred in an OCRA jurisdiction Electronic Data Sources: Larceny and Fraud Study

47 jurisdictions currently use OCRA Larceny and Fraud Study OCRA Jurisdictions 12 AlbemarleLynchburgRockingham AlexandriaMontgomeryShenandoah AugustaNelsonSmyth BedfordNew KentSouthampton BristolNewport NewsSpotsylvania CarolineNorfolkStafford ChesapeakeNorthamptonStaunton DanvillePittsylvaniaSuffolk DickensonPortsmouthTazewell DinwiddiePowhatanWashington FauquierPrince EdwardWaynesboro FredericksburgPrince WilliamWilliamsburg HalifaxPulaskiWinchester HanoverRichmond CityYork HenricoRoanoke City Isle of WightRoanoke County Loudoun

Other Court records (paper files) Law Enforcement Databases Commonwealth’s Attorneys’ files Victim Impact Statements Probation Office records Larceny and Fraud Study Other Potential Data Sources

14 Region 1 Tidewater Cases: 68 Region 2 Northern Virginia Cases: 25 Region 5 Southside Virginia Cases: 24 Region 6 Shenandoah Valley/Piedmont Cases: 55 Region 4 Southwest Virginia Cases: 66 Region 3 Central Virginia Cases: 81 Larceny and Fraud Study Cases in Non-OCRA Courts without a PSI Total: 319

Spring/Summer 2015 Data collection August/September 2015 Data analysis September 2015 Present preliminary results November 2015 Present proposal for guidelines revision (if supported by data) Larceny and Fraud Study Revised Work Plan* 15 * Subject to change based on accessibility of information