Developing Transnational Project Indicators. The purpose of indicators > Indicators are useful tools that allow programme and project managers to monitor:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Il Project Cycle Management :A Technical Guide The Logical Framework Approach 1 1.
Advertisements

1 Mateja Bizilj PEMPAL BCOP KEY CONCEPTS AND APPROACHES TO PROGRAMS AND PERFORMANCE Tbilisi, June 28, 2007.
Results Based Monitoring (RBM)
1 EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Evaluation: Setting Outcome Indicators and Targets Seminar: 15 March 2011, La Hulpe Veronica Gaffey Acting Director.
Sharing experienceListening to practice Informing policy Krakow 30 November 2011 Cliff Hague, UK ECP ESPON-INTERSTRAT.
WMO Monitoring & Evaluation System (Measuring our Performance/Success)
Module 4 Planning SP. What’s in Module 4  Opportunities for SP  Different SP models  Communication plan  Monitoring and evaluating  Working session.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Chapter 3 – Evaluation of Performance
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
CONGESTION MITIGATION & AIR QUALITY(CMAQ) 1.  FY2013 = $9.8 million for NE  New CMAQ Guidance, November 12, 2013  Purpose of the CMAQ Program is to.
Pestalozzi Children‘s Foundation emPower 2012 Monitoring & Evaluation Lecturers: Beatrice Schulter.
The Knowledge Resources Guide The SUVOT Project Sustainable and Vocational Tourism Rimini, 20 October 2005.
Development of Competence Profile Quality managers in VET-institutions Project no: PL1-LEO This publication [communication] reflects the.
DATABASE DATABASE General Presentation Sofia Workshop 8 June 2007.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
UN-Water Water Country Briefs Introduction & Background Frederik Pischke Interagency Water Advisory UN-Water Frederik Pischke Interagency Water Advisory.
Lesson 3: Monitoring and Indicator Macerata, 23 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND INTERREG IIC Community Initiative concerning Transnational Co-operation on Spatial Planning
Application Form Part 1, Sections 4-9 How to Apply Seminar 16 th September 2010 – Copenhagen Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
Outcome Based Evaluation for Digital Library Projects and Services
OECD/INFE Tools for evaluating financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD Policy Analyst OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD Trust.
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
The LOGICAL FRAMEWORK Scoping the Essential Elements of a Project Dr. Suchat Katima Mekong Institute.
Regional Policy European Commission 1 10/17/2015 Wolfgang Petzold DG REGIO 10 September 2004 SFIT meeting on evaluation DG REGIO's Information and Communication.
JCint - JobCreator International Network and Web Services n. LLP-LDV-TOI-09-IT-0502 This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH. UNAIDS M&E Senior Adviser 12 th May 2009.
Workshop II Monitoring and Evaluation INTERACT ENPI Annual Conference December 2009 | Rome.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
“ BIRD Project“ 1 Broadband Access, Innovation & Regional Development” Broadband Access, Innovation & Regional Development” Project Description Ulrich.
UNDP-GEF Community-Based Adaptation Programme Anne-France WITTMANN CBA-Morocco Programme Manager (UNV) Tools & Tips to foster Gender Mainstreaming & Inclusion.
Project Cycle Management for International Development Cooperation Indicators Teacher Pietro Celotti Università degli Studi di Macerata 16 December 2011.
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation 1 Common monitoring and evaluation framework Jela Tvrdonova, 2010.
1 Organisational structure of supervisory organisations – The CQC approach Husna Mortuza & Claire Robbie Strategy & Policy 29 September
UK Aid Direct Introduction to Logframes (only required at proposal stage)
Regional Policy Result Orientation of future ETC Programes Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation & European Semester 23 April 2013.
Innovation Indicators across Innovation Agencies TAFTIE Policy Forum, 25 November 2014.
Task NumberHarmonise, develop & implement capacity building Performance Indicators CB-07-01c Harmonise efforts by Tasks, in particular those related with.
The P Process Strategic Design
Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.
1 Sequenced Information Strategy –incorporating short-term programme proposal Paris21 Consortium meeting : June 2000 Tony Williams UK Department.
ESPON Workshop at the Open Days 2012 “Creating Results informed by Territorial Evidence” Brussels, 10 October 2012 Introduction to ESPON Piera Petruzzi,
KEITH WOOD COMMUNITY PLANNING MANAGER NEWARK AND SHERWOOD DISTRICT COUNCIL A Presentation to the 3 rd Annual AAP Conference – 6 November 2009 The Role.
Selecting cost effective abatement measures to achieve good water status with the environmental costing model S. Broekx 1, E. Meynaerts 1, P. Vercaemst.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
AlpCity AlpCity Final Conference Prà Catinat, 16 October 2006 Ivan Curzolo - JTS Alpine Space Programme.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
Results Oriented Monitoring & Evaluation Model (ROMEM) Presented by Shawn Grey Ministry of Transport and Works Jamaica. Model developed by MTW and DPMI.
A Sustainable Tourism Framework for the Caribbean Mercedes Silva Sustainable Tourism Specialist Caribbean Tourism Organization “Ma Pampo” World Ecotourism.
Development of Gender Sensitive M&E: Tools and Strategies.
W w w. a u d i t 0 6. f i ENERGY AUDIT ’06 International Conference on Energy Audits Timo Husu Head of Unit, Energy Efficiency Motiva Oy, Finland.
Transnational Working & Reporting Procedures. LP Seminar January 2013 Transnational Cooperation & Reporting Procedures I) Transnational cooperation: Definition.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Project Development seminar Katerina Staneva Kring February 2010 | Prague.
Filippo Compagni - UK Contact Point – Atlantic Area
Marelize Gorgens The World Bank An M&E strategy Monitoring & Evaluation strategy Master & Execute Money and Energy is a waste of M&E that we do not M&E.
Transnational Working & Reporting Procedures What project promoters cannot ignore about INTERREG IVB NWE project monitoring.
WORKPLAN ON PROPAGATING UNION LAW FOR WORKERS. Background & Justification ● Socio-economic condition – Vietnam's unemployment rate is about 6% – The country's.
Building an ENI CBC project
M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH
Introduction - Final activity reporting
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 7. Managers’ and stakeholders’ information needs.
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
Opening seminar of the project

The Water Framework Directive: Challenges, Threats and Opportunities
Project intervention logic
Project intervention logic
Presentation transcript:

Developing Transnational Project Indicators

The purpose of indicators > Indicators are useful tools that allow programme and project managers to monitor: - Progress - Efficiency - Effectiveness

The purpose of indicators 2 The CADSES programme will use your indicators to measure your achievements. The indicators you choose must give an accurate picture of what you are doing.

The purpose of indicators 3 > You can also use indicators within the partnership.Use targets to define delivery responsibilities and quality requirements. For example: ”Partner 3 is responsible for: Development of 3 new technologies to reduce mercury levels in Lake X by 50% by 2007.” …This transparency makes project work much easier.

Basic Terminology Activities – The work done in your project Input – The resources you use to carry out the activities Outputs – What your project produces/delivers Results – The immediate benefits Impacts – The long-term benefits

For example... Activity: Writing a report Input: 300 staff hours, € Output: Report on spatial development in CADSES area Result: Increased awareness of spatial development issues in CADSES area Impact: Improved policies based on this new knowledge

Role of Transnational indicators Output – Result – Impact Documents (analytical, strategic) Meetings (seminars, workshops, conferences) Output Networking (administration, research, private sector, countries) Learning (spatial development, foreign systems) Result European integration Spatial development perspectives Impact European Policies Interreg CADSES Projects Others…

The limitations of indicators 1 > Indicators cannot give a full picture of your project – they can only provide a snapshot of the status of some of the work being done. > Therefore, the first decision is to decide WHAT to measure: what are the interesting and important parts of the project?

The limitations of indicators 2 It is often impossible to measure the long- term benefit (the impact) of a project within the lifetime of that project. Projects must still provide indicators of what the expected impacts are and how it would be possible to measure them in future. Sometimes it may only be possible to state that the project will make a contribution to achieving change. This happens when it is impossible to differentiate the impact of the project from the impact of other activities.

The need for logical connection between indicators GOOD (Clear connections) Output: New filters at water treatment plant -> Result: Nitrate levels in water fall by 50% -> Impact: Fish stocks in river increase by 25% BAD (No logical connection) Output: Analysis of transport systems Result: Networking between transport workers Impact: Less pollution from trucks

Indicators must also be S.M.A.R.T S – Specific M – Measurable A – Achievable R – Relevant T – Timed

Specific GOOD -Tourism SMEs in target area have 25% increase in turnover BAD - Business performance is better

Measurable GOOD: - Increase in number areas with access to broadband internet services. (km 2 ) Achievable GOOD: -25% crime reduction in pilot project area BAD: - No crime in pilot project area

Relevant... to the project’s and programme’s objectives Timed... stating when something should happen. For example, “Increase in number of visitors to region by end of project / by end 2010 / in 2006, etc”.

Other indicator essentials Indicators are quantitative. 1.They need a UNIT so we know what is being measured. 2.A BASELINE so we know the figure at the start of the project. 3.A TARGET so we know the figure that the project hopes to achieve.

For example Increase in amount of freight (tonnes) carried by boat on River X by end of (Current amount = 1.7 million. Estimate by end 2007 = 2 million) UNIT BASELINE TARGET

Qualitative indicators Although indicators should be quantitative, a qualitative statement will sometimes say more about the project. If you use this kind of indicator you still need to find some way of measuring the qualitative change.

Qualitative indicators 2 For example: ”Improvement in quality of life (% of residents measured by survey in May 2008)” Like every other project, this one will also have to budget for data collection to measure performance on this indicator.

Conclusions: Good indicators must be… Directly related to the project’s most important objectives. Logically structured SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Timed) Provided with a unit, baseline and target Necessary data collection should be included in project budgets