Dependable Power. Dependable People. The mission of Santee Cooper is to be the state’s leading resource for improving the quality of life for the people.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Renewable Energy as a Mechanism for Reducing Pollution North Carolina DENR/DAQ Mercury/CO2 Workshop Raleigh. North Carolina April 20, 2004 Harnessing the.
Advertisements

Sustainability In Northern Indiana Kelly Carmichael Director, Environmental Policy and Permitting South Shore Clean Cities Annual Meeting February 14,
EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
Prospective new EPA rules on existing source greenhouse gas emissions National Lieutenant Governors Association Oklahoma City, OK July 19, 2013 Eugene.
DEQ Mission By the end of the decade, Virginians will enjoy cleaner water available for all uses, improved air quality that supports communities and ecosystems,
1 Transformation Presentation to the Public Sector Management Workshop June 1,
Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Environmental Management Commission.
The Massachusetts Approach to Power Plant Clean-up Policy Making and Standards Setting to Reach Clean Air Sonia Hamel Massachusetts Executive Office of.
Co-generation Cogeneration is an attractive option for facilities with high electric rates and buildings that consume large amounts of hot water and electricity.
WOOD STOVE CHANGEOUT PROGRAMS AS SEPs Presentation by Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association (HPBA) NCAF 2006 Energy Programs Leveraging Conference October.
Energy Efficiency and Arizona’s Energy Future Jeff Schlegel Southwest Energy Efficiency Project (SWEEP) April
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
Clear Thinking on Nuclear: New Plant Construction Nuclear energy is dependable, affordable, and environmentally sound. Nuclear energy is needed to meet.
Houghton College/NextEra Solar Array. Solar Array Details 2.5 MW system covering 11 acres 2.92 million kWh production (equivalent to powering 270 homes.
Neeharika Naik-Dhungel, EPA CHP Partnership Program Central Pennsylvania AEE Meeting January 26, 2012 Combined Heat and Power: CHP Partnership and the.
Katrina Pielli U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CHP Partnership
Siemens sans siemens sans bold siemens sans italic siemens sans italic bold siemens sans black siemens black italic Siemens Building Technologies.
Robert L. Burns, Jr., Esq. Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC August 1, 2013 Impact of Environmental Regulation on Coal Combustion for Electrical.
Xcel Energy and Environmental Parties Least-Cost Resource Plan Settlement Agreement.
AEP’s Emission Reduction Strategy AEP’s Emission Reduction Strategy Presented by: John McManus, Vice President Environmental Services APP Site Visit October.
Biomass Energy and its future in Wisconsin David Donovan Manager, Regulatory Policy David Donovan Manager, Regulatory Policy.
Mirant Mid-Atlantic MWAQC Technical Advisory Committee Briefing January 21, 2005.
PSNH "The Right Way" Attorney at Law: Simeon Marklin, Esq. MBA : Environmental Science.
ACC Open Meeting – November 18, 2010 Four Corners Power Plant 1.
Overview of Environmental Regulations and Drought Impacts in the ERCOT Region Dana Lazarus Planning Analyst, ERCOT July 13, 2015.
Pasadena Water & Power Intermountain Power Project Amend the Existing Contracts Participate in Renewal Project Pasadena City Council Item 11 July 20, 2015.
Resource Planning Georgia Power’s Diverse Plan to Meet Georgia’s Energy Needs AWMA Fall 2010 Conference October 7, 2010 Jeff Burleson Director of Resource.
Wyoming Infrastructure Authority Developing Electric Infrastructure for the Future of the West Energy Gateway Update Presented by Darrell T. Gerrard Vice.
NEW SOURCE REVIEW REFORM/SIMPLIFICATION JOHN A. PAUL STAPPA/ALAPCO MAY, 2002.
UTILITY NSR REFORM TIMEFRAMES EARLY 90’SBEGIN CAAA IMPLEMENTATION MID 90’SNSR REFORM DEVELOPMENT - S/A Principles - EPA Proposals.
Freeport Generating Project Project Description Modernization projects at Power Plant #2 Developers – Freeport Electric and Selected Development Company.
Citizens’ Academy Kathy Viehe GRU Interim General Manager November 12, 2014.
3 rd Annual Waste Heat to Power Workshop, 2007 Thomas R. Casten Chairman, Recycled Energy Development, LLC Waste Heat to Power September 25, 2007.
An Energy Conversion: Making Renewable Energy America’s Energy Sponsored by: U.S. Congressman Jeff Fortenberry and the University of Nebraska - Lincoln.
WORLD ENERGY OUTLOOK OIL & GAS SUPPLY MOEB/D Existing New Actual
Exposing the Myth Showing that America can have a Clean Environment and Affordable Energy.
EPA’s Proposed Clean Power Plan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Kimberton, PA | Kennesaw, GA | Strategic Air Planning: Is the Time for a PAL Here? Mark Wenclawiak, CCM|
Overview of Civil Judicial Enforcement. Civil Judicial Enforcement  Who may file civil judicial environmental enforcement actions in U.S.? Federal Government.
Holy Cross Energy Del Worley October 22, Holy Cross is an electric distribution cooperative that serve 55,000 meters Most of our consumers are located.
EPA Cooling System Regulations Hall of States Briefing February 22, 2011.
Developing a Framework for Offset Use in RGGI Opportunities and Risks Dale Bryk, NRDC and Brian Jones, MJB&A – Northeast Regional GHG Coalition RGGI Stakeholder.
WATER QUALITY TOPICS ENFORCEMENT – ARE FINES BECOMING A WAY OF LIFE AT THE DEQ By:Donald D. Maisch Supervising Attorney, Water Quality Division Office.
National Clean Diesel Campaign Upcoming Funding Opportunities Rosalva Tapia June 3, 2009 National Tribal Forum on Air Quality Management Conference 2009.
CLEAN POWER PLAN PROPOSAL Reducing Carbon Pollution From Existing Power Plants Kerry Drake,Associate Director Air Division, US EPA, Region 9 California.
June 26, Background of Federal GHG Regulation Supreme Court determines greenhouse gases (GHGs) are “air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act U.S.
Progress Energy Issues Overview April 25, 2006 Don Cooke Sr. Environmental Coordinator.
Southern California Edison The San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station April 14, 2011.
Bob Cupit Manager, Energy Facility Permitting Minnesota Public Utilities Commission.
1 Region 5 Enforcement Approach George Czerniak June 13, 2007 NACAA Enforcement and Compliance Workshop.
The Effect of Environmental Regulation upon the Electric Power Industry: A Rating Agency Perspective 23rd February 2005 At the California Public Utility.
Air Pollution Challenges Kentucky Coal Association April 29, 2013 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Impacts of Environmental Regulations in the ERCOT Region Dana Lazarus Planning Analyst, ERCOT January 26, 2016.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
Next Steps: Air Quality Planning In the AACOG Region Air Improvement Resources Advisory Committee Meeting Alamo Area Council of Governments January 17,
Johnson Controls, Inc. — 1 1/6 2/6 4/6 5/6 1/4 3/4 1/2 WAHOO PUBLIC SCHOOL SENIOR/JUNIOR HIGH & ELEMENTARY ENERGY PERFORMANCE CONTRACT FEASIBILITY March.
Nuclear Energy in 2013: Status and Outlook Paul Genoa Senior Director, Policy Development Nuclear Energy Institute Florida Senate Committee on Communications,
Presented By: Jeff Cook Dr. Jorge Estevez Kyle Zellner.
Federal Leadership in the Procurement of Green Power U.S. EPA Green Power Partnership Blaine Collison EPA Green Power Partnership Phone: (202)
Energy Management System (EnMS) Awareness
Tampa Electric Company’s Emission Reduction Program
FUEL CELLS.
Eskom’s response to Minimum Emission Standards
NSPS Rulemakings for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
CR3 and Crystal River Energy Complex
Alternative Energy in NC
Division of Energy Resources
About Dominion: One of America’s Leading Energy Companies
Presentation transcript:

Dependable Power. Dependable People.

The mission of Santee Cooper is to be the state’s leading resource for improving the quality of life for the people of South Carolina.

Santee Cooper is customer-focused with commitments to Low-Cost / Dependable Power Dependable People Quality Service Environmental Stewardship

Santee Cooper Generation Jefferies Hydro 1, 2, 3, 4 & MW Moncks Corner

Jefferies Steam 1 & 2 - Oil MW Moncks Corner Jefferies Steam 3 & 4 - Coal MW Santee Cooper Generation

Winyah Steam 1 - Coal MW Georgetown Winyah Steam 2 - Coal MW Winyah Steam 3 - Coal MW Winyah Steam 4 - Coal MW Santee Cooper Generation

Grainger Steam 1& 2 - Coal MW Conway Santee Cooper Generation

Cross Steam 2 - Coal MW Cross Cross Steam 1 - Coal MW Cross Steam 3 - Coal * MW * Projected Santee Cooper Generation Cross Steam 4 - Coal * MW

Schedule for Additional Generating Capability Santee Cooper Generation Cross Steam 3 - Coal * MW Class Cross Steam 4 - Coal * MW Class

Pollution Control Technology SO 2 NO X 7 coal-fired units scrubbed for SO 2 removal in GA, SC, & NC 5 of 7 are Santee Cooper units Santee Cooper has committed to: ● Install SCR Technology on Cross & Winyah Units and Low-NO X Burners on others ● ● Spend $280 M to comply with NO X SIP Call Requirements

NSR Settlement JULY 2000 SANTEE COOPER, LIKE MANY OTHER COAL FIRED UTILITIES, RECEIVED A SECTION 114 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ITS COAL FIRED UNITS FROM THE MID- 1970’S TO THE PRESENT

NSR Settlement TIME FRAME -PROVIDED A LARGE NUMBER OF DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO THE 114 REQUEST - BEGAN DISCUSSIONS WITH EPA REGARDING A POSSIBLE RESOLUTION THAT WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH SANTEE COOPER’S BUSINESS PLAN -NO RESOLUTION WAS REACHED DURING TIME FRAME -EPA’S ENFORCEMENT POLICIES BEGAN SHIFTING

NSR Settlement TIME FRAME -SANTEE COOPER BEGAN PERMITTING PROCESS WITH EPA AND DHEC FOR CROSS UNITS 3 AND 4 -A “BEGIN CONSTRUCTION” ISSUE AROSE WITH SOME CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AT THE PLANT SITE -DHEC, EPA CONTACTED SANTEE COOPER ABOUT POTENTIAL ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY WITH REGARD TO NSR AND “BEGIN CONSTRUCTION” ISSUES -SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS RESUMED

NSR Settlement MARCH 2004 SANTEE COOPER REACHED A SETTLEMENT WITH DHEC, EPA AND DOJ WHICH RESOLVES PAST AND FUTURE NSR LIABILITY, RESOLVES “BEGIN CONSTRUCTION” ISSUES AND IS CONSISTENT WITH ITS BUSINESS PLAN FOR FUTURE POLLUTION CONTROL CONSENT DECREE IS ENTERED JUNE 2004

NSR Settlement ● Certainty ● Operational Flexibility ● Opportunity to move forward with projects Agreement with EPA & DHEC provides:

NSR Settlement ● Pollution Controls ● Civil Penalties ● Environmental Projects THREE MAJOR COMPONENTS

NSR Settlement Santee Cooper has agreed to spend approximately $140 M on additional pollution controls: ● Scrubbers and Scrubber Upgrades for SO 2 Reduction ● Year-Round Operation of SCRs for NO X Reduction ● Additional PM Controls

NSR Settlement Costs of Settlement Compare Favorably to Future Control obligations Largest Costs ● M for Scrubbers at Winyah 1 and 2 ● 2012 – Possible Costs of 50 M for Scrubber Upgrades at Winyah 3 and 4 and PM Upgrades at Jefferies and Grainger

NSR Settlement Benefits of Additional Controls ● SO 2 reductions allow significant savings in purchase of SO2 credits ● Additional controls allow fuel flexibility ● Pollutant reductions allow for permitting through netting process

NSR Settlement Results of Additional Controls ● SO 2 Reductions of 50% (measured in lbs. per unit of electricity generated) ● NO X Reductions of 70% ● State of the Art Controls on nearly 90% of Santee Cooper’s coal-fired generation

NSR Settlement - Civil Penalties Totaling 2 Million Dollars ●1.3 Million to EPA ●.7 Million to DHEC -Environmental Projects Totaling 4.5 Million Santee Cooper has agreed to:

NSR Settlement ● Environmentally Beneficial Projects - Land Conservation Project - Energy Efficient Technologies Project - Demand-Side Management Project - Clean-Diesel School Bus Retrofit Project - Environmental Management System

NSR Settlement CHALLENGES OF SETTLEMENT - COMPLICATED CONSENT DECREE SUBJECT TO INTERPRETATION - LOTS OF RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS -LOTS OF DEADLINES -LESS MARGIN FOR ERROR IN OPERATION

NSR Settlement BENEFITS OF SETTLEMENT CLEAR PATH TO PERMITTING CROSS 3 AND 4 ● 1100 Megawatts of New Coal Fired Generation – Permit Unopposed and Un- appealed ● 1.4 Billion Dollars of New Construction Underway Since January 2004

NSR Settlement BENEFITS OF SETTLEMENT -Avoided Cost and Risk of High Profile Environmental Suit -Resolved Potential NSR Liability within Framework of Business Plan -Maintained Operational Flexibility -Maintained Support of Environmental Community

NSR Settlement DOJ SAID ABOUT SETTLEMENT: “Today’s settlement again demonstrates this Administration’s commitment to secure major pollution reductions from coal fired plants. The citizens of South Carolina will benefit from significant improvements in air quality. Santee Cooper deserves credit for stepping up to the plate and resolving this matter in a way that promotes the public interest.”

NSR Settlement EPA SAID ABOUT SETTLEMENT: “The people of South Carolina will soon benefit from the responsible actions of Santee Cooper in cleaning up the emissions from their facilities”

NSR Settlement Light Reading -Consent Decree can be downloaded at

Dependable Power. Dependable People.