Design Guidance for Low-water Crossing in Gravel Rivers Xing Fang Lamar University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENTRY OF FLOW MEASUREMENT DATA
Advertisements

San Joaquin River Bedload Sampling summary January 4 and 5, 2011 April 1 and 2, 2011 Ledger Island.
ON WIDTH VARIATIONS IN RIVER MEANDERS Luca Solari 1 & Giovanni Seminara 2 1 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Firenze 2 Department of Environmental.
Assessment of gravel transport characteristics of the upper Santa Ana River Scott Wright and Toby Minear USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento,
River Studies. Outline of Events During your river field work you will be visiting two different sites in the lower course of the river. At each site.
Design of Hydraulic Controls & Structures
Channel Repair of Montezuma Creek in Coronado National Memorial following Fire and Flood Damage Stephanie Yard, P.E. & Allen Haden, Aquatic Ecologist Natural.
Floodplain Mapping using HEC-RAS and ArcView GIS Eric Tate Francisco Olivera David Maidment
Fluxes of water, sediment, and elements class 1.Introduce instrumentation and approach for surveying and flow gauging 2.Introduce and understand Manning’s.
Remote Mapping of River Channel Morphology March 9, 2003 Carl J. Legleiter Geography Department University of California Santa Barbara.
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
CLASS PLAN RIVER BEHAVIOR FLOW GAUGING MANNING’S EQUATION BANKFULL DISCHARGE DISCUSS MCPHEE.
HEC-RAS.
U.S. EPA: NCEA/Global Change Research Program Jim Pizzuto and students University of Delaware Changing Climate and Land Use in the Mid-Atlantic: Modeling.
Modeling River Ice and River Ice Jams with HEC-RAS
FIELD METHODS IN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY GEOS 3110.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation 1-Dimensional Modeling CWPPRA Technical Committee and.
Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – February 2004 Part 3 – Hydrologic Assessment.
IX. 1 See these resources: HDS6-01 (Section 9.3), HEC20-95 (Section 4.3 to 4.7), HDS1-78 (Section 11), TXDOT-02 (Section 4.4), FITD Class CD IX. Overview.
1 Mixing engineering and biology. Where Fish Passage is required Connectivity is required across the landscape wherever there are fish. Fish and fish.
Abstract Background Conclusion Stream Bed Morphology and Discharge Rates of Deckers Creek Data was collected at 5 different points along a 100 meter transect.
US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Two.
1D Steady State Hydraulic Modelling Bratton Stream Case Study.
Fluvial Processes “the great sculptor of the landscape”
Hydraulic Engineering
Time of Travel. American Water Charleston intake on the Elk River Charleston 1,000, ,984 = 1880 seconds or 31 minutes.
Site Selection and Security Considerations Mark Heggli Innovative Hydrology, Inc. Consultant To The World Bank Expert Real-Time Hydrology Information Systems.
MA BF REFERENCE CURVES Objective Develop bankfull regional curves and equations for estimating bankfull width, mean depth, cross-sectional area, and discharge.
Streams and Drainage Systems The most important source of moving water.
Morphodynamics of the North Fork Toutle River Near Mount St. Helens, Washington John Pitlick 1, Jon Major 2 and Kurt Spicer 2 1/Geography Department, University.
__________________________ SITES INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT for WATER RESOURCE SITE ANALYSIS COMPLEX WATERSHEDS SITES IN SERIES.
Evaluation of Potential Impacts of Uranium Mining on Drinking Water Sources in the Roanoke River Basin Assessment Approach Presentation to Roanoke River.
Bed Mobility David Thompson Will Asquith, Meghan Roussel, Frank Heitmuller Ted Cleveland Xing Fang.
Watershed Slope Lower Bounds for Methods EWRI MAY 2012.
National Consultation with TNMC 3 May 2005, Bangkok WUP-FIN Phase II – Bank erosion study.
Guidance for Design in Areas of High Bed Mobility Project Theodore G. Cleveland, University of Houston.
Fluvial Geomorphic Analyses of the Llano River and Sandy Creek Basins, Central Texas, using GIS and Arc Hydro Tools Franklin T. Heitmuller CE 394K November.
Baird Claytor Hydroelectric Project Sedimentation Study.
1 Overview of Unsteady Flow Modeling With HEC-RAS Gary W. Brunner, P.E.
Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.
Basic Hydraulics: Culverts – I
Basic Hydraulics: Channels Analysis and design – I
HEC-RAS Version 3.1 Overview
Basic Hydrology: Gauge Analysis. Gage Analysis Gage analysis is use of historical records to construct a frequency curve for a gauging station. This frequency.
Basic Hydrology & Hydraulics: DES 601 Module 6 Regional Analysis.
Morphological Modeling of the Alameda Creek Flood Control Channel Rohin Saleh, Alameda County Flood Control District Søren Tjerry, Ph.D., DHI Portland,
7. Bedforms in coarse-grained channels Step-pool units Cluster bedforms Riffle-pool sequences.
Gennaro Cioffi. Field evidence for rapid downstream fining of river gravels through selective transport Ferguson, R.I, Hoey, T., Wathen, S. and Werrity,
Environmental Hydrodynamics Lab. Yonsei University, KOREA RCEM D finite element modeling of bed elevation change in a curved channel S.-U. Choi,
River Meanders Outline Primary flow characteristics within a meander bend Flow and sediment transport within meander bend Controls on meander wavelength.
WATERWAYS AND BRIDGES IN TEXAS “Final” Presentation by: Brandon Klenzendorf CE 394K Dr. Maidment.
HydroEurope Final Presentation Pranav DHAWAN, Wooseok JANG, Kalpesh MALANI, Pablo SANCHEZ HERNANDEZ Clément LUCAS, Anna MSIGWA, Hakim OUERTANI, Malo LAMBERT.
The Measurement of Bed Load Sediment Transport in Rivers and Estuaries using Stationary and Moving ADCP Methods (using workhorse, channel master and stream.
Development of a High-Resolution Flood Inundation Model of Charles City, Iowa Nathan Young Associate Research Engineer Larry Weber.
What is the Bradshaw model?
FLOODPLAIN REPRESENTATION AND ACCURACY OF PROCESSES 1D/2D
Bridges Reach analysis Fundamental tool for design
Presentation to Roanoke River Basin Bi-State Commission March 31, 2010
Morphodynamic and Sediment Tracers in One-Dimension
THE SEARCH FOR THE HOLY GRAIL:
Erosional/Depositional Systems
GIS FOR HYDROLOGIC DATA DEVELOPMENT FOR DESIGN OF HIGHWAY DRAINAGE FACILITIES by Francisco Olivera and David Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources.
Hydrology.
Discharge, stream flow & channel shape
CLASS PLAN RIVER BEHAVIOR FLOW GAUGING MANNING’S EQUATION
Streams and Drainage Systems
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Module # 17 Overview of Geomorphic Channel Design Practice
by B. M. Gawlik, L. Galbiati, J. Zaldivar, G. Bidoglio
Shaver Creek Permitting
Presentation transcript:

Design Guidance for Low-water Crossing in Gravel Rivers Xing Fang Lamar University

Guidance in Estimating Sediment Transport in Gravel River Goal: Provide a set of simple tools /procedures for TxDOT engineers to evaluate sediment transport in gravel rivers for various low-water crossing profiles. Tasks: Identify and test simple tools and procedures for many low-water crossings in hill-country area.

Simple Tools/Procedures Part I – Flow Estimation (1). Estimate watershed parameters from 30-meter digital elevation model (low- water crossing as watershed outlet). (2). Estimate discharges for different return periods from state-wide regression equations (Asquith and Slade, 1997) (3). Check any available discharge measurements from USGS or other agencies.

Simple Tools/Procedures Part II – Particle Distribution (1). Propose a simple method to determine sediment particle distribution in gravel river nearby low-water crossing, e.g., pebble accounting frame or tape method with gravelometer. (2). Test and document methods into simple procedures, which should be easy for TxDOT technicians to apply.

Determine particle distribution by using pebble counting frame and gravelometer

Determine particle distribution by tape method and gravelometer (6” interval)

Simple Tools/Procedures Part III – Surveying of Channel Geometry (1). Propose to survey at least three to five channel cross sections near the low-water crossing: one at the low-water crossing, two at the downstream and two at the upstream of the crossing including estimation of channel slope. (2). Provide guidance on cross section survey, especially, recommend appropriate distances between cross sections – important for HEC-RAS. (3). Channel geometry will be used for BAGS (Bedload Assessment in Gravel-bedded Streams) and/or HEC-RAS modeling.

Simple Tools/Procedures Part IV – Estimation of Bedload Transport (1). Propose and test to use BAGS and to estimate bedload transport rate under various flow conditions for natural channel condition and various proposed low-water crossing profiles. (2). Identify possibility to verify BAGS results with physical/numerical model results and field observations.

Simple Tools/Procedures Part IV – Estimation of Bedload Transport (3). Quantify the order of sediment deposition before the crossing for discharges at various return periods – Give possible sediment deposition at that return period. (4). Suggest which crossing profile is better – less sediment deposition, easy to pass sediment over the structure, and less possibility to maintenance.

Simple Tools/Procedures Part V – HEC-RAS Simulation (1). Identify ways to more accurately compute water surface profiles in HEC-RAS for gravel rivers with large gravel transport over low-water crossing, e.g. increase of Manning’s n for channel part, elevate the channel bed with D84 or particle characteristics size (e.g., Limerinos, 1970). (2). Use results of physical/numerical or field observation to verify water surface profile computation.

Two- or Three Hydrodynamic and Sediment Transport Model Use NCCH2D/3D - two- or three- dimensional sediment transport model from NCCH (National Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering) for hydrodynamic and sediment transport modeling for low-water crossing in gravel rivers. 2D model is free from NCCHE, but 3D model is not. It has mesh generator.

2D/3D Modeling Goal: (1) Use 2D model to simulate water surface profiles for gravel river with heavy gravel transport in order to identify ways to more accurately compute water surface profiles by using HEC-RAS. Equivalent Manning’s n – link n with characteristic particle size (some literature review)

2D/3D Modeling Goal: (2) Test possibility/ideas of design of structure to fail (sacrificial structures). Goal: (3) Test/evaluate possible design a gravel accelerator/guide/funnel which is designed to promote passage of gravel flux over/ through structure (low-water crossing).

Porous Structure Simple model for flow simulation through porous structure. Lay a series of small pipes inside porous structure to (a) accelerate flow passage under base flow condition, (b) eliminate any large size of culverts, and (c) make low-water crossing have minimum disturbance to natural channel.