M&E TRAINING MODULES Indicators.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reasons for Monitoring and Evaluation at the Project Level
Advertisements

1 Mateja Bizilj PEMPAL BCOP KEY CONCEPTS AND APPROACHES TO PROGRAMS AND PERFORMANCE Tbilisi, June 28, 2007.
TREATMENT DATA INDICATORS IN THE UNODC DATA COLLECTION SYSTEM.
Results Based Monitoring (RBM)
A Fresh Look at the Intervention Logic of Structural Funds
Introduction to Impact Assessment
Qualitative Indicator Prepared by Nyi Nyi THAUNG, UIS (Bangkok) Capacity Building Workshop on Monitoring and Evaluating Progress in Education in the Pacific.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks Kyiv, Ukraine May 23, 2006 MEASURE Evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation: A Review of Terms. Goals To provide better treatment for people with tuberculosis in Country X To achieve a treatment success.
Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks   What is an M&E Framework?   Why do we use M&E Frameworks?   How do we develop M&E Frameworks? MEASURE Evaluation.
Role of Result-based Monitoring in Result-based Management (RBM) Setting goals and objectives Reporting to Parliament RBM of projects, programs and.
1 Monitoring and evaluation after 2013 – some first ideas, mainly for ERDF / CF Evaluation network DG REGIO 14 th October 2010.
Nine steps of a good project planning
Supporting voluntary and community action supporting voluntary and community action Measuring Outcomes How do we understand the changes we are making …
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Unit 10. Monitoring and evaluation
Developing Indicators
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
How to Move from Line-Item to Performance Budgeting? The Case of Madagascar Dr. Jean Razafindravonona AfCoP, Nairobi, May 23-25, 2011.
M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH. UNAIDS M&E Senior Adviser 12 th May 2009.
Development Hypothesis or Theory of Change M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Maputo 19 and 20 September 2011 Arif Rashid, TOPS.
Monitoring & Evaluation: The concepts and meaning Day 9 Session 1.
Model Name Transition Project Learning Network Workshop 3 IYF Transition Project.
21/4/2008 Evaluation of control measures 1. 21/4/2008 Evaluation of control measures 2 Family and Community Medicine Department.
UK Aid Direct Introduction to Logframes (only required at proposal stage)
Monitoring and Evaluation Orientation 17 th May 2011 MCA Namibia.
DMAIC 1. (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control) is a process for continual improvement. It is a systematic and fact based approach to plan, sequence.
111 CINDI PMER Workshop March, 2007 By Simon Opolot © 2007 Office of the Premier, KwaZulu-Natal Province, Private Bag X9037 Telecom House, 2nd Floor,
Indicators in Malaria Program Phases By Bayo S Fatunmbi [Technical Officer, Monitoring & Evaluation] ERAR-GMS, WHO Cambodia & Dr. Michael Lynch Epidemiologist.
BLAIR STEVENSON Strategic Planning for Digital Education.
Application of Human Rights Principles in Results Based Management Muhammad Usman Akram, Evaluation Advisor Adapted from RBM training held for UNDP BRC.
Evaluation: from Objectives to Outcomes Janet Myers, PhD MPH AIDS Education and Training Centers National Evaluation Center
Outcomes Focused planning NHS Health Scotland
Monitoring and evaluation Objectives of the Session  To Define Monitoring, impact assessment and Evaluation. (commonly know as M&E)  To know why Monitoring.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation. Learning Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Define program components Define.
SUB-MODULE 4. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Inclusive Business Impact Assessment Why Harmonization and How? 2 nd Asia Inclusive Business Forum Feb 2016, ADB headquarters, Manila For inquiries:
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18 th & 19 th March 2010 Indicators.
Importance of Monitoring and Evaluation. Lecture Overview  Monitoring and Evaluation  How to Build an M&E System.
Project monitoring and evaluation
M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH
Monitoring & Evaluation Processes A A walkthrough of the whole process
Session 1 – Study Objectives
Making Housing Matter 5 July 2016, Skainos Centre.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
Global Mechanisms for Reporting of Treatment Data
Monitoring and Evaluation
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
مديريت كارورزي پزشكي اجتماعي.
شاخصهای عملکردی بیمارستان
Project Name: Country:
إستراتيجيات ونماذج التقويم
MANAGEMENT, STAFF, NATIONAL COALITION, FINANCIAL RESOURCES,
Assessing learners’ needs
مدل زنجیره ای در برنامه های سلامت
فرق بین خوب وعالی فقط اندکی تلاش بیشتر است
PROCESSES AND INDICATORS FOR MEASURING THE IMPACT OF EQUALITY BODIES
Project Management Training
MANAGEMENT, STAFF, NATIONAL COALITION, FINANCIAL RESOURCES,
Monitoring and Evaluation
monitoring & evaluation THD Unit, Stop TB department WHO Geneva
Monitoring and Evaluation in Communication Management
Monitoring and Evaluation
M&E TRAINING MODULES Selecting indicators.
Monitoring and Evaluation in SIYB Program
Presentation transcript:

M&E TRAINING MODULES Indicators

INDICATORS An indicator is a measure that is used to demonstrate change in a situation, or the progress in, or results of an activity, project, or programme. Indicators: are measures used to demonstrate changes over time; point to the results; enable us to be “watchdogs”; are essential instruments for monitoring and evaluation.

INDICATORS: TYPES Indicators exist in many different forms: Direct indicators correspond precisely to results at any performance level. Indirect or "proxy" indicators demonstrate the change or results if direct measures are not feasible. Direct Indirect / proxy Indicators are usually quantitative measures, expressed as percentage or share, as a rate, as a ratio. Indicators may also be qualitative observations. Qualitative Quantitative Global / standardised Standardised global indicators are comparable in all settings. Other indicators tend to be context specific and must be developed locally. Locally developed

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Impact Performance indicators: are measures that show results relative to what was planned at each level of the "results chain". Outcome Output are tools for performance-based decisions about programme strategies and activities. can also be used later to evaluate project/programme success. Process Input

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Impact Impact Measure the quality and quantity of long-term results generated by programme outputs. Outcome Outcome Measure the intermediate results generated by programme outputs. They often correspond to any change in people’s behaviour as a result of programme. Output Output Measure the quantity, quality and timeliness of the products — goods or services — that are the result of an activity/project/programme. Process Process Measure the progress of activities in a programme/project and the way these are carried out . Input Input Measure the quantity, quality and timeliness of resources provided for an activity/project/programme.

EXAMPLE Impact Impact Outcome Outcome Output Output Process Process Reduction in morbidity and mortality Proportion of target population who meet prescribed standards of behaviour Outcome Outcome Number whose behaviour change Output Output Number whose opinions change Number who learn the facts Process Process Number who read the literature Number of people who receive the literature Input Input Amount of literature distributed Number of pieces of literature available for distribution