Lateral boundary conditions and forecast errors in the mid-latitudes – first results Luka Honzak, Nedjeljka Žagar, Gregor Skok CE Space-SI and University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide 1ECMWF forecast products users meeting – Reading, June 2005 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
Advertisements

Introduction to data assimilation in meteorology Pierre Brousseau, Ludovic Auger ATMO 08,Alghero, september 2008.
COSMO Workpackage No First Results on Verification of LMK Test Runs Basing on SYNOP Data Lenz, Claus-Jürgen; Damrath, Ulrich
Data assimilation of trace gases in a regional chemical transport model: the impact on model forecasts E. Emili 1, O. Pannekoucke 1,2, E. Jaumouillé 2,
Real-time WRF EnKF 36km outer domain/4km nested domain 36km outer domain/4km nested domain D1 (36km) D2 (4km)
Huang et al: MTG-IRS OSSEMMT, June MTG-IRS OSSE on regional scales Xiang-Yu Huang, Hongli Wang, Yongsheng Chen and Xin Zhang National Center.
Assessment of Future Change in Temperature and Precipitation over Pakistan (Simulated by PRECIS RCM for A2 Scenario) Siraj Ul Islam, Nadia Rehman.
The Effects of Grid Nudging on Polar WRF Forecasts in Antarctica Daniel F. Steinhoff 1 and David H. Bromwich 1 1 Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research.
Verification of Numerical Weather Prediction systems employed by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology over East Antarctica during the summer season.
A Radar Data Assimilation Experiment for COPS IOP 10 with the WRF 3DVAR System in a Rapid Update Cycle Configuration. Thomas Schwitalla Institute of Physics.
Page1 PAGE 1 The influence of MM5 nudging schemes on CMAQ simulations of benzo(a)pyrene concentrations and depositions in Europe Volker Matthias, GKSS.
V Gorin and M Tsyrulnikov Can model error be perceived from routine observations?
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
Tropical Domain Results Downscaling Ability of the NCEP Regional Spectral Model v.97: The Big Brother Experiment Conclusions: Motivation: The Big Brother.
MJO simulations under a dry environment Marcela Ulate M Advisor: Chidong Zhang (… in a Nudging World)
Predictability of stratospheric sudden warming events and associated stratosphere-troposphere coupling system T. Hirooka, T. Ichimaru (DEPS, Kyushu Univ.),
Sensitivity experiments with the Runge Kutta time integration scheme Lucio TORRISI CNMCA – Pratica di Mare (Rome)
The State of the Atmosphere 1.Atmospheric mass and pressure 2.Temperature structure 3.Geopotential 4.Circulation 5.Water in the atmosphere.
Objective Digital Analog Forecasting “Is The Future In The Past?”
WRF Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation (FDDA) Jimy Dudhia.
Improved road weather forecasting by using high resolution satellite data Claus Petersen and Bent H. Sass Danish Meteorological Institute.
Verification Verification with SYNOP, TEMP, and GPS data P. Kaufmann, M. Arpagaus, MeteoSwiss P. Emiliani., E. Veccia., A. Galliani., UGM U. Pflüger, DWD.
DATA ASSIMILATION M. Derkova, M. Bellus, M. Nestiak.
Applications of a Regional Climate Model to Study Climate Change over Southern China Keith K. C. Chow Hang-Wai Tong Johnny C. L. Chan CityU-IAP Laboratory.
Ui-Yong Byun, Song-You Hong, Hyeyum Shin Deparment of Atmospheric Science, Yonsei Univ. Ji-Woo Lee, Jae-Ik Song, Sook-Jung Ham, Jwa-Kyum Kim, Hyung-Woo.
INTERCOMPARISON – HIRLAM vs. ARPA-SIM CARPE DIEM AREA 1 Per Kållberg Magnus Lindskog.
Stratosphere-Troposhere Coupling in Dynamical Seasonal Predictions Bo Christiansen Danish Meteorological Institute.
Preliminary results from assimilation of GPS radio occultation data in WRF using an ensemble filter H. Liu, J. Anderson, B. Kuo, C. Snyder, A. Caya IMAGe.
Concordiasi Satellite data assimilation at high latitudes F. Rabier, A. Bouchard, F. Karbou, V. Guidard, S. Guedj, A. Doerenbecher, E. Brun, D. Puech +
ITSC-1227 February-5 March 2002 Use of advanced infrared sounders in cloudy conditions Nadia Fourrié and Florence Rabier Météo France Acknowledgement G.
A physical initialization algorithm for non-hydrostatic NWP models using radar derived rain rates Günther Haase Meteorological Institute, University of.
1 3D-Var assimilation of CHAMP measurements at the Met Office Sean Healy, Adrian Jupp and Christian Marquardt.
Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs) with LM Verification against Temps Ulrich Pflüger, Deutscher Wetterdienst.
OSEs with HIRLAM and HARMONIE for EUCOS Nils Gustafsson, SMHI Sigurdur Thorsteinsson, IMO John de Vries, KNMI Roger Randriamampianina, met.no.
IC2_I Scenarios of future changes in the occurrence of extreme storm surges Nilima Natoo A. Paul, M. Schulz (University of Bremen) M.
Exploring and Validating LM Performances at Very High Resolution M. Didone, D. Lüthi, H.C Davies Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich.
1 MODIS winds assimilation experiments and impact studies to date at the Met Office Howard Berger, Mary Forsythe, Met Office, Bracknell/Exeter, UK UW-CIMSS.
Indirect impact of ozone assimilation using Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (GSI) data assimilation system for regional applications Kathryn Newman1,2,
Emerging Research Opportunities at the Climate Modeling Laboratory NC State University (Presentation at NIA Meeting: 9/04/03) Fredrick H. M. Semazzi North.
Pogoreltsev A., Ugrjumov A..
1Weidinger, T., 2Costa, A. A., 3Lajos, T., 4Kiss, Á.,
Xiang-Yu Huang, Hongli Wang, Yongsheng Chen
WRF Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation (FDDA)
Impact of Traditional and Non-traditional Observation Sources using the Grid-point Statistical Interpolation Data Assimilation System for Regional Applications.
Figure S1: Observed May SST difference (ºC) between 9 coldest years and the 9 warmest years based on SST Anomalies. The dotted areas denote the statistical.
  Robert Gibson1, Douglas Drob2 and David Norris1 1BBN Technologies
WCRP Workshop on Seasonal Prediction
IMPROVING HURRICANE INTENSITY FORECASTS IN A MESOSCALE MODEL VIA MICROPHYSICAL PARAMETERIZATION METHODS By Cerese Albers & Dr. TN Krishnamurti- FSU Dept.
MODEL WIND FIELD COMPARE WITH HRD WIND FIELD
RECENT INNOVATIONS IN DERIVING ATMOSPHERIC MOTION VECTORS AT CIMSS
Winter storm forecast at 1-12 h range
Testing the assimilation of highly sampled aircraft wind observations (GADS) in the ECMWF global model Workshop on Wind Profiles and Mesoscale Data Assimilation,
Forecast Pressure.
Studying Hector: meteorology and tracer transport
Application of the ensemble technique to CRCM simulations
Lidia Cucurull, NCEP/JCSDA
Nonlinear modulation of O3 and CO induced by mountain waves in the UTLS region during TREX Mohamed Moustaoui(1), Alex Mahalov(1), Hector Teitelbaum(2)
Initialization of Numerical Forecast Models with Satellite data
Exploring Application of Radio Occultation Data in Improving Analyses of T and Q in Radiosonde Sparse Regions Using WRF Ensemble Data Assimilation System.
Real-time WRF EnKF 36km outer domain/4km nested domain D1 (36km)
Comparison of different combinations of ensemble-based and variational data assimilation approaches for deterministic NWP Mark Buehner Data Assimilation.
2007 Mei-yu season Chien and Kuo (2009), GPS Solutions
Impact of aircraft data in the MSC forecast systems
The Met Office Ensemble of Regional Reanalyses
Influence of large-scale nudging on RCM’s internal variability
Data Assimilation of TEMPO NO2: Winds, Emissions and PBL mixing
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Louisville, KY, USA
Peter M.K. Yau and Badrinath Nagarajan McGill University
Presentation transcript:

Lateral boundary conditions and forecast errors in the mid-latitudes – first results Luka Honzak, Nedjeljka Žagar, Gregor Skok CE Space-SI and University of Ljubljana 1

Errors Error sources in RCM: domain size nesting approach resolution difference between GCM and RCM temporal density of LBCs update LBCs errors We limit our study to the domain size: LBC update and nesting the same in all simulations resolution of GCM and RCM the same LBCs are assumed “truth” (analyses) 2

HchHch WRF setup Ch: Mid-latitude channel, 1439139 points (35 o N and 70 o N) Hch: Euro-Atlantic sector (100 o W and 60 o E), 639139 points Eu: Europe (45 o W and 45 o E), 319139 points Horizontal resolutions: 0.250.25 degrees IC/LBC: operational analyses of ECMWF on the same grid available with time frequency of 6 hours. Pre-processing: 91 ECMWF model levels interpolated to 31 WRF levels. Top level at 10 hPa, six levels below 850 hPa, 20 levels between 850 and 100 hPa and five levels are in the stratosphere. =0 at the top. ChChEu 3

HchHch WRF simulations ChChEu Three simulations carried out on each domain Starting dates 6 days apart ( , , ) Simulation length 3 months ( ) Verification against ECMWF on the same grid Fields: wind, geopotential, temperature on 30, 100, 250, 300, 500, 700, 850 and 925 hPa 4

Total precipitation accumulated between and Ch, exp 1 TRMM ECMWF 5

Ch Ch eridional wind at 250 hPa M eridional wind at 250 hPa Geop. height at 500 hPa Geop. height at 500 hPa Zonal wind at 250 hPa Zonal wind at 250 hPa Time averaged rmse: Ch 6

Ch M eridional wind at 250 hPa M eridional wind at 250 hPa Geop. height at 500 hPa Geop. height at 500 hPa Zonal wind at 250 hPa Zonal wind at 250 hPa Time averaged rmse: Hch HchHchHchHch 7

Ch M eridional wind at 250 hPa M eridional wind at 250 hPa Geop. height at 500 hPa Geop. height at 500 hPa Zonal wind at 250 hPa Zonal wind at 250 hPa Time averaged rmse: Eu HchHchHchHch Eu 8

Average meridional profiles of rmse Meridionalwindrmseat250hPa Meridionalwindrmseat250hPa Meridionalwindrmseat250hPa Meridionalwindrmseat250hPa 10 Jan 10 Jan 10 Jan 10 Jan 20 Jan 20 Jan 20 Jan 20 Jan 30 Jan 30 Jan 30 Jan 30 Jan rmse (m/s) rmse (m/s) latitude latitude NH-ChNH-HCh NH-Ch on HCh NH-Ch NH-HCh Hch Ch Eu U wind at 250 hPa V wind at 250 hPa Geop. height at 500 hPa Geop. height at 500 hPa 9

Internal variability: total precipitation Ch, experiment 3 Ch, experiment 1 Ch, experiment 2 10

Ch Internal variability: zonal wind at 250 hPa HchHchHchHch 1. experiment ( ) 2. experiment ( ) 3. experiment ( ) 11

Internal variability: zonal wind at 250 hPa Ch HchHchHchHch Ch on Hch Ch on Eu Hch on Eu Eu 12

Internal variability: zonal wind at 250 hPa Meridionalwindrmseat250hPa Meridionalwindrmseat250hPa Meridionalwindrmseat250hPa Meridionalwindrmseat250hPa 10 Jan 10 Jan 10 Jan 10 Jan 20 Jan 20 Jan 20 Jan 20 Jan 30 Jan 30 Jan 30 Jan 30 Jan rmse (m/s) rmse (m/s) latitude latitude NH-ChNH-HCh NH-Ch on HCh NH-Ch NH-HCh Hch Ch Eu 1. experiment 2. experiment 3. experiment 13

Future work Coupling WRF Ch, Hch, Eu into meridionally larger WRF channel (Lch: 30 o N and 80 o N ) 14