Quantum interferometric visibility as a witness of general relativistic proper time Bhubaneswar, 21 st December 2011 M. Zych, F. Costa, I. Pikovski, Č.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Physics 55 Friday, December 2, Quiz 7 (last quiz) 2.Relativistic mass, momentum, energy 3.Introduction to General Relativity 4.Einstein’s equivalence.
Advertisements

General Relativity Physics Honours 2006 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29 Lecture Notes 9.
Knight - Chapter 28 (Grasshopper Book) Quantum Physics.
Early Quantum Theory and Models of the Atom
Quantum One: Lecture 5a. Normalization Conditions for Free Particle Eigenstates.
Extragalactic Astronomy & Cosmology First-Half Review [4246] Physics 316.
Phy107 Fall 2006 From last time… Einstein’s Relativity ◦ All laws of physics identical in inertial ref. frames ◦ Speed of light=c in all inertial ref.
Chapter 11 – Gravity Lecture 2
Developing a Theory of Gravity Does the Sun go around the Earth or Earth around Sun? Why does this happen? Plato } Artistotle } Philosophy Ptolemy }& Models.
Wavefunction Quantum mechanics acknowledges the wave-particle duality of matter by supposing that, rather than traveling along a definite path, a particle.
Real clocks and rods in quantum mechanics. Rodolfo Gambini Universidad de la Republica Uruguay With Jorge Pullin (Louisiana State) and Rafael Porto (Carnegie.
Unusual Interferometry via Translational-Internal Entanglement Nir Bar-Gill Michal Kolar Tomas Opatrny Gershon Kurizki.
2/9/2006Welcome to LIGO1 Welcome to LIGO!. 2/9/2006Welcome to LIGO2 LIGO: A detector that measures very tiny displacements How tiny?
Gravity. Gravitational Field Interpretation: Gravitational Field is the force that a test particle would feel at a point divided by the mass of the test.
Chapter 12 Gravitation. Theories of Gravity Newton’s Einstein’s.
Gravity as Geometry. Forces in Nature Gravitational Force Electromagnetic Force Strong Force Weak Force.
CERN Colloquium, 28/04/11. Matter and Forces Current Paradigm FUNDAMENTAL FORCES: carried by elementary particles.
Entropy localization and distribution in the Hawking radiation Horacio Casini CONICET-Intituto Balseiro – Centro Atómico Bariloche.
Chapter 26 Relativity. General Physics Relativity II Sections 5–7.
Gravitational Waves (& Gravitons ?)
Finsler Geometrical Path Integral Erico Tanaka Palacký University Takayoshi Ootsuka Ochanomizu University of Debrecen WORKSHOP ON.
Imperial College, LONDON, SEPTEMBER, 2008 From local to global relativity Tuomo Suntola, Finland Physical Interpretations of Relativity Theory XI.
Introduction to special relativity
General Relativity Principle of equivalence: There is no experiment that will discern the difference between the effect of gravity and the effect of.
Chapter 26 Relativity © 2006, B.J. Lieb
Correspondence of The Principle of Maximum Entropy With other Laws of Physics Maximum Proper Time Least Action Least Time Minimum Energy How may the Maximum.
 Newtonian relativity  Michelson-Morley Experiment  Einstein ’ s principle of relativity  Special relativity  Lorentz transformation  Relativistic.
1 PH604 Special Relativity (8 lectures) Books: “Special Relativity, a first encounter”, Domenico Giulini, Oxford “Introduction to the Relativity Principle”,
General Relativity Physics Honours 2005 Dr Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29
Relatively Einstein 2005 has been chosen as the World Year of Physics to celebrate the 100th anniversary of Einstein’s Miraculous Year. In this presentation,
Fundamental Principles of General Relativity  general principle: laws of physics must be the same for all observers (accelerated or not)  general covariance:
Chapter 8 Potential Energy. Potential energy is the energy associated with the configuration of a system of objects that exert forces on each other This.
Potential Energy ~March 1, 2006.
Gravitational Red Shift Gravitational Red Shift - The reddening of light from a very massive object caused by photons escaping and traveling away from.
Wave-Particle Duality - the Principle of Complementarity The principle of complementarity states that both the wave and particle aspects of light are fundamental.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2008 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 560, A29 Lecture Notes 10.
Principle of Equivalence: Einstein 1907 Box stationary in gravity field Box falling freely Box accelerates in empty space Box moves through space at constant.
Search for Quantum Gravity Using Atom Interferometers Charles Wang, University of Aberdeen, UK Robert Bingham, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Tito.
Astronomy 1143 – Spring 2014 Lecture 18: Special Relativity.
Relativistic Quantum Theory of Microwave and Optical Atomic Clocks
General Relativity Physics Honours 2008 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 560, A29 Lecture Notes 9.
Physics 12 MODERN PHYSICS: AN INTRODUCTION.  QUOTE AND CLIP OF.
Possible Enhancement of noncommutative EFFECTS IN gravity Objective Look for consequences of gravity on noncommutative (NC) space-time Chamseddine In particular,
Hirophysics.com PATRICK ABLES. Hirophysics.com PART 1 TIME DILATION: GPS, Relativity, and other applications.
Indefinite causal order in quantum mechanics Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna & Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information, Vienna Mateus.
General Relativity and Cosmology The End of Absolute Space Cosmological Principle Black Holes CBMR and Big Bang.
Length Contraction. Relative Space  An observer at rest measures a proper time for a clock in the same frame of reference.  An object also has a proper.
Chapter 39 Relativity. A Brief Overview of Modern Physics 20 th Century revolution 1900 Max Planck Basic ideas leading to Quantum theory 1905 Einstein.
An equation for matter waves Seem to need an equation that involves the first derivative in time, but the second derivative in space As before try solution.
Soichiro Isoyama Collaborators : Norichika Sago, Ryuichi Fujita, and Takahiro Tanaka The gravitational wave from an EMRI binary Influence of the beyond.
By: Jennifer Doran. What was Known in 1900 Newton’s laws of motion Maxwell’s laws of electromagnetism.
1924: de Broglie suggests particles are waves Mid-1925: Werner Heisenberg introduces Matrix Mechanics In 1927 he derives uncertainty principles Late 1925:
Gravity on Matter Equation of State and the Unruh temperature Hyeong-Chan Kim (KNUT) 2016 FRP workshop on String theory and cosmology Seoul, Korea, June.
Chapter 38 Photons and Matter Waves. 38.2: The Photon, the Quantum of Light: In 1905, Einstein proposed that electromagnetic radiation (or simply light)
Anisotropic Mechanics J.M. Romero, V. Cuesta, J.A. Garcia, and J. D. Vergara Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, UNAM, Mexico.
qBOUNCE: a quantum bouncing ball gravity spectrometer
Equation of State and Unruh temperature
Schrodinger wave equation
Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
5. Wave-Particle Duality - the Principle of Complementarity
Relativity H7: General relativity.
GENERAL RELATIVITY General relativity describes the effect of gravitational fields on space and time.
Topics for Today Post-game analysis of first exam (Kletzing)
GENERAL RELATIVITY General relativity describes the effect of gravitational fields on space and time.
Lecture 29 Oscillation, linear superposition, and wave
Light and Energy Electromagnetic Radiation is a form of energy that is created through the interaction of electrical and magnetic fields. It displays wave-like.
Mechanical Energy.
5. Wave-Particle Duality - the Principle of Complementarity
Classical Principles of Electromagnetism
Principle of Equivalence: Einstein 1907
Presentation transcript:

Quantum interferometric visibility as a witness of general relativistic proper time Bhubaneswar, 21 st December 2011 M. Zych, F. Costa, I. Pikovski, Č. Brukner

Interpretation ambiguity of gravitationally induced phase shifts modes associated with the corresponding paths γ 1,2 Probabilities of detection Mach-Zehnder interferometer in the gravitational field two beam splitters (BS), phase shifter (PS), two detectors D ±. γ 1,2 – two possible paths through the setup, g - homogeneous gravitational field, Δh - separation between the paths The state inside the setup neutrons, COW, 1975

Δ Φ: measure of a general relativisitc time dilation non-relativistic quantum mechanics Δ Φ: gravitational analog of an Aharonov-Bohm effect  gravity : metric theory,  proper time τ may flows at different rates,  curved space-time geometry  gravity: potential force (possibly non- Newtonian)  there exists a global time paramter,  flat space-time general relativity Interpretation ambiguity of gravitationally induced phase shifts

Outline  Derivation of the main result and the experimental proposal - quantitative predictions;  Feasibility of practical implementations;  Discussion and extensions: how to test theories in which proper time is supposed to be a quantum degree of freedom;  Conclusion  General idea: test of general relativistic time dilation in conjunction with the principle of quantum complementarity;

Interferometric visibility as a witness of proper time Probabilities of detection state of the “clock”, which followed the path γ 1,2 Visibility of the interference pattern: Distunguishability of the paths: “clock” - a system with an evolving in time degree of freedom

Interferometric visibility as a witness of proper time quantum complementarity + time dilation = drop in the interferometric visibility Probabilities of detection state of the “clock”, which followed the path γ 1,2 Visibility of the interference pattern: “clock” - a system with an evolving in time degree of freedom

Results “clock” d.o.f. implemented in internal states of a massive particle (neglecting finite size effects) rest frame: laboratory frame: metric, signature mostly plus evolution w.r.t. proper time evolution w.r.t. laboratory time t energy of a mass m in a space- time with metric g μν Particle in a Schwarzschild metric; up to quadratic terms in the kinetic, potential and internal energy: canonical quantization of E  H 0, Hamiltonian of the external d.o.f.

Results Up to a phase  ΔE:=E 1 -E 0,  Δh: distance between the paths  ΔV:=gΔh, gravitational potential (up to linear terms in Δh)  ΔT: time for which the particle travels in superposition at constant heights, E GR corr averaged over the two paths expectation value taken w.r.t. the |τ in >

Results change in the interferometric visibility relative phase from the Newtonian potential GR corrections to the relative phase from the path d.o.f. phase shift proportional to the average internal energy new effects appearing with the “clock”:  ΔE:=E 1 -E 0,  Δh: distance between the paths  ΔV:=gΔh, gravitational potential (up to linear terms in Δh)  ΔT: time for which the particle travels in superposition at constant heights,

Results dashed, black line - interference without the “clock” blue line - interference with the “clock” thick, red line - modulation in the visibility  ΔE:=E 1 -E 0,  Δh: distance between the paths  ΔV:=gΔh, gravitational potential (up to linear terms in Δh)  ΔT: time for which the particle travels in superposition at constant heights,

Generalization  orthogonalization time (of a quantum system):  total time dilation between the trajectories: time dilation between the interferometric paths = orthogonalization time of the “clock” => maximal which-way information & no interference here:

Implementations  ΔE:=E 1 -E 0,  Δh: distance between the paths  ΔV:=gΔh, gravitational potential,  g=10 m/s 2  ΔT: time for which the particle travels in superposition at constant heights, previously used interferometers testing e.g. gravitational phase shift for the full loss of the interferometric visibility “clock” frequency ω=∆E/ħ

Discussion and final remarks  interferometric visibility drops  proper time has operational meaning take an eigenstate of the internal energy Hamiltonian ⇒ only the phase of the state changes... the „clock“ does not „tick“ ⇒ the concept of proper time has no operational meaning ⇒ visibility is maximal!  phase shift occurs independently of the implementation of the „clock“

In quantum mechanics it makes no sense to speak about quantities without specifying how they are measured! Discussion and final remarks  each massive particle = Compton clock measuring proper time along ist path  interferometric visibility drops  proper time has operational meaning  phase shift occurs independently of the implementation of the „clock“ interference should always be lost! (since the which-path information is stored „somewhere“ in the particle) redshift of a clock ticking at the Compton frequency

Discussion and final remarks tests the corrections to the gravitational potential, analogous to the A-B effect in the electromagnetism  interferometric visibility drops  proper time has operational meaning  phase shift occurs independently of the implementation of the „clock“ tests quantum complementarity principle in the conjunction with the general relativistic time dilation

toward testing new theories Theories which assume that proper time is a new quantum degree of freedom can be tested with our proposal.  V m - measured visibility, with estimated error Δν;  V QM - visibility predicted by quantum mechanics

Conclusion  new paradigm for tests of genuine general relativistic effects in quantum mechanics  clarification of the notion of proper time in the quantum context - only operationally well defined physical quantities have meaning in quantum mechanics!  Test of theories in which proper time is assumed to be a quantum degree of freedom;  previously not considered mechanism of decoherence (important for quantum-to-classical transition) Drop in the visibility of quantum interference due to gravitational time dilation

Thank you for your attention! Quantum interferometric visibility as a witness of general relativistic proper time Nat. Commun. 2:505 doi: /ncomms1498 (2011) M. Z., F. Costa, I. Pikovski, Č. Brukner