Simulations of RGM air emissions from 30 power plants + 16 other large RGM sources in the 4-state region Simulations with HYSPLIT-Hg for Oct-2004 through.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementation of the Particle & Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) for the CMAQ Modeling System: Sulfur & Nitrogen Tagging 5 th Annual CMAS Conference.
Advertisements

Shannon Capps April 22, Mercury cycling From
EPA PM2.5 Modeling Guidance for Attainment Demonstrations Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS February 20, 2007.
Chapter 4: Image Enhancement
THE IMPACTS OF TRANS-BOUNDARY TRANSPORT OF AEROSOLS ON THE REGIONAL AIR QUALITY: A case study of Mexican wildland fire on May 1998 Hee-Jin In 1, Daewon.
Working together for clean air Puget Sound Area Ozone Modeling NW AIRQUEST December 4, 2006 Washington State University Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Washington.
Mercury in the Great Lakes Region Sponsored by the Commission for Environmental Cooperation’s Environment, Economy and Trade and Pollutants and Health.
Experience of short-range (1-5 days) numerical ice forecasts for the freezing seas. Sergey Klyachkin, Zalman Gudkovich, Roman Guzenko Arctic and Antarctic.
Time – Time Calculations
Atmospheric Mercury Deposition to the Great Lakes A Multi-Year Study Supported by the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Principal Investigator: Dr. Mark.
(work funded through the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative)
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 13 The Integral.
Lecture 15 Tobit model for corner solution
More partial products Recall that we can use a drawing of a rectangle to help us with calculating products. The rectangle is divided into regions and we.
September 12, SW Colorado PSD Increment Study Southwest Colorado Nitrogen Dioxide ( NO 2 ) Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Increment.
NOAA’s Atmospheric Mercury Monitoring in the Gulf of Mexico Region [April 2007 summary] This summary is updated periodically, and the current version is.
Organization of Course INTRODUCTION 1.Course overview 2.Air Toxics overview 3.HYSPLIT overview HYSPLIT Theory and Practice 4.Meteorology 5.Back Trajectories.
The Impact of Biogenic VOC Emissions on Tropospheric Ozone Formation in the Mid-Atlantic Region Michelle L. Bell Yale University Hugh Ellis Johns Hopkins.
Implementation of the Particle & Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) for the CMAQ Modeling System: Mercury Tagging 5 th Annual CMAS Conference Research.
1 Summary of LADCO’s Regional Modeling in the Eastern U.S.: Preliminary Results April 27, 2009 MWAQC TAC June 15, 2009.
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
WRAP Update WESTAR Meeting San Francisco April 25, 2011.
1 Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ PM2.5 Source Apportionment Estimates Kirk Baker and Brian Timin U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Connecticut July 2013.
Modeling the Atmospheric Deposition of Mercury to Lake Champlain (from Anthropogenic Sources in the U.S. and Canada) Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Central States May 2013.
Georgia Institute of Technology Initial Application of the Adaptive Grid Air Quality Model Dr. M. Talat Odman, Maudood N. Khan Georgia Institute of Technology.
Numerical Simulation of Atmospheric Loadings of Mercury from a Coal Fired Power Plant to Lake Erie S. M. Daggupaty, C. M. Banic and P. Blanchard Air Quality.
PM Model Performance & Grid Resolution Kirk Baker Midwest Regional Planning Organization November 2003.
Here are some “final” results for 2005, based on adding up just the time periods in 2005.
Application of the CMAQ Particle and Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) to Support Water Quality Planning for the Virginia Mercury Study 6 th Annual.
© Crown copyright Met Office Estimating UK and NW European CH 4 emissions using inversion modelling Alistair Manning with thanks to Simon O’Doherty & Dickon.
 Great Lakes Areas of Concern  U.S. urban areas (pink shading)  Large U.S./Canadian 2005 point sources of mercury Type of Emissions Source coal-fired.
Pollutant Emissions from Large Wildfires in the Western United States Shawn P. Urbanski, Matt C. Reeves, W. M. Hao US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research.
Post-processing air quality model predictions of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) at NCEP James Wilczak, Irina Djalalova, Dave Allured (ESRL) Jianping Huang,
Analysis of Ozone Modeling for May – July 2006 in PNW using AIRPACT3 (CMAQ) and CAMx. Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. EPA Region 10 Nov CMAQ O 3 Prediction.
Using HYSPLIT to Understand Source-Receptor Relationships: Some Examples HYSPLIT Training NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Jun 2-4, 2009 Silver Spring, MD,
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Midwestern States July 2013.
Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Silver Spring, Maryland
The Atmospheric Transport and Deposition of Mercury to the Great Lakes Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Silver Spring, Maryland Collection.
Rectangles and Multiplication Here is a rectangle with sides 3 and 7. The total number of squares can be found by multiplying 3 and
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review New Hampshire July 2013.
WESTAR 2003 Fall Technical Conference Introduction to Class I Area Impact Analyses September 16, 2003 John Bunyak National Park Service.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 6 The Integral.
Seasonal Airmass Transport Pathways to the US Prepared by: Rudolf B. Husar and Bret Schichtel CAPITACAPITA,Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Impact of Temporal Fluctuations in Power Plant Emissions on Air Quality Forecasts Prakash Doraiswamy 1, Christian Hogrefe 1,2, Eric Zalewsky 2, Winston.
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
Wildfire activity as been increasing over the past decades Cites such as Salt Lake City are surrounded by regions at a high risk for increased wildfire.
Spatial distribution of hourly trajectory endpoint frequencies top 10% of daytime RGM vs. total year with estimated 2002 emissions of reactive gaseous.
Source-apportionment for atmospheric mercury deposition: Where does the mercury in mercury deposition come from? Mark Cohen, Roland Draxler, and Richard.
2002 U.S. data from USEPA National Emissions Inventory (NEI); 2002 Canadian data from Environment Canada; 1999 Mexican data from inventory prepared by.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Northeastern States July 2013.
Forecasting smoke and dust using HYSPLIT. Experimental testing phase began March 28, 2006 Run daily at NCEP using the 6Z cycle to produce a 24- hr analysis.
 group of organisms of the  same species  live in a specific area  can interbreed.
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Cases and controls A case is an individual with a disease, whose location can be represented by a point on the map (red dot). In this table we examine.
Statistical Methods for Model Evaluation – Moving Beyond the Comparison of Matched Observations and Output for Model Grid Cells Kristen M. Foley1, Jenise.
A Performance Evaluation of Lightning-NO Algorithms in CMAQ
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Vetting the GENESYS Model
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Satellite NO2 Monitoring over the Oil Sands Region (video)
To View this slide show:
Monitoring Data Sets and Analysis Tools for the VIEWS/TSS Web Sites
NEW JERSEY 1-HR SULFUR DIOXIDE (SO2) ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION
The Heavy Metal Case study for the Netherlands
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
GATORADE MX Production
The sum of an Infinite Series
Presentation transcript:

Simulations of RGM air emissions from 30 power plants + 16 other large RGM sources in the 4-state region Simulations with HYSPLIT-Hg for Oct-2004 through Dec-2005, using NARR met data Oct-2004 through Dec-2004 used as model “spin-up” Results for Jan-2005 through Dec-2005 are presented, i.e., the entire year 2005 Unit emissions runs were carried out; then results multiplied by actual emissions Individual runs done for each plant; results added together in post-processing RGM emissions estimates from EPA’s 2005 National Emissions Inventory Emissions from plants have not been constant; this is a “snapshot” for one year Results were tabulated on a 0.5 o x 0.5 o grid (~50km) Pattern of deposition makes “sense” relative to plants modeled With just the 30 power plants, the maximum deposition grid cell is ~15 ug/m 2 -yr Adding in the other RGM sources, the maximum deposition grid cell is ~37 ug/m 2 -yr More than 100 cells have grid-cell fluxes of between 1-16 ug/m 2 -year All values are average deposition flux over a given grid cell, i.e., a 50km x 50km area Localized deposition can be significantly higher We have include the power plants + 16 other large RGM sources, but there are other mercury sources in the region Sources outside the region will also contribute to deposition So, this is only a “partial” picture of the mercury deposition pattern Methodology Results and Discussion

We explicitly modeled sources representing about 90% of the RGM emissions in the four-state area, according to the 2005 NEI

15 Location of modeled power plant Here’s what we had before, when we just included the power plants

Here’s what we get when we add in other large RGM sources in the region Location of modeled power plant Location of other large RGM source

Location of modeled power plant

Just in case its helpful, here’s something I did a few weeks earlier… These are illustrative overall and time-series results just for one plant (Big Cajun) First map is for the overall simulation, over 15 months The second set of slides shows the time-series of deposition, on a finer-grid close-in to the source, that demonstrates how things evolve… for a unit emissions of RGM from the plant, for 3-hr time steps… This “movie” might be interesting to show?

Movie showing illustrative simulation of deposition arising from 1 g/hr emissions of RGM from Big Cajun II power plant each frame represents 3 hours; four weeks shown actual plant emits ~9 g/hr RGM (according to 2005 National Emissions Inventory)