19 July 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit (via Eric Torrence) VLCW06 19 July 06.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fast and Precise Beam Energy Measurement at the International Linear Collider Michele Viti.
Advertisements

Ideas and Speculations for the Headon Extraction Line L. Keller Oct. 19, Give up the 3.5 m Separation between the Charged Dump and the Incoming.
EXTRACTION BEAM LOSS AT 1 TEV CM WITH TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov, G. White August 25, 2014.
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
Zero Degree Extraction using an Electrostatic Separator Take another look at using an electrostatic separator and a weak dipole to allow a zero degree.
Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.
Summary of wg2a (BDS and IR) Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Shigeru Kuroda, Andrei Seryi October 21, 2005.
E166 Collaboration J.C. Sheppard SLAC, October, 2003 E166 Background Test Simulations: Overview-what do we need J. C. Sheppard.
Beam Loss in the Extraction Line for 2 mrad Crossing Angle A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang.
Stanford – Mar , 2005 LCWS-2005 Norbert Meyners Upstream Polarimetry with 4-Magnet Chicane 1 Introduction & Overview O Compton polarimetry basics.
Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  IR background issues and plans for Snowmass Jeff Gronberg/LLNL Linear Collider Workshop October 25, 2000.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Jeff Gronberg/LLNL For the Beam Delivery Group LCWS - October 25, 2000.
IPBI 6 April 05Ken Moffeit Polarimetry Design Updates - Dispersion in upstream chicane - 20mrad extraction line 0.75 mrad beam stay clear location of Synchrotron.
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
A.Seryi, Oct. 26, BDS comparison and positron source A.Seryi October 26, 2005 Discussion of BDS and positron source is given in [1] “Comment on.
Background comparison between 20 mrad and 2 mr crossings Takashi Maruyama SLAC Machine-Detector Interface Workshop SLAC January 6-8, 2005.
20 March 2005Ken Moffeit LCWS1 Highlights from the MDI workshop Spin Rotation System for 2 IR’s Downstream polarimetry Ken Moffeit.
A.Seryi, Nov 22, 2005, slide 1 Evaluation of Aug9 2mrad Use 2mrad extraction, version Aug 9, Use high.
Status of ongoing studies for comparing 2-mrad and 20-mrad IRs T. Maruyama SLAC.
2 February 2005Ken Moffeit Spin Rotation scheme for two IRs Ken Moffeit SLAC.
M. Woods (SLAC) Beam Diagnostics for test facilities of i)  ii) polarized e+ source January 9 –11, 2002.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC Backgrounds What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
Beijing, Feb 3 rd, 2007 LEPOL 1 Low Energy Positron Polarimetry for the ILC Sabine Riemann (DESY) On behalf of the LEPOL Collaboration.
NEW COMMENTS TO ILC BEAM ENERGY MEASUREMENTS BASED ON SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FROM MAGNETIC SPECTROMETER E.Syresin, B. Zalikhanov-DLNP, JINR R. Makarov-MSU.
A study of systematic uncertainties of Compton e-detector at JLab, Hall C and its cross calibration against Moller polarimeter APS April Meeting 2014 Amrendra.
October 31, BDS Group1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Hybrid” Layout 2006e Release Preliminary M. Woodley.
Polarimetry at the LC Source Which type of polarimetry, at which energies for LC ? Sabine Riemann (DESY), LEPOL Group International Workshop on Linear.
Backgrounds in the NLC BDS ISG9 December 10 – Takashi Maruyama SLAC.
1 Options for low energy spin manipulation Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October 2009 K. Moffeit, D.
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
Oct. 6, Summary of the Polarisation Session J. Clarke, G. Moortgat-Pick, S. Riemann 10 November 2006, ECFA Workshop, Valencia.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
ERHIC with Self-Polarizing Electron Ring V.Ptitsyn, J.Kewisch, B.Parker, S.Peggs, D.Trbojevic, BNL, USA D.E.Berkaev, I.A.Koop, A.V.Otboev, Yu.M.Shatunov,
Philip Burrows Snowmass 2005: SiD Concept Plenary, 15/8/05 SiD and MDI issues Philip Burrows Queen Mary, University of London Thanks to: Toshiaki Tauchi,
EIC Compton detector update October 24 th 2014 Alexandre Camsonne.
Background Simulations for the LHCb Beam Condition Monitor Overview: ● The LHCb Beam Condition Monitor (BCM) – Purpose, Design and Function – Implementation.
October 20, 2006 Global Design Effort 1 ILC Interaction regions : The GDE perspective Talk based on several talks presented by BDS area leaders Andrei.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
ILC EXTRACTION LINE TRACKING Y. Nosochkov, E. Marin September 10, 2013.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Tor Raubenheimer Beam Delivery System Design Differences American Linear Collider Physics Meeting SLAC January 8.
Ken Moffeit SLAC LCWA09 1 Polarization Considerations for CLIC Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October.
IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 1 IHEP/Protvino Group: Igor Azhgirey Igor Bayshev Igor Kurochkin + one post-graduate student Tools:
Capture and Transport Simulations of Positrons in a Compton Scheme Positron Source A. VIVOLI*, A. VARIOLA (LAL / IN2P3-CNRS), R. CHEHAB (IPNL & LAL / IN2P3-CNRS)
BDS/MDI Deepa Angal-Kalinin Andrei Seryi AD&I Meeting, DESY, May 29, 2009.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Performance Study of Pair-monitor 2009/06/30 Yutaro Sato Tohoku Univ.
LCWS Paris – April 19-23, 2004 Polarimeter Issues K. Peter Schüler Polarimeter Issues 1 Polarimeter Studies for TESLA O General Considerations O.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Design challenges for head-on scheme Deepa Angal-Kalinin Orsay, 19 th October 2006.
The design of the 2mrad extraction line Rob Appleby Daresbury Laboratory On behalf of the SLAC-BNL-UK-France task force ILC European Regional Meeting and.
FCC-ee Interaction Region design
Benchmarking MAD, SAD and PLACET Characterization and performance of the CLIC Beam Delivery System with MAD, SAD and PLACET T. Asaka† and J. Resta López‡
A.P. Potylitsyn, I.S. Tropin Tomsk Polytechnic University,
Analysis of 14/20 mrad Extraction Line Energy Chicane
The MDI at CEPC Dou Wang, Hongbo Zhu, Huamin Qu, Jianli Wang, Manqi Ruan, Qinglei Xiu, Sha Bai, Shujin Li, Weichao Yao, Yanli Jin, Yin Xu, Yiwei Wang,
Overview of Polarimetry
Other beam-induced background at the IP
The small crossing angle layout - where are we and what do we do now?
The 2mrad horizontal crossing angle IR layout for the ILC
Tony Hill Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
GLD IR optimization and background study
Low Energy Electron-Ion Collision
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit (via Eric Torrence) VLCW06 19 July 06

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit2 BDS Layout 2 mrad 14/20 mrad

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit3 14/20 mrad Extraction Line

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit4 2 mrad Extraction Line

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit5

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit6 The extraction line transport is simulated using the program GEANT. Disrupted beam events were taken from files prepared by Andrei Seryi. For these studies files: cs11 corresponds to a normal ILC beam (mean energy GeV and RMS GeV) cs13 with parameters set for large-y (mean energy GeV and RMS GeV). cs13 dy = 4nm gives large-y parameter data sets with the centroid of the beams missing by 4nm in the vertical (mean energy GeV and RMS GeV) cs13 dx =200nm has beams missing by 200nm in the horizontal (mean energy GeV and RMS GeV)

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit7

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit8

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit9

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit10 Spin Precession Change in spin direction for various bend angles and the projection of the longitudinal polarization. Electron beam energy is 250 GeV. Change in Bend AngleChange in Spin Direction at 250 GeV Longitudinal Polarization Projection 1 mrad32.5 o 84.3% 275  rad 8.9 o 98.8% 100  rad 3.25 o = 56mrad99.8%

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit11

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit12 2mrad x vs y +/-100  m

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit13 2mrad Extraction Line: Beam accepted and polarization projection for various micron selections about the x value of the beam at the Compton IP. In each case abs(y+2.0cm)<100 microns and abs(x ). x microns %Beam within +-100microns in x & y Polarization Projection

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit14 20mrad Extraction Line with 2.019<y<-1.999cm and abs(x)<0.01cm Condition (file name)%Beam within microns in x & y Polarization Projection Nominal Beam Condition (cs11) Large y (cs13) Large y horizontal offset 200nm (cs13_dx200) Large y vertical offset 4nm (cs13_dy4) mrad Extraction Line with abs(y+2)<0.01cm and abs(x )<0.01cm Condition (file name)%Beam within microns in x & y Polarization Projection Nominal Beam Condition (cs11) Large y (cs13) Large y horizontal offset 200nm (cs13_dx200) Large y vertical offset 4nm (cs13_dy4)

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit15 Beam Losses from the e+e- IR to the Compton Detector Plane Condition (file name) LossesBeamLost Beam Nominal Beam Condition (cs11)034883<0.5 * Large y (cs13)030000<0.6 * Large y horizontal offset 200nm (cs13_dx200)030000<0.6 * Large y vertical offset 4nm (cs13_dy4)030000<0.6 * mrad Crossing Angle Extraction Line Condition (file name) LossesBeamLost Beam Nominal Beam Condition (cs11) * Large y (cs13) * Large y horizontal offset 200nm (cs13_dx200) * Large y vertical offset 4nm (cs13_dy4) * mrad Crossing Angle Extraction Line

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit16 Beam losses were further studied by using a file with the tails of the disrupted beam having events with energy less than 0.65 of the beam energy or the angle greater than 0.5 mrad: 00urad.dat 00urad.dat Beam Losses

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit17 Only 5899 of the 10,503 particles continue to the Compton Detector plane. This represents a loss of 2.62*10 -4 of the million original beam tracks. 2mrad extraction line Estimate ~50 photons/cm 2 are in the region of the Cherenkov counter cells for each bunch of 2*10 10 electrons Only ~20% above 10 MeV Can reduce by local shielding of Cherenkov Detector Compton Signal ~650 backscattered electrons per GeV or >1000 per 1cm cell

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit18 Synchrotron Radiation

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit19 Table IV: Energy Loss from Synchrotron Radiation between the e+e- IR and the Center of the Energy Chicane. a) 20 mrad Crossing Angle Extraction Line Condition (file name)Energy Loss (MeV) Nominal Beam Condition (cs11)119.4 Large y (cs13)123.0 Large y horizontal offset 200nm (cs13_dx200)122.7 Large y vertical offset 4nm (cs13_dy4)124.3 b) 2 mrad Crossing Angle Extraction Line Condition (file name)Energy Loss (MeV) Nominal Beam Condition (cs11)854.2 Large y (cs13)854.2 Large y horizontal offset 200nm (cs13_dx200)828.5 Large y vertical offset 4nm (cs13_dy4)859.4

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit20

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit21

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit22 The 20 mrad extraction line has: Core of beam within +-100microns has between 32 and 48% of the beam. The polarization projection is to 99.85% at the Compton IP. No beam losses from e+e- IR to Compton detector plane out of 17.6 million beam tracks. Beam energy loss due to synchrotron radiation to the middle of energy chicane (z=59.7 m) is only ~110 MeV and does not show variation with beam conditions. The collimator at z= meters needs to be designed. It absorbs the synchrotron radiation above the 0.75 mrad beam stay clear allowing the Cherenkov detector to begin at y~14 cm. Conclusions

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit23 There are large beam losses between e+e- IR and Compton detector plane (>2.6*10 -4 are lost) giving secondary backgrounds of mainly photons in the region of the Cherenkov Detector. A small percentage of beam is hit by laser spot microns (~15%) at the Compton IP and results in low Compton luminosity. There are large beam energy losses (~850 MeV) due to synchrotron radiation between IR and the center of the energy chicane at z= meters. Synchrotron radiation at Cherenkov Detector is favorable. The detector only sees the synchrotron radiation from the magnets of the polarimeter chicane, and this is contained between -9 and +2 cm. The first cell of the Cherenkov Detector starts at +10 cm. The 2 mrad extraction line has: