Prevention and Care Dr S Charalambous www.kaizernetwork.org www.aids2006.org WHO guidelines.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide #1 HIV Entry Inhibitors Trip Gulick, MD, MPH Director, Cornell HIV Clinical Trials Unit Associate Professor of Medicine Weill Medical College of.
Advertisements

VIREAD (Tenofovir DF) Update. Viread Update  Pharmacokinetics  Safety & Tolerability  Efficacy  Virology.
WHO Guidelines for treatment monitoring Nathan Ford Dept of HIV/AIDS World Health Organization.
20th International AIDS Conference; July 20-25, 2014; Melbourne, Australia DTG-Based Regimens Are Active in INI-Naive Patients With a History of NRTI Resistance.
Track B Workshop Controversies in the Management of HIV-positive Adults: A Case-Based Approach Sasisopin Kiertiburanakul, MD, MHS Associate Professor Department.
Can dose-optimization trials be conducted ethically in low-income countries? Dr Andrew Hill World AIDS Conference, Melbourne, Australia July 2014 [TUWS1104]
Response Rates in Heavily Pretreated HIV+ Patients Roy M. Gulick, MD, MPH Cornell Clinical Trials Unit.
Undetectable = Uninfectious ? Treatment as Prevention.
Effects of nucleoside analogues versus ritonavir boosted protease inhibitors on lipid levels – analysis of 12 clinical trials in 4231 antiretroviral naïve.
Is monitoring for CD4 counts still needed for the management of patients with long- term HIV RNA suppression? Andrew Hill, Liverpool University, UK.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Future ART options for HIV-infected children exposed to maternal HAART Lee Kleynhans Experts Roundtable June 2008.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TC MONARK  LPV/r QD vs BID M M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2.
Global HIV Resistance: The Implications of Transmission
Failure Therapy VIRAL RESITANCE ADHERENCE!!!!!!!!!!! DRUG INTERACTION.
When to Initiate ART in Adults and Adolescents (2009 WHO Guidelines) Target PopulationClinical conditionRecommendation Asymptomatic Individuals (including.
1 Review of Antiretroviral Therapy in Adults HAIVN Harvard Medical School AIDS Initiative in Vietnam.
The Role of Maraviroc in Antiretroviral Therapy for Treatment-Experienced Patients Daniel R. Kuritzkes, MD Section of Retroviral Therapeutics Brigham and.
Predicting NNRTI Resistance – do polymorphisms matter? Nicola E Mackie 1, Lucy Garvey 1, Anna Maria Geretti 2, Linda Harrison 3, Peter Tilston 4, Andrew.
Guidelines published as an update on 2003 guidelines. About 8-9 pages. New data only Guidelines published as an update on 2003 guidelines. About 8-9 pages.
1 Introduction to ARV Therapy HAIVN Harvard Medical School AIDS Initiative in Vietnam.
Implementation of HIV Treatment as Prevention in China Yan Zhao MD National Center for AIDS/STD Control & Prevention Chinese Center for Disease Control.
TITAN = TMC114/r In Treatment-experienced pAtients Naïve to lopinavir
CASO CLINICO Il paziente naϊve ad alta viremia Rapido sviluppo di resistenza ad EFV dopo solo 4 mesi di terapia.
Update on HIV Therapy Elly T Katabira, FRCP Department of Medicine Makerere University Medical School Scaling up Treatment Programs: Issues, Challenges.
A prospective, randomized, Phase III trial of NRTI-, PI-, and NNRTI-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection – ACTG 5142 Riddler S.A.,
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc in Treatment- Experienced (TE) Patients Infected with R5 HIV-1: 96-week Combined Analysis of the MOTIVATE 1 & 2 Studies.
The 2 nd International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment July 13-16, 2003; Paris, France Selected and summarized by Douglas J.
New drugs and treatment strategies David A Cooper National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research The University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Clinical development programme for Second-Line treatment Anton Pozniak World AIDS Conference, July 2014.
Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment-naïve subjects
N ORTHWEST A IDS E DUCATION AND T RAINING C ENTER Treatment-Experienced Patients in Resource- Limited Settings Susan M. Graham Assistant Professor, Medicine.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
SAILING Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment- experienced INI-naïve patients DK/DLG/0041/14c September 2015.
Cost-effectiveness of initiating and monitoring HAART based on WHO versus US DHHS guidelines in the developing world Peter Mazonson, MD, MBA Arthi Vijayaraghavan,
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
Novel Antiretroviral Studies and Strategies
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
Rilpivirine-TDF-FTC versus Efavirenz-TDF-FTC STaR Trial
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Optimizing Antiretorviral Therapy for Long-Term HIV Care
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
EFV versus ATV + RTV, both with ABC-3TC or TDF-FTC ACTG 5202
Switch to PI/r + 3TC vs PI/r monotherapy
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Saquinavir + RTV versus Lopinavir-RTV in Treatment-Naïve GEMINI Trial
Switching to TDF-FTC from ABC-3TC for Hyperlipidemia ROCKET II
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Results of round 1 of the Delphi survey
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
CASO CLINICO Il paziente naϊve ad alta viremia.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
CASO CLINICO Il paziente naϊve con resistenze al basale.
A prospective, randomized, Phase III trial of NRTI-, PI-, and NNRTI-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection – ACTG 5142 Riddler S.A.,
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Presentation transcript:

Prevention and Care Dr S Charalambous WHO guidelines

Toronto : new information Kericho, Kenya : tea plantation workers volunteers* –Circumcised 0.79/100py –Uncircumcised 2.84/100py –HRR 0.31 (95%CI 0.15 – 0.64) –(Models : Demographic factors – less significant, Behavioural factors – still significant) Modelling study of HIV prevalence in Soweto* in 20 years (61% protective effect) – HIV infxns – HIV prev 16% - 23% –Current rates of circ : 17% –10% per year –32000 fewer infections: 17% to 14% HIV prevalence –20% per year –53000 fewer infections: 17% to 13% HIV prevalence –30% risk behaviour – fewer infections: 17% to 15% HIV prev * TUAC0201 ** TUAC0203

Toronto : new information Cost-effectiveness of male circumcision, J Khan* –Orange Farm study data: Total cost: $ 56 –Assumptions: No effect on women 25% increased risk compensation Life time cost of treatment $ 8000 –Cost of HIV infection averted $181 ($91 – 668 HIV Prev) Savings: $2,4 million –Cost of circumcision must inc 45x for no cost difference Kenya : assessment of behavioural disinhibition** following male circumcision –648 men : 324 circumcised vs 324 uncircumcised –Baseline : Risky acts 33.6% circum vs 25.6% uncirc –No increase in sex acts or unprotected sex acts * TUAC0203 **TUAC0205

STATE-OF-THE-ART Treatment naïve patients: New IAS guidelines Treatment experienced patients: achieving undetectable viral load Role of HAART in HIV prevention

Antiretroviral regimens recommended for first-line therapy (new IAS-USA guidelines) *In selected patients # No longer recommended for initial therapy except when use of NNRTIs or PIs is precluded Adapted from Hammer et al. JAMA 2006; 296: Recommended components NRTINNRTIPI TDF + FTC ZDV + 3TC ABC + FTC EFV (or NVP*) LPV/r SQV/r ATV/r FPV/r Alternate components TDF + 3TC ABC + 3TC ZDV + FTC Special circumstances only (3-NRTI regimen) ZDV+3TC+ABC # *In selected patients # No longer recommended for initial therapy except when use of NNRTIs or PIs is precluded Adapted from Hammer et al. JAMA 2006; 296:827-43

Staccato: Highest response of 24-week analyses (HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL; ITT) 1. Murphy et al. AIDS 2003; 17:2603–142. Gathe et al. AIDS 2004; 18:1529–37 3. Podzamczer et al. 9th EACS Abstract F1/34. Walmsley et al. N Engl J M,ed 2002; 346:2039–46 5. van Leth et al. Lancet. 2004; 363:1253–636. Saag et al. JAMA 2004; 292:180–9 7. Staszewski et al. 10 th CROI Poster 564b8. Eron J, et al. Lancet 2006; 368: 476–82 9. Ananworanich et al. Antivir Ther 10: Subjects with HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL (%) Gilead FTC Staccato SQV/r** + 2 NRTIs EFV + ddI + d4T Gilead 903 EFV + TDF + 3TC Gilead FTC-301 EFV + ddI + FTC 89% Abbott % 74% 78% 81% GSK - SOLO 55% Abbott M98-863* 65% BMS-008* † LPV/r (od) + FTC + TDF FPV/r + ABC + 3TC LPV/r + d4T + 3TC NVP (bid) + d4T + 3TC 65% ATV + d4T + 3TC 38% 2NN* KLEAN* LPV/r + ABC + 3TC 72% KLEAN* FPV/r + ABC + 3TC 68% † ATV 400 mg results used; *HIV RNA at 24 weeks estimated from graph; **Investigational Invirase/r 1600/100 mg qd dosage. The approved dosing regimen is Invirase/r 1000/100 mg bid

Tenofovir 903 Trial: 96 week results: safety and tolerability of tenofovir, Uganda: reduction in side effects due to tenofovir Subtype C isolates may develop the K65R mutation more rapidly than Subtype B isolates Uganda & Zimbabwe: 1.3% patients developed severe GFR reduction, found to have similar rates of glomerular filtration reduction as other regimens

Treatment-experienced patients Undetectable viremia is now a realistic goal of therapy for treatment-experienced patients Before adding a new agent, ARVs should be selected to provide the maximum activity –Baseline characteristics are important prognostic factors predictive of a treatment response –Resistance testing may overestimate the number of active drugs –Drugs from a new mechanistic class (e.g. ENF) should retain their full activity in treatment- experienced patients

30% 60% < 400 copies/mL Week 24 Patients (%) TORO 1 & 2 LPV/r LPV/r + ENF 46% 64% < 50 copies/mL Week 24 Patients (%) POWER 1 & 2 DRV/r DRV/r + ENF 30% 54% Patients (%) RESIST 1 & 2 TPV/r TPV/r + ENF < 400 copies/mL Week 24 Haubrich et al. IDSA 2005; Abstract 785; Hill and Moyle. BHIVA 2006; Abstract P1. Summary of TORO, RESIST and POWER trials

HAART and HIV Prevention PMTCT works by reducing viral load to reduce transmission Uganda, Quinn et al – reduction of transmission in serodiscordant couples – no transmission if VL<1500 Taiwan, reduction in HIV transmission 53% after introduction of HAART Call for cost-effectiveness of use of HAART as prevention : immediate treatment of 100% HIV population –Cost $7 billion/year – total cost $42 billion –HIV infected people 38 million to <1 million

“History will judge us not by our scientific advances, but what we do with our scientific advances” A Fauci