New Results from the Salt Phase of SNO Kathryn Miknaitis Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, Univ. of Washington For the Sudbury.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutrinos Louvain, February 2005 Alan Martin Arguably the most fascinating of the elementary particles. Certainly they take us beyond the Standard Model.
Advertisements

Neutrino oscillations/mixing
M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Gamma backgrounds, shielding and veto performance for dark matter detectors M. Carson,
Recent Discoveries in Neutrino Physics: Understanding Neutrino Oscillations 2-3 neutrino detectors with variable baseline 1500 ft nuclear reactor Determining.
Neutrino emission =0.27 MeV E=0.39,0.86 MeV =6.74 MeV ppI loss: ~2% ppII loss: 4% note: /Q= 0.27/26.73 = 1% ppIII loss: 28% Total loss: 2.3%
MiniBooNE: (Anti)Neutrino Appearance and Disappeareance Results SUSY11 01 Sep, 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL 1.
Takaaki Kajita ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo Nufact05, Frascati, June 2005.
G. Sullivan - Princeton - Mar 2002 What Have We Learned from Super-K? –Before Super-K –SK-I ( ) Atmospheric Solar –SNO & SK-I Active solar –SK.
Neutrino Mass and Mixing David Sinclair Carleton University PIC2004.
Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
2. Present Understandings
Experimental Status of Geo-reactor Search with KamLAND Detector
Results and Future of the KamLAND Experiment
21-25 January 2002 WIN 2002 Colin Okada, LBNL for the SNO Collaboration What Else Can SNO Do? Muons and Atmospheric Neutrinos Supernovae Anti-Neutrinos.
October 3, 2003IFIC, UVEG-CSIC A road map to solar fluxes, osc. param., and test for new physics Carlos Pena Garay IAS ~
No s is good s Sheffield Physoc 21/04/2005 Jeanne Wilson A historical introduction to neutrinoless double beta decay.
Neutrino Mass By Ben Heimbigner.
Neutrino emission =0.27 MeV E=0.39,0.86 MeV =6.74 MeV ppI loss: ~2% ppII loss: 4% note: /Q= 0.27/26.73 = 1% ppIII loss: 28% Total loss: 2.3%
Results and Prospects for SNO
1 Super-Kamiokande atmospheric neutrinos Results from SK-I atmospheric neutrino analysis including treatment of systematic errors Sensitivity study based.
Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
SNO+ Mark Chen Queen’s University Neutrino Geophysics, Honolulu, Hawaii December 15, 2005.
Status of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) Alan Poon for the SNO Collaboration Institute for Nuclear and Particle Astrophysics Lawrence Berkeley.
Solar Neutrinos Perspectives and Objectives Mark Chen Queen’s University and Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR)
Welcome to SNOLAB And to the Neutrino Geoscience Conference Art McDonald Queen’s University, Kingston Director, SNO Institute (+)
Latest SNO Results from Salt-Phase Data and Current NCD-Phase Status Melin Huang ● Introduction ● Results of Salt Phase (Phase II) ● Status of NCD Phase.
Solar neutrino measurement at Super Kamiokande ICHEP'04 ICRR K.Ishihara for SK collaboration Super Kamiokande detector Result from SK-I Status of SK-II.
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
Simulation study of RENO-50 Jungsic Park Seoul National University RENO-50 International Workshop June 13-14, 2013 Hoam Faculty House, Korea.
Results from Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Huaizhang Deng University of Pennsylvania.
Neutrino Physics from SNO Aksel Hallin University of Alberta Erice, 2009.
Michael Smy UC Irvine Solar and Atmospheric Neutrinos 8 th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Superbeams & Betabeams Irvine, California, August.
Methods and problems in low energy neutrino experiments (solar, reactors, geo-) I G. Ranucci ISAPP 2011 International School on Astroparticle physics THE.
Monday, Feb. 24, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #11 Monday, Feb. 24, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Brief Review of sin 2  W measurement 2.Neutrino.
KamLAND : Studying Neutrinos from Reactor Atsuto Suzuki KamLAND Collaboration KEK : High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
Solar Neutrino Experiments A Review The CAP'09 Congress Moncton, 7-10 June, 2009 Alain Bellerive On behalf of the SNO Collaboration Carleton University,
Wednesday, Feb. 14, 2007PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #6 Wednesday, Feb. 14, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino Oscillation Formalism 2.Neutrino.
Kr2Det: TWO - DETECTOR REACTOR NEUTRINO OSCILLATION EXPERIMENT AT KRASNOYARSK UNDERGROUND SITE L. Mikaelyan for KURCHATOV INSTITUTE NEUTRINO GROUP.
SNO and the new SNOLAB SNO: Heavy Water Phase Complete Status of SNOLAB Future experiments at SNOLAB: (Dark Matter, Double beta, Solar, geo-, supernova.
Analysis of Alpha Background in SNO Data Using Wavelet Analysis
Application of neutrino spectrometry
LoNu Workshop R. B. Vogelaar October 14, 2006 Extraordinary Neutrino Beam Free of Charge For NEUTRINO PHYSICS: WELL DEFINED HIGHEST FLUX (~10 11 cm -2.
Solar neutrino results from Super-Kamiokande Satoru Yamada for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration Institute of cosmic ray research, University of Tokyo.
Tests of non-standard neutrino interactions (NSI) Cecilia Lunardini Institute for Nuclear Theory University of Washington, Seattle.
Study of solar neutrino energy spectrum above 4.5 MeV in Super-Kamiokande-I 1, Solar Neutrino Oscillation 2, Super-Kamiokande detector 3, Data set for.
J. Goodman – January 03 The Solution to the Solar Problem Jordan A. Goodman University of Maryland January 2003 Solar Neutrinos MSW Oscillations Super-K.
Data Processing for the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Aksel Hallin Queen’s, October 2006.
Masatoshi Koshiba Raymond Davis Jr. The Nobel Prize in Physics 2002 "for pioneering contributions to astrophysics, in particular for the detection of cosmic.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
J. Dunmore, University of Oxford NDM03, 10 June 2003 Event Isotropy in the Salt Phase of SNO Jessica Dunmore University of Oxford NDM03, Nara - 10 June.
Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment On behalf of the DayaBay collaboration Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Joseph ykHor YuenKeung,
Neutrino Oscillations at Super-Kamiokande Soo-Bong Kim (Seoul National University)
Super-Kamiokande and Neutrino Oscillation
1 Muon Veto System and Expected Backgrounds at Dayabay Hongshan (Kevin) Zhang, BNL DayaBay Collaboration DNP08, Oakland.
Birth of Neutrino Astrophysics
P Spring 2002 L18Richard Kass The Solar Neutrino Problem M&S Since 1968 R.Davis and collaborators have been measuring the cross section of:
Solar Neutrinos By Wendi Wampler. What are Neutrinos? Neutrinos are chargeless, nearly massless particles Neutrinos are chargeless, nearly massless particles.
Solar Neutrino Results from SNO
Results and Implications from MiniBooNE: Neutrino Oscillations and Cross Sections 15 th Lomonosov Conference, 19 Aug 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL
5th June 2003, NuFact03 Kengo Nakamura1 Solar neutrino results, KamLAND & prospects Solar Neutrino History Solar.
Review of experimental results on atmospheric neutrinos Introduction Super-Kamiokande MACRO Soudan 2 Summary Univ. of Tokyo, Kamioka Observatory.
News from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Simon JM Peeters July 2007 o SNO overview o Results phases I & II o hep neutrinos and DSNB o Update on the III.
Results and Prospects with the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Neutrinos and SNO Phase III Results Low Threshold Analysis Future (maybe) Josh Klein University.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
Solar neutrino physics The core of the Sun reaches temperatures of  15.5 million K. At these temperatures, nuclear fusion can occur which transforms 4.
First Results from Phase II of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Joshua R. Klein University of Texas at Austin  Solar Neutrinos  Review of Phase I Solar.
“Solar” Neutrino Oscillations (Dm2, q12)
Sudbury Neutrino Observatory
Davide Franco for the Borexino Collaboration Milano University & INFN
Intae Yu Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Korea KNO 2nd KNU, Nov
Presentation transcript:

New Results from the Salt Phase of SNO Kathryn Miknaitis Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, Univ. of Washington For the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory In this talk: SNO overview Salt phase overview New solar neutrino flux, spectrum, and day-night asymmetry results from 391 days of salt data! The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory

The SNO Detector Acrylic vessel (AV), 12 m diam tonnes H 2 O inner shielding 1000 tonnes D 2 O 6800 feet (~2km) underground 5300 tonnes H 2 O outer shielding ~9500 PMTs, 54% coverage

SNO’s Three Reactions Charged Current: Neutral Current:Elastic Scattering: Detect the e - energy spectrum Weak directional sensitivity Detect the n through secondary capture No directional or neutrino energy info Detect the e - Mainly sensitive to Highly directional

Flavor Change Solar Neutrino Physics with SNO (I) Measurement of the 8 B Solar Neutrino Flux: Flavor change:

Solar Neutrino Physics with SNO (II) Spectrum 6 MeV13 MeV No. of CC events Increasing Δm 2 Day Night Day-Night Asymmetry: MSW SignaturesMSW Parameter Constraints hep-ph/ July Bandyopadhyay, Choubey, Goswami, Petcov, and Roy Global analysis of solar neutrino and KamLAND data from 2004 SNO measurements of CC/NC, spectrum, and day-night asymmetry contribute to MSW constraints “LMA region”

Pure D 2 OSalt 3 He Nov May 01 July 01 - Sep. 03 Nov 04 - Dec. 06 γ γ γ 35 Cl 36 Cl 36 Cl* n γ 2H2H 3H3H 3 H* n n captures on deuterium σ = b 6.25 MeV γ n captures on chlorine σ = 44b 8.6 MeV multiple γs n captures on 3 He in discrete prop. counter array σ = 5330b MeV n + 3 He  p + 3 H p 3H3H 5 cm n 3 He PRL 87, , 2001 PRL 89, , 2002 PRL 89, , 2002 PRL 92, , 2004 (for first 254 days) nucl-ex/ DAY RESULTS! Three ways to catch that neutron!

1. Higher capture cross-section means more neutrons detected 2. Boosts energy of NC events further above analysis threshold … 3H3H 36 Cl 2 H+n 35 Cl+n 6.25 MeV  = b  = 44 b 8.6 MeV Advantages of Salty D 2 O (I)

Define an “isotropy parameter” based on Legendre polynomials in θ ij 3. Multiple gammas for NC means light is more isotropic than for CC, ES  ij Advantages of Salty D 2 O (II) Statistical separation of CC, NC events with no constraint on the CC spectrum shape

20 EnergyIsotropy Direction Radius

Extracted Events: 391- day salt results ! 4722 events, r 5.5MeV (Patience! Energy spectrum coming up soon!) CC: 2176 ± 78 NC: 2010 ± 85 ES: 279 ± 26 External neutrons: 128 ± 42 Backgrounds fixed in fit: 128

391- day salt results !

Systematics Dominant systematic uncertainties for the shape-unconstrained analysis: Energy scale-0.9% +1.0%-3.3% +3.8%-1.6% +1.9% β 14 mean-4.0% +3.7%-3.6% +4.5%-1.2% +1.3% Radial scale-2.6% +2.5%-3.0% +3.3%-2.6% +3.0% Angular Res.-0.4% +0.4%-0.2% +0.2%-5.1% +5.1% CC NC ES For spectrum analysis: Systematic uncertainties evaluated in each extracted CC energy bin

CC Spectrum Extracted CC spectrum with statistical and systematic uncertainties Extracted CC spectrum with statistical uncertainties, compared to model predictions: CC spectrum consistent with LMA, undistorted 8 B

Systematics for the Day-Night Analysis DN Correlated Uncertainties: overall energy scale uncertainty… “cancel” in asymmetry ratio Differential Uncertainties: time variations (diurnal and long term) evaluate with in-situ techniques geometric uncertainties evaluate with calibration data Classes of Events Used to Limit Diurnal Variations: “Muon Followers” – neutrons induced by cosmic ray muons “Hot Spot” - radioactive spot on the acrylic vessel (AV) D2O radioactivity - uranium and thorium in the D2O H2O radioactivity - uranium and thorium in the H2O AV radioactivity - radioactive decays in the acrylic PMT beta - gammas from decays in the PMTs

A CC = ± (stat.) ± (syst.) A NC = ± 0.086(stat.) ± (syst.) A ES = ± 0.198(stat.) ± (syst.) (CC, ES spectrum shapes unconstrained in this analysis) Day-Night Asymmetries (I) A CC and A NC are correlated (ρ = ) In standard neutrino oscillations, A NC should be zero…

Day-Night Asymmetries (II) A CC = ± 0.063(stat.) ±0.032(syst.) A ES = ± 0.198(stat.) ±0.030(syst.) Constraining A NC to be zero: In the pure-D2O phase, (shape constrained, A NC constrained) Combine with analogous A CC from the salt phase: Convert Super-Kamiokande A ES to A e, and combine with SNO:

MSW Constraints Previous global analysis of solar neutrino data Global Solar, with new salt results Global Solar + KamLAND 766 ton- year data

Detection Principle 2 H + x  p + n + x MeV (NC) 3 He + n  p + 3 H MeV x n 40 Strings on 1-m grid 440 m total active length NCD PMT SNO Phase III (NCD Phase)  3 He Proportional Counters (“NC Detectors”) now installed  Production data taking underway Physics Motivation Event-by-event separation. Measure NC and CC in separate data streams. Different systematic uncertainties than neutron capture on NaCl.

Conclusions Results from full 391-day salt phase available nucl-ex/ Solar neutrino flux results confirm and improve previous results CC spectrum presented, consistent with LMA prediction (also consistent with no distortion) Day-Night asymmetries consistent with LMA prediction (also with no asymmetry) MSW mixing parameters: